31 March 2026
TOMCO ENERGY PLC
("TomCo" or the "Company" or, together with its subsidiaries, the "Group")
Final Results for the year ended 30 September 2025
TomCo (AIM: TOM), the US operating oil development group focused on using innovative technology to unlock unconventional hydrocarbon resources, is pleased to announce its audited results for its financial year ended 30 September 2025.
Copies of the full 2025 Annual Report and Final Statements will be made available on the Company's website at www.tomcoenergy.com and hard copies are today also being posted to shareholders.
Enquiries:
|
TomCo Energy plc |
|
|
Malcolm Groat (Executive Chairman) |
+44 (0)20 3823 3635 |
|
|
|
|
Strand Hanson Limited (Nominated Adviser) |
|
|
James Harris / Matthew Chandler / Harry Marshall |
+44 (0)20 7409 3494 |
|
|
|
|
CMC Markets UK Plc (Joint Broker) Thomas Curran |
+44 (0)20 7170 8200 |
|
|
|
|
AlbR Capital Limited (Joint Broker) |
|
|
Jon Belliss / Colin Rowbury |
+44 (0)20 7469 0930 |
For further information, please visit www.tomcoenergy.com.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of United Kingdom domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, as amended by virtue of the Market Abuse (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
I am pleased to provide this statement to, amongst others, the stakeholders in TomCo Energy PLC ("TomCo" or the "Company", or, together with its subsidiaries the "Group") as part of the Annual Report and Financial Statements for its financial year ended 30 September 2025.
Operational Review
Following the receipt of, in aggregate, $1.575m in Q3 2024 as gross proceeds for the redemption of the Group's 10% ownership stake in Tar Sands Holdings II LLC ("TSHII"), which owns, inter alia, the land on which we continue to hold our leased oil mining and drilling rights, we were able to settle accumulated trade creditors, partly reduce our indebtedness to our principal contractor, technical partner and former joint venture partner, Valkor LLC ("Valkor"), and had sufficient working capital to operate the Group for some eighteen months thereafter without raising further capital from shareholders.
It became clear to the Board that progressing our plans for Greenfield Energy, LLC ("Greenfield") in Uintah County, Utah, USA, would best be achieved via a renewed closer collaboration with Valkor who are advancing their neighbouring Asphalt Ridge project ("Asphalt Ridge"). We therefore engaged in detailed discussions and protracted negotiations with them with respect to re-shaping and building on our existing relationship for the common good. At the same time, Valkor was earnestly engaged in progressing Asphalt Ridge and has recently announced that it will shortly commence construction of a fully funded, full-scale, asphalt plant on its acreage, aiming to be in production by the end of 2026. Valkor is also trialing various techniques to drill for oil below the oil-sands layer with a view to optimising a commercially viable methodology during 2026.
Alongside our focus on Greenfield and discussions with Valkor, we have also continued to identify and evaluate several other new project opportunities in the energy and mining sectors, none of which have so far proved to be suitably attractive or feasible.
Most recently, in February 2026, we were delighted to announce details of a renewed and closer partnership with Valkor. The new arrangements resulted in us reinstating Valkor as a joint 50% owner of our previously wholly owned subsidiary, Greenfield, and Valkor's founder and CEO, Steven Byle, joining our Board as a Non-Executive Director, with a view to jointly exploiting Greenfield's subsidiary's, AC Oil, LLC ("AC Oil"), existing leased oil-sands acreage (the "Lease Area") in Uintah County and the Group's intellectual and technological expertise.
Accordingly, TomCo now has the prospect, subject to additional funding being procured, of participating in the drilling of one or more well's on AC Oil's acreage (both the currently permitted six wells and any future wells), alongside Valkor and other potential investors, by the end of 2026 (if Valkor is successful in finalising an economically viable drilling methodology).
In the longer term, and again subject to funding, TomCo will have the potential opportunity of constructing a future oil sands separation plant with Valkor, via Greenfield, on the back of Valkor successfully completing and commissioning a similar plant on its neighbouring project area.
TurboShale RF Technology
The Company's legacy TurboShale and Oil Mining Company assets, fully impaired historically from an accounting perspective, may well become viable for exploitation in the future if advances in technology and macroeconomic conditions allow. For the time being, the Company is simply maintaining the protection and good standing of its relevant rights.
Corporate Review
During the year, the Company was able to continue operating without raising any additional equity or debt. In late February 2026, the Company undertook a £550,000 gross fundraise, by way of a placing and subscription with certain existing and new investors, to provide additional working capital and strengthen the Group's financial position. CMC Markets UK Plc ("CMC") were appointed as the Company's joint corporate broker following the fundraise.
As part of the aforementioned new partnering arrangements with Valkor, the existing loan facility between Greenfield and Valkor was also amended and restated to, inter alia, revise the repayment date and interest rate and settle half of the total amended outstanding balance via the issue of new ordinary shares in TomCo to Valkor at a deemed price of 0.1p per share representing a substantial premium to the Company's then prevailing market share price.
As and when Valkor has optimised its methodology, such that economically viable and sustainable drilling operations can commence on AC Oil's Lease Area, we anticipate that a typical well will cost in the order of $0.8m to $1.0m and would be held by separate special purpose vehicles outside of Greenfield and funded by a consortium of investors with each participant receiving a proportionate production/revenue share based on the funding contributed.
In the longer term, Valkor will afford TomCo the opportunity to pursue the potential financing, construction and commissioning of a similar mined oil sands separation plant on tract D of the Lease Area for a period of 18 months from Valkor's plant on Asphalt Ridge coming onto commercial production, thereby significantly de-risking and proving the viability of such a future operation which would be operated by Greenfield and subject to certain profit sharing and royalty arrangements between the parties.
I would like to take this opportunity to record my thanks, once again, to my fellow directors and our loyal and supportive shareholder base.
The vision we are trying to achieve is not easy and a number of practical and financial hurdles remain. That said, progress is now being made and it feels like we are coming within range of the ultimate prize.
Malcom Groat
Executive Chairman
30 March 2026
DIRECTORS' REPORT
The Directors submit their report and the financial statements of the Group for the year ended 30 September 2025.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY AND REVIEW OF THE BUSINESS
The principal activity of the Group is that of seeking to exploit the heavy oil contained in the Group's AC Oil Lease Area, and to extract and process oil sands resources from an area of land known as Tract D owned by TSHII. A review of the Group's business is included within the Chairman's statement.
RISK ASSESSMENT
The Group's oil and gas activities are subject to a range of financial and operational risks which can significantly impact on its performance, with the key risks for the year ended 30 September 2025 set out below.
Operational risk
As set out in the Chairman's statement, the Group holds certain rights to mine oil sands and to drill for oil on acreage leased from TSHII in the Uintah Basin, USA. It now also has a renewed collaborative partnership with Valkor via Greenfield, through which the Group expects to benefit from Valkor's growing expertise and experience from conducting similar activities on its neighbouring project site. There remains some uncertainty as to whether and when Valkor will be able to perfect its drilling methodology and commence sustainable commercial oil extraction and the same uncertainty applies to the Group. In due course, the Group will need to secure additional financing to participate in proposed drilling alongside Valkor and other consortium members on AC Oil's Lease Area and future oil-sands separation activities, a task that always carries uncertainty but which has been made less risky thanks to the Group's refreshed relationship with Valkor. There can be no guarantee that any wells will ultimately be drilled, or, if drilled, that they will be commercially successful, or that the Company will be able to raise the requisite additional funds to participate at the relevant time.
Similarly, there can be no certainty that a suitable funding arrangement can be successfully concluded for the construction of a future oil sands separation plant(s) on the Group's acreage nor as to the precise terms and structure of any such funding package and the Group will continue to explore and assess a number of potential funding sources and avenues.
The Group continues to operate with a small team, on which it is highly reliant. Information is openly shared within the team to ensure no over reliance on specific individuals.
Risks relating to environmental, health and safety and other regulatory standards
The Group's proposed future extraction and separation activities are subject to various US federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment including the obtaining of appropriate permits and approvals by relevant environmental authorities. Such regulations typically cover a wide variety of matters including, without limitation, prevention of waste, pollution and protection of the environment, labour regulations and worker safety. Furthermore, the future introduction or enactment of new laws, guidelines and regulations could serve to limit or curtail the growth and development of the Group's business or have an otherwise negative impact on its planned operations. The Group ensures that it complies with the relevant laws and regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which it operates.
Liquidity and interest rate risks
The Group is ultimately dependent on sources of additional equity and/or debt funding to develop its interest in Greenfield and any of the Group's other exploration assets and/or intellectual and technological expertise and to meet its day-to-day capital commitments and overheads. Cash forecasts identifying the liquidity requirements of the Group are produced frequently and are reviewed regularly by management and the Board. This strategy will continually be reviewed in light of existing project developments and new project opportunities as they arise. For further information regarding the Group's cash reserves and future funding requirements, please refer to the 'Going Concern' section below.
Currency risk
Due to the limited income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies, it was not considered cost effective to manage transactional currency exposure on an active basis. Consequently, as the financial statements are reported in sterling, any movements in the exchange rate of foreign currencies against sterling may affect the Group's statements of comprehensive income and financial position. The Group holds some cash in US dollars to mitigate the foreign exchange risk and keeps its currency profile under regular review.
Financial instruments
It was not considered appropriate for the Group to enter into any hedging activities or trade in any financial instruments in 2025. Further information is set out in Note 19.
