Final Results
Panther Securities PLC
16 June 2000
Results for the year ended 31st December 1999
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
Introduction
I am pleased to present the results for the year ended 31st December 1999.
Pre-tax profits were £2,056,000 compared to £3,236,000 for the year ended 31st
December 1998. The results achieved are lower than those of last year, but it
should be borne in mind that the 1998 results included the benefit of the
profit on sale of our largest investment property whilst the current year
bears the cost of approximately £550,000 in arranging and consolidating our
new term loan, which is mentioned later in my report.
Main Events
In January 1999 we received a reverse premium of £812,875 in respect of
dilapidations and the surrender of various leases in our office building at
Elmbank Chambers, Glasgow. We were originally intending to refurbish the
property and re-let the premises but are currently offering the freehold for
sale on the open market.
In June 1999 we acquired Northstar Properties Limited, Northstar Property
Investment Limited and Northstar Land Limited. The Northstar portfolio of
properties, which was valued for the transaction at £8,000,000, produces a
rental income of £960,000 per annum. When we acquired these companies, we
assumed existing bank loans of £5,560,000 and our actual cash outlay was
approximately £2,260,000. This portfolio is performing to expectations.
In July 1999 we sold 348 City Road, London for £375,000 which was 25% above
its March 1999 valuation.
In August 1999 we sold 9-11 St James Street, Nottingham for £1,100,000. This
property was vacant and had been in poor condition for some time, yet the sale
price was 26% in excess of the March 1999 valuation.
In October 1999, after extensive refurbishment, we let 11,800 sq ft of offices
at Neil House, Whitechapel Road, London E1 at a rent of £10 per sq ft, which
is double the original rental value when we acquired the property in 1994.
This letting gave an immediate saving of approximately £50,000 per annum in
terms of vacant rates and service charges previously borne by the company.
Panther House Redevelopment
As I mentioned in my interim statement, we have had to revise our proposals
for the redevelopment of our entire site following the local council's
classification of Panther House, which occupies approximately half of the
total site, as a building of special interest in a newly designated
conservation area.
We have already received planning permission for an extensive refurbishment of
Panther House with a two floor extension. This permission is valid and
remains unaffected by the conservation area limitations. The permission
provides for a building with a gross floor area of 64,000 sq ft with a net
floor area of 43,500 sq ft of office space. As the Grays Inn Road frontage
contains no buildings of special interest, a new building is also being
planned which could be linked to Panther House when refurbished.
This revised scheme is taking longer than I would have liked, but it should
eventually produce an acceptable proposal for the overall site. The
Holborn/Clerkenwell area is one of the most sought after areas in London and
we have a number of parties who have indicated interest in acquiring this
development site. We are currently considering these proposals with our
agents.
Bristol Redevelopment
In my interim statement I also mentioned that we have upgraded the scheme for
our property at Bristol. The final size of the scheme has expanded and is now
intended to comprise 100,000 sq ft, split as follows: 70,000 sq ft for a
superstore with 400 car parking spaces, 20,000 sq ft mixed-use smaller units
with some residential and 10,000 sq ft of community facilities which include a
library/advice centre and meeting rooms. We hold a long lease on nearly half
the site containing the majority of the existing shopping centre. The
freehold of the site and the remaining area is owned by the local authority.
I am pleased to say that we have received provisional planning permission.
Due to the size of the scheme however there is a possibility that it could be
called in for consideration by the Department of the Environment, although we
are advised that this is unlikely because it is a brownfield site and our
scheme does not significantly change the existing use of the site. Our
proposals have the enthusiastic support of both the local authority and local
community, who were closely consulted during all stages of the planning
process.
We have a few outside interests to acquire to enable the scheme to proceed,
but as we have the co-operation of the local authority with its extensive
facilitating powers we feel that in due course this scheme will proceed and
could be very profitable for our group.
Wynnstay Properties PLC
Between October and December 1999 we increased our percentage shareholding in
the ordinary shares of Wynnstay from 25% to 29.8%, which is just below the
level at which a takeover bid becomes obligatory.
Whilst we have built up our stake over the last few years at a significant
discount to Wynnstay's stated net asset value, the company has produced only a
modest performance in what have undoubtedly been extremely good years for the
property industry. By way of example if we compare the period since we
obtained our full listing in July 1994 and based on the audited results for
the year ended 31st December 1993 as tabulated in the listing document, our
net asset value has increased from almost £1 per share to £1.88 per share, an
88% appreciation. Since March 1994 Wynnstay's net asset value per share has
declined from £2.12 to £2.07 per share as at March 1999 - a decline of 2%!
We were concerned at this and requisitioned an Extraordinary General Meeting
of Wynnstay requesting that the company liquidate its property portfolio with
a view to becoming a cash shell company, which could have significantly
improved prospects for all shareholders. Regretably, the shareholders turned
down our proposals, seemingly on the basis that the directors informed them
that they had a new strategy which was going to produce growth in the future.
