More encouraging results in third batch of assays

Hole ID	Prospect	Hole Type	Tot Depth (m)		Easting	Northing	RL	Dip	Azimuth
25GRADD048	Grandão	DD	128.25		601650	4607783	567	-50	190
25GRADD049	Grandão	DD	120.7		601516	4607909	507	-50	230
25GRARC134*	Grandão	RC	30		601928	4607805	578	-90	0
25GRARC135*	Grandão	RC	50		601889	4607672	587	-90	0
25GRARC136*	Grandão	RC	40		601884	4607651	595	-90	0
25GRARC137*	Grandão	RC	80		601772	4607635	606	-90	0
25GRARC138*	Grandão	RC	80		601776	4607634	606	-60	90
25GRARC139*	Grandão	RC	84		601803	4607696	577	-90	0
25GRARC140*	Grandão	RCDD	28.6		601817	4607719	562	-90	0
25GRARC141*	Grandão	RC	90		601787	4607763	551	-72	90
25GRARC142	Grandão	RCDD	49		601734	4607675	596	-60	90
25GRARC143	Grandão	RCDD	50		601732	4607675	597	-90	0
25GRARC144*	Grandão	RC	170		601730	4607716	582	-70	90
25GRARC145	Grandão	RC	142		601729	4607716	582	-90	0
25GRARC146	Grandão	RCDD	122.25		601634	4608025	504	-60	120
25GRARC147*	Grandão	RC	141		601742	4608055	539	-65	45
25GRARC148	Grandão	RC	128.25		601650	4607783	568	-50	190
25GRARC149	Grandão	RC	120.70		601517	4607910	507	-50	230
25PNRDD009*	Pinheiro	DD	84.85		601594	4606830	580	-60	270
25PNRDD010	Pinheiro	DD	110.35		601590	4606831	584	-57	215
25PNRDD011*	Pinheiro	DD	120.75		601583	4606909	575	-50	263
25PNRDD012	Pinheiro	DD	101.2		601579	4606910	575	-50	63
25PNRDD013*	Pinheiro	DD	124.9		601399	4606803	538	-60	90
25PNRDD014	Pinheiro	DD	111.8		601414	4606856	561	-50	185
25PNRDD015*	Pinheiro	DD	126.8		601598	4607011	583	-50	310
25PNRDD016	Pinheiro	DD	108.3		601399	4606802	538	-50	110
25PNRDD017	Pinheiro	DD	100.1		601599	4607011	583	-62	310
25PNRDD018	Pinheiro	DD	179.55		601637	4606994	572	-55	230
25PNRRC026*	Pinheiro	RCDD	120		601607	4606920	573	-70	270
25PNRRC027*	Pinheiro	RC	100		601578	4606879	581	-90	0
25PNRRC028*	Pinheiro	RCDD	94.3		601577	4606879	581	-80	270
25PNRRC029*	Pinheiro	RC	70		601575	4606878	581	-60	270
25PNRRC030*	Pinheiro	RC	70		601430	4606800	554	-60	90
25PNRRC031*	Pinheiro	RCDD	128.55		601599	4607010	583	-60	245
25PNRRC032*	Pinheiro	RC	100		601639	4607036	584	-60	270
25PNRRC033	Pinheiro	RCDD	131.5		601636	4606995	573	-60	270
25PNRRC034*	Pinheiro	RC	85		601664	4607061	591	-60	270
25PNRRC035*	Pinheiro	RC	110		601589	4606977	572	-60	270
25RESDD015	Reservatório	DD	150,80		599507	4609100	615	-50	222
25RESDD016	Reservatório	DD	90,80		599869	4609271	577	-50	350
25RESRC046*	Reservatório	RCDD	184.8		599583	4609279	639	-80	150
25RESRC047*	Reservatório	RCDD	178.7		599585	4609275	639	-65	150
25RESRC048*	Reservatório	RCDD	186.5		599498	4609187	641	-90	0
