Batch 5 Results from 2nd Drill programme at Fer...

27 June 2014 Sula Iron & Gold plc ("Sula" or the "Company") Batch 5 Results from 2nd Drill programme at Ferensola Sula Iron & Gold plc ("Sula" or the "Company"), the exploration and development company focused on iron ore in Sierra Leone, is pleased to provide an update on operations at its 100% owned Ferensola project ("the project"). The Company is continuing its programme of exploration for further potential direct shipping ore ("DSO") zones and the depth extent of the fresh magnetite Banded Iron Formation ("BIF") target. Highlights - Significant results from batch five samples include: BHDD131, 6m @ 57.99% Fe, 6-12m BHDD131, 6m @ 59.48% Fe, 38-44m BHDD131, 8m @ 55.75% Fe, 74-82m BHDD132, 12m @ 57.34% Fe, 6-18m BHDD135, 10m @ 59.90% Fe, 6-16m BHDD135, 10m @ 57.15% Fe, 30-40m - The oxide (DSO) targeted drilling, which commenced in early April 2014, has now been completed at 200m line intervals - Drilling programme now continues targeting the depth extent of the fresh magnetite BIF To view a full version of the announcement, including figures and maps, please visit the Company's website at: www.sulairongold.com Sula CEO Nick Warrell said, "We are delighted that the results from batch five continue to demonstrate that we have a well-defined iron oxide cap (DSO) present at Ferensola. I'm further pleased to report that the DSO drill programme has now completed and that the assay results reported by SRK UK are being received on a regular basis." Sula commenced a resource drilling campaign at Ferensola during 2014 after a successful reconnaissance drill programme was undertaken in May-July 2013. The results reported here are from 6 drill holes received from batch five comprising 551.5m of drilling conducted between 9 May 2014 and 19 May 2014. Drilling on this 2nd drill programme targeting oxide material has now been completed with further results expected over the next 4 months. The Company has focused drilling on investigating shallow, high grade iron mineralisation contained in the oxide and transitional saprolitic zones overlying the primary magnetite BIF. A summary of the mineralised intersections from batch 5 are shown in Table 1. Preliminary drilling has now commenced to test the depth extent of the fresh magnetite BIF interpreted below the defined oxide package. The primary magnetite BIF mineralisation currently remains open at depth. A total of 3 drillholes has been planned with the main purpose of the deep BIF drilling being to estimate an Inferred Mineral Resource for the BIF material, when used in conjunction with the results from the 2013 drilling campaign. The Ferensola Project The Ferensola project appears to be a typical weathered BIF with an underlying fresh magnetite BIF. The project consists of elevated iron grades at surface grading down to a fresh and competent magnetite BIF. The Phase 1 drilling, being the focus of this press release has been undertaken on a regular grid on 400m x 50m intervals. Each hole has been drilled vertically and represents the true vertical thickness of the oxide units. In addition, the company has now completed an additional phase 2 infill programme based on generating 200m x 50m intervals. In all phases, a total of 7,911.4m of drilling has been completed. This includes 5,423.15m which has currently been completed defining units of high grade material that lie within the oxide cap during the phase 1 and 2 drilling campaigns. Results have been received from the initial seven drill fences indicating a strike extent of 2.8 km which currently remains open at either end. Results received from the 6 holes (551.5m) received in batch 5, have been positive with multiple intercepts in excess of 55% Fe defining a potential DSO domain and additional high grade laterite and saprolitic material within the oxide zone. Results have been tabulated in table 1 for drill holes which have intercepted the mineralised unit. Metallurgical testing has commenced on material associated with the underlying fresh magnetite-BIF to confirm that a saleable concentrate can be generated through standard magnetic separation techniques. Table 1 -- Mineralised Intersections* Drillhole Logged From To Values Material Sum of Average Average Average Average INTERVAL of Fe of Al2O3 of SiO2 of P BHDD131 DUR 0 12 12 29.31 35.52 0.74 0.09 OXIDE 12 129 117 44.81 9.84 16.47 0.07 Including 6 12 6 57.99 8.36 0.79 0.05 And 38 44 6 59.48 6.52 0.96 0.07 And 74 82 8 55.75 5.58 4.94 0.08 BHDD132 DUR 0 16 16 48.72 13.90 6.36 0.08 OXIDE 16 56 40 42.21 9.54 23.02 0.06 Including 6 18 12 57.34 8.09 2.18 0.05 BHDD135 DUR 0 18 18 25.92 33.58 10.45 0.07 OXIDE 18 127.5 109.5 39.92 12.99 19.53 0.07 Including 6 16 10 59.90 