The inherent problems associated with Wynnstay's small size and its
comparatively high management costs give me grave doubts that they will
succeed in their aims. We will continue to monitor closely Wynnstay's
management performance with the proper interest that a major shareholder
should have in its investment.
Other Investments
Since the year end we have invested approximately £1 million in shares in
quoted property companies where we will receive a dividend return equivalent
to the bank deposit interest currently foregone. This return comes from
companies where the dividends are well covered and the shares were purchased
at more than 50% discount to their underlying net asset value.
I find it surprising that sound, secure investment in property companies
should be so lowly rated on the Stock Market, whereas companies with no more
than a good idea (which could be copied) and a business plan can be valued at
vast sums and, even more surprisingly in my opinion, some institutions appear
to be reducing their exposure to safe and secure investments for the high risk
glamour industries. Only time will tell which course is correct but I see
that there has already been a substantial drop in the share prices of many
high tech companies and there is still very high volatility in this market.
For this reason alone I believe this decline has not yet ended.
Finance
In December 1999 we concluded a new seven year secured term loan with our main
lenders, HSBC Bank plc, amounting to £25,000,000 on more favourable terms than
previously enjoyed. The costs, (including legal and professional) and the
payment of interest penalties for early redemption on other loans, totalled
approximately £550,000. These costs, which are non-recurring, have been borne
in the year under review. This new loan has resulted in additional cash of
£5,000,000 which is available for investment.
Early in 2000 we instructed Donaldsons, Chartered Surveyors, to revalue the
Northstar properties, Panther House/Grays Inn Road and two other properties
where circumstances have significantly changed since they were last valued.
This produced a revaluation surplus of £3,734,000 and raises our net asset
value to 182.0p per share, which does not take account of the additional 6p
per share in stock property values in excess of their book value.
Warrants
In my Chairman's statement accompanying the interim results which were
announced on 29th October 1999, I indicated that the Board was proposing to
submit a resolution to shareholders and warrantholders at the next
shareholders' meeting to extend the life of the warrants. During the second
six months of the financial year to 31st December 1999, your Company's net
asset value per share has risen to 188p (including an estimated additional 6p
per share of unrealised surplus in trading stock) compared to 168p at 30th
June 1999.
Your Board has been advised that, under the circumstances, to extend the life
of the warrants, which have an exercise price of 140p per share, by a further
three years could represent a transfer of value from shareholders to
warrantholders and so we have therefore decided not to extend the life of the
warrants when they expire.
Dividends
An interim dividend of 2.5p per share was paid on 3rd December 1999 and we are
recommending a final dividend of 3.5p per share for the year ended 31st
December 1999. The total dividend for 1999 is held at the same rate as that
for 1998, when the dividend was increased by 50% above the previous year.
Prospects
The property market is still buoyant both in terms of value and tenant demand
and we are well positioned to take advantage of these circumstances. However,
I have previously expressed my concern about the Stock Market and the
potential repercussions on property companies should there be a severe Stock
Market downturn and, for this reason, we maintain a high level of cash to
enable us to take advantage of any special opportunities that may occur.
Taxation
Since 'New Labour' came to power in 1997 stamp duty on the purchase of all
residential and commercial properties has been raised on three occasions. It
is now 4% on all purchases over £500,000. This is an onerous and unfair
imposition which is already having a detrimental effect on the liquidity of
the market and commerce generally. It should be borne in mind that occupiers
and owners of commercial property pay approximately £15 billion in commercial
rates every year.
Due to the complex rules, property companies are often unable to fully recover
VAT. Development companies are often required, by increasingly tougher
legislation, to provide substantial community benefits, including some much
needed subsidised social housing, in return for the granting of planning
consent. It has been shown that a number of Councils have requested benefits
out of all proportion to the viability of a scheme, which results in
developments being shelved and thus leaving derelict sites which remain a
terrible scar on the landscape in our towns and countryside.
Finally, large shareholders or employee shareholders in companies that invest,
improve and develop properties, and subsequently retain them as investments,
are not treated on the same basis as other investors as they do not obtain the
favoured rates of tapered Capital Gains Tax announced in the last Budget.
This discriminating treatment of property companies is typically 'Old Labour'
policy. Taxation policy needs to be set by those with experience in the real
business world!
Malcolm Bloch
Malcolm Bloch retired from the Board and active business life on 31st March
2000 to live abroad. In a separate document to be enclosed with the
annual accounts we will set out our proposal to purchase his personal
shareholding of 1,065,307 Ordinary Shares for £1.20 each for cancellation,
which requires shareholder approval.Malcolm Bloch has been my business
partner and friend for over thirty-five years and we have jointly built up
this group. He has been a director since 1972 when we took over
Levers Optical Company Limited which became Panther Securities PLC in 1980.
All of us at Panther wish him well in his retirement and although we will
no longer have his full time services, we maintain regular
contact and he is always pleased to give advice. I will refer more
fully both to his retirement and to our proposal to purchase his
shares in the said document.
