Batch 5 Results from 2nd Drill programme at Fer...
27 June 2014
Sula Iron & Gold plc
("Sula" or the "Company")
Batch 5 Results from 2nd Drill programme at Ferensola
Sula Iron & Gold plc ("Sula" or the "Company"), the exploration and
development company focused on iron ore in Sierra Leone, is pleased to provide
an update on operations at its 100% owned Ferensola project ("the project").
The Company is continuing its programme of exploration for further potential
direct shipping ore ("DSO") zones and the depth extent of the fresh magnetite
Banded Iron Formation ("BIF") target.
Highlights
- Significant results from batch five samples include:
BHDD131, 6m @ 57.99% Fe, 6-12m
BHDD131, 6m @ 59.48% Fe, 38-44m
BHDD131, 8m @ 55.75% Fe, 74-82m
BHDD132, 12m @ 57.34% Fe, 6-18m
BHDD135, 10m @ 59.90% Fe, 6-16m
BHDD135, 10m @ 57.15% Fe, 30-40m
- The oxide (DSO) targeted drilling, which commenced in early April 2014, has now been completed at 200m line intervals
- Drilling programme now continues targeting the depth extent of the fresh magnetite BIF
To view a full version of the announcement, including figures and maps, please visit the Company's website at: www.sulairongold.com
Sula CEO Nick Warrell said, "We are delighted that the results from
batch five continue to demonstrate that we have a well-defined iron oxide cap
(DSO) present at Ferensola. I'm further pleased to report that the DSO drill
programme has now completed and that the assay results reported by SRK UK are
being received on a regular basis."
Sula commenced a resource drilling campaign at Ferensola during 2014 after a
successful reconnaissance drill programme was undertaken in May-July 2013. The
results reported here are from 6 drill holes received from batch five
comprising 551.5m of drilling conducted between 9 May 2014 and 19 May 2014.
Drilling on this 2nd drill programme targeting oxide material has now been
completed with further results expected over the next 4 months.
The Company has focused drilling on investigating shallow, high grade iron
mineralisation contained in the oxide and transitional saprolitic zones
overlying the primary magnetite BIF. A summary of the mineralised
intersections from batch 5 are shown in Table 1.
Preliminary drilling has now commenced to test the depth extent of the fresh
magnetite BIF interpreted below the defined oxide package. The primary
magnetite BIF mineralisation currently remains open at depth. A total of 3
drillholes has been planned with the main purpose of the deep BIF drilling
being to estimate an Inferred Mineral Resource for the BIF material, when used
in conjunction with the results from the 2013 drilling campaign.
The Ferensola Project
The Ferensola project appears to be a typical weathered BIF with an underlying
fresh magnetite BIF. The project consists of elevated iron grades at surface
grading down to a fresh and competent magnetite BIF.
The Phase 1 drilling, being the focus of this press release has been
undertaken on a regular grid on 400m x 50m intervals. Each hole has been
drilled vertically and represents the true vertical thickness of the oxide
units. In addition, the company has now completed an additional phase 2 infill
programme based on generating 200m x 50m intervals. In all phases, a total of
7,911.4m of drilling has been completed. This includes 5,423.15m which has
currently been completed defining units of high grade material that lie within
the oxide cap during the phase 1 and 2 drilling campaigns. Results have been
received from the initial seven drill fences indicating a strike extent of 2.8
km which currently remains open at either end.
Results received from the 6 holes (551.5m) received in batch 5, have been
positive with multiple intercepts in excess of 55% Fe defining a potential DSO
domain and additional high grade laterite and saprolitic material within the
oxide zone. Results have been tabulated in table 1 for drill holes which have
intercepted the mineralised unit.
Metallurgical testing has commenced on material associated with the underlying
fresh magnetite-BIF to confirm that a saleable concentrate can be generated
through standard magnetic separation techniques.