25RESRC049*	Reservatório	RCDD	174		599500	4609184	641	-70	150
25RESRC050*	Reservatório	RCDD	140.1		599520	4609147	631	-63	150
25RESRC051*	Reservatório	RCDD	160.4		599618	4609287	620	-80	150
25RESRC052*	Reservatório	RCDD	158.8		599620	4609285	619	-70	150
25RESRC053*	Reservatório	RC	111		599695	4609242	613	-90	0
25RESRC054*	Reservatório	RCDD	150.4		599656	4609309	604	-90	0
25RESRC055*	Reservatório	RCDD	105		599657	4609306	604	-70	150
25RESRC056*	Reservatório	RCDD	88		599913	4609253	577	-80	0
25RESRC057*	Reservatório	RC	88		599915	4609247	577	-60	140
25RESRC058*	Reservatório	RCDD	96		599710	4609302	593	-80	150
25RESRC059*	Reservatório	RC	100		599950	4609211	586	-60	150
25RESRC060*	Reservatório	RC	147		599712	4609299	593	-60	150
25RESRC061*	Reservatório	RC	120		599783	4609267	588	-70	310
25RESRC062*	Reservatório	RC	120		599784	4609266	588	-90	0
25RESRC063*	Reservatório	RC	67		599934	4609230	581	-60	150
25RESRC064*	Reservatório	RC	55		599970	4609238	575	-60	150
25RESRC065*	Reservatório	RC	140		599503	4609102	617	-60	150
25RESRC066*	Reservatório	RC	70		599970	4609241	575	-80	0
25RESRC067*	Reservatório	RCDD	160.8		599481	4609136	628	-65	150
25RESRC068*	Reservatório	RC	94		599968	4609241	575	-60	340
25RESRC069*	Reservatório	RC	91		599901	4609215	594	-60	150
25RESRC070*	Reservatório	RC	100		599888	4609236	589	-60	150
25RESRC071*	Reservatório	RCDD	143		599480	4609138	628	-75	150
25RESRC072*	Reservatório	RC	85		599889	4609238	589	-90	0
25RESRC073*	Reservatório	RCDD	177.25		599479	4609139	628	-85	150
25RESRC074*	Reservatório	RC	90		599586	4609050	607	-60	150
25RESRC075*	Reservatório	RCDD	85		599863	4609275	579	-70	150
25RESRC076*	Reservatório	RC	100		599568	4609080	614	-60	150
25RESRC077*	Reservatório	RC	105		599566	4609082	614	-80	150
25RESRC078*	Reservatório	RCDD	91		599863	4609276	579	-90	0
25RESRC079*	Reservatório	RC	121		599733	4609259	603	-60	150
25RESRC080*	Reservatório	RC	122		599800	4609219	606	-60	150
25RESRC081*	Reservatório	RC	133		599799	4609221	606	-90	0
25RESRC082*	Reservatório	RC	147		599801	4609224	606	-70	330
25RESRC083*	Reservatório	RC	107		599852	4609221	600	-60	150
25RESRC084*	Reservatório	RC	111		599852	4609222	600	-90	0
25RESRC085	Reservatório	RC	160	599710	4609308	597	-80	330
25RESRC086	Reservatório	RC	109.80	599710	4609303	594	-80	150
25RESRC087	Reservatório	RC	109	599826	4609268	584	-60	150
25RESRC088	Reservatório	RC	116	599827	4609270	585	-80	150
25RESRC089	Reservatório	RC	120	599827	4609271	585	-75	330
25RESRC090	Reservatório	RC	153	599827	4609271	585	-55	330
25RESRC091	Reservatório	RC	108	599862	4609278	576	-70	330

