First Results from 2nd Drill programme at Feren...

16June 2014 Sula Iron & Goldp lc ("Sula" or the "Company") First Results from 2nd Drill programme at Ferensola Sula Iron & Gold plc ("Sula" or the "Company"), the exploration and development company focused on iron ore in Sierra Leone, is pleased to provide an update on operations at its 100% owned Ferensola project ("the project"). The Company is continuing its programme of exploration for further potential direct shipping ore ("DSO") zones and the depth extent of the fresh magnetite Banded Iron Formation ("BIF") target. Highlights * Significant results from the first two batches of samples include: * Hole BHDD106, 8m @ 60.89% Fe, 16m - 24m * Hole BHDD106, 6m @ 60.56% Fe, 28m - 34m * Hole BHDD111, 8m @ 60.25% Fe, 8m - 16m * Hole BHDD120, 16m @ 59.34% Fe, 32m - 48m * As of June 8 2014, a total of 4,693m of drilling had been completed * A total of 7 batches of samples have now been submitted for analysis * Drilling programme to continue, targeting open areas of further potential DSO resource To view a full version of the announcement, including figures and maps, please visit the Company's website at: www.sulairongold.com Sula CEO Nick Warrell said, "We are very pleased with the initial results which demonstrate that a well-defined haematite or iron oxide cap is present at Ferensola." Sula commenced a resource drilling campaign at Ferensola during 2014 after a successful reconnaissance drill programme was undertaken in May-July 2013. The results reported are from 15 drill holes comprising 881m of drilling conducted between 4 April 2014 and 29 April 2014. Drilling remains on-going with further results expected over the next 6 months. The Company has focused drilling to investigate shallow, high grade iron mineralisation contained in the oxide and transitional saprolitic zones overlying the primary magnetite BIF. A summary of the mineralised intersections are shown in Table 1. Preliminary drilling is also being implemented to test the depth extent of the fresh magnetite BIF interpreted below the defined oxide package. The primary magnetite BIF mineralisation currently remains open at depth. The Ferensola Project The Ferensola project appears to be a typical weathered BIF with an underlying fresh magnetite BIF. The project consists of elevated iron grades at surface grading down to a fresh and competent magnetite BIF. The preliminary lithological interpretations supported by initial grade based observations have indicated a laterite/duricrust cap with elevated iron and aluminium content; this caps a zone of high grade black haematite / magnetite sand which is noted to be highly friable. The Phase 1 drilling, being the focus of this press release has been undertaken on a regular grid on 400m x 50m intervals. Each hole has been drilled vertically and represents the true vertical thickness of the oxide units. A total of 4,693m has currently been completed defining units of high grade material that lie within the oxide cap. Preliminary results received from the initial 15 holes (881m), have been positive with multiple intercepts in excess of 55% Fe defining a potential DSO domain and additional high grade laterite and saprolitic material within the oxide zone. Results have been tabulated in table 1 for key drill holes which have intercepted the mineralised unit. In addition to these intercepts, it is noted that four further holes have been drilled into the hangingwall and footwall material with these intercepts considered to have no influence or bearing on the mineralised unit. Metallurgical testing has commenced on material associated with the underlying fresh magnetite-BIF to confirm that a saleable concentrate can be generated through standard magnetic separation techniques. Table 1 -- Mineralised Intersections* Logged From To Sum of Average Average Average Average Protolith (m) (m) INTERVAL of Fe(%) of Al2O3 of SiO2 of P (%) Material (m) (%) (%) BHDD104 DUR 0 14 14 43.93 20.55 1.94 0.08 OXIDE 14 66 52 43.96 7.68 21.73 0.06 Including 22 28 8 57.5 4.26 3.28 0.08 BHDD106 DUR 0 16.2 16.2 44.43 11.46 15.23 0.07 OXIDE 16.2 62.5 46.3 35.80 10.94 29.48 0.06 Including 16 24 8 60.89 5.00 2.47 0.04 And 28 34 6 60.56 2.53 5.57 0.06 BHDD107 DUR 0 11.1 11.1 39.80 23.29 3.55 0.07 OXIDE 11.1 63 51.9 40.94 5.25 29.78 0.04 BHDD109 DUR 0 10.96 10.96 46.42 18.67 1.99 0.04 OXIDE 10.96 65.5 54.54 40.41 8.30 26.90 0.05 Including 10 18 8 57.91 7.69 1.99 0.05 BHDD111 DUR 0 7.5 7.5 52.18 13.12 1.66 0.06 OXIDE 7.5 26 18.5 41.53 14.53 15.43 0.09 Including 8 16 8 60.25 4.36 2.88 0.06 BHDD112 DUR 0 5.8 5.8 48.54 13.91 