5.28 0.91 0.09 And 30 40 10 57.15 5.30 4.61 0.05 BHDD136 DUR 0 10 10 51.58 14.22 1.13 0.06 OXIDE 10 34 24 42.07 13.61 16.17 0.07 BHDD137 DUR 0 8 8 51.07 13.94 1.58 0.06 OXIDE 8 79 71 28.91 16.49 32.16 0.06 BHDD138 DUR 0 12 12 50.61 13.72 1.11 0.08 OXIDE 12 100 88 32.53 13.98 29.59 0.07 *results are reported as an average for down-hole lithological intervals, high grade intervals are length weighted with a lower cut-off grade of 55% Fe and a maximum internal waste of 5m. Datum WGS84, Zone 29N, some minor errors occur due to rounding. Enquires: Sula Iron & Gold plc +44 (0) 20 7583 8304 Nick Warrell / Matt Wood www.sulairongold.com Cairn Financial Advisers LLP +44 (0) 20 7148 7900 James Caithie / Avi Robinson Daniel Stewart & Company Plc +44 (0) 20 7776 6550 Martin Lampshire / David Hart Yellow Jersey PR +44 (0)7768 537 739 Dominic Barretto / Kelsey Traynor Qualified Person The information in this press release that relates to the current drilling programme is based on information compiled by Mr Colin Rawbone, who is a Chartered Professional Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Rawbone is a full time employee of SRK and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Colin Rawbone has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in the press release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which this appears. In addition to the above, this press release has been compiled under the direction of Mr Howard Baker, who is a Chartered Professional Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Baker is a full time employee of SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Baker has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in the press release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which this appears. Forward-looking Statements This announcement includes certain forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein are forward-looking statements that involve various known and unknown risks and uncertainties as well as other factors. Such forward looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations, including delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Notes: Sula Iron & Gold plc is a multi-commodity exploration company focussed on West Africa. The Company's main objective is to explore and advance its Ferensola Projects, in Northern Sierra Leone, that are highly prospective for iron and gold. Sula is currently focussed on delineating a maiden JORC compliant iron ore resource estimate and evaluating the gold prospectivity. The 153 sq. km licence area is contiguous to African Minerals' operational Tonkolili Iron Mine, which has a JORC compliant resource of 12.8 billion tonnes iron mineralisation. Exploration work at the project has confirmed the presence of BIF at surface, which has a known strike length of 3.1km. The BIF is proven to extend NE from the Tonkolili licence and into Sula's licence area. A 2,000m scout drilling programme conducted over a 2.2km section of BIF, confirmed the licence area's prospectivity for high grade iron mineralisation. Significant Greenstone Belt-style gold mineralisation has also been identified at various prospects within the licence area. Five target areas for hard rock gold mineralisation have been identified based on the location of historic drill intercepts, the source areas for alluvial gold deposits, and the position of major structures as defined by airborne magnetic data and drainage orientation. The information in this release that relates to Exploration Results has been reviewed by Mr Andrew Dacey, Non-Executive Technical Director of Sula Iron & Gold plc. Mr Dacey is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials Minerals and Mining, a Registered Professional Geologist with the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a Competent Person as defined in the Australasian Code for Reporting of exploration results and Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. APPENDIX A. JORC CODE, 2012 Edition, Table 1 (Section 1 and 2) Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling - Nature and quality of Diamond core samples collected techniques sampling (eg cut by Sula staff were of half HQ channels, random chips, core, with the sample cut so as or specific specialised to equally divide structures. industry standard Sample lengths ranged from 0.5 measurement tools m to 2 m. Sample intervals were appropriate to the not matched to geological minerals under boundaries. investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. - Include reference to Sula used a minimum sample size measures taken to ensure of 0.25 kg per core sample sample representivity dispatched. They routinely and the appropriate