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	· Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. · Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. · Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	· The majority of previous holes were reverse circulation, sampled at 1m intervals. RC samples were collected in large plastic bags attached to the cyclone. On completion of the 1m run the large sample was passed through a 3-stage riffle splitter to collect a 2.5-4kg sub sample, to be used for assay. · Diamond holes were completed for metallurgical sampling, geotechnical analysis and resource estimation. Core was PQ/HQ size, sampled at 1m intervals in the pegmatite, with boundaries sampled to geological boundaries. Half core samples were collected for analysis. · Drilling was carried out to infill previous drilling to achieve a nominal 40m by 40m spacing with selected infill to 40m by 20m spacings, or as twins of previous RC drilling to get known samples for metallurgical testing. Geotechnical drilling was designed purely to intersect planned pit walls and pegmatite intersections were incidental, but followed all standard logging and sampling in line with all the drilling. · Collar surveys are carried using differential DGPS with an accuracy to within 0.2m. · A down hole survey for each hole was completed using gyro equipment. · The lithium mineralisation is predominantly in the form of Spodumene-bearing pegmatites, the pegmatites are unzoned and vary in thickness from 5m-109m.
Drilling techniques	· Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	• RC drilling used a 120mm diameter face sampling hammer. · Core drilling was carried out using PQ/HQ single tube core barrels.
Drill sample recovery	· Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. · Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. · Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	· RC drilling sample weights were monitored to ensure samples were maximised. Samples were carefully loaded into a splitter and split in the same manner ensuring that the sample split to be sent to the assay laboratories were in the range of 4-6kg. · Core recovery was measured and was found to be generally excellent. · No obvious relationships between sample recovery and grade.
Logging	· Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. · Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. · The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	· RC holes were logged in the field at the time of sampling. Core was logged in detail for a variety of physical characteristics in a logging yard away from the drilling · Each 1m sample interval was carefully homogenised and assessed for lithology, colour, grainsize, structure and mineralisation. Core was sampled to geological boundaries and at 1m intervals therein. · A representative chip sample produced from RC drilling was washed and taken for each 1m sample and stored in a chip tray which was photographed. · Percussion holes were logged for every metre drilled with the spoil collected for each metre by shovel and placed in a sample bag, a representative sub sample was taken and logged for lithology, colour, grainsize and mineralisation. · Core was photographed.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation	· If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. · If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. · For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. · Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. · Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. · Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	· 1m RC samples were split by the riffle splitter at the drill rig and sampled dry. · Core was cut in half using a diamond saw with 1m half core samples submitted for analysis or for metallurgical samples one of the halves was cut again for a quarter core and sent for analysis. · The sampling was conducted using industry standard techniques and were considered appropriate. · Field duplicates were used to test repeatability of the sub-sampling and were found to be satisfactory. · Every effort was made to ensure that the samples were representative and not biased in any way.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	· The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. · For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. · Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.	· Samples were received, sorted, labelled, and dried. · Samples were crushed to 70% less than 2mm, riffle split off 250g, pulverise split to better than 85% passing 75 microns and 5g was split of for assaying. · The samples were analysed using ALS Laboratories ME-MS89L Super Trace method which combines a sodium peroxide fusion with ICP-MS instrumentation utilising collision/reaction cell technologies to provide the lowest detection limits available. · A prepared sample (0.2g) is added to sodium peroxide flux, mixed well and then fused in at 670°C. The resulting melt is cooled and then dissolved in 30% hydrochloric acid. This solution is then analysed by ICP-MS and the results are corrected for spectral inter-element interferences. · The final solution is then analysed by ICP-MS, with results corrected for spectral inter-element interferences. · Standards/blanks and duplicates were inserted on a 1:20 ratio for both to samples taken. · Duplicate sample regime is used to monitor sampling methodology and homogeneity. · Routine QA/QC controls for the method ME-MS89L include blanks, certified reference standards of Lithium and duplicate samples. Samples are assayed within runs or batches up to 150 samples. At the fusion stage that quality control samples are included together with the samples, so all samples follow the same procedure until the end. Fused and diluted samples are prepared for ICP-MS analysis. ICP instrument is calibrated through appropriate certified standards solutions and interference corrections to achieve strict calibration fitting parameters. Each 40-sample run is assayed with two blanks, two certified standards and one duplicate sample and results are evaluated accordingly. · A QA/QC review of all information indicated that all assays were satisfactory.