RESULTS AND DIVIDENDS
The statement of comprehensive shows the Group reporting a loss before taxation for the year of £0.69m (2024: £6.34m). The 2024 loss was principally the result of a one-off impairment charge. The Directors do not propose the payment of a dividend (2024: £nil).
Directors
The Directors who served on the Board during the year to 30 September 2025 and to date were as follows:
Malcolm Groat
Louis Castro
Zac Phillips
Directors' interests in the ordinary shares of the Company, including family interests, as at 30 September 2025 were as follows:
|
|
30 September 2025 |
30 September 2024 |
||||
|
|
Ordinary shares of nil par value |
Share warrants |
Share options |
Ordinary shares of nil par value |
Share warrants |
Share options |
|
M. Groat |
11,887 |
- |
20,380,952 |
11,887 |
- |
20,380,952 |
|
L. Castro |
- |
- |
15,000,000 |
- |
- |
15,000,000 |
|
Z. Phillips |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,887 |
- |
35,380,952 |
11,887 |
- |
35,380,952 |
Details of the Directors' remuneration, share warrants and share options can be found in the Remuneration Committee Report and Notes 6 and 18 to these financial statements.
Significant shareholders
As at the date of issuing this report, the Directors are aware of the following shareholdings of 3% or more of the Company's existing issued ordinary share capital:
|
Shareholder |
No. of ordinary shares held |
% of issued ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Interactive Investor Services Nominees Limited HSDL Nominees Limited Hargreaves Lansdown Nominees Limited Vidacos Nominees Limited Puma Nominees Limited Valkor LLC Nortrust Nominees Limited Barclays Direct Investing Nominees Limited ABN AMRO Global Nominees Limited Idealing Nominees Limited GHC Nominees Limited Global Investment Strategy UK Limited
|
1,726,072,639 451,314,175 443,997,803 371,206,674 317,724,464 290,500,000 250,000,001 248,334,647 245,000,000 223,230,542 203,348,333 192,399,393 |
28.5% 7.5% 7.3% 6.1% 5.2% 4.8% 4.1% 4.1% 4.0% 3.7% 3.4% 3.2% |
Payments of payables
The Group's policy is to negotiate payment terms with its suppliers in all sectors to ensure that they know the terms on which payment will take place when the business is agreed and to abide by those terms of payment.
Going Concern
The Group's financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which presumes that the Group will be able to meet its obligations as they fall due for the foreseeable future. At 27 March 2026, the Group had cash reserves of approximately £0.4 million. The Directors have prepared a cash flow forecast for the twelve months to 31 March 2027.
As set out in the Chairman's statement, as part of the recent transaction with the Group's partner, Valkor, the Company has issued new ordinary shares to Valkor in part settlement of half of its outstanding loan to Greenfield (the "Valkor Loan"), and the terms of the remainder of the Valkor Loan, which is unsecured, were varied such that the loan is now scheduled for repayment on 23 February 2027, and, subject to meeting its normal working capital requirements, Greenfield intends to apportion one third of future Financings (as defined in the amended loan agreement) to satisfaction of the outstanding balance.
The forecast, which includes all commitments at the date of this report and reflects receipt of the gross proceeds of £0.55m from the equity fundraising announced on 23 February 2026, indicates that the Group will need to secure approximately an additional £0.6m in Q3 2026, including the amount needed to repay the remaining half of the Valkor Loan, in order to meet its currently envisaged working capital requirements for the twelve months to 31 March 2027, beyond which further funding will be required. As at 30 September 2025 the Company had negative equity of £0.30 million including the Valkor loan of £0.42 million. The recent capitalisation of half of this loan and the planned repayment in Q3 2026 of the second half of the loan should resolve the issue of negative equity.
Based on the historical and recent support from new and existing investors and historical debt raisings, the Board reasonably believes that additional funding can be obtained when required, via further debt or equity issuances, and, in the meantime, it is carefully preserving the Group's existing cash reserves and taking measures to reduce costs and defer expenditure (including directors' salaries) such that it continues to consider it appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.
However, the Board's ability to raise such additional funds cannot be guaranteed. As a consequence, there is a material uncertainty as to the going concern status of the Group. These financial statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the Group was unable to continue as a going concern. The Directors' consideration of the Group's going concern status is also set out in note 1.3 to the financial statements and the auditors refer to going concern by way of a material uncertainty within their audit report.
Directors' responsibilities
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
The directors have resolved to prepare financial statements for each financial year end and have elected to prepare financial statements in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards. The financial statements are required to give a true and fair view of the state of the affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period.
In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
· consistently select and apply appropriate accounting policies;
· present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;
· provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in International Financial Reporting Standards is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity's financial position and financial performance; and
· state that the Group has complied with International Financial Reporting Standards, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements.
The Directors confirm that they have complied with these requirements, and, having a reasonable expectation that the Group has and will have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, have continued to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Website publication
The directors are responsible for ensuring that the annual report and financial statements are made available on a website. Financial statements are published on the Company's website in accordance with legislation in the Isle of Man governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the Company's website is the responsibility of the directors. The directors' responsibility also extends to the on-going integrity of the financial statements contained therein.
Auditors
All of the current Directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any information needed by the Company's auditors for the purposes of their audit and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information. The Directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware.
PKF Littlejohn LLP have expressed their willingness to continue in office and a resolution to re-appoint them will be proposed at the Company's next annual general meeting.
By order of the Board
Malcolm Groat
Executive Chairman
30 March 2026
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
As Chairman, I am pleased to present the Company's Corporate Governance Statement under the 2023 QCA Corporate Governance Code (the "QCA Code"). Establishing effective corporate governance structures that evolve with the business and protect shareholder value is a key element of my role, together with the Board as a whole. Set out below are details of the Company's governance framework benchmarked against the QCA Code principles.
The Board of Directors of TomCo (the "Board") monitors the business affairs of the Company and its subsidiaries on behalf of its shareholders. The Board currently consists of the Executive Chairman and two Non-Executive Directors. Neither of the Non-Executive Directors have previously held an executive position with the Company. The Directors have responsibility for the overall corporate governance of the Company and recognise the need for the highest standards of behaviour and accountability. The Directors are committed to the principles underlying best practice in corporate governance and have adopted the QCA Code.
This statement explains, at a high level, how the QCA Code is applied by the Company and how its application supports the Company's medium to long-term development. Further information on the application of the QCA Code can be found on the Company's website at https://tomcoenergy.com/investors/governance/.
The Board is responsible for the stewardship of the Company through consultation with the management of the Company. Management comprises the Executive Chairman. Any responsibility that is not delegated to management or to the specific committees of the Board remains with the Board, subject to the powers of shareholder meetings. The frequency of Board meetings, as well as the nature of agenda items, varies depending on the state of the Company's affairs and in light of the opportunities or risks which the Company faces. Members of the Board are in frequent contact with one another, and meetings of the Board are held as deemed necessary.
Statement of compliance with the QCA Code
Sava as set out below, throughout the year ended 30 September 2025, the Company has been in compliance with the provisions set out in the QCA Code.
Application of the QCA Code principles
The Company has applied the principles set out in the QCA Code, by complying with it as reported above. Further explanations of how the principles have been applied is set out below.
Principle One - Business Model and Strategy
In September 2024, TomCo completed the redemption of its 10% minority membership interest in TSHII but retained its leased acreage from TSHII via AC Oil on which it may, subject to, inter alia, securing the requisite funding, participate in the drilling of one or more in situ oil production wells alongside its partner Valkor and potential other consortium investors. The Company also intends to seek to agree terms with the owners of TSHII, to enable Greenfield to mine oil sands on an additional lease area thereby providing feed stock for a potential future oil separation plant(s), the construction of which is again dependent, inter alia, on ultimately being able to secure sufficient funding.
Principle Two - Corporate Culture
The Board recognises that its decisions regarding strategy and risk will impact the corporate culture of the Group as a whole and that this will have an effect on the performance of the Group. The corporate governance arrangements that the Board has adopted are designed to ensure that the Group delivers long-term value to its shareholders and that shareholders have the opportunity to express their views and expectations for the Company in a manner that encourages open dialogue with the Board.
A large part of the Group's activities is centred upon what needs to be an open and respectful dialogue with partners, suppliers, consultants and other stakeholders. Therefore, the importance of sound ethical values and behaviour is crucial to the ability of the Group to successfully achieve its corporate objectives.
The Directors consider that, at present, the Group has an open culture facilitating comprehensive dialogue and feedback and enabling positive and constructive challenge.
Principle Three - Understanding Shareholder Needs and Expectations
The Board is committed to maintaining good communications and having constructive dialogue with its shareholders. Shareholders and analysts have the opportunity to discuss issues and provide feedback at meetings with the Company's management.
All shareholders are encouraged to attend and participate in shareholder meetings duly convened by the Company, in particular its Annual General Meeting (AGM). Investors also have access to current information on the Company and the Group through the Company's website at: www.tomcoenergy.com.
Principle Four - Considering Wider Stakeholder and Social and Environmental Responsibilities
The Board recognises that the long-term success of the Group is reliant upon the efforts of its employees, partners, consultants, contractors, suppliers, regulators and other stakeholders. The Board have put in place a range of processes and systems to ensure that there is close oversight and contact with key stakeholders.
The Group is subject to oversight by a number of different U.S. State and other regulatory bodies, who directly or indirectly are involved with the permitting and approval process for its oil and gas operations in Utah, including those conducted by Greenfield. Additionally, given the nature of the Group's business, including the activities of Greenfield, there are other parties who, whilst not having regulatory power, nonetheless have an interest in seeing that the Group conducts its operations in a safe, environmentally responsible, ethical and conscientious manner.