submitted blanks, duplicate and calibration of any certified reference material. measurement tools or systems used. - Aspects of the Diamond core samples were HQ determination of diameter, and were cut in half mineralisation that are using a core saw, dividing Material to the Public geological structures equally Report. where possible. Some samples demonstrated a significant variance when compared to duplicate samples, but this affect was observed to be minor, with most samples showing good repeatability. Sample preparation techniques were deemed to be of international best practice. - In cases where All sampling preparation has `industry standard' work been undertaken by an has been done this would accredited laboratory; be relatively simple (eg preparation of samples has been `reverse circulation undertaken through ALS Monrovia drilling was used to and XRF analysis has been obtain 1 m samples from undertaken by ALS based in which 3 kg was Ireland. pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drilling - Drill type (eg core, Drill method was diamond techniques reverse circulation, drilling of dominantly HQ core open-hole hammer, rotary during the drill programmes air blast, auger, undertaken, using standard Bangka, sonic, etc) and tubes. A CS1000 man portable details (eg core drill rig operated by a diameter, triple or reputable company acting under standard tube, depth of industry best practices. diamond tails, face-sampling bit or Core on vertical holes other type, whether core targeting oxide material has is oriented and if so, not been orientated. by what method, etc). Drill sample - Method of recording Drill core recovery was recovery and assessing core and recorded for every hole through chip sample recoveries routine monitoring of drill rod and results assessed. depth and recovered core. Recoveries for each hole were graphically plotted and show total recovery better than 85%. Where recovery has been recorded these intervals are identified and flagged for re-drilling as required. - Measures taken to Supervision of the diamond maximise sample recovery drilling by Sula geologists and ensure ensured sample recovery was representative nature of good, and that samples were the samples. representative without contamination issues. Where poor recovery has been encountered contractual agreements with the drill company incur penalties and re-drill policies. - Whether a relationship No studies are known to have exists between sample been completed on sample bias. recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging - Whether core and chip Geological logging for diamond samples have been core includes a descriptive log geologically and with some quantitative logging geotechnically logged to of mineralogy and alteration, a level of detail to in addition to plotting of support appropriate assays and the geology as a Mineral Resource graphic log. estimation, mining studies and No geotechnical logging has metallurgical studies. been undertaken on oxide material due to core fragmentation and lack of orientation. - Whether logging is Logging is qualitative, with qualitative or the exception of some quantitative in nature. quantitative logging of Core (or costean, mineralogical and alteration channel, etc) content. photography. Core photography is undertaken for both half and whole core on a box by box basis. - The total length and 100% of diamond core samples percentage of the can be correlated to graphic relevant intersections logs of the diamond drill hole. logged. Sub-sampling - If core, whether cut Drill core samples were half HQ techniques and or sawn and whether core, where the core was cut to sample quarter, half or all equally divide significant preparation core taken. structures in the rock. Half core is dispatched for analytical process's - If non-core, whether All sampling relates to drill riffled, tube sampled, core rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. - For all sample types, Diamond core samples have been the nature, quality and analysed by XRF for a full appropriateness of the suite of analytes including but sample preparation not limited to Fe_%, Al2O3_%, technique. SiO2_% and P_%. In addition to this analysis the LOI was also recorded. - Quality control For diamond drill core procedures adopted for sampling, standards, duplicates all sub-sampling stages and blanks were interleaved to maximise randomly with the routine representivity of samples, every 20th sample; samples. targeting a frequency of 5% - Measures taken to Field duplicates are submitted ensure that the sampling as 1 in 20 insertion rate, is representative of the where duplicates are selected in situ material the remaining half core is collected, including