Verification of sampling and assaying	· The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. · The use of twinned holes. · Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. · Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	· All information was internally audited by company personnel. · During this programme no holes were twinned. · Savannah's experienced project geologists supervised all processes. · All field data is entered into a custom log sheet and then into excel spreadsheets (supported by look-up tables) at site and subsequently validated as it is imported into the centralised Access database. · Hard copies of logs, survey and sampling data are stored in the local office and electronic data is stored on the company's cloud drive. · Results were reported as Li (ppm) and were converted to a percentage by dividing by 10,000 and then to Li₂O% by multiplying by 2.153.
Location of data points	· Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. · Specification of the grid system used. · Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	· The coordinate of each drill hole was taken at the time of collecting using a handheld GPS with an accuracy of 5m. All collars were subsequently surveyed using DGPS with an accuracy of 0.2m. · The grid system used is WSG84 Zone29N. · An accurate, aerial topographic survey was obtained with accuracy of +/- 0.5m.
Data spacing and distribution	· Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. · Whether sample compositing has been applied.	· Drilling was carried out on an infill basis to attain on a nominal 40m by 40m and based on geological targets with selected infill to 40m by 20m. · Drill data is considered of sufficient spacing to define Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource in accordance with requirements for a DFS · Compositing to 1m will be applied prior to resource estimation.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	· Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. · If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	· Drilling was generally carried out using angled holes, as close to perpendicular to strike as possible. All Geotech holes were drilled in various orientations to intersect planned pit walls. According to the expert (GGC - Consultants) requirements.
Sample security	· The measures taken to ensure sample security.	· Samples were delivered to a courier and chain of custody is managed by Savannah.
Audits or reviews	· The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	· Internal company auditing based on previous programmes is carried out and an external review will be carried out by the resource consultant to assure that all data collection and QA/QC procedures were conducted to industry standards.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	· Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. · The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the area.	· All work was completed inside the Mina do Barroso project C-100. · Savannah has received written confirmation from the DGEG that under article 24 of Decree-Law no. 88/90 of March 16 being relevant justification based on the resources allocated exploited and intended, Savannah has been approved an expansion up to 250m of C100 mining concession in specific areas where a resource has been defined and the requirement for the expansion can be justified. · The entire Phase 2 includes a total of 117 drill holes. The surface access was granted by an administrative easement right defined in the C-100 mining contract, 95 of the drill holes were included in a first easement process, and the remaining 22 were subject to second easement that is still in progress.
Exploration done by other parties	· Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	· Limited exploration work has been carried out by previous operators. · No historic information has been included in the Mineral Resource estimates.
Geology	· Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	· The lithium mineralisation is predominantly in the form of Spodumene-bearing pegmatites which are hosted in meta-pelitic and mica schists, and occasionally carbonate schists of upper Ordovician to lower Devonian age. The pegmatites vary in thickness from 5m-109m. The pegmatites occur within the license area as discrete bodies and currently four pegmatite bodies have a resource defined on them. The pegmatites vary in orientation from large shallow dipping bodies, such as the north - south striking Grandão and the east - west trending Reservatório to steeply dipping dyke like bodies seen at NOA and Pinheiro.
Drill hole information	· A summary of all information material to the under-standing of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: · easting and northing of the drill hole collar · elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar · dip and azimuth of the hole · down hole length and interception depth · hole length · If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	· A table containing all drill holes drilled and a list of significant assays from the results received is included with the release. · No material data has been excluded from the release. .
Data aggregation methods	· In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. · Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. · The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	· Length weighted average grades have been reported. · No high-grade cuts have been applied to reported grades. · Metal equivalent values are not being reported; however, Li is reported as ppm and converted to the oxide Li₂O for resource purposes. The conversion factor used is to divide the Li value by 10,000 and multiplying by 2.153 to represent the value as a percentage.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	· These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. · If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. · If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known').	· The majority of holes have been drilled at angles to intersect the mineralisation in perpendicular relation to the pegmatite
Diagrams	· Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	· A relevant plan showing the drilling is included within this release.
Balanced Reporting	· Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	· All relevant results available have been previously reported.
Other substantive exploration data	· Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	· Geological mapping and rock chip sampling has been conducted over the project area.
Further work	· The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large- scale step-out drilling). · Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	· The present drill programme has been designed to infill previous drilling to attain a measured or indicated class for an upcoming resource estimation. Further work is being planned as part of a second phase of resource infill drilling. · Economic evaluation of the defined Mineral Resources, will be completed after the second phase of drilling.

