Important Victory For NEXT In Equal Pay Appeal

Next PLC

07 September 2026

 

7 September 2026

NEXT plc ("NEXT")

IMPORTANT VICTORY FOR NEXT IN EQUAL PAY APPEAL

NEXT has won a landmark victory in its ongoing Equal Pay litigation. It has succeeded in its appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal on the key issue of Basic Pay.

Background

The case revolves around whether retail and warehouse employees must be engaged on the same terms, even if those jobs clearly require very different terms in order to effectively recruit, retain and motivate colleagues.

The Judgment and Its Significance

The appeal judgment endorsed NEXT's position that it should not have to pay shop assistants and warehouse operatives the same amount of Basic Pay, in circumstances where the market and working conditions are very different.

The importance of this decision is that the Appeal Tribunal has confirmed that it was justifiable for NEXT to rely on market forces to distinguish between different groups of employees, where there was a good rationale to pay one group more than the other.

In this case, NEXT had to pay a higher market rate to warehouse operatives because of recruitment and retention pressures, which did not apply to the workforce in its stores. NEXT believes this element of the judgment is not only correct in law, but also a victory for common sense.

The judgment affirms a principle at the heart of any effective employment market - that employers must be able to pay what is necessary to recruit the people they need; and that doing so does not oblige them to raise the pay of other employees where there is no reason to do so.

Had the judgment gone against NEXT, it would have created a threat to the ongoing viability of many of our stores. It would also have had the perverse effect of putting retailers who operate their own warehousing at a material disadvantage to competitors who contract out their warehouse operations, which makes no sense.

There was never any finding of direct sex discrimination

Both the original Employment Tribunal and the Appeal Tribunal found that there was no direct discrimination. The Employment Tribunal found that 'gender did not enter into the equation' when NEXT set pay rates and that it had an "abundance of evidence… which supported the conclusion that sex had nothing to do with NEXT's decision on pay rates". The Employment Tribunal also rejected the theories in the expert evidence put forward on behalf of the Claimants that the differences in pay were related to sex.

The Appeal Tribunal upheld these findings and dismissed the Claimants' cross-appeal on this issue.

Next Steps

NEXT has now won the vast majority of the terms challenged by the Claimants in this Equal Pay litigation, including bonus pay to warehouse staff (on which it succeeded before the original Employment Tribunal in its decision last year), and now Basic Pay as a result of the appeal decision today.

NEXT believes that the same rationale applies to the small number of other terms, which were not overturned in the appeal, including paid rest breaks, where the same legal principles apply. NEXT intends to seek permission to appeal in relation to those terms.

Conclusion

This important decision respects the aims of the Equal Pay legislation whilst restoring the relevance of market forces in determining the differences between the pay and conditions of different groups of workers.

This judgment has come at the right time, the UK economy desperately needs jobs and the loss of this appeal would have represented a hammer blow to retail employment in the UK.

Contacts:	Alistair Mackinnon-Musson	Email: [e-mail]
	Rowbell PR	Tel: [phone]

 

END