for split to produce a field based instance results for quarter core sample for field comparative studies. duplicate/second-half sampling. - Whether sample sizes Diamond core samples were half are appropriate to the HQ core, which is a large grain size of the diameter core for exploration material being sampled. drilling. Quality of assay - The nature, quality SRK deem the accredited data and and appropriateness of laboratory and the requested laboratory tests the assaying and analysis to be suitable and laboratory procedures sufficient for this type and used and whether the style of mineralisation deposit technique is considered partial or total. - For geophysical tools, No geophysical tools or other spectrometers, handheld unusual analysis methods were XRF instruments, etc, employed. the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. - Nature of quality For diamond drill core control procedures sampling, standards, duplicates adopted (eg standards, and blanks were interleaved blanks, duplicates, randomly with the routine external laboratory samples, every 20th sample; checks) and whether targeting a frequency of 5%. acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of Samples are reviewed on a batch bias) and precision have by batch basis to identify any been established. bias with in the analytical process. Verification of - The verification of Mr Colin Rawbone of SRK has sampling and significant independently verified the assaying intersections by either intersections derived from independent or lithological and grade logging. alternative company personnel. - The use of twinned No twinned holes have been used holes. to verify sampling and assaying. - Documentation of Data has been compiled from primary data, data entry good quality paper plans and procedures, data digitally compiled at a later verification, data date. storage (physical and electronic) protocols. The data has been assimilated into the Company's Microsoft Excel database, after compilation and validation in Mapinfo Software. - Discuss any adjustment No adjustment to assay data has to assay data. been undertaken Location of data points - Accuracy and quality All drill collars are of surveys used to positioned with handheld GPS to locate drill holes an accuracy of within 5m. (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine Down hole surveys are not workings and other utilised on shallow vertical locations used in drill holes but where required Mineral Resource has been undertaken using the estimation. REFLEX tools - Specification of the WGS 84 UTM Zone 29 North grid system used. - Quality and adequacy Current topographic surveys has of topographic control. been limited to SRTM data. An aerial survey to meter scale accuracy has recently been undertaken - results pending Data spacing - Data spacing for Diamond drill core samples are and distribution reporting of Exploration collected over contiguous Results. intervals of alteration as per logging. There are lengths of diamond core not sampled. Some sampled intervals were reâ€sampled as composites, or as single duplicate samples. Drilling has taken place on 400m spaced drill fences at 50m intervals - Whether the data No Mineral Resource or Ore spacing and distribution Reserve calculations have been is sufficient to establish the degree of reported on the deposit at this geological and grade stage. continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. - Whether sample Sample compositing was compositing has been performed for reporting of applied. diamond drill core results, based on a weighted average as a function of sample length versus grade. Orientation of - Whether the Drilling has been best data in relation orientation of sampling orientated to allow a to geological achieves unbiased perpendicular intercept of the structure sampling of possible surface oxide zone to be structures and the achieved. extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. - If the relationship Based on current information no between the drilling bias has been introduced based orientation and the on the orientation of drilling orientation of key and relationship with key mineralised structures structures. is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Sample security - The measures taken to Sula geologists maintain a full ensure sample security. chain of custody of samples as they leave site and are transported to the process laboratory. Upon sample return sufficient checks and balances are undertaken to ensure samples have not been tampered with. Audits or - The results of any All logging and sampling reviews audits or reviews of techniques have been audited sampling techniques and during an independent site data. visit undertaken by Mr Colin Rawbone of SRK Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement - Type, reference EL54/2011 issued by the and land tenure name/number, location Government of Sierra Leone 23rd status and ownership August 2011 to Blue Horizon (SL including agreements Ltd). Blue Horizon (SL Ltd) is or material issues a 100% owned subsidiary of Sula with third parties Iron & Gold Plc. Full due such as joint diligence on the license was ventures, carried out by Sula's SL partnerships, lawyers and UK lawyers prior to overriding royalties, IPO in October 2012. There are native title no joint ventures in place save interests, historical an MOU with the Town Chief and sites, wilderness or his Elders of Dalakuru Town national park and regarding the buildings in environmental Dalakuru base camp. There are settings. no historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings within our demarcated license area. - The security of the As above tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Exploration done by - Acknowledgment and Exploration carried out by Mano other parties appraisal of River during the 1990s. Almost exploration by other impossible to appraise the parties. exploration as little or no records of the exploration were submitted to the Ministry of Mineral Resources. Geology - Deposit type, The Ferensola project appears geological setting and to be a typical weathered BIF style of with an underlying fresh mineralisation. magnetite BIF. Drill hole - A summary of all All tabulated exploration Information information material collars are included in the to the understanding release in appendix B. of the exploration results including a Table depicts all intercepts tabulation of the where drill holes have following information intercepted mineralisation. for all Material drill Intercept lengths from diamond holes: drilling are presented as down hole lengths, not true lengths, o easting and northing and this is stated in the of the drill hole release. collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. - If the exclusion of Intercepts have been omitted this information is from this report where drill justified on the basis holes have not intercepted the that the information interpreted mineralisation. is not Material and Drill collars for each of these this exclusion does holes however have been not detract from the recorded in Appendix B understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation - In reporting Weighting is calculated as a methods Exploration Results, function of each sample length weighting averaging multiplied by each grade, with techniques, maximum the summed product divided by and/or minimum grade the total sample length, to truncations (eg present composited intervals. A cutting of high high grade portion of these grades) and cut-off intercepts has been highlighted grades are usually using a 55% Fe Cut-off grade Material and should be where intervals were greater stated. than 5m. - Where aggregate Where intercepts are reported intercepts incorporate as longer lengths of lower short lengths of high grade, it is clearly stated grade results and that the higher incepts within longer lengths of low are part of the lower grade grade results, the intercept, not in addition to procedure used for the low grade intercept. such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. - The assumptions used No metal equivalents are used for any reporting of for the exploration results at metal equivalent Ferensola Prospect. values should be clearly stated. Relationship - These relationships Diamond drill sample intercepts between mineralisation are particularly are reported as down hole widths and important in the widths. intercept lengths reporting of Exploration Results. - If the geometry of Mineralisation is considered to the mineralisation be steeply dipping (approx. 70° with respect to the NW) with a dominant strike drill hole angle is NE-SW. However oxidation of known, its nature this material is deemed to have should be reported. affected a horizon of material concordant with topography. Therefore the vertical holes currently drilled in targeting this material are deemed suitable to intercept the primary target as close to 90° as possible. - If it is not known This is clearly stated in the and only the down hole release. lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg `down hole length, true width not known'). Diagrams - Appropriate maps and Diagrams are provided that show sections (with scales) all surface samples and the and tabulations of diamond drill hole traces in intercepts should be plan view, plus a cross section included for any is provided with the intercept significant discovery