Companies

Savannah Resources (SAV)

UK 100

Latest directors dealings

6 hours ago ASOS
6 hours ago MJ Gleeson
6 hours ago Rolls-Royce Holdings
7 hours ago Crest Nicholson Holdings
7 hours ago Naked Wines

All directors dealings today

More encouraging results in third batch of assays

The Company is listed and regulated on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange and trades under the ticker "SAV".APPENDIX 1: Drill hole locations of Completed Phase 2 RC and Diamond Resource Holes (* with assays)

APPENDIX 2 - Summary of Significant Intercepts from the diamond drilling using a 0.5% Li₂O Cutoff.

APPENDIX 3 - JORC 2012 Table 1 - DFS Infill Drilling

Companies

UK 100

Latest directors dealings

Hole ID	Prospect	From	To	Width	Li20
25GRARC144	Grandão	65	72	7	1.38
and	Grandão	104	114	10	0.82
and	Grandão	126	139	13	0.92
25GRARC145	Grandão	50	62	12	0.79
and	Grandão	88	90	2	0.95
and	Grandão	103	107	4	1.24
and	Grandão	111	134	23	1.55
25GRARC146	Grandão	60	75	15	0.98
25GRARC147	Grandão	13	19	6	0.97
and	Grandão	23	27	4	1.03
and	Grandão	30	41	11	0.97
and	Grandão	68	72	4	0.51
and	Grandão	77	80	3	0.5
and	Grandão	115	118	3	0.61
25PNRDD015	Pinheiro	14	29	15	0.7
and	Pinheiro	32	43	11	0.81
and	Pinheiro	50	69	19	1.25
and	Pinheiro	73	120	47	1.29
25PNRDD016	Pinheiro	64.6	68.55	3.95	1.34
and	Pinheiro	71.25	76	4.75	1.07
25PNRRC034	Pinheiro	15	58	43	1.24
and	Pinheiro	70	78	8	0.66
25PNRRC035	Pinheiro	46	76	30	1.5
and	Pinheiro	81	84	3	0.71
25RESRC052**	Reservatório	124	139	15	0.77
and	Reservatório	144	149	5	1.09
25RESRC061	Reservatório	86	102	16	1.25
25RESRC062	Reservatório	72	98	26	1.1
25RESRC063	Reservatório	35	38	3	1.04
and	Reservatório	42	44	2	0.86
25RESRC066	Reservatório	30	60	30	1.26
25RESRC067	Reservatório	127	131	4	1.38
25RESRC068	Reservatório	49	75	26	1.33
25RESRC069	Reservatório	16	19	3	0.88
and	Reservatório	29	46	17	1.31
and	Reservatório	69	83	14	1.07
25RESRC070	Reservatório	41	79	38	1.67
25RESRC071	Reservatório	30	33	3	0.9
and	Reservatório	125	138	13	1.43
and	Reservatório	141	143	2	0.76
25RESRC072	Reservatório	64	67	3	0.9
and	Reservatório	73	78	5	0.93
25RESRC073	Reservatório	30	33	3	1.02
and	Reservatório	133	140	7	1.47
25RESRC074	Reservatório	65	73	8	0.89
25RESRC075	Reservatório	66	70	4	1.52
25RESRC076	Reservatório	63	68	5	0.8
and	Reservatório	74	80	6	1.03
and	Reservatório	83	91	8	1.04
25RESRC077	Reservatório	62	68	6	0.83
and	Reservatório	72	75	3	0.81
and	Reservatório	78	80	2	0.82
and	Reservatório	85	91	6	0.94
25RESRC078*	Reservatório	Waiting for results from diamond tail
25RESRC079	Reservatório	61	76	15	1.01
and	Reservatório	82	87	5	0.76
and	Reservatório	109	115	6	0.75
25RESRC080	Reservatório	42	70	28	1.17
and	Reservatório	96	105	9	0.86
25RESRC081	Reservatório	48	68	20	0.84
and	Reservatório	92	105	13	0.9
and	Reservatório	121	124	3	1.18
25RESRC082	Reservatório	53	58	5	1.02
and	Reservatório	89	94	5	1.03
and	Reservatório	100	121	21	1.19
and	Reservatório	124	137	13	0.79
25RESRC083	Reservatório	23	26	3	0.97
and	Reservatório	82	100	18	1.1
25RESRC084	Reservatório	71	102	31	1.23

More encouraging results in third batch of assays

The Company is listed and regulated on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange and trades under the ticker "SAV".APPENDIX 1: Drill hole locations of Completed Phase 2 RC and Diamond Resource Holes (* with assays)

APPENDIX 2 - Summary of Significant Intercepts from the diamond drilling using a 0.5% Li2O Cutoff.

APPENDIX 3 - JORC 2012 Table 1 - DFS Infill Drilling

Companies

UK 100

Latest directors dealings

APPENDIX 2 - Summary of Significant Intercepts from the diamond drilling using a 0.5% Li₂O Cutoff.