Table 1 -- Mineralised Intersections*
Drillhole Logged From To Values
Material
Sum of Average Average Average Average
INTERVAL of Fe of Al2O3 of SiO2 of P
BHDD131 DUR 0 12 12 29.31 35.52 0.74 0.09
OXIDE 12 129 117 44.81 9.84 16.47 0.07
Including 6 12 6 57.99 8.36 0.79 0.05
And 38 44 6 59.48 6.52 0.96 0.07
And 74 82 8 55.75 5.58 4.94 0.08
BHDD132 DUR 0 16 16 48.72 13.90 6.36 0.08
OXIDE 16 56 40 42.21 9.54 23.02 0.06
Including 6 18 12 57.34 8.09 2.18 0.05
BHDD135 DUR 0 18 18 25.92 33.58 10.45 0.07
OXIDE 18 127.5 109.5 39.92 12.99 19.53 0.07
Including 6 16 10 59.90 5.28 0.91 0.09
And 30 40 10 57.15 5.30 4.61 0.05
BHDD136 DUR 0 10 10 51.58 14.22 1.13 0.06
OXIDE 10 34 24 42.07 13.61 16.17 0.07
BHDD137 DUR 0 8 8 51.07 13.94 1.58 0.06
OXIDE 8 79 71 28.91 16.49 32.16 0.06
BHDD138 DUR 0 12 12 50.61 13.72 1.11 0.08
OXIDE 12 100 88 32.53 13.98 29.59 0.07
*results are reported as an average for down-hole lithological intervals, high
grade intervals are length weighted with a lower cut-off grade of 55% Fe and a
maximum internal waste of 5m. Datum WGS84, Zone 29N, some minor errors occur
due to rounding.
Enquires:
Sula Iron & Gold plc +44 (0) 20 7583 8304
Nick Warrell / Matt Wood
www.sulairongold.com
Cairn Financial Advisers LLP +44 (0) 20 7148 7900
James Caithie / Avi Robinson
Daniel Stewart & Company Plc +44 (0) 20 7776 6550
Martin Lampshire / David Hart
Yellow Jersey PR +44 (0)7768 537 739
Dominic Barretto / Kelsey Traynor
Qualified Person
The information in this press release that relates to the current drilling
programme is based on information compiled by Mr Colin Rawbone, who is a
Chartered Professional Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Rawbone is a full time employee of SRK and has
sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and
type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is
undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of
the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources
and Ore Reserves'. Mr Colin Rawbone has reviewed this press release and
consents to the inclusion in the press release of the matters based on his
information in the form and context in which this appears.
In addition to the above, this press release has been compiled under the
direction of Mr Howard Baker, who is a Chartered Professional Fellow of the
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Baker is a full
time employee of SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd and has sufficient experience which
is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a
Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr
Baker has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in the
press release of the matters based on his information in the form and context
in which this appears.
Forward-looking Statements
This announcement includes certain forward-looking statements. All statements,
other than statements of historical fact, included herein are forward-looking
statements that involve various known and unknown risks and uncertainties as
well as other factors. Such forward looking statements are subject to a number
of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to differ
materially from current expectations, including delays in obtaining or failure
to obtain required regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that such
statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events
could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Notes:
Sula Iron & Gold plc is a multi-commodity exploration company focussed on West
Africa. The Company's main objective is to explore and advance its Ferensola
Projects, in Northern Sierra Leone, that are highly prospective for iron and
gold. Sula is currently focussed on delineating a maiden JORC compliant iron
ore resource estimate and evaluating the gold prospectivity. The 153 sq. km
licence area is contiguous to African Minerals' operational Tonkolili Iron
Mine, which has a JORC compliant resource of 12.8 billion tonnes iron
mineralisation.
Exploration work at the project has confirmed the presence of BIF at surface,
which has a known strike length of 3.1km. The BIF is proven to extend NE from
the Tonkolili licence and into Sula's licence area. A 2,000m scout drilling
programme conducted over a 2.2km section of BIF, confirmed the licence area's
prospectivity for high grade iron mineralisation.
Significant Greenstone Belt-style gold mineralisation has also been identified
at various prospects within the licence area. Five target areas for hard rock
gold mineralisation have been identified based on the location of historic
drill intercepts, the source areas for alluvial gold deposits, and the
position of major structures as defined by airborne magnetic data and drainage
orientation.
The information in this release that relates to Exploration Results has been
reviewed by Mr Andrew Dacey, Non-Executive Technical Director of Sula Iron &
Gold plc. Mr Dacey is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials Minerals and
Mining, a Registered Professional Geologist with the Australian Institute of
Geoscientists and a Competent Person as defined in the Australasian Code for
Reporting of exploration results and Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.
APPENDIX A. JORC CODE, 2012 Edition, Table 1 (Section 1 and 2)
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling - Nature and quality of Diamond core samples collected
techniques sampling (eg cut by Sula staff were of half HQ
channels, random chips, core, with the sample cut so as
or specific specialised to equally divide structures.
industry standard Sample lengths ranged from 0.5
measurement tools m to 2 m. Sample intervals were
appropriate to the not matched to geological
minerals under boundaries.
investigation, such as
down hole gamma sondes,
or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These
examples should not be
taken as limiting the
broad meaning of
sampling.
- Include reference to Sula used a minimum sample size
measures taken to ensure of 0.25 kg per core sample
sample representivity dispatched. They routinely
and the appropriate submitted blanks, duplicate and
calibration of any certified reference material.
measurement tools or
systems used.
- Aspects of the Diamond core samples were HQ
determination of diameter, and were cut in half
mineralisation that are using a core saw, dividing
Material to the Public geological structures equally
Report. where possible. Some samples
demonstrated a significant
variance when compared to
duplicate samples, but this
affect was observed to be
minor, with most samples
showing good repeatability.
Sample preparation techniques
were deemed to be of
international best practice.
- In cases where All sampling preparation has
`industry standard' work been undertaken by an
has been done this would accredited laboratory;
be relatively simple (eg preparation of samples has been
`reverse circulation undertaken through ALS Monrovia
drilling was used to and XRF analysis has been
obtain 1 m samples from undertaken by ALS based in
which 3 kg was Ireland.
pulverised to produce a
30 g charge for fire
assay'). In other cases
more explanation may be
required, such as where
there is coarse gold
that has inherent
sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Drilling - Drill type (eg core, Drill method was diamond
techniques reverse circulation, drilling of dominantly HQ core
open-hole hammer, rotary during the drill programmes
air blast, auger, undertaken, using standard
Bangka, sonic, etc) and tubes. A CS1000 man portable
details (eg core drill rig operated by a
diameter, triple or reputable company acting under
standard tube, depth of industry best practices.
diamond tails,
face-sampling bit or Core on vertical holes
other type, whether core targeting oxide material has
is oriented and if so, not been orientated.
by what method, etc).
Drill sample - Method of recording Drill core recovery was
recovery and assessing core and recorded for every hole through
chip sample recoveries routine monitoring of drill rod
and results assessed. depth and recovered core.
Recoveries for each hole were
graphically plotted and show
total recovery better than 85%.
Where recovery has been
recorded these intervals are
identified and flagged for
re-drilling as required.
- Measures taken to Supervision of the diamond
maximise sample recovery drilling by Sula geologists
and ensure ensured sample recovery was
representative nature of good, and that samples were
the samples. representative without
contamination issues. Where
poor recovery has been
encountered contractual
agreements with the drill
company incur penalties and
re-drill policies.
- Whether a relationship No studies are known to have
exists between sample been completed on sample bias.
recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may
have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain
of fine/coarse material.
Logging - Whether core and chip Geological logging for diamond
samples have been core includes a descriptive log
geologically and with some quantitative logging
geotechnically logged to of mineralogy and alteration,
a level of detail to in addition to plotting of
support appropriate assays and the geology as a
Mineral Resource graphic log.
estimation, mining
studies and No geotechnical logging has
metallurgical studies. been undertaken on oxide
material due to core
fragmentation and lack of
orientation.
- Whether logging is Logging is qualitative, with
qualitative or the exception of some
quantitative in nature. quantitative logging of
Core (or costean, mineralogical and alteration
channel, etc) content.
photography.
Core photography is undertaken
for both half and whole core on
a box by box basis.
- The total length and 100% of diamond core samples
percentage of the can be correlated to graphic
relevant intersections logs of the diamond drill hole.
logged.
Sub-sampling - If core, whether cut Drill core samples were half HQ
techniques and or sawn and whether core, where the core was cut to
sample quarter, half or all equally divide significant
preparation core taken. structures in the rock. Half
core is dispatched for
analytical process's
- If non-core, whether All sampling relates to drill
riffled, tube sampled, core
rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or
dry.
- For all sample types, Diamond core samples have been
the nature, quality and analysed by XRF for a full
appropriateness of the suite of analytes including but
sample preparation not limited to Fe_%, Al2O3_%,
technique. SiO2_% and P_%. In addition to
this analysis the LOI was also
recorded.
- Quality control For diamond drill core
procedures adopted for sampling, standards, duplicates
all sub-sampling stages and blanks were interleaved
to maximise randomly with the routine
representivity of samples, every 20th sample;
samples. targeting a frequency of 5%
- Measures taken to Field duplicates are submitted
ensure that the sampling as 1 in 20 insertion rate,
is representative of the where duplicates are selected
in situ material the remaining half core is
collected, including for split to produce a field based
instance results for quarter core sample for
field comparative studies.
duplicate/second-half
sampling.
- Whether sample sizes Diamond core samples were half
are appropriate to the HQ core, which is a large
grain size of the diameter core for exploration
material being sampled. drilling.
Quality of assay - The nature, quality SRK deem the accredited
data and and appropriateness of laboratory and the requested
laboratory tests the assaying and analysis to be suitable and
laboratory procedures sufficient for this type and
used and whether the style of mineralisation deposit
technique is considered
partial or total.
- For geophysical tools, No geophysical tools or other
spectrometers, handheld unusual analysis methods were
XRF instruments, etc, employed.
the parameters used in
determining the analysis
including instrument
make and model, reading
times, calibrations
factors applied and
their derivation, etc.
- Nature of quality For diamond drill core
control procedures sampling, standards, duplicates
adopted (eg standards, and blanks were interleaved
blanks, duplicates, randomly with the routine
external laboratory samples, every 20th sample;
checks) and whether targeting a frequency of 5%.
acceptable levels of
accuracy (ie lack of Samples are reviewed on a batch
bias) and precision have by batch basis to identify any
been established. bias with in the analytical
process.
Verification of - The verification of Mr Colin Rawbone of SRK has
sampling and significant independently verified the
assaying intersections by either intersections derived from
independent or lithological and grade logging.
alternative company
personnel.
- The use of twinned No twinned holes have been used
holes. to verify sampling and
assaying.
- Documentation of Data has been compiled from
primary data, data entry good quality paper plans and
procedures, data digitally compiled at a later
verification, data date.
storage (physical and
electronic) protocols. The data has been assimilated
into the Company's Microsoft
Excel database, after
compilation and validation in
Mapinfo Software.
- Discuss any adjustment No adjustment to assay data has
to assay data. been undertaken
Location of data points - Accuracy and quality All drill collars are
of surveys used to positioned with handheld GPS to
locate drill holes an accuracy of within 5m.
(collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine Down hole surveys are not
workings and other utilised on shallow vertical
locations used in drill holes but where required
Mineral Resource has been undertaken using the
estimation. REFLEX tools
- Specification of the WGS 84 UTM Zone 29 North
grid system used.
