Bonya - High grade tungsten results confirmed

Hole ID	Easting (GDA94 zone 53)	Northing (GDA94 zone 53)	Elevation (m ASL)	Azi -muth	Dip	Hole depth (m)	Intersection	Estimated true width (m)
Tashkent
19RC001	616930	7488325	355	49.9	-59.3	40	2m @ 0.35%WO3 from 16m 2m @ 0.21%WO3 from 20m	1 1
19RC002	616913	7488309	360	51.9	-52	66	3m @ 0.12%WO3 from 55m	1.5
19RC003	616868	7488375	366	50.1	-60.7	40	No significant intercept
19RC004	616853	7488356	368	42.1	-55.1	60	No significant intercept
19RC005	616837	7488392	368	44.2	-59.6	40	3m @ 0.39%WO3 from 18m	1.5
19RC006	616819	7488370	370	43.3	-52.3	60	No significant intercept
19RC007	616789	7488425	370	50.9	-55.7	40	No significant intercept
Jericho
19RC008	614467	7489484	383	68.1	-54.3	40	1m @ 0.22%WO3 from 17m	1
19RC009	614466	7489482	383	79.9	-78.4	60	3m @ 0.31%WO3 from 31m 2m @ 0.46% Cu from 32m 4m @ 0.23%WO3 from 35m	1.5 1 2
19RC010	614489	7489449	380	65.1	-53.2	40	No significant intercept
19RC011	614488	7489447	380	76.3	-79.4	60	No significant intercept
19RC012	614509	7489412	379	63.4	-59.4	40	No significant intercept
19RC013	614507	7489413	379	52.4	-77.4	60	No significant intercept
White Violet
19RC014	609754	7486033	409	206.5	-54.6	60	No significant intercept
19RC015	609764	7486047	410	206	-58.9	60	No significant intercept
19RC016	609768	7486056	409	209	-63	78	No significant intercept
19RC017	609734	7486034	422	211.4	-60	66	1m @ 0.2%WO3 from 45m	1
19RC018	609736	7486044	421	208.9	-60.3	108	1m @ 0.13%WO3 from 71m 3m @ 0.16%WO3 from 80m 10m @0.15% WO3 & 0.38% Cu fr 87m	0.5 1.5 6
19RC019	609739	7486056	420	198.6	-58.1	108	3m @ 0.16%WO3 from 79m	2
19RC020	609684	7486043	403	204.1	-56.7	90	27m @ 0.29%WO3 from 35m including 16m @0.31% Cu from 43m 7m @ 0.20%WO3 from 67m	20 12 4
19RC021	609690	7486054	403	206.9	-57.7	108	12m @ 0.67%WO3 from 46m 25m @ 0.39%WO3 from 63m 5m @ 0.1%WO3 from 96m	30
19RC022	609697	7486063	403	202.8	-57.7	120	29m @ 0.70%WO3 from 81m including 13m at 1.13%WO3 fr 91m	20
19RC023	609712	7485992	401	5.8	-56.4	60	No significant intercept	-
Samarkand
19RC024	612011	7485446	422	51.7	-60.5	60	No significant intercept
19RC025	612031	7485459	421	55.1	-59	100	3m @ 0.34% WO3 from 40m 2m @0.50% WO3 from 52m 3m @ 0.08%WO3 from 60m 2m @ 0.12%WO3 from 73m	1.5 1 1.5 1
19RC026	612052	7485478	420	47.7	-60.9	60	13m @ 0.48%WO3 from 19m	7
19RC027	612055	7485480	419	45.9	-59	40	3m @ 0.27% WO3 from 7m	1.5
19RC028	612046	7485433	415	56.6	-55.6	120	8m @ 0.45% WO3 from 38m	5
19RC029	612078	7485355	435	42.2	-55.1	60	5m @ 0.36% Cu from 9m including 2m @ 0.23% WO3 1m @ 0.7% Cu and 0.1% WO3 fr 24m 5m 0.52% Cu from 44m	3 1 0.5 3
19RC030	612088	7485364	435	54.7	-59	120	13m @ 0.27% Cu from 4m including 7m @ 0.11% WO3 from 10m 12m @ 0.77% Cu from 22m including 4m @ 0.09% WO3 from 28m 9m @0.74% WO3 from 64 m including 2m @ 0.2% Cu from 69m 5m @ 0.3% WO3 and 0.52% Cu fr 99m	7 4 7 2.5 5 1 3
19RC031	612103	7485382	431	54.8	-60	60	7m @0.44% Cu from 25m 1m @ 0.16% WO3 from 39m 2m @0.24% Cu from 57m	4 0.5 1
19RC032	612110	7485390	429	55.2	-62.1	60	1m @ 0.44% Cu from 7m 7m @ 1.23% Cu from 37m including 2m @ 0.09% WO3 from 41m	0.5 4 1
	Bonya drilling April 2019 significant assay intercepts with estimated true widths