4.46 0.05 OXIDE 5.8 49.5 43.7 32.42 11.05 33.76 0.08 BHDD113 DUR 0 10.5 10.5 36.69 23.03 9.22 0.04 OXIDE 10.5 46 35.5 40.71 5.13 29.28 0.09 BHDD114 DUR 0 10.5 10.5 49.42 13.68 3.77 0.05 OXIDE 10.5 43.5 33 41.65 11.64 19.90 0.06 Including 8 22 14 58.75 6.19 1.72 0.05 BHDD116 DUR 0 15 15 37.81 23.47 5.63 0.07 OXIDE 15 81 66 32.09 11.01 33.83 0.07 BHDD120 DUR 0 9.2 9.2 40.86 22.19 4.45 0.05 OXIDE 9.2 77 67.8 47.32 7.29 17.68 0.05 Including 10 18 8 56.89 8.01 1.92 0.08 And 32 48 16 59.34 2.77 7.4 0.05 *results are reported as a weighted average for down-hole intervals,high grade intervals are reported with a lower cut-off grade of 55% Fe and a maximum internal waste of 5m. Datum WGS84, Zone 29N, some minor errors occur due to rounding. Enquires: Sula Iron & Gold plc +44 (0) 20 7583 8304 Nick Warrell / Matt Wood www.sulairongold.com Cairn Financial Advisers LLP +44 (0) 20 7148 7900 James Caithie / Avi Robinson Daniel Stewart & Company Plc +44 (0) 20 7776 6550 Martin Lampshire / David Hart Yellow Jersey PR +44 (0)7768 537 739 Dominic Barretto / Kelsey Traynor Qualified Person The information in this press release that relates to the current drilling programme is based on information compiled by Mr Colin Rawbone, who is a Chartered Professional Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Rawbone is a full time employee of SRK and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Colin Rawbone has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in the press release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which this appears. In addition to the above, this press release has been compiled under the direction of Mr Howard Baker, who is a Chartered Professional Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Baker is a full time employee of SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Baker has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in the press release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which this appears. Forward-looking Statements This announcement includes certain forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein are forward-looking statements that involve various known and unknown risks and uncertainties as well as other factors. Such forward looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations, including delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Notes: Sula Iron & Gold plc is a multi-commodity exploration company focussed on West Africa. The Company's main objective is to explore and advance its Ferensola Projects, in Northern Sierra Leone, that are highly prospective for iron and gold. Sula is currently focussed on delineating a maiden JORC compliant iron ore resource estimate and evaluating the gold prospectivity. The 153 sq. km licence area is contiguous to African Minerals' operational Tonkolili Iron Mine, which has a JORC compliant resource of 12.8 billion tonnes iron mineralisation. Exploration work at the project has confirmed the presence of BIF at surface, which has a known strike length of 3.1km. The BIF is proven to extend NE from the Tonkolili licence and into Sula's licence area. A 2,000m scout drilling programme conducted over a 2.2km section of BIF, confirmed the licence area's prospectivity for high grade iron mineralisation. Significant Greenstone Belt-style gold mineralisation has also been identified at various prospects within the licence area. Five target areas for hard rock gold mineralisation have been identified based on the location of historic drill intercepts, the source areas for alluvial gold deposits, and the position of major structures as defined by airborne magnetic data and drainage orientation. The information in this release that relates to Exploration Results has been reviewed by Mr Andrew Dacey, Non-Executive Technical Director of Sula Iron & Gold plc. Mr Dacey is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials Minerals and Mining, a Registered Professional Geologist with the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a Competent Person as defined in the Australasian Code for Reporting of exploration results and Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. APPENDIX A. JORC CODE, 2012 Edition, Table 1 (Section 1 and 2) Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques - Nature and quality of Diamond core samples collected sampling (eg cut by Sula staff were of half HQ channels, random chips, core, with the sample cut so as or specific specialised to equally divide structures. industry standard Sample lengths ranged from 0.5 measurement tools m to 2 m. Sample intervals