The Group makes all reasonable efforts, directly or through its advisers, to engage in and maintain active dialogue with each of these governmental and non-governmental bodies, to ensure that any issues faced by the Group, including but not limited to regulations or proposed changes to regulations, are well understood and ensuring to the fullest extent possible that the Group is in compliance with all relevant regulations, standards and specific licensing obligations, including environmental, social and safety aspects, at all times.
Principle Five - Risk Management and Internal Controls
In addition to its other roles and responsibilities, the Board is responsible for ensuring that procedures are in place and are being implemented effectively to identify, evaluate and manage the significant risks faced by the Group.
As a result of the process described above, a number of risks have been identified. The principal risks and the manner in which the Company and its Board seek to mitigate them are set out below. The Board reviews the principal risks facing the business as part of its meetings throughout the year and changes to those risks as the Company develops. Where risks change or new risks are identified the Board amends existing or implements new risk management strategies as applicable.
|
Risk |
Comment |
Mitigation |
|
Operational risks |
See Chairman's statement. |
As set out in the Chairman's statement, the Group holds certain rights to mine oil sands and to drill for oil on leased acreage in the Uintah Basin, USA. It now also has a renewed collaborative partnership with Valkor via Greenfield, through which the Group expects to benefit from Valkor's growing expertise and experience from conducting similar activities on its neighbouring project site. There remains some uncertainty as to whether and when Valkor will be able to perfect its drilling methodology and commence sustainable commercial oil extraction and the same uncertainty applies to the Group. In due course, the Group will need to secure additional financing to participate in proposed drilling alongside Valkor and potentially other consortium members on AC Oil's Lease Area and future oil-sands separation activities, a task that always carries uncertainty but which has been made less risky thanks to the Group's refreshed relationship with Valkor.
There can be no guarantee that any wells will ultimately be drilled, or, if drilled, that they will be commercially successful, or that the Company will be able to raise the requisite additional funds to participate at the relevant time.
Similarly, there can be no certainty that a suitable funding arrangement can be successfully concluded for the construction of a future oil sands separation plant(s) on the Group's acreage nor as to the precise terms and structure of any such funding package and the Group will continue to explore and assess a number of potential funding sources and avenues.
|
|
Environmental, health and safety and other regulatory standards |
See Directors' Report. |
The Company has engaged leading advisers to assist it in maintaining relevant permits or licences to operate.
The Company maintains ongoing oversight of health and safety and environmental compliance.
|
|
Liquidity risk |
See Directors' Report including 'Going Concern' section. |
The Company maintains a detailed cashflow forecast and carefully monitors expenditure and seeks to raise additional funding as required and as referred to in Note 1.3.
|
|
Currency risk |
See Directors' Report. |
The Company aims to manage currency exposures by holding funds in the applicable currency to match anticipated expenditure.
|
The Board considers that an internal audit function is not necessary or practical due to the current size of the Group and the close day to day control exercised by the Executive Chairman. However, the Board will continue to monitor the need for an internal audit function. The Executive Chairman has established appropriate reporting and control mechanisms to ensure the effectiveness of the Group's control systems for the size of the business and its activities. The Board obtains regular updates on risks from the Executive Chairman, which allows it to monitor the effectiveness of risk management and through its regular engagement and review of reporting on areas such as the status of the Company's projects, budgets, results and cash flow position of the Company.
Principle Six - A Well-Functioning Board of Directors
The Board currently comprises an Executive Chairman, Malcolm Groat, and two senior independent Non-Executive Directors, Louis Castro and Zac Phillips.
Biographies for each of the current Directors are set out on the Company's website. The Directors are subject to re-election usually at the Company's Annual General Meeting, at intervals of no more than three years.
The Board meets on a regular basis, typically once a month.
The Board is responsible for formulating, reviewing and approving the Group's strategy, budgets and corporate actions. As such, the Company has established separate Audit and Remuneration Committees.
The Audit Committee comprises Louis Castro (Chairman) and Zac Phillips. The Audit Committee meets at least twice a year to consider the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, including its annual and interim accounts; the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls and risk management systems; auditor reports; and terms of appointment and remuneration for the auditor.
The Company's Remuneration Committee comprises Louis Castro (Chairman) and Zac Phillips. The Remuneration Committee meets from time to time, but not less than once a year, to review and determine, amongst other matters, the remuneration of Executives on the Board and any share incentive plans of the Company.
The QCA Code recommends that the Chairman must have adequate separation from the day-to-day business to be able to make independent decisions. The Board comprises three members, Malcolm Groat who is the Executive Chairman and two senior independent non-executive directors. It is the non-executive directors, who are in the majority, who have adequate separation from the day-to day business and ensure that the Board can, overall, make decisions independent of the executive function. As the Board is comprised of only three members, one of whom is an Executive and two of whom are independent senior Non-Executive Directors, the Board does not believe it is currently necessary to appoint a single senior independent director.
Whilst each of the Non-Executive Directors are considered to be part time, they are expected to provide as much time to the Company as is required. The attendance record of the Directors at Board and committee meetings held during the year ended 30 September 2025 was as follows:
|
|
Main Board |
Audit Committee |
Remuneration Committee |
|
Meetings held |
11 |
3 |
1 |
|
Attendance: |
|
|
|
|
Malcolm Groat |
11 |
- |
- |
|
Louis Castro |
11 |
3 |
1 |
|
Zac Phillips |
11 |
3 |
1 |
Principle Seven - Appropriate Skills and Experience of the Directors and Maintenance of Governance Structures and Processes
The Board believes that the current balance of skills held by the Board as a whole, reflects a very broad range of commercial and professional skills across geographies and industries and each of the Directors has previous experience of public markets.
The Board believes that the Directors are well suited to the Company's fundamental objective of enhancing and preserving long-term shareholder value and ensuring that the Group conducts its business in an ethical and safe manner. The Board, which will shortly be augmented by the proposed appointment of Steven Byle, is considered to be of a sufficient size to provide more than adequate experience and perspective to its decision-making process and, given the size and nature of the Group, the Board does not consider at this time that it is appropriate to increase the size of the Board or amend its composition.
The Board has not yet implemented a written policy regarding the identification and nomination of female directors. In the event that one of the existing members of the Board stands down from their current position, the Company will, at that time, give further consideration to the specific selection of a female member of the Board and the adoption of a formal policy relating to the positive appointment of additional female members of the Board for future opportunities.
The Board is responsible for: (a) ensuring that all new Directors receive a comprehensive orientation, that they fully understand the role of the Board and its committees, as well as the contribution individual directors are expected to make (including the commitment of time and resources that the Company expects from its directors) and that they understand the nature and operation of the Group's business; and (b) providing continuing education opportunities for all directors, so that individuals may maintain or enhance their skills and abilities as directors, as well as to ensure that their knowledge and understanding of the Group's business remains current.
Given the size of the Company and the in-depth experience of its Directors, the Board has not deemed it necessary to develop a formal process of orientation for new Directors but encourages all its Directors to visit the Group's operations to ensure familiarity and proper understanding.
Skills & Experience of Board Members
Malcolm Groat
Malcolm is a Chartered Accountant and has extensive corporate experience, with roles as Chairman, Non-Executive Director, Chairman of Audit Committees, CEO, COO and CFO for a number of public companies. He is an adviser on compliance and governance, strategy and operational improvement, and managing the risks of rapid change.
Louis Castro
Louis is a graduate engineer and PwC trained Chartered Accountant who has spent his career in the City and more recently in the natural resources industry. He has worked in investment banking, with SG Warburg (now UBS), and in capital markets, advising growth companies on a wide range of matters including fund-raising and M&A. He served as an AIM Nomad for many years before becoming CFO of a listed oil company. In recent years, Louis became Executive Chairman of Orosur Mining Inc. which is quoted on both the TSX-V and on AIM, and he is also a non-executive director of Tekcapital plc and Innovative Eyewear, Inc.
Zac Phillips
Zac has over 25 years' experience in oil and gas finance, having worked for BP, Chevron, Merrill Lynch and ING Barings. He was previously CFO for Dubai World's oil and gas business (DB Petroleum) with responsibility for risk management and authoring of investment proposals. He has a degree in Chemical Engineering and a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Bath University.
Ultimate authority for all aspects of the Group's activities rests with the Board, with the responsibilities of the Executive Chairman arising as a consequence of delegation by the Board.
The Board has adopted appropriate delegations of authority which set out matters which are reserved to the Board. The Executive Chairman, together with the two non-executives, is responsible for the effectiveness of the Board and compliance with the QCA Code. Management of the Group's business and primary contact with shareholders has been delegated by the Board to the Executive Chairman.
When assessing the independence of each Non-Executive Director, length of service is one of the considerations alongside experience and knowledge. When making appointments, the Board considers the need to balance the experience and knowledge that each independent director has of the Group and its operations, with the need to ensure that independent directors can also bring new perspectives to the business.
In accordance with the Isle of Man Companies Act 2006, the Board complies with: a duty to act within their powers; a duty to promote the success of the Company; a duty to exercise independent judgement; a duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence; a duty to avoid conflicts of interest; a duty not to accept benefits from third parties and a duty to declare any interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement.
Principle Eight - Evaluation of Board Performance
The Board has determined that it shall be responsible for assessing the effectiveness and contributions of the Board as a whole and its committees (which currently comprise the Audit Committee and the Remuneration Committee). The small size of the Board allows for open discussion.
No formal assessments have been prepared in the year. However, the Board assesses its effectiveness on an ongoing basis and will make adjustments as and when required. The Board will keep this matter under review and especially if either the size of the Board or the number of committees increases, which in turn may require a more formalised assessment and evaluation process to be established to ensure continued effectiveness.
Principle Nine - Remuneration policy
The QCA Code emphasises the importance of aligning remuneration policies with the Company's purpose, strategy, and culture, ensuring they incentivise management to focus on long-term sustainable growth. The Remuneration Committee believes that the Company's incentive arrangements are consistent with this Principle, ensuring that remuneration structures are transparent and support long-term value creation for shareholders.
Principle Ten - Shareholder Communication
The Board is accountable to the Company's shareholders and, as such, it is important for the Board to appreciate the aspirations of shareholders and equally that shareholders understand how the actions of the Board and short-term financial performance relate to the achievement of the Group's longer-term goals.
The Board reports to the Company's shareholders on its stewardship of the Group through the publication of interim and final financial results. The Company announces significant developments which are disseminated via various outlets including, before anywhere else, the London Stock Exchange's regulatory news service (RNS). In addition, the Company maintains a website (www.tomcoenergy.com) on which RNS announcements, press releases, corporate presentations and the Report and Financial Statements are available to view.
Enquiries from individual shareholders on matters relating to the business of the Group are welcomed. Shareholders and other interested parties can subscribe to receive notification of news updates and other documents from the Company via email.
The Annual General Meeting, and other meetings of shareholders that may be called by the Company from time to time, provide an opportunity for communication with all shareholders and the Board encourages shareholders to attend and welcomes their participation. The Board is committed to maintaining good communication and having constructive dialogue with its shareholders. The Company has close ongoing relationships with its private shareholders.
Malcolm Groat
Executive Chairman
30 March 2026
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Overview
The Committee met three times during the year to consider the full year 2024 accounts and the interim 2025 accounts, and to review audit planning for the full year 2025 accounts. It has also met after the year end to consider the full year 2025 accounts.
Louis Castro is Chairman of the Committee. The other Committee member for the year under review was Zac Phillips.
Financial Reporting
The Committee monitored the integrity of the interim and annual financial statements and reviewed the significant financial reporting issues and accounting policies and disclosures in the financial reports. The external auditor attended the Committee meeting as part of the full year accounts approval process. The process included the consideration of reports from the external auditor identifying the primary areas of accounting judgements and key audit risks identified as being significant to the full year audited accounts.
Audit Committee Effectiveness
The Board considers the effectiveness of the Committee on a regular basis but not as part of a formal process.
External Audit
The Committee is responsible for managing the relationship with the Company's external auditor, PKF Littlejohn LLP.
The objectivity and independence of the external auditor is safeguarded by reviewing the auditor's formal declarations, monitoring relationships between key audit staff and the Group and reviewing the non-audit fees payable to the auditor. Discussions were held with the auditor about matters significant to the audit, of which the principal item was the matter of the going concern of the Company.
Non-audit services are not performed by the auditor. During the year, audit fees of £48,000 (2024: £49,500) were paid.
Internal Audit
The Committee considered the requirement for an internal audit function. The Committee considered the size of the Group, its current activities and the close involvement of senior management. Following the Committee's review, it did not deem it necessary to operate an internal audit function during the year.
Louis Castro
Chairman, Audit Committee
30 March 2026
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT
This report is on the activities of the Remuneration Committee for the financial year ended 30 September 2025.
The Remuneration Committee meets from time to time, but not less than once a year, to review and determine, amongst other matters, the remuneration of the Executive(s) on the Board and any share incentive plans of the Company.
Louis Castro is Chairman of the Committee and the other member of the Committee for the year under review was Zac Phillips.
The Directors' emoluments comprise fees paid for services. The amounts paid for their services are detailed below:
|
|
Salaries |
Bonus |
Total |
Salaries |
Bonus |
Total |
|
|
2025 |
2025 |
2025 |
2024 |
2024 |
2024 |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Groat |
60 |
- |
60 |
50 |
14 |
64 |
|
J. Potter (passed away on 24 May 2024) |
- |
- |
- |
131 |
- |
131 |
|
L. Castro |
50 |
- |
50 |
42 |
14 |
56 |
|
Z. Phillips |
43 |
- |
43 |
36 |
14 |
50 |
|
Total |
153 |
- |
153 |
259 |
42 |
301 |
As detailed in Note 18, the Company has in place a share option scheme for its Directors.
The Committee met once during the year in conjunction with a Board meeting to review salaries.
Louis Castro
Chairman, Remuneration Committee
30 March 2026
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF TOMCO ENERGY PLC
Opinion
We have audited the group financial statements of TomCo Energy Plc (the 'group') for the year ended 30 September 2025, which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, and the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is UK-adopted international accounting standards.
In our opinion, the financial statements:
· give a true and fair view of the state of the group's affairs as at 30 September 2025 and of its loss for the year then ended; and
· have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Material uncertainty related to going concern
We draw attention to note 1.3 in the financial statements, which indicates that while the group currently has sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations as they fall due within the next 12 months, its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the successful execution of future projects and its ability to raise additional funds as required to either settle existing obligations or fund any future projects. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the group's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the director's use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the group's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
⦁ Obtaining management's base case forecast for the period up to 31 March 2027 and testing the mathematical accuracy of the base case forecast, including a review of the cash position as at and after the year end;
⦁ Reviewing management's assessment of going concern, including their evaluation of future funding requirements;
⦁ Reviewing the reasonable worst-case forecast scenario prepared by management and evaluating the financial resources available to address this scenario; and
⦁ Critically assessing the disclosures made within the financial statements for consistency with management's assessment of going concern.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Our application of materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. The quantitative and qualitative thresholds for materiality determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures. Group materiality was £13,700 (2024: £35,000) based upon 2% of expenses (2024: 2% of expenses). The reason for the change in benchmark for materiality during current and prior year was due to the Sale of TSHII in the prior year meaning the Group became a cash shell. We therefore consider expenses to be the main driver of the business as the group and the metric that the users of the accounts will be most interested in.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions, and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes.
For each component in scope of the group audit, we allocated performance materiality to each entity based on their contribution to overall group expenses. The range of performance materiality allocated across the components was between £8,000 and £4,450 (2024: between £20,000 and £25,000).
We agreed with the audit committee that we would report to the committee all audit differences identified during the course of our audit in excess of £600 (2024: £1,750) as well as differences below these thresholds that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
Our approach to the audit
In designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we looked at areas requiring the directors to make subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting estimates including the convertible loan, and carrying value of unquoted investments. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including evaluating whether there was evidence of bias by the directors that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
An audit was performed on the financial information of the group's operating entities which for the year ended 30 September 2025 were located in the Isle of Man and United States of America. As a result of our materiality and risk assessments, we determined which components required a full scope audit of their financial information with consideration to their significance to the group based on their contribution to overall expenses, the presence of material classes of transactions and account balances, and other risk characteristics. On this basis, one component required a full scope audit of their financial information. Other components were subject to a specific scope audit whereby procedures were performed on one or more classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures. The audit work on each significant component was performed by us as group auditor based upon materiality or risk profile, or in response to potential risks of material misstatement to the Group.
All components of the group were audited by us in our London, UK office.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team.
Except for the matter described in the Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern Section, we have determined that there are no key audit matters to communicate in our report.
Other information
The other information comprises the information included in the annual report[1], other than the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report. Our opinion on the group financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
· We obtained an understanding of the group and the sector in which it operates to identify laws and regulations that could reasonably be expected to have a direct effect on the financial statements. We obtained our understanding in this regard from discussions with management.
· We determined the principal laws and regulations relevant to the group in this regard to be those arising from the AIM Rules, relevant local laws and regulations in the where the Group operates (Isle of Man and United States, UK Bribery Act, QCA Corporate governance, and Permit and Environmental compliance in the United States.
· We designed our audit procedures to ensure the audit team considered whether there were any indications of non-compliance by the group with those laws and regulations. These procedures included, but were not limited to:
o Enquiries of management regarding potential non-compliance;
o Review of legal and professional fees to understand the nature of the costs and the existence of any non-compliance with laws and regulations;
o Review of RNS announcement made to the market throughout the year; and
o Review of minutes of meetings of those charged with governance and regulatory news service announcements.
· We also identified the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud.
· As in all of our audits, we addressed the risk of fraud arising from management override of controls by performing audit procedures which included, but were not limited to: the testing of journals; reviewing accounting estimates for evidence of bias; and evaluating the business rationale of any significant transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of business.
Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, there is a risk that we will not detect all irregularities, including those leading to a material misstatement in the financial statements or non-compliance with regulation. This risk increases the more that compliance with a law or regulation is removed from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, as we will be less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance. The risk is also greater regarding irregularities occurring due to fraud rather than error, as fraud involves intentional concealment, forgery, collusion, omission or misrepresentation.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor's report.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with our engagement letter. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone, other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Zahir Khaki (Senior Statutory Auditor) 15 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HD
For and on behalf of PKF Littlejohn LLP
Statutory Auditor
30 March 2026
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the financial year ended 30 September 2025
|
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
Note |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Impairment losses |
2 |
- |
(4,269) |
|
Administrative expenses |
2 |
(623) |
(854) |
|
Foreign exchange losses |
|
(8) |
(817) |
|
Operating loss |
4 |
(631) |
(5,940) |
|
Finance costs |
3 |
(55) |
(59) |
|
Loss on disposal of investment at fair value through profit and loss |
|
- |
(336) |
|
Loss on ordinary activities before taxation |
|
(686) |
(6,335) |
|
Taxation |
5 |
- |
- |
|
Loss for the year attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
Equity shareholders of the parent |
|
(686) |
(6,335) |
|
|
|
(686) |
(6,335) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations |
|
30 |
348 |
|
Other comprehensive income for the year attributable to equity shareholders of the parent |
|
30 |
348 |
|
Total comprehensive loss attributable to equity shareholders of the parent |
|
(656) |
(5,987) |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
|
|
Pence |
Pence |
|
Loss per share attributable to equity shareholders of the parent |
|
|
per share |
per share |
|
Basic & diluted loss per share |
7 |
|
(0.02) |
(0.17) |
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
as at 30 September 2025
|
|
|
Group |
Group |
|
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
Note |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
8 |
- |
- |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
9 |
- |
- |
|
Other receivables |
10 |
65 |
65 |
|
|
|
65 |
65 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
10 |
9 |
40 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
11 |
151 |
857 |
|
|
|
160 |
897 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
225 |
962 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
12 |
(442) |
(462) |
|
Trade and other payables |
13 |
(86) |
(147) |
|
|
|
(528) |
(609) |
|
Net current (liabilities)/assets |
|
(368) |
288 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
(528) |
(609) |
|
Total net (liabilities)/assets |
|
(303) |
353 |
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
15 |
- |
- |
|
Share premium |
16 |
35,318 |
35,318 |
|
Warrant reserve |
17 |
93 |
225 |
|
Translation reserve |
|
153 |
123 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
(35,867) |
(35,313) |
|
Equity attributable to owners of the parent |
|
(303) |
353 |
|
Total equity |
|
(303) |
353 |
The financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 30 March 2026.
Malcolm Groat Louis Castro
Executive Chairman Non-Executive Director
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
for the financial year ended 30 September 2025
|
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|||||||
|
|
Note |
Share capital |
Share premium |
Warrant reserve |
Translation reserve |
Retained Deficit |
Total |
|
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Balance at 1 October 2023 |
|
- |
34,886 |
390 |
(225) |
(29,143) |
5,908 |
|
Loss for the year |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
(6,335) |
(6,335) |
|
Comprehensive income for the year |
|
- |
- |
- |
348 |
- |
348 |
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year |
|
- |
- |
- |
348 |
(6,335) |
(5,987) |
|
Issue of shares (net of costs) |
15,16 |
- |
432 |
- |
- |
- |
432 |
|
Expiry of warrants |
17 |
- |
- |
(165) |
- |
165 |
- |
|
At 30 September 2024 |
|
- |
35,318 |
225 |
123 |
(35,313) |
353 |
|
Loss for the year |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
(686) |
(686) |
|
Comprehensive income for the year |
|
- |
- |
- |
30 |
- |
30 |
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year |
|
- |
- |
- |
30 |
(686) |
(656) |
|
Expiry of warrants |
17 |
- |
- |
(132) |
- |
132 |
- |
|
At 30 September 2025 |
|
- |
35,318 |
93 |
153 |
(35,867) |
(303) |
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within owners' equity:
Reserve Descriptions and purpose
Share capital Amount subscribed for share capital at nominal value, together with transfers to share premium upon redenomination of the shares to nil par value.
Share premium Amount subscribed for share capital in excess of nominal value, together with transfers from share capital upon redenomination of the shares to nil par value.
Warrant reserve Amounts credited to equity in respect of warrants to acquire ordinary shares in the Group.
Translation reserve Gains and losses on the translation of foreign operations.
Retained deficit Cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income less transfers to retained deficit on expiry.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the financial year ended 30 September 2025
|
|
Note |
Group |
Group |
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax |
2 |
(686) |
(6,335) |
|
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
Finance costs |
3 |
57 |
59 |
|
Unrealised foreign exchange losses |
|
30 |
772 |
|
Impairment provisions |
|
- |
4,269 |
|
Loss on disposal of investment |
|
- |
336 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other receivables |
|
30 |
(8) |
|
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other payables |
|
(61) |
25 |
|
Cash used in operations |
|
(630) |
(882) |
|
Interest paid |
|
(76) |
- |
|
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
|
(706) |
(882) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
Sale of investments at FVTPL |
|
- |
1,245 |
|
Net cash generated from/(used in) investing activities |
|
- |
1,245 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
Issue of equity instruments |
15,16 |
- |
450 |
|
Costs of share issue |
|
- |
(18) |
|
Net cash generated from financing activities |
|
- |
432 |
|
Net (increase)/ decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(706) |
795 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of financial year |
|
857 |
62 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of financial year |
|
151 |
857 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2025
TomCo Energy Plc is a Company incorporated in the Isle of Man (IoM registration number:6969V; England & Wales registration number FC022829). The address of the registered office is 1st Floor, Sixty Circular Road, Douglas, Isle of Man IM1 1AE, The Company is a public limited company limited by shares, quoted on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange. The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all years presented, unless otherwise stated.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards.
The financial statements are presented in GBP. The Company's functional currency is also GBP and has been assessed by the Directors based on consideration of the currency and economic factors that mainly influence the Company's investments, operating costs, financing and related transactions. Changes to these factors may have an impact on the judgement applied in the determination of the Company's functional currency.
Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in profit or loss.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Company's accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are disclosed in note 1.2.
The Group's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and with those parts of the Isle of Man Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS. The financial statements have been prepared under the historic cost convention, except where IFRS requires assets and liabilities to be stated at fair value.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of estimates and assumptions. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of the amount, event or actions, actual results ultimately may differ from those estimates. Details of the Group's significant accounting judgments are set out in these financial statements and include:
Judgements and estimates
- Internally generated development assets
Following the redemption of the Group's 10% interest in Tar Sands Holdings II LLC ("TSHII") during 2024, the directors determined that a full impairment provision against its Oil Sands Technology and related assets was appropriate as at 30 September 2024. The reasons for this decision were:
a) given the uncertainties concerning obtaining appropriate project financing for Greenfield, as highlighted in the 2024 accounts' directors' report, there is doubt as to the availability of adequate financial resources to develop and use the Group's previously capitalised assets such that the directors cannot determine reliably their value in use; and
b) in the current conditions, there is uncertainty concerning the fair value less costs to sell of the assets concerned.
The directors consider that the factors that led to their decision to impair as at 30 September 2024 still exist, and therefore any reversal of the provision is inappropriate.
Estimates
- Share based payments
Estimates are required in determining the fair value of share warrants granted including future share price volatility and the instrument life. Volatility is estimated using TomCo's historic share prices for a period of time that matches the exercise period of the warrant or option concerned. This assumes that historic share price volatility is the best estimate of future volatility. The Black-Scholes model is used for valuing the warrants. Estimates are also made of the likely time of exercise of the warrants.
In 2021, the Company acquired the remaining 50% of Greenfield. The wholly deferred consideration comprised the potential issue of 592.8 million new ordinary shares to Valkor, contingent on the receipt by the Group of third party funding via a loan or credit facility for the construction of an oil sands processing facility by 25 August 2024. No such loan or credit facility was secured by such date, such that the obligation to issue the consideration shares lapsed. Nevertheless, under IFRS 2 there is no reversal of the original credit to reserves of £1.063 million which represents the estimate of the fair value of the contingent issue, determined by reference to the cost of the assets acquired.
The Group's financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which presumes that the Group will be able to meet its obligations as they fall due for the foreseeable future. At 27 March 2026, the Group had cash reserves of approximately £0.4 million. The Directors have prepared a cash flow forecast for the twelve months to 31 March 2027.
As set out in the Chairman's statement, as part of the recent transaction with the Group's partner, Valkor, the Company has issued new ordinary shares to Valkor in part settlement of half of its outstanding loan to Greenfield (the "Valkor Loan"), and the terms of the remainder of the Valkor Loan, which is unsecured, were varied such that the loan is now scheduled for repayment on 23 February 2027, and, subject to meeting its normal working capital requirements, Greenfield intends to apportion one third of future Financings (as defined in the amended loan agreement) to satisfaction of the outstanding balance.
The forecast, which includes all commitments at the date of this report and reflects receipt of the gross proceeds of £0.55m from the equity fundraising announced on 23 February 2026, indicates that the Group will need to secure approximately an additional £0.6m in Q3 2026, including the amount needed to repay the remaining half of the Valkor loan, in order to meet its currently envisaged working capital requirements for the twelve months to 31 March 2027, beyond which further funding will be required. As at 30 September 2025 the Company had negative equity of £0.30 million including the Valkor loan of £0.42 million. The recent capitalisation of half of this loan and the planned repayment in Q3 2026 of the second half of the loan should resolve the issue of negative equity.
Based on the historical and recent support from new and existing investors and historical debt raisings, the Board reasonably believes that additional funding can be obtained when required, via further debt or equity issuances, and, in the meantime, it is carefully preserving the Group's existing cash reserves and taking measures to reduce costs and defer expenditure (including directors' salaries) such that it continues to consider it appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis. However, the Board's ability to raise such additional funds cannot be guaranteed. As a consequence, there is a material uncertainty as to the going concern status of the Group. These financial statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the Group was unable to continue as a going concern.