- Quality and adequacy Current topographic surveys has
of topographic control. been limited to SRTM data. An
aerial survey to meter scale
accuracy has recently been
undertaken - results pending
Data spacing - Data spacing for Diamond drill core samples are
and distribution reporting of Exploration collected over contiguous
Results. intervals of alteration as per
logging. There are lengths of
diamond core not sampled. Some
sampled intervals were
reâ€sampled as composites, or
as single duplicate samples.
Drilling has taken place on
400m spaced drill fences at 50m
intervals
- Whether the data No Mineral Resource or Ore
spacing and distribution Reserve calculations have been
is sufficient to
establish the degree of reported on the deposit at this
geological and grade stage.
continuity appropriate
for the Mineral Resource
and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s)
and classifications
applied.
- Whether sample Sample compositing was
compositing has been performed for reporting of
applied. diamond drill core results,
based on a weighted average as
a function of sample length
versus grade.
Orientation of - Whether the Drilling has been best
data in relation orientation of sampling orientated to allow a
to geological achieves unbiased perpendicular intercept of the
structure sampling of possible surface oxide zone to be
structures and the achieved.
extent to which this is
known, considering the
deposit type.
- If the relationship Based on current information no
between the drilling bias has been introduced based
orientation and the on the orientation of drilling
orientation of key and relationship with key
mineralised structures structures.
is considered to have
introduced a sampling
bias, this should be
assessed and reported if
material.
Sample security - The measures taken to Sula geologists maintain a full
ensure sample security. chain of custody of samples as
they leave site and are
transported to the process
laboratory. Upon sample return
sufficient checks and balances
are undertaken to ensure
samples have not been tampered
with.
Audits or - The results of any All logging and sampling
reviews audits or reviews of techniques have been audited
sampling techniques and during an independent site
data. visit undertaken by Mr Colin
Rawbone of SRK
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement - Type, reference EL54/2011 issued by the
and land tenure name/number, location Government of Sierra Leone 23rd
status and ownership August 2011 to Blue Horizon (SL
including agreements Ltd). Blue Horizon (SL Ltd) is
or material issues a 100% owned subsidiary of Sula
with third parties Iron & Gold Plc. Full due
such as joint diligence on the license was
ventures, carried out by Sula's SL
partnerships, lawyers and UK lawyers prior to
overriding royalties, IPO in October 2012. There are
native title no joint ventures in place save
interests, historical an MOU with the Town Chief and
sites, wilderness or his Elders of Dalakuru Town
national park and regarding the buildings in
environmental Dalakuru base camp. There are
settings. no historical sites, wilderness
or national park and
environmental settings within
our demarcated license area.
- The security of the As above
tenure held at the
time of reporting
along with any known
impediments to
obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
Exploration done by - Acknowledgment and Exploration carried out by Mano
other parties appraisal of River during the 1990s. Almost
exploration by other impossible to appraise the
parties. exploration as little or no
records of the exploration were
submitted to the Ministry of
Mineral Resources.
Geology - Deposit type, The Ferensola project appears
geological setting and to be a typical weathered BIF
style of with an underlying fresh
mineralisation. magnetite BIF.
Drill hole - A summary of all All tabulated exploration
Information information material collars are included in the
to the understanding release in appendix B.
of the exploration
results including a Table depicts all intercepts
tabulation of the where drill holes have
following information intercepted mineralisation.
for all Material drill Intercept lengths from diamond
holes: drilling are presented as down
hole lengths, not true lengths,
o easting and northing and this is stated in the
of the drill hole release.
collar
o elevation or RL
(Reduced Level -
elevation above sea
level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of
the hole
o down hole length and
interception depth
o hole length.
- If the exclusion of Intercepts have been omitted
this information is from this report where drill
justified on the basis holes have not intercepted the
that the information interpreted mineralisation.
is not Material and Drill collars for each of these
this exclusion does holes however have been
not detract from the recorded in Appendix B
understanding of the
report, the Competent
Person should clearly
explain why this is
the case.