were appropriate to the not matched to geological minerals under boundaries. investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. - Include reference to Sula used a minimum sample size measures taken to ensure of 0.25 kg per core sample sample representivity dispatched. They routinely and the appropriate submitted blanks, duplicate and calibration of any certified reference material. measurement tools or systems used. - Aspects of the Diamond core samples were HQ determination of diameter, and were cut in half mineralisation that are using a core saw, dividing Material to the Public geological structures equally Report. where possible. Some samples demonstrated a significant variance when compared to duplicate samples, but this affect was observed to be minor, with most samples showing good repeatability. Sample preparation techniques were deemed to be of international best practice. - In cases where All sampling preparation has `industry standard' work been undertaken by an has been done this would accredited laboratory; be relatively simple (eg preparation of samples has been `reverse circulation undertaken through ALS Monrovia drilling was used to and XRF analysis has been obtain 1 m samples from undertaken by ALS based in which 3 kg was Ireland. pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drilling techniques - Drill type (eg core, Drill method was diamond reverse circulation, drilling of dominantly HQ core open-hole hammer, rotary during the drill programmes air blast, auger, undertaken, using standard Bangka, sonic, etc) and tubes. A CS1000 man portable details (eg core drill rig operated by a diameter, triple or reputable company acting under standard tube, depth of industry best practices. diamond tails, face-sampling bit or Core on vertical holes other type, whether core targeting oxide material has is oriented and if so, not been orientated. by what method, etc). Drill sample recovery - Method of recording Drill core recovery was and assessing core and recorded for every hole through chip sample recoveries routine monitoring of drill rod and results assessed. depth and recovered core. Recoveries for each hole were graphically plotted and show total recovery better than 85%. Where recovery has been recorded these intervals are identified and flagged for re-drilling as required. - Measures taken to Supervision of the diamond maximise sample recovery drilling by Sula geologists and ensure ensured sample recovery was representative nature of good, and that samples were the samples. representative without contamination issues. Where poor recovery has been encountered contractual agreements with the drill company incur penalties and re-drill policies. - Whether a relationship No studies are known to have exists between sample been completed on sample bias. recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging - Whether core and chip Geological logging for diamond samples have been core includes a descriptive log geologically and with some quantitative logging geotechnically logged to of mineralogy and alteration, a level of detail to in addition to plotting of support appropriate assays and the geology as a Mineral Resource graphic log. estimation, mining studies and No geotechnical logging has metallurgical studies. been undertaken on oxide material due to core fragmentation and lack of orientation. - Whether logging is Logging is qualitative, with qualitative or the exception of some quantitative in nature. quantitative logging of Core (or costean, mineralogical and alteration channel, etc) content. photography. Core photography is undertaken for both half and whole core on a box by box basis. - The total length and 100% of diamond core samples percentage of the can be correlated to graphic relevant intersections logs of the diamond drill hole. logged. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation - If core, whether cut Drill core samples were half HQ or sawn and whether core, where the core was cut to quarter, half or all equally divide significant core taken. structures in the rock. Half core is dispatched for analytical process's - If non-core, whether All sampling relates to drill riffled, tube sampled, core rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. - For all sample types, Diamond core samples have been the nature, quality and analysed by XRF for a full appropriateness of the suite of analytes including but sample preparation not limited to Fe_%, Al2O3_%, technique. SiO2_% and P_%. In addition to this analysis the LOI was also recorded. - Quality control For diamond drill core