The following standards have been published and are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after 1 January 2026 but have not been early adopted by the Group:
i. Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 - Amendments to the classification and measurement of financial instruments; and
ii. Annual improvements of IFRS: minor amendments concerning IFRS 1, IFRS 7, IFRS 9, IFRS 10 and IAS 7.
The following standards have been published and are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after 1 January 2027 but have not been early adopted by the Group:
iii. IFRS 18 - Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements
· Replaces IAS 1.
· Introduces structured categories in the income statement: operating, investing, and financing.
· Requires new subtotals: "Operating profit or loss" and "Profit or loss before financing and income tax".
· Mandatory disclosure of Management Performance Measures (MPMs) with reconciliations.
iv. Enhanced aggregation/disaggregation guidance for clearer financial reporting.
ii. IFRS 19 - Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures
· Provides reduced disclosure requirements for eligible subsidiaries applying full IFRS recognition and measurement principles.
Management does not expect that adoption of the standards listed above will have a material impact on the financial statements of the Group in future periods.
The Group's financial statements consolidate the accounts of the parent company, TomCo Energy plc, and all of its subsidiary undertakings (see note 22) drawn up to 30 September 2025. All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
The acquisition of subsidiaries where the acquisition represents the purchase of a business is accounted for on the purchase basis. A subsidiary is consolidated where the Company has control over an investee. The Group controls an investee if all three of the following elements are present: power over the investee, exposure to variable returns from the investee, and the ability of the investor to use its power to affect those variable returns. Control is reassessed whenever facts and circumstances indicate that there may be a change in any of these elements of control. On acquisition, all of the subsidiary's assets and liabilities which existed at the date of acquisition are recorded at their fair values reflecting their condition at the time. If, after re-assessment, the Group's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceeds the cost of the business combination, the excess is recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive income.
Acquisitions of subsidiaries where the IFRS 3 definition of a business combination are not met are accounted for as the purchase of the relevant assets less liabilities at cost.
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the Board of Directors.
Based on an analysis of risks and returns, the Directors consider that the Group has two principal business segments based on geographical location. The loss before taxation arises principally within the UK and US. Net assets are principally in the UK and the US.
Finance income is accounted for on an effective interest basis.
1.8 Finance costs
Interest on debt instruments is recognised by reference to the effective interest rate computed after the deduction of issue costs.
Property, plant and equipment employed in exploration and evaluation activities are carried at cost. Following a review of the Group's current activities, these assets remain fully impaired as at 30 September 2025.
Exploration and development licences
The Group applies the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas operations. For evaluation properties, all mineral leases, permits, acquisition costs, geological and geophysical costs and other direct costs of exploration appraisal, renewals and development are capitalised as intangible fixed assets in appropriate cost pools, with the exception of tangible assets, which are classed as property, plant and equipment. Costs relating to unevaluated properties are held outside the relevant cost pool and are not amortised until such time as the related property has been fully appraised. When a cost pool reaches an evaluated and bankable feasibility stage, the assets are transferred from intangible to oil properties within property, plant and equipment. These assets were impaired in full during the prior year.
Development assets
Greenfield has incurred expenditure on researching and developing the design and operation of a pilot plant and processes for oil sands extraction that is not of a scale economically feasible for commercial production. Development expenditure at acquisition was measured at cost. Development expenditure incurred following the acquisition of Greenfield that meets the requirements of IAS 38 for recognition as intangible assets are capitalised. All other expenditure is expensed. No amortisation will be charged on such assets until future commercial exploitation of the processes commences. These assets were impaired in full during the prior year.
Exploration and development licences
Exploration and development assets are assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may exceed the recoverable amount. In accordance with IFRS 6 the Group firstly considers the following facts and circumstances in their assessment of whether the Group's exploration and evaluation assets may be impaired, namely whether:
- the period for which the Group has the right to explore in a specific area has expired during the period or will expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed;
- substantive expenditure on further exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in a specific area is neither budgeted nor planned;
- exploration for and evaluation of hydrocarbons in a specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of hydrocarbons and the Group has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area; and
- sufficient data exists to indicate that although a development in a specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is unlikely to be recovered in full, either from successful development or by sale.
Taxation expense represents the sum of current tax and deferred tax.
Current tax is based on taxable profits for the financial period using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the statement of comprehensive income because it excludes items of income or expenses that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible.
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. If deferred tax arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit nor loss, it is not accounted for. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date and that are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised, or the deferred tax liability is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, except where the timing of the reversals of the temporary differences is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax is charged or credited in the statement of comprehensive income, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.
The accounts have been prepared in pounds sterling being the presentational currency of the Group. The functional currency of TomCo Energy plc is also pounds sterling. The functional currency of the US subsidiaries is US dollars. Assets and liabilities held in the Group or overseas subsidiaries in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the rate of exchange ruling at the reporting date.
Transactions entered into by Group entities in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity concerned are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur. Exchange differences arising from the settlement of monetary items are included in the statement of comprehensive income for that period.
The Group is party as lessee only to low value or short-term leases. Rentals payable under such leases, net of lease incentives, are charged to the statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
These assets are non-derivative financial assets which are held in a business model whose objective is to collect contractual cashflows and whose contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding. They arise principally through types of contractual monetary asset such as receivables. They are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue and are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less provision for impairment. Impairment provisions are recognised based on expected credit losses over the asset's life.
The Group's assets held at amortised cost comprise trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated statement of financial position.
1.16 Financial Instruments
Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are measured at initial recognition at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Trade and other receivables are accounted for at original invoice amount less any provisions for doubtful debts. Provisions are made where there is evidence of a risk of non-payment, taking into account the age of the debt, historical experience and general economic conditions. If a trade debt is determined to be uncollectable, it is written off, firstly against any provisions already held and then to the statement of comprehensive income. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously provided for are credited to the statement of comprehensive income.
Appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised in profit or loss in accordance with the expected credit loss model under IFRS 9. For trade and other receivables which do not contain a significant financing component, the Company applies the simplified approach. This approach requires the allowance for expected credit losses to be recognised at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses. For other debt financial assets the Company applies the general approach to providing for expected credit losses as prescribed by IFRS 9, which permits for the recognition of an allowance for the estimated expected loss resulting from default in the subsequent 12-month period. Exposure to credit loss is monitored on a continual basis and, where material, the allowance for expected credit losses is adjusted to reflect the risk of default during the lifetime of the financial asset should a significant change in credit risk be identified.
The majority of the Company's financial assets are expected to have a low risk of default. A review of the historical occurrence of credit losses indicates that credit losses are insignificant due to the size of the Company's clients and the nature of its activities. The outlook for the natural resources industry is not expected to result in a significant change in the Company's exposure to credit losses. As lifetime expected credit losses are not expected to be significant, the Company has opted not to adopt the practical expedient available under IFRS 9 to utilise a provision matrix for the recognition of lifetime expected credit losses on trade receivables. Allowances are calculated on a case-by-case basis based on the credit risk applicable to individual counterparties.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:
· In the principal market for the asset or liability; or
· In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability principal or the most advantageous market accessible by the Group.
The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant's ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.
The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
· Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
· Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable
· Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable
For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period.
For the purpose of fair value disclosures, the Company has determined classes of assets and liabilities on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy, as explained above.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits held at the bank and other short-term liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
1.18 Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Financial liabilities at amortised cost include debt instruments and the host contract element of hybrid liabilities containing embedded derivatives. These liabilities are measured initially at transaction price, less issue costs and the separation of the fair value of embedded derivatives. They are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Trade payables are recognised at amortised cost. All of the trade payables are non-interest bearing.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Shares issued in the period are recognised at the fair value of the consideration received.
Warrants issued as part of financing transactions in which the holder receives a fixed number of shares on exercise of the warrant are fair valued at the date of grant and recorded within the warrant reserve. Fair value is measured by the use of the Black-Scholes model.
On expiry or exercise, the fair value of warrants is credited to reserves as a change in equity.
Equity-settled share-based payments to directors are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date. Details regarding the determination of the fair value of equity-settled share-based transactions is set out in Note 18.
The fair value determined at the grant date is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period or periods, based on the Group's estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest. At each balance sheet date, the Group revises its estimate of the number of equity instruments expected to vest. The impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, is recognised in profit or loss such that the cumulative expenses reflects the revised estimate, with a corresponding adjustment to equity reserves.
In respect of equity-settled arrangements within the scope of IFRS 2 representing contingent consideration for the acquisition of assets, the value of the equity instruments is presumed to be equivalent to the fair value of the assets acquired. In the case of assets acquired on the acquisition of Greenfield, cost is deemed to be the best estimate of fair value.
The loss before taxation arises within principally the UK and US. Net assets are principally in the UK and US. Based on an analysis of risks and returns, the Directors consider that the Group has two principal business segments based on geography, with the UK primarily representing head office costs of the Group. Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the Board of Directors. The Directors therefore consider that no further segmentation is appropriate.
|
|
United States |
United Kingdom |
Eliminations |
Total |
United States |
United Kingdom |
Eliminations |
Total |
||||||||
|
|
Year ended 30 September |
2025 |
2025 |
2025 |
2025 |
2024 |
2024 |
2024 |
2024 |
|||||||
|
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|||||||
|
|
Administrative expenses |
(75) |
(548) |
- |
(623) |
(82) |
(772) |
- |
(854) |
|||||||
|
|
Impairment losses |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(4,269) |
- |
- |
(4,269) |
|||||||
|
|
Foreign exchange gains/(losses) |
(27) |
19 |
- |
(8) |
(803) |
(14) |
- |
(817) |
|||||||
|
|
Operating profit/(loss) |
(102) |
(529) |
- |
(631) |
(5,154) |
(786) |
- |
(5,940) |
|||||||
|
|
Finance (costs)/income |
(57) |
2 |
- |
(55) |
(59) |
- |
- |
(59) |
|||||||
|
|
Loss on disposal of investment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(336) |
- |
- |
(336) |
|||||||
|
|
Loss/(profit) before taxation |
(159) |
(527) |
- |
(686) |
(5,549) |
(786) |
- |
(6,335) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Non-Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
- Exploration and development assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||||
|
|
- Other |
65 |
- |
- |
65 |
65 |
- |
- |
65 |
|||||||
|
|
- Investments at FVTPL |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||||
|
|
|
65 |
- |
- |
65 |
65 |
- |
- |
65 |
|||||||
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
- |
9 |
- |
9 |
- |
40 |
- |
40 |
|||||||
|
|
Other financial assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||||
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
- |
151 |
- |
151 |
- |
857 |
- |
857 |
|||||||
|
|
Total assets |
65 |
160 |
- |
225 |
65 |
897 |
- |
962 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Trade and other payables |
- |
(86) |
- |
(86) |
- |
(147) |
- |
(147) |
|||||||
|
|
Financial liabilities |
(442) |
- |
- |
(442) |
(462) |
- |
|
(462) |
|||||||
|
|
Total liabilities |
(442) |
(86) |
- |
(528) |
(462) |
(147) |
- |
(609) |
|||||||
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Interest payable |
57 |
59 |
|
Interest income |
(2) |
- |
|
Total finance costs for the financial year |
55 |
59 |
|
The following items have been charged/(credited) in arriving at operating loss: |
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Auditors' remuneration: audit services |
48 |
50 |
|
Rentals payable in respect of land and buildings |
- |
16 |
There is no tax charge in the year due to the loss incurred for the year.
|
Factors affecting the tax charge: |
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Loss on ordinary activities before tax |
(686) |
(6,335) |
|
Loss on ordinary activities at standard rate of corporation tax |
- |
- |
|
Tax charge for the financial year |
- |
- |
No charge to taxation arises due to the losses incurred. TomCo is not subject to tax in the Isle of Man but is subject to tax in relation to its subsidiaries operating in the USA, however, the Group is loss making and has no taxable profits to date. No deferred tax asset has been recognised on accumulated tax losses because of the uncertainty over the timing of future taxable profits against which the losses may be offset.
Disclosure concerning deferred tax is given in Note 14.
The Group has one employee (2024: one) other than the Directors, whose emoluments comprise fees paid for services. The amounts for their services are detailed below and also in the remuneration committee report in more detail. The Directors are the key management personnel.
|
|
Salaries (incl. short term bonuses) |
Salaries (incl. short term bonuses) |
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
|
|
|
|
J. Potter (passed away on 24 May 2024) |
- |
131 |
|
M. Groat |
60 |
64 |
|
L. Castro |
50 |
56 |
|
Z. Phillips |
43
|
50
|
|
Total remuneration |
153 |
301 |
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the losses attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Reconciliations of the losses and weighted average number of shares used in the calculations are set out below.
|
|
Losses |
Weighted average number of shares |
Per share Amount |
|
|
Financial year ended 30 September 2025 |
£'000 |
Pence |
||
|
Basic and Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses attributable to ordinary shareholders on continuing operations |
(686) |
3,904,075,277 |
(0.02) |
|
|
Total losses attributable to ordinary shareholders |
(686) |
3,904,075,277 |
(0.02) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial year ended 30 September 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses attributable to ordinary shareholders on continuing operations |
(6,335) |
3,626,038,747 |
(0.17) |
|
|
Total losses attributable to ordinary shareholders |
(6,335) |
3,626,038,747 |
(0.17) |
|
The warrants and share options which were issued or for which entitlement was established in the current and prior years (Notes 17 and 18) are anti-dilutive. As these instruments would be anti-dilutive a separate diluted loss per share is not presented.
|
|
Oil & Gas |
Oil & Gas |
Oil & Gas |
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Exploration and evaluation expenditure |
Development expenditure |
Patents and patent applications |
Total |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2023 |
8,507 |
5,797 |
30 |
14,334 |
|
Disposals |
(30) |
- |
- |
(30) |
|
Translation differences |
(8) |
(396) |
- |
(404) |
|
At 30 September 2024 |
8,469 |
5,401 |
30 |
13,900 |
|
Translation differences |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
At 30 September 2025 |
8,469 |
5,401 |
30 |
13,900 |
|
Amortisation/Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
At 1 October 2023 |
(8,287) |
(1,314) |
(30) |
(9,631) |
|
Impairment |
(182) |
(4,087) |
- |
(4,269) |
|
At 30 September 2024 |
(8,469) |
(5,401) |
(30) |
(13,900) |
|
At 30 September 2025 |
(8,469) |
(5,401) |
(30) |
(13,900) |
|
Net book value |
|
|
|
|
|
At 30 September 2025 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
At 30 September 2024 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Following the redemption of the Group's 10% interest in Tar Sands Holdings II LLC ("TSHII") in 2024, the directors determined that a full impairment provision against its Oil Sands Technology and related assets was appropriate at 30 September 2024, given the uncertainties concerning obtaining appropriate project financing to develop and use its previously capitalised assets such that the directors cannot determine reliably their value in use. In the current conditions, there is continuing uncertainty concerning the fair value less costs to sell of the assets concerned.
The assets acquired with Greenfield are described at note 1.10. The exploration and development licences comprise five Utah oil shale leases which are valid and renewable annually, covering approximately 8,279 acres. These assets were impaired in full as at 30 September 2021 and remain so.
|
|
Exploration and evaluation equipment |
|
|
£'000 |
|
Cost at 1 October 2023 |
386 |
|
Translation differences |
- |
|
At 30 September 2024 |
386 |
|
Translation differences |
- |
|
At 30 September 2025 |
386 |
|
Impairment at 1 October 2023 |
386 |
|
Charge for year |
- |
|
At 30 September 2024 and 2025 |
386 |
|
Net book value |
|
|
At 30 September 2025 |
- |
|
At 30 September 2024 |
- |
These assets were impaired in full as at 30 September 2021 and remain so for the reasons given in Note 1.11.
|
|
Group 2025 |
Group 2024 |
|
Current |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Other receivables |
5 |
17 |
|
Prepayments and accrued income |
4 |
23 |
|
|
9 |
40 |
|
Non-current Other receivables |
65 |
65 |
|
Total Receivables |
74 |
105 |
As at 30 September 2025, there were no receivables considered past due (2024: £Nil). The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the fair value of each class of receivable and cash and cash equivalents as disclosed in Note 11.
All current receivable amounts are due within six months.
|
|
Group 2025 |
Group 2024 |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Cash at bank and in hand |
151 |
857 |
The Group earns 0.05% (2024: 0.05%) interest on its cash deposits, consequently the Group's exposure to interest rate volatility is not considered material.
12. Loans
|
|
Group 2025 |
Group 2024 |
|
Current |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Term loan |
442 |
462 |
|
|
442 |
462 |
This loan comprises the loan received from Valkor, further details of which are set out in the Going Concern note and also in the Directors' Report.
|
|
Group 2025 |
Group 2024 |
|
Current |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Trade payables |
8 |
5 |
|
Other payables |
1 |
6 |
|
Accruals |
77 |
136 |
|
|
86 |
147 |
All current amounts are payable within six months and the Directors consider that the carrying values adequately represent the fair value of all payables.
Unrecognised losses
The Group has tax losses in respect of excess management expenses of approximately £15.2 million (2024: £14.7 million) available for offset against future Company income. This gives rise to a potential deferred tax asset at the reporting date of £3.8 million (2024: £3.7 million). No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of the tax losses carried forward as the recoverability of this benefit is dependent on the future profitability of the Company, the timing of which cannot reasonably be foreseen but the excess management expenses have no expiry date. In addition, subsidiary entities have accumulated losses of approximately £16 million for which no deferred tax asset is recorded given the uncertainty of future profits.
|
|
Number of shares in issue |
2025 £ |
|
Issued and fully paid at 1 October 2023 - shares of no par value |
3,062,408,610 |
- |
|
October 2023-subscription at £0.0008 per share (note 16) |
125,000,000 |
- |
|
January 2024-subscription at £0.001 per share (note 16) |
50,000,000 |
- |
|
February 2024-placing and subscription at £0.00045 per share (note 16) |
666,666,667 |
|
|
March 2024-additional conversion shares |
60,000 |
- |
|
At 30 September 2024 and 2025 |
3,904,135,277 |
- |
All shares issued were issued to provide working capital for the Group.
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
At 1 October |
35,318 |
34,886 |
|
Conversion of convertible loans and associated interest |
- |
- |
|
Placing and subscriptions-net of costs* (note 15) |
- |
432* |
|
Additional conversion shares |
- |
- |
|
At 30 September |
35,318 |
35,318 |
*The placing and subscriptions raised aggregate gross proceeds of £450,000 with associated costs of £18,000.
At 30 September 2025, the following share warrants were outstanding in respect of ordinary shares:
|
|
2025 |
2025 |
2024 |
2024 |
|
|
number |
Weighted average exercise price Pence |
number |
Weighted average exercise price Pence |
|
Outstanding at 1 October |
215,857,130 |
0.48 |
244,190,463 |
0.58 |
|
Expired during the year |
(95,857,143) |
(0.47) |
(55,000,000) |
(0.75) |
|
Granted during the year |
- |
- |
26,666,667 |
0.05 |
|
Outstanding at 30 September |
119,999,987 |
0.48 |
215,857,130 |
0.48 |
|
Exercisable at 30 September |
119,999,987 |
0.48 |
215,857,130 |
0.48 |
The inputs into the Black-Scholes model for calculating the estimated fair value of warrants granted, at their grant date, were as follows:
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
|
Share price (pence) |
- |
0.05 |
|
Exercise price (pence) |
- |
0.045 |
|
Expected volatility |
- |
138% |
|
Risk-free rate |
- |
4.49% |
|
Expected period before exercise (years) |
- |
2 |
Expected volatility was determined by calculating the historical volatility of the Company's share price. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
Issue of Warrants
26,666,667 warrants were issued in the year ended 30 September 2024 at an exercise price of 0.045p in connection with a placing, but are deemed to have a fair value of zero.
Each warrant in issue is governed by the provisions of warrant instruments representing the warrants which have been adopted by the Company. The rights conferred by the warrants are transferable in whole or in part subject to and in accordance with the transfer provisions set out in the Company's Articles. The warrants outstanding at 30 September 2025 had a weighted average exercise price of 0.48p (2024: 0.48p) and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 0.48 years (2024: 1.46 years).
18. Share-based payments
The Company implemented a share option scheme for its Directors during the year ended 30 September 2018. Further issues of options took place in June 2020 and June 2021. Options are exercisable at a price equal to the quoted market price of the Company's shares at the date of grant. The vesting period is between six months and 1 year. If the options remain unexercised after a period of ten years from the date of grant (5 years in the case of options granted in June 2020) the options expire. Options are forfeited if the director leaves the Company before the options vest.
Details of the share options outstanding at the year-end are as follows:
|
|
2025 |
2025 |
2024 |
2024 |
|
|
number |
Weighted average exercise price Pence |
number |
Weighted average exercise price Pence |
|
Outstanding as at 1 October |
98,365,078 |
0.70 |
98,365,078 |
0.70 |
|
Outstanding at 30 September |
98,365,078 |
0.70 |
98,365,078 |
0.70 |
|
Exercisable at 30 September |
98,365,078 |
|
98,365,078 |
|
Details of the options held by each Director are provided in the Directors' Report.
No new options were granted in the year ended 30 September 2025 (2024: nil). The weighted average unexpired life of the options at 30 September 2025 was 2.08 years (2024: 3.08 years).
During 2024, John Potter sadly passed away. The share options held by John remain technically exercisable but are out of the money at the reporting date. The Board has decided that the options will be allowed to lapse naturally under the terms of the scheme. These options, totalling 52,714,285, are included in the number of options exercisable at the year end.
The charge recognised in profit or loss for 2025 was £nil (2024: £nil).
Where equity instruments to be issued as consideration for the purchase of a group of assets that does not constitute a business are within the scope of IFRS 2, the value of the equity instruments is determined by reference to the fair value of the net assets acquired. This is deemed to be cost at the date of acquisition.
The Group's financial instruments, other than its investments, comprise cash and items arising directly from its operations such as other receivables, and trade payables.
Management reviews the Group's exposure to currency risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and credit risk on a regular basis and considers that through this review they manage the exposure of the Group. No formal policies have been put in place in order to hedge the Group's activities to the exposure to currency risk or interest risk, however, this is constantly under review. Financial instruments held at amortised cost comprised:
|
Assets Non-current
|
Group 2025 £'000 |
Group 2024 £'000 |
|
Other receivables |
65 |
65 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
Other receivables |
9 |
40 |
|
Liabilities
|
Group 2025 |
Group 2024 |
|
Current |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Trade and other payables |
86 |
147 |
|
Term loan |
442 |
462 |
|
|
528 |
609 |
Management reviews the Group's exposure to currency risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and credit risk on a regular basis and considers that through this review they manage the exposure of the Group. No formal policies have been put in place in order to hedge the Group's activities to the exposure to currency risk or interest risk, however, this is constantly under review.
There is no material difference between the book value and fair value of the Group and Company's cash and other financial assets.
Currency risk
The Group has overseas subsidiaries which operate in the United States and include expenses, assets and liabilities denominated in US$. Foreign exchange risk is inherent in the Group's activities and is accepted as such. The effect of a 10% strengthening or weakening of the US dollar against sterling at the reporting date would, all other variables held constant, result in a gain or loss reported in profit and loss of approximately £550,000 (2024: £610,000).
Interest rate risk
The Group and Company manage the interest rate risk associated with the Group's cash assets by ensuring that interest rates are as favourable as possible, whether this is through investment in floating or fixed interest rate deposits, whilst managing the access the Group requires to the funds for working capital purposes.
The Group's cash and cash equivalents are subject to interest rate exposure due to changes in interest rates. Short-term receivables and payables are not exposed to interest rate risk. The Group borrows at fixed interest rates and therefore there is no effect on profit and loss attributable to changes in interest rates.
A 1% increase or decrease in the floating rate attributable to the cash balances held at the year-end would not result in a significant difference in interest receivable.
Liquidity risk
At the year end the Group and Company had cash balances comprising the following:
|
|
Group |
Group |
|
Bank balances |
2025 £'000 |
2024 £'000 |
|
British Pounds |
3 |
93 |
|
US Dollars |
148 |
764 |
|
Total |
151 |
857 |
All financial liabilities of the Group mature in less than 12 months: details of the analysis of such liabilities is provided in Notes 12 and 13.
Liquidity risk arises from the Group's management of working capital. It is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as they fall due. Refer to Note 1.3 for details of going concern.
The Group's policy is to ensure that it will always have sufficient cash to allow it to meet its liabilities when they become due. To achieve this aim, it seeks to maintain cash balances (or agreed facilities) to meet expected requirements for a period of at least 90 days. The cash balances are held with a bank rated at A+/stable.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or a counter party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Group is principally exposed to credit risk on cash and cash equivalents with banks and financial institutions. For banks and financial institutions, only independently rated parties with an acceptable credit rating are utilised. There has been no significant change in credit risk since the recognition of applicable assets and therefore no credit losses have been recognised on financial assets.
Capital management policies
In managing its capital, which includes its equity, cash and debt, the Group's primary objective is to maintain a sufficient funding base to enable the Group to meet its working capital and strategic investment needs. In making decisions to adjust its capital structure to achieve these aims, through new share issues or debt, the Group considers not only its short-term position but also its long-term operational and strategic objectives.
20. Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
The table below details changes in the Group's liabilities arising from financing activities, including both cash and non-cash changes. Liabilities arising from financing activities are those for which cash flows were, or future cash flows will be, classified in the cash flow statement as cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
1 October |
Financing cash flows |
Non-cash transactions |
30 September |
|
Group 2025 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|
Loans |
462 |
- |
(20) |
442 |
|
Total |
462 |
- |
(20) |
442 |
|
Group 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
445 |
- |
17 |
462 |
|
Total |
445 |
- |
17 |
462 |
The Directors are Key Management and information in respect of Key Management is provided in Note 6.
The Company was charged £14,000 (2024: £6,993) for professional services rendered by Oil & Gas Advisors Ltd of which a director is the controlling shareholder. £nil (2024: £669) was owed to this entity at 30 September 2025.
22. Subsidiary undertakings
The subsidiary undertakings of TomCo Energy plc at 30 September 2025 and 2024, all registered at First Floor, Sixty Circular Road, Douglas, Isle of Man IM1 1AE, were as follows:
|
|
Country of incorporation |
|
Greenfield Energy LLC |
USA |
|
AC Oil LLC |
USA |
|
TurboShale Inc (dormant) |
USA |
|
The Oil Mining Company Inc (dormant) |
USA |
All entities are wholly-owned. Ownership of AC Oil LLC is via Greenfield Energy LLC.
As at 30 September 2025 and 30 September 2024 there was no ultimate controlling party.
At 30 September 2025, the Group had no operating lease commitments (2024: £nil).
On 23 January 2026, the Company announced that it had received an exercise notice in respect of certain broker warrants to subscribe for a total of 26,666,667 new ordinary shares of no-par value each in the capital of TomCo ("Ordinary Shares") at a price of 0.045 pence per share, for a total consideration to the Company of £12,000.
On 23 February 2026, the Company announced details of a renewed and closer collaboration with Valkor, its current principal contractor, technical partner and former joint venture partner, involving, inter alia, the issue of new membership interests in Greenfield such that Greenfield is now jointly (50:50) owned and controlled by TomCo and Valkor, with the intention of jointly exploiting its subsidiary's existing leased oil-sands acreage in the Uinta Basin, Utah, United States, and intellectual and technological expertise.
Steven Byle, Valkor's founder and CEO, agreed to join the Board as a Non-Executive Director, subject to completion of the Nominated Adviser's customary due diligence process and Valkor also agreed to certain amendments to its pre-existing loan facility to Greenfield including the conversion of approximately half of the outstanding principal and accrued/additional interest into new Ordinary Shares at a substantial premium to the Company's then prevailing market share price.
Furthermore, the Company announced that it had raised, in aggregate, £550,000 before expenses by way of a placing and subscription with certain existing and new investors to provide additional working capital for the Group. CMC were appointed as the Company's joint corporate broker alongside such fundraise.