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	· Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. · Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. · Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. · In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	Reverse Circulation drilling with face sampling hammer was used to obtain one metre interval samples. All samples were dry. Subsamples of approximately 2-3kg were taken from each interval using rotary splitter for indicative portable XRF analysis and follow up laboratory analysis where appropriate. Chip tray samples were collected, logged and photographed. Industry standard QAQC protocol was adopted with reference material inserted at approximately 1 in 20.
Drilling techniques	· Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	Reverse circulation drilling with face sampling hammer.
Drill sample recovery	· Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. · Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. · Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	Visual estimate was used to gauge overall sample recoveries. Reasonable sample recovery was obtained after the initial collar sample. Sample recoveries were consistent across different rock units.
Logging	· Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. · Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. · The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	Hole cuttings were logged geologically and photographed for the entire length of each hole. Mineralised and unmineralised zones were easily determined from geological observations.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation	· If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. · If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. · For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. · Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. · Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. · Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	Subsamples for independent laboratory analyses were taken by Rotary splitter - all samples were dry. Sample size of 2-3kg is appropriate for RC samples with a maximum particle size of 6mm. For preliminary XRF determination not to be used for resource estimation - a further subsample of 30g was taken which is not considered representative.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	· The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. · For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. · Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	Industry standard sample preparation finishing with sample pulverisation to 80% passing 75µm. Preliminary analysis via mixed four acid digest with ICP-OES. Samples with initial tungsten results >0.1% have follow up assay by peroxide fusion and ICP-MS. The technique is considered appropriate for the analyte suite. Industry standard QA/QC protocol is implemented in the assay process.
Verification of sampling and assaying	· The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. · The use of twinned holes. · Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. · Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Significant intersections reported correspond with visual indications in samples. No further independent verification has been undertaken.
Location of data points	· Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. · Specification of the grid system used. · Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	Hand held GPS - accuracy is within +/- 2m horizontally and 5m vertically. Grid system used is GDA94, zone 53.
Data spacing and distribution	· Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. · Whether sample compositing has been applied.	Drill spacing was variable for this program. Infill and extensional drilling will be undertaken before resource estimation is undertaken. 40 metre spaced sections with 25 metre spaced hole intercepts is considered appropriate for this style of mineralisation. No resource or reserve is being reported. Samples have not been composited.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	· Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. · If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	Hole orientations are appropriately for the orientation of target mineralised zones. Estimated true widths are stated.
Sample security	· The measures taken to ensure sample security.	The project is located in a remote region. No unauthorised company personnel visited the site during operations. Assay samples were collected from each hole immediately after drilling. Samples were transported for safe storage at a base camp before being securely packaged for transport to the laboratory. All submitted assay samples were receipted by the laboratory.
Audits or reviews	· The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	None

Companies

Thor Energy (THR)

UK 100

Latest directors dealings

1 day ago Savannah Energy
1 day ago Buccaneer Energy PLC
1 day ago Savannah Energy
1 day ago Carclo
1 day ago Schroder Japan Growth Fund

All directors dealings today

Costean ID	Easting GDA94 zone 53)	Northing GDA94 zone 53)	Elevation (m ASL)	Azi -muth	Dip	Sample length (m)	Significant Intersection	Estimated true width (m)
Marrakech
19MC01	607782	7491012	461	025		33	No significant intersection
19MC02	607752	7490979	469	348		55	No significant intersection
Tashkent
19TC01	616925	7488345	371	050	0	12	3m @ 0.29%WO3 from 3m	3
19TC02	616887	7488368	374	047	0	13	No significant intersection
19TC03	616849	7488393	377	043	0	11	2m @ 0.13%WO3 from 6m	2
19TC04	616819	7488421	382	049	0	10	No significant intersection
	Bonya costean sampling April 2019 significant assay intercepts with estimated true widths

Mick Billing	+61 (8) 7324 1935	Thor Mining PLC	Executive Chairman
Ray Ridge	+61 (8) 7324 1935	Thor Mining PLC	CFO/Company Secretary
Colin Aaronson/ Richard Tonthat/ Ben Roberts	+44 (0) 207 383 5100	Grant Thornton UK LLP	Nominated Adviser
Nick Emerson	+44 (0) 1483 413 500	SI Capital Ltd	Joint Broker
David Hignell / Rob Rees	+44 (0) 20 3470 0470	SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP	Joint Broker
Tim Blythe/ Camilla Horsfall	+44 (0) 207 138 3222	Blytheweigh	Financial PR