Finally, I would like to thank all our staff and professional advisers for the
wholehearted contribution they have given throughout the year.
Andrew S. Perloff
Chairman 15th June 2000
Date: 16th June 2000
For further information please contact:
Andrew Perloff, Chairman Panther Securities PLC 020-7278-8011
Simon Courtenay City Profile Group 020-7726-8588
e-mail: sc@profilecomms.co.uk
Peter Brookes City Profile Group 020-7726-8588
e-mail: pb@profilecomms.co.uk
CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
for the year ended 31st December 1999
Notes 1999 1999 1999 1998
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
Continuing
operations Acquisitions Total
Turnover 5,337 524 5,861 5,510
Cost of sales (941) (56) (997) (1,351)
------ ------ ------ ------
Gross profit 4,396 468 4,864 4,159
Administrative expenses (1,320) (26) (1,346) (763)
------ ------ ------ ------
Operating profit 3,076 442 3,518 3,396
Income from participating 64 - 64 80
interests
Profit on disposal of 153 - 153 1,079
property
------ ------ ------ ------
Profit on ordinary
activities before interest 3,293 442 3,735 4,555
Interest receivable 242 420
Interest payable (1,921) (1,739)
------ ------
Profit on ordinary
activities before taxation 2,056 3,236
Taxation (503) (1,514)
------ ------
Profit on ordinary
activities after taxation 1,553 1,722
Minority interests (9) (12)
------ ------
Profit attributable to
members of the parent
undertaking 1,544 1,710
Dividends 1 (1,085) (1,086)
------ ------
Retained profit for the 459 624
year
Transferred from 805 2,716
revaluation reserve
Purchase of own shares (41) -
Retained profit brought
forward 8,515 5,175
------ ------
Retained profit carried
forward 9,738 8,515
------ ------
Earnings per share
- basic 2 8.6p 9.5p
- diluted 7.8p 8.9p
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF TOTAL RECOGNISED
GAINS AND LOSSES
for the year ended 31st December 1999
1999 1998
£'000 £'000
Profit for the financial year after taxation 1,553 1,722
Unrealised surplus on revaluation of
properties and investments 3,892 3,840
------- -------
Total gains and losses relating to the year 5,445 5,562
------- -------
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
at 31st December 1999
1999 1998
£'000 £'000
Fixed assets
Tangible assets 51,136 40,198
Investments 1,707 1,269
------ ------
52,843 41,467
------ ------
Current assets
Stock 4,812 4,816
Debtors: due within one 788 1,078
year
Cash at bank and in hand 7,687 4,183
------ ------
13,287 10,077
------ ------
Creditors:
amounts falling due within (2,761) (4,000)
one year
------ ------
Net current assets 10,526 6,077
------ ------
Total assets less current 63,369 47,544
liabilities
Creditors:
amounts falling due after
more than one year (30,379) (18,913)
Minority interests (115) (131)
------ ------
Net assets 32,875 28,500
------ ------
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital 4,515 4,524
Share premium account 2,859 2,856
Revaluation reserve 14,384 11,297
Capital redemption reserve 281 271
Negative goodwill reserve 1,098 1,037
Profit and loss account 9,738 8,515
------ ------
Equity shareholders' funds 32,875 28,500
------ ------
Notes
1. Dividends
The company has already paid an interim dividend of 2.5p per share (net)
(1998: 2p (net) ) and the Directors now recommend payment of a final
dividend of 3.5p per share (net) (1998: 4p (net) ). The final dividend
will be payable on 31 July, 2000 to shareholders on the register at the
close of business on 30th June, 2000.
2. Earnings per ordinary share
The calculation of earnings per ordinary share is based on earnings,
after minority interests, of £1,544,000 (1998 - £1,710,000) and on
18,033,295 ordinary shares being the weighted average number of ordinary
shares in issue during the year (1998 - 18,038,013).
The fully diluted earnings per share is based on 21,772,014 (1998 -
21,777,576) ordinary shares, allowing for the full conversion of the nil
paid warrants and adjusted earnings of £1,704,000 (1998 - £1,930,000).
Earnings have been adjusted by adding net interest deemed to be earned
from 2 per cent. Consolidated stock on the proceeds of each theoretical
warrant conversion.
3. Report and Accounts
The financial information for the year ended 31st December 1998 is
extracted from the group's financial statements to that date which
received an unqualified auditor's report and have been filed with the
Registrar of Companies.
The financial information for the year ended 31st December 1999 is
extracted from the group's financial statements to that date which
received an unqualified auditor's report and will be filed with the
Registrar of Companies in due course.
4. Annual General Meeting
The annual general meeting will be held on 21st July 2000.
5. Copies of the Reports and Accounts will be posted to shareholders shortly
and will be available from the Company's registered office at Panther
House, 38 Mount Pleasant, London WC1X 0AP.