Interim Results

ABERFORTH GEARED CAPITAL & INCOME TRUST plc INTERIM RESULTS For the six months to 30 June 2005 FEATURES Total Assets Total Return +11.8% Net Asset Value of Notional Unit Total Return +16.5% Net Asset Value of Capital Shares +25.3% First Interim Dividend 3.23p [+2.5%] 1. Notional Unit is made up of 70% Income Shares and 30% Capital Shares. 2. Capital shares performance assumes Income Shares have a capital entitlement of 100p each. 3. For comparative purposes all of the above returns were calculated using middle market prices and exclude the fair value loss on the interest rate swap. (see notes to the financial statements). Aberforth Geared Capital & Income Trust plc (AGCiT) invests only in small UK quoted companies and does not invest in any unquoted securities, AIM listed securities or securities issued by investment trusts or investment companies. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS RESULTS REVIEW I am pleased to be able to report a period of positive returns for the assets of Aberforth Geared Capital & Income Trust plc. The total return on total assets for the period of 11.8% was achieved against a positive background for the UK equity market. The FTSE All-Share Index showed a total return of 8.2%, while the Hoare Govett Smaller Companies Index (Excluding Investment Companies) (HGSC (XIC)), representative of AGCiT's opportunity base, has generated a similar gain of 8.4%. Given this level of absolute return on total assets, the gearing employed by AGCiT worked beneficially to generate a 16.5% return on Shareholders' funds. After allowance has been made for the 100p capital entitlement of the Income Shares, the net asset value of a Capital Share rose by 25.3% from 314.6p on 31 December 2004 to 394.2p. A first interim dividend for 2005 of 3.23p per Income Share has been declared. This represents an increase of 2.5% over the 3.15p paid in respect of the comparative period in 2004. The dividend will be paid on 25 August 2005 to Income Shareholders on the register on 29 July 2005. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS There are several changes to accounting practices that have to be incorporated into these accounts. Unfortunately the immediate impact of the changes is to complicate reporting, but as we move into 2006 the reporting will simplify as comparables will be on a consistent basis. AGCiT continues to prepare its financial statements under UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP) and the AITC's Statement of Recommended Practice. It has been resolved not to adopt International Accounting Standards at this time. In the meantime the financial statements incorporate, for the first time, Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 25 and 26. Adoption of these standards has required a change in the treatment and presentation of the interim dividend, the interest rate swap and the basis of valuing investments in the portfolio. Further information regarding these changes has been provided in the notes to these financial statements. These changes make comparison with the previous periods less straightforward. In accordance with the AITC's recommended practice the total return figures and net asset values reported above have been prepared using the accounting policies used for the year to 31 December 2004 and do not include the adjustments required by FRS 25 and 26 as described above. Alastair C Dempster Chairman 13 July 2005 MANAGERS' REPORT INVESTMENT BACKGROUND In constant currency terms, the returns from UK equities in the first half were broadly consistent with those of other major stockmarkets around the world. Other asset classes however, proved rather more exciting. Commodities performed well with the oil price climbing towards $60. Meanwhile, leveraged players in the corporate debt market had their nerve tested by an increase in yields following downgrades of Ford and GM debt by the rating agencies. Furthermore, the resurgence of the US dollar, given extra impetus by the "no" votes for the European constitution, caught many by surprise. Taking a step back, however, the problem of the gaping US current account deficit remains unresolved and the dollar's 11% rise against the euro has merely taken it back to levels that prevailed twelve months ago. However, the most intriguing and perhaps most significant development has been the continued decline in government bond yields to unusually low levels in a post war context, a phenomenon described by Alan Greenspan as a "conundrum". With the Fed having raised interest rates four times in 2005, this has resulted in a convergence between short and long term yields in the US. Conventionally, such a flattening yield curve is interpreted as an indication of slowing economic activity. Recent economic data in the US are, though, far from conclusive. While, a decline in the rate of growth later in the year would hardly be surprising given the strength of the upswing over the last two years, the housing market remains buoyant, perhaps too buoyant, and should be able to bolster consumer spending for some time. In contrast, the UK, where monetary conditions have been tighter for longer, has experienced a pronounced moderation in house price inflation. The consequent slowdown in the consumer sector, evident in weak retail sales and consumer borrowing data, is now becoming evident in slowing GDP growth. INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE Against this background, the HGSC (XIC), with its bias to domestically oriented sectors such as retailing and building, might be considered to have performed resiliently, having exceeded the return from the more internationally diversified larger companies. As was the case in 2004, the small company universe appears to be benefiting from corporate activity and, more generally, a trend to replace equity with debt financing. This is most obvious in the still high level of takeovers, though also encompasses rising dividend payments and returns of equity through share repurchases. In the first half, 30 of the 662 companies that comprised the HGSC (XIC) at the start of the year were acquired, with several others subject to takeover speculation. AGCiT again benefited disproportionately, having seen bids or approaches for seven of its 86 stock portfolio. The buyers have tended to be other corporates, though private equity houses remain able to compete by virtue of the present cheapness of debt finance. Meanwhile, twelve portfolio companies have returned, or are in the process of returning, capital to shareholders, most often in the form of share repurchases. Turning to the supply of new equity, the first half saw ten new issues eligible for inclusion in the HGSC (XIC). In contrast, there were 31 new issues in the first half of 1996, a period when smaller company valuations, both absolute and relative to large, were very close to those currently prevailing. Moreover, company boards now appear reluctant to use equity to fund acquisitions. Ten portfolio companies made acquisitions in the first half, all of which were substantially debt funded. The supply of new equity to the small company universe has therefore not compensated for reductions through takeover and share buy-backs. This remains the case even taking into account the frenzied activity on AIM, which admitted 219 companies to its ranks in the first half alone. AGCiT does not invest in AIM listed companies and they are not part of its investment universe. AGCiT's out-performance in the first half was helped by, but was not reliant upon, corporate activity. The portfolio added value against the HGSC (XIC) in 20 out of 31 sectors. As has been the case for some time, stock selection, which accounted for over 80% of the out- performance, was more significant than sector selection. Indeed, the present importance of company specific fundamentals is perhaps evident in the fact that eight sectors were represented in the list of ten stocks that made the largest positive contributions to the portfolio's return. This top ten contained just two companies that were subject to takeover and two others that bought back shares. The two companies that were acquired, though affording an immediate boost to performance, have been holdings since the portfolio was first fully invested. It is worth noting that by the end of the period, AGCiT had a considerably lower exposure than the small company universe to the Financials sector. Even here company specifics have played the more important role for your Managers in arriving at sector weights, but two general comments might be made. First, an environment of higher interest rates and more recently a cautious consumer have clouded the trading outlook for many of the sector's constituents. Secondly, the tremendous performance of property companