More High Grade Gold Assays from Spring Hill

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	· Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	· Industry standard RC drilling, sampling and assay designed to test target areas of potential gold mineralisation considered likely to enhance the previously identified resource.
· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.	· Collar locations were picked up using handheld GPS. · Downhole survey shots were taken at 30 metre intervals using Reflex electronic single shot.
· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.	· Every metre drilled was sampled, logged and assayed to industry standards.
· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	· Reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 1 kg was pulverised to produce a 50 g charge for fire assay
Drilling techniques	· Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	· Drilling was carried out using a 4¾ inch reverse circulation face sampling hammer bit.
Drill sample recovery	· Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.	· Qualitative observations were recorded in geology logs.
· Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.	· Some sample loss was experienced in the first metre or two of each hole but overall sample recovery was very good
· Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	· As sample recovery was very good it is unlikely that such a relationship could be established.
Logging	· Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.	· All drill samples were was geologically logged and photographed
· Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.	· All drill samples were geologically logged and photographed
· The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	· 100%
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation	· If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.	· No core drilled
· If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.	· Rotary split
· For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	· Accepted industry standard sampling process
· Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.	· QAQC procedures were followed as per industry best practice including the use blanks, duplicates and certified reference material standards.
· Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.	· Field duplicates were inserted every 30 samples
· Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	· A 2 kg sub sample from 30 kg with particle size sub 10mm is within the acceptable sample size range.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	· The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.	· Fire assay was used to determine total gold content
· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.	· Not applicable
· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	· Internal laboratory quality control was applied and duplicates run on all samples over 2g/t Au. Accuracy and precision was deemed acceptable.
Verification of sampling and assaying	· The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.	· Yes
· The use of twinned holes.	· No
· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	· Validation processes integrated with data entry procedure.
· Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	· None required
Location of data points	· Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	· Hand held GPS averaged over 10 minute interval · Downhole survey shots were taken at 30 metre intervals using Reflex electronic single shot.
· Specification of the grid system used.	· The Spring Hill mine grid comprises the following adjustments relative to GDA94 zone52: o Rotation -28.16degrees o East translation -790,091.789m o North translation -8,480,800.386m o Mine Grid RL = AHD + 976.75m
· Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	· < 5m
Data spacing and distribution	· Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	· As per drill hole location plan
· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.	· Not applicable
· Whether sample compositing has been applied.	· Significant intercepts are calculated as length weighted averages
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	· Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.	· Drilling is oriented to minimise sample bias as much as possible. Interpreted true thicknesses are provided where possible. Whether a quoted mineralised interval is downhole or considered true is indicated throughout the report.
· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	· Yes, and has therefore been addressed.
Sample security	· The measures taken to ensure sample security.	· Direct delivery by Thor personnel to the assay laboratory.
Audits or reviews	· The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	· Not available.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	· Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	· Spring Hill is located on ML23812 in the Pine Creek Orogen and is jointly owned by Thor Mining subsidiary TM Gold P/L (51%) and Western Desert Resources (49%).
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	· The tenement is in good standing
Exploration done by other parties	· Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	· Prior to Thor Mining involvement previous drilling of the resource was conducted by the Ross Mining / Billiton joint venture in the 1990s
Geology	· Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	· Orogenic gold hosted by siltstones and greywackes of the Mount Bonnie Formation of the Pine Creek Orogen.
Drill hole Information	· A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length.	· Table provided
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	· Not applicable
Data aggregation methods	· In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.	· Aggregated grades are length weighted where applicable. · Intersections less than 0.2g/t Au are not presented in significant intersect summary tables. · No high grade cut has been applied.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	· Intersections are calculated using 0.2 g/t gold cutoff with a minimum interval of 1 metre and maximum internal dilution of 3 metres · High grade intersections indicated by use of bold font are calculated using 2 g/t gold cutoff with a maximum of 3 metres internal dilution
· The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	· Not applicable
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	· These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.	·
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	· 'True width' is estimated for wider intersections from the interpreted dip of the intersected mineralisation and the declination of the drill hole.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').	·
Diagrams	· Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	· Refer to figures in the body of the text
Balanced reporting	· Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	· All intercepts of gold mineralisation over 0.2 g/t are provided in the report.
Other substantive exploration data	· Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	·
Further work	· The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	· Screen fire assays are in progress on all samples greater than 2g/t Au. Other future work is yet to be determined.

*A Private Investor is a recipient of the information who meets all of the conditions set out below, the recipient:

Obtains access to the information in a personal capacity;
Is not required to be regulated or supervised by a body concerned with the regulation or supervision of investment or financial services;
Is not currently registered or qualified as a professional securities trader or investment adviser with any national or state exchange, regulatory authority, professional association or recognised professional body;
Does not currently act in any capacity as an investment adviser, whether or not they have at some time been qualified to do so;
Uses the information solely in relation to the management of their personal funds and not as a trader to the public or for the investment of corporate funds;
Does not distribute, republish or otherwise provide any information or derived works to any third party in any manner or use or process information or derived works for any commercial purposes.

Please note, this site uses cookies. Some of the cookies are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but if you do, parts of the site may not work. To find out more about the cookies used on Investegate and how you can manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy

To continue using Investegate, please confirm that you are a private investor as well as agreeing to our Privacy and Cookie Policy & Terms.

Mick Billing	+61 (8) 7324 1935	Thor Mining PLC	Executive Chairman
Allan Burchard	+61 (8) 7324 1935	Thor Mining PLC	CFO/Company Secretary
Colin Aaronson/ David Hignell	+44 (0) 207 383 5100	Grant Thornton UK LLP	Nominated Adviser
Nick Emerson/ Renato Rufus	+44 (0) 1483 413500	SI Capital Limited	Broker
Alex Walters	+44 (0) 7771 713608 +44 (0) 207 839 9260	Cadogan PR	Financial PR

Hole id	North GDA	East GDA	RL GDA	Azimuth	Dip	Hole Depth (m)	From (m)	Drill Interval (m)	True Width (rounded)	Au g/t

SHRC253	8493975	794215	241	-	90	103	18	1		1.80
							82	21	*	7.21
						including	88	2	*	3.59
						and	93	10	*	14.07

SHRC254	8494017	794234	263	055	55	43	0	3		0.35
							12	1		1.62
							18	4		0.61
							26	4		0.95
							32	9		0.42

SHRC255	8494195	794028	237	055	55	55	0	3		0.76
							22	2		2.42
							35	11		1.21
						including	42	2		4.02

SHRC256	8494307	794207	273	055	55	60	22	3		1.08
							79	2		0.66

SHRC257	8494433	794306	267	055	55	55	0	13		0.35
							22	5	4	4.07
						including	22	4	3	5.03

SHRC258	8494374	794213	272	263	68	163	10	1		0.71
							54	10		1.71
						including	56	3	2.5	4.32
							91	2		0.27
							94	2		0.25
							116	3		0.33
							128	7		0.34
							148	7		0.47

SHRC259	8494290	794217	281	055	55	55	51	2		0.36

Companies

UK 100

Latest directors dealings