procedures adopted for sampling, standards, duplicates all sub-sampling stages and blanks were interleaved to maximise randomly with the routine representivity of samples, every 20th sample; samples. targeting a frequency of 5% - Measures taken to Field duplicates are submitted ensure that the sampling as 1 in 20 insertion rate, is representative of the where duplicates are selected in situ material the remaining half core is collected, including for split to produce a field based instance results for quarter core sample for field comparative studies. duplicate/second-half sampling. - Whether sample sizes Diamond core samples were half are appropriate to the HQ core, which is a large grain size of the diameter core for exploration material being sampled. drilling. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests - The nature, quality SRK deem the accredited and appropriateness of laboratory and the requested the assaying and analysis to be suitable and laboratory procedures sufficient for this type and used and whether the style of mineralisation deposit technique is considered partial or total. - For geophysical tools, No geophysical tools or other spectrometers, handheld unusual analysis methods were XRF instruments, etc, employed. the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. - Nature of quality For diamond drill core control procedures sampling, standards, duplicates adopted (eg standards, and blanks were interleaved blanks, duplicates, randomly with the routine external laboratory samples, every 20th sample; checks) and whether targeting a frequency of 5%. acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of Samples are reviewed on a batch bias) and precision have by batch basis to identify any been established. bias with in the analytical process. Verification of sampling and assaying - The verification of Mr Colin Rawbone of SRK has significant independently verified the intersections by either intersections derived from independent or lithological and grade logging. alternative company personnel. - The use of twinned No twinned holes have been used holes. to verify sampling and assaying. - Documentation of Data has been compiled from primary data, data entry good quality paper plans and procedures, data digitally compiled at a later verification, data date. storage (physical and electronic) protocols. The data has been assimilated into the Company's Microsoft Excel database, after compilation and validation in Mapinfo Software. - Discuss any adjustment No adjustment to assay data has to assay data. been undertaken Location of data points - Accuracy and quality All drill collars are of surveys used to positioned with handheld GPS to locate drill holes an accuracy of within 5m. (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine Down hole surveys are not workings and other utilised on shallow vertical locations used in drill holes but where required Mineral Resource has been undertaken using the estimation. REFLEX tools - Specification of the WGS 84 UTM Zone 29 North grid system used. - Quality and adequacy Current topographic surveys has of topographic control. been limited to SRTM data. An aerial survey to meter scale accuracy is currently being undertaken Data spacing and distribution - Data spacing for Diamond drill core samples are reporting of Exploration collected over contiguous Results. intervals of alteration as per logging. There are lengths of diamond core not sampled. Some sampled intervals were re‐sampled as composites, or as single duplicate samples. Drilling has taken place on 400m spaced drill fences at 50m intervals - Whether the data No Mineral Resource or Ore spacing and distribution Reserve calculations have been is sufficient to establish the degree of reported on the deposit at this geological and grade stage. continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. - Whether sample Sample compositing was compositing has been performed for reporting of applied. diamond drill core results, based on a weighted average as a function of sample length versus grade. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure - Whether the Drilling has been best orientation of sampling orientated to allow a achieves unbiased perpendicular intercept of the sampling of possible surface oxide zone to be structures and the achieved. extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. - If the relationship Based on current information no between the drilling bias has been introduced based orientation and the on the orientation of drilling orientation of key and relationship with key mineralised structures structures. is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Sample security - The measures taken to Sula geologists maintain a full ensure sample security. chain of custody of samples as they leave site and are transported to the process laboratory. Upon sample return sufficient checks and balances are undertaken to ensure samples have not been tampered with. Audits or reviews - The results of any All logging and sampling audits or reviews of techniques have been audited sampling techniques and during an independent site data. visit undertaken by Mr Colin Rawbone of SRK Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status - Type, reference EL54/2011 issued by the name/number, location Government of Sierra Leone 23rd and ownership August 2011 to Blue Horizon (SL including agreements Ltd). Blue Horizon (SL Ltd) is or material issues a 100% owned subsidiary of Sula with third parties Iron & Gold Plc. Full due such as joint diligence on the license was ventures, carried out by Sula's SL partnerships, lawyers and UK lawyers prior to overriding royalties, IPO in October 2012. There are native title no joint ventures in place save interests, historical an MOU with the Town Chief and sites, wilderness or his Elders of Dalakuru Town national park and regarding the buildings in environmental Dalakuru base camp. There are settings. no historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings within our demarcated license area. - The security of the As above tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Exploration done by other parties - Acknowledgment and Exploration carried out by Mano appraisal of River during the 1990s. Almost exploration by other impossible to appraise the parties. exploration as little or no records of the exploration were submitted to the Ministry of Mineral Resources. Geology - Deposit type, The Ferensola project appears geological setting and to be a typical weathered BIF style of with an underlying fresh mineralisation. magnetite BIF. Drill hole Information - A summary of all All tabulated exploration information material collars are included in the to the understanding release in appendix B. of the exploration results including a Table depicts all intercepts tabulation of the where drill holes have following information intercepted mineralisation. for all Material drill Intercept lengths from diamond holes: drilling are presented as down hole lengths, not true lengths, o easting and northing and this is stated in the of the drill hole release. collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. - If the exclusion of Intercepts have been omitted this information is from this report where drill justified on the basis holes have not intercepted the that the information interpreted mineralisation. is not Material and Drill collars for each of these this exclusion does holes however have been not detract from the recorded in Appendix B understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation methods - In reporting Weighting is calculated as a Exploration Results, function of each sample length weighting averaging multiplied by each grade, with techniques, maximum the summed product divided by and/or minimum grade the total sample length, to truncations (eg present composited intervals. A cutting of high high grade portion of these grades) and cut-off intercepts has been highlighted grades are usually using a 55% Fe Cut-off grade Material and should be where intervals were greater stated. than 5m. - Where aggregate Where intercepts are reported intercepts incorporate as longer lengths of lower short lengths of high grade, it is clearly stated grade results and that the higher incepts within longer lengths of low are part of the lower grade grade results, the intercept, not in addition to procedure used for the low grade intercept. such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. - The assumptions used No metal equivalents are used for any reporting of for the exploration results at metal equivalent Ferensola Prospect. values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths - These relationships Diamond drill sample intercepts are particularly are reported as down hole important in the widths. reporting of Exploration Results. - If the geometry of Mineralisation is considered to the mineralisation be steeply dipping (approx. 