locations and known geology. being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Balanced reporting - Where comprehensive Exploration results are reporting of all presented in the Table 1, Exploration Results is regardless of grade where not practicable, mineralised material has been representative intercepted. Grade has been reporting of both low split by lithology based on and high grades and/or logging undertaken by the Sula widths should be geologists. practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Other substantive - Other exploration Discussion of the Ferensola exploration data data, if meaningful Prospect geology is included in and material, should the release. be reported including (but not limited to): In situ density measurements geological are carried out using observations; Archimedean principles for geophysical survey consolidated fresh core and are results; geochemical undertaken on a lithological survey results; bulk basis. samples - size and method of treatment; To date no economic or metallurgical test extractive measures such as results; bulk density, bulk samples, metallurgical groundwater, testing, bulk density, geotechnical and rock groundwater, geotechnical or characteristics; rock samples have been potential deleterious undertaken. or contaminating substances. Further work - The nature and scale Drill testing is identified as of planned further future planned work. At present work (eg tests for the infill drilling to a 200m x lateral extensions or 50m spacing has been commenced depth extensions or to increase confidence in the large-scale step-out initial interpretations of drilling). geometry and grade distribution. In addition 1,500m of deep drilling has been planned to develop the fresh magnetite BIF interpreted below the primary oxide material. - Diagrams clearly Possible extensions are highlighting the areas indicated on the plan and cross of possible section provided in the extensions, including release. the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. APPENDIX B. - Ferensola Completed Drill Collars X_COLLAR Y_COLLAR Z_COLLAR BHID DEPTH 216834 1013727 795 BHDD001 187.5 216768 1013806 797 BHDD002 302.2 216546 1013462 763 BHDD003 240.25 216478 1013533 776 BHDD004 269.65 216010 1012883 750 BHDD005 157.4 215946 1012957 765 BHDD006 245 215681 1012631 768 BHDD007 131.7 215589 1012757 808 BHDD008 293.15 216997 1013856 803 BHDD009 161.1 215928 1012978 758 BHDD101 72 215962 1012938 763 BHDD102 70.5 215598 1012733 799 BHDD103 64.5 215994 1012895 722 BHDD104 66.5 215633 1012688 769 BHDD105 67 216028 1012860 733 BHDD106 62.5 215669 1012654 782 BHDD107 63 216057 1012821 723 BHDD108 66 215696 1012626 732 BHDD109 65.5 216088 1012782 675 BHDD110 67.5 215727 1012579 737 BHDD111 61.5 215348 1012322 670 BHDD112 49.5 216210 1013192 703 BHDD113 46 215379 1012289 695 BHDD114 43.5 216501 1013515 776 BHDD115 66 216537 1013479 765 BHDD116 81 215429 1012257 683 BHDD117 48 215283 1012401 744 BHDD118 54.5 216258 1013173 683 BHDD119 56 216563 1013442 755 BHDD120 77 215306 1012369 733 BHDD121 69.2 216599 1013399 729 BHDD122 70 216291 1013148 705 BHDD123 72.5 216814 1013759 794 BHDD124 75 216622 1013373 717 BHDD125 63 216317 1013109 710 BHDD126 64.5 216846 1013725 788 BHDD127 69 217119 1013970 788 BHDD128 100 216876 1013685 770 BHDD129 70.5 217427 1014213 663 BHDD130 78 217091 1014007 781 BHDD131 129 216909 1013648 751 BHDD132 56.5 217399 1014248 654 BHDD133 63 217788 1014753 594 BHDD134 25.5 217065 1014043 772 BHDD135 127.5 217347 1014270 656 BHDD136 58.5 218089 1014591 634 BHDD137 79.5 217143 1013952 783 BHDD138 100.5 215838 1012832 779 BHDD139 71.5 218080 1014633 633 BHDD140 84 215881 1012798 769 BHDD141 73.5 217031 1014085 754 BHDD142 131 218080 1014633 633 BHDD143 67.5 218104 1014586 635 BHDD144 69 215902 1012757 732 BHDD145 60.5 217176 1014230 711 BHDD146 100.5 216109 1013104 709 BHDD147 54 215926 1012729 739 BHDD148 86.8 216648 1013922 736 BHDD149 500.3 217208 1014192 716 BHDD150 114.6 216133 1013067 729 BHDD151 70.5 216178 1013048 702 BHDD152 72 215492 1012518 732 BHDD153 76.5 216963 1013895 797 BHDD154 106.5 216186 1013005 650 BHDD155 91.5 215477 1012547 757 BHDD156 72 216929 1013926 788 BHDD157 123 216354 1013350 741 BHDD158 67.5 215537 1012468 692 BHDD159 64.5 216676 1013612 783 BHDD160 76.6 216378 1013323 732 BHDD161 78 215564 1012435 715 BHDD162 98.8 216697 1013583 774 BHDD163 72 216409 1013293 719 BHDD164 75 215971 1012923 721 BHDD165 63.5 216725 1013556 760 BHDD166 75 216427 1013241 704 BHDD167 108 216745 1013531 746 BHDD169 80.15 215853 1012822 777 BHDD170 73.5 216525 1013497 772 BHDD171 80 215707 1012606 759 BHDD172 73.5 217312 1014110 700 BHDD173 50 216583 1013425 745 BHDD174 73.5 217278 1014153 700 BHDD175 69
UK 100