Data aggregation - In reporting Weighting is calculated as a
methods Exploration Results, function of each sample length
weighting averaging multiplied by each grade, with
techniques, maximum the summed product divided by
and/or minimum grade the total sample length, to
truncations (eg present composited intervals. A
cutting of high high grade portion of these
grades) and cut-off intercepts has been highlighted
grades are usually using a 55% Fe Cut-off grade
Material and should be where intervals were greater
stated. than 5m.
- Where aggregate Where intercepts are reported
intercepts incorporate as longer lengths of lower
short lengths of high grade, it is clearly stated
grade results and that the higher incepts within
longer lengths of low are part of the lower grade
grade results, the intercept, not in addition to
procedure used for the low grade intercept.
such aggregation
should be stated and
some typical examples
of such aggregations
should be shown in
detail.
- The assumptions used No metal equivalents are used
for any reporting of for the exploration results at
metal equivalent Ferensola Prospect.
values should be
clearly stated.
Relationship - These relationships Diamond drill sample intercepts
between mineralisation are particularly are reported as down hole
widths and important in the widths.
intercept lengths reporting of
Exploration Results.
- If the geometry of Mineralisation is considered to
the mineralisation be steeply dipping (approx. 70°
with respect to the NW) with a dominant strike
drill hole angle is NE-SW. However oxidation of
known, its nature this material is deemed to have
should be reported. affected a horizon of material
concordant with topography.
Therefore the vertical holes
currently drilled in targeting
this material are deemed
suitable to intercept the
primary target as close to 90°
as possible.
- If it is not known This is clearly stated in the
and only the down hole release.
lengths are reported,
there should be a
clear statement to
this effect (eg `down
hole length, true
width not known').
Diagrams - Appropriate maps and Diagrams are provided that show
sections (with scales) all surface samples and the
and tabulations of diamond drill hole traces in
intercepts should be plan view, plus a cross section
included for any is provided with the intercept
significant discovery locations and known geology.
being reported These
should include, but
not be limited to a
plan view of drill
hole collar locations
and appropriate
sectional views.
Balanced reporting - Where comprehensive Exploration results are
reporting of all presented in the Table 1,
Exploration Results is regardless of grade where
not practicable, mineralised material has been
representative intercepted. Grade has been
reporting of both low split by lithology based on
and high grades and/or logging undertaken by the Sula
widths should be geologists.
practiced to avoid
misleading reporting
of Exploration
Results.
Other substantive - Other exploration Discussion of the Ferensola
exploration data data, if meaningful Prospect geology is included in
and material, should the release.
be reported including
(but not limited to): In situ density measurements
geological are carried out using
observations; Archimedean principles for
geophysical survey consolidated fresh core and are
results; geochemical undertaken on a lithological
survey results; bulk basis.
samples - size and
method of treatment; To date no economic or
metallurgical test extractive measures such as
results; bulk density, bulk samples, metallurgical
groundwater, testing, bulk density,
geotechnical and rock groundwater, geotechnical or
characteristics; rock samples have been
potential deleterious undertaken.
or contaminating
substances.
Further work - The nature and scale Drill testing is identified as
of planned further future planned work. At present
work (eg tests for the infill drilling to a 200m x
lateral extensions or 50m spacing has been commenced
depth extensions or to increase confidence in the
large-scale step-out initial interpretations of
drilling). geometry and grade
distribution. In addition
1,500m of deep drilling has
been planned to develop the
fresh magnetite BIF interpreted
below the primary oxide
material.
- Diagrams clearly Possible extensions are
highlighting the areas indicated on the plan and cross
of possible section provided in the
extensions, including release.
the main geological
interpretations and
future drilling areas,
provided this
information is not
commercially
sensitive.