70° with respect to the NW) with a dominant strike drill hole angle is NE-SW. However oxidation of known, its nature this material is deemed to have should be reported. affected a horizon of material concordant with topography. Therefore the vertical holes currently drilled in targeting this material are deemed suitable to intercept the primary target as close to 90° as possible. - If it is not known This is clearly stated in the and only the down hole release. lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg `down hole length, true width not known'). Diagrams - Appropriate maps and Diagrams are provided that show sections (with scales) all surface samples and the and tabulations of diamond drill hole traces in intercepts should be plan view, plus a cross section included for any is provided with the intercept significant discovery locations and known geology. being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Balanced reporting - Where comprehensive Exploration results are reporting of all presented in the Table 1, Exploration Results is regardless of grade where not practicable, mineralised material has been representative intercepted. Grade has been reporting of both low split by lithology based on and high grades and/or logging undertaken by the Sula widths should be geologists. practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Other substantive exploration data - Other exploration Discussion of the Ferensola data, if meaningful Prospect geology is included in and material, should the release. be reported including (but not limited to): In situ density measurements geological are carried out using observations; Archimedean principles for geophysical survey consolidated fresh core and are results; geochemical undertaken on a lithological survey results; bulk basis. samples - size and method of treatment; To date no economic or metallurgical test extractive measures such as results; bulk density, bulk samples, metallurgical groundwater, testing, bulk density, geotechnical and rock groundwater, geotechnical or characteristics; rock samples have been potential deleterious undertaken. or contaminating substances. Further work - The nature and scale Drill testing is identified as of planned further future planned work. At present work (eg tests for the infill drilling to a 200m x lateral extensions or 50m spacing has been commenced depth extensions or to increase confidence in the large-scale step-out initial interpretations of drilling). geometry and grade distribution. In addition 1,500m of deep drilling has been planned to develop the fresh magnetite BIF interpreted below the primary oxide material. - Diagrams clearly Possible extensions are highlighting the areas indicated on the plan and cross of possible section provided in the extensions, including release. the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. APPENDIX B. - Ferensola Completed Drill Collars X_COLLAR Y_COLLAR Z_COLLAR BHID DEPTH 216834 1013727 795 BHDD001 187.5 216768 1013806 797 BHDD002 302.2 216546 1013462 763 BHDD003 240.25 216478 1013533 776 BHDD004 269.65 216010 1012883 750 BHDD005 157.4 215946 1012957 765 BHDD006 245 215681 1012631 768 BHDD007 131.7 215589 1012757 808 BHDD008 293.15 216999 1013855 806 BHDD009 161.1 215928 1012978 758 BHDD101 72 215962 1012938 763 BHDD102 70.5 215598 1012733 799 BHDD103 64.5 215994 1012895 722 BHDD104 66.5 215633 1012688 769 BHDD105 67 216028 1012860 733 BHDD106 62.5 215669 1012654 782 BHDD107 63 216196 1012792 697 BHDD108 66 215696 1012626 732 BHDD109 65.5 216088 1012782 675 BHDD110 67.5 215727 1012579 737 BHDD111 61.5 215348 1012322 670 BHDD112 49.5 216210 1013192 703 BHDD113 46 215379 1012289 695 BHDD114 43.5 216499 1013512 746 BHDD115 66 216535 1013471 756 BHDD116 81 215429 1012257 683 BHDD117 48 215283 1012401 744 BHDD118 54.5 216258 1013173 683 BHDD119 56 216562 1013439 752 BHDD120 77 215306 1012369 733 BHDD121 69.2 216598 1013401 723 BHDD122 70 216291 1013148 705 BHDD123 72.5 216815 1013761 798 BHDD124 75 216626 1013369 680 BHDD125 63 216317 1013109 710 BHDD126 64.5 216846 1013724 753 BHDD127 69 217116 1013968 790 BHDD128 100 216876 1013683 731 BHDD129 70.5 217428 1014212 676 BHDD130 78 217091 1014008 776 BHDD131 129 216578 1013231 720 BHDD132 56.5 217398 1014250 637 BHDD133 63 217782 1014750 601 BHDD134 25.5 217063 1014042 738 BHDD135 127.5 217351 1014271 666 BHDD136 58.5 218088 1014586 607 BHDD137 79.5 217138 1013951 786 BHDD138 100.5 215838 1012832 779 BHDD139 71.5 218079 1014619 608 BHDD140 84 215881 1012798 769 BHDD141 73.5 217028 1014084 702 BHDD142 131 218081 1014632 601 BHDD143 67.5 218103 1014589 600 BHDD144 69 215902 1012757 732 BHDD145 60.5 217174 1014230 735 BHDD146 100.5 216109 1013104 709 BHDD147 54 215926 1012729 739 BHDD148 86.8 216133 1013067 729 BHDD151 70.5
UK 100

Latest directors dealings