APPENDIX B. - Ferensola Completed Drill Collars
X_COLLAR Y_COLLAR Z_COLLAR BHID DEPTH
216834 1013727 795 BHDD001 187.5
216768 1013806 797 BHDD002 302.2
216546 1013462 763 BHDD003 240.25
216478 1013533 776 BHDD004 269.65
216010 1012883 750 BHDD005 157.4
215946 1012957 765 BHDD006 245
215681 1012631 768 BHDD007 131.7
215589 1012757 808 BHDD008 293.15
216997 1013856 803 BHDD009 161.1
215928 1012978 758 BHDD101 72
215962 1012938 763 BHDD102 70.5
215598 1012733 799 BHDD103 64.5
215994 1012895 722 BHDD104 66.5
215633 1012688 769 BHDD105 67
216028 1012860 733 BHDD106 62.5
215669 1012654 782 BHDD107 63
216057 1012821 723 BHDD108 66
215696 1012626 732 BHDD109 65.5
216088 1012782 675 BHDD110 67.5
215727 1012579 737 BHDD111 61.5
215348 1012322 670 BHDD112 49.5
216210 1013192 703 BHDD113 46
215379 1012289 695 BHDD114 43.5
216501 1013515 776 BHDD115 66
216537 1013479 765 BHDD116 81
215429 1012257 683 BHDD117 48
215283 1012401 744 BHDD118 54.5
216258 1013173 683 BHDD119 56
216563 1013442 755 BHDD120 77
215306 1012369 733 BHDD121 69.2
216599 1013399 729 BHDD122 70
216291 1013148 705 BHDD123 72.5
216814 1013759 794 BHDD124 75
216622 1013373 717 BHDD125 63
216317 1013109 710 BHDD126 64.5
216846 1013725 788 BHDD127 69
217119 1013970 788 BHDD128 100
216876 1013685 770 BHDD129 70.5
217427 1014213 663 BHDD130 78
217091 1014007 781 BHDD131 129
216909 1013648 751 BHDD132 56.5
217399 1014248 654 BHDD133 63
217788 1014753 594 BHDD134 25.5
217065 1014043 772 BHDD135 127.5
217347 1014270 656 BHDD136 58.5
218089 1014591 634 BHDD137 79.5
217143 1013952 783 BHDD138 100.5
215838 1012832 779 BHDD139 71.5
218080 1014633 633 BHDD140 84
215881 1012798 769 BHDD141 73.5
217031 1014085 754 BHDD142 131
218080 1014633 633 BHDD143 67.5
218104 1014586 635 BHDD144 69
215902 1012757 732 BHDD145 60.5
217176 1014230 711 BHDD146 100.5
216109 1013104 709 BHDD147 54
215926 1012729 739 BHDD148 86.8
216648 1013922 736 BHDD149 500.3
217208 1014192 716 BHDD150 114.6
216133 1013067 729 BHDD151 70.5
216178 1013048 702 BHDD152 72
215492 1012518 732 BHDD153 76.5
216963 1013895 797 BHDD154 106.5
216186 1013005 650 BHDD155 91.5
215477 1012547 757 BHDD156 72
216929 1013926 788 BHDD157 123
216354 1013350 741 BHDD158 67.5
215537 1012468 692 BHDD159 64.5
216676 1013612 783 BHDD160 76.6
216378 1013323 732 BHDD161 78
215564 1012435 715 BHDD162 98.8
216697 1013583 774 BHDD163 72
216409 1013293 719 BHDD164 75
215971 1012923 721 BHDD165 63.5
216725 1013556 760 BHDD166 75
216427 1013241 704 BHDD167 108
216745 1013531 746 BHDD169 80.15
215853 1012822 777 BHDD170 73.5
216525 1013497 772 BHDD171 80
215707 1012606 759 BHDD172 73.5
217312 1014110 700 BHDD173 50
216583 1013425 745 BHDD174 73.5
217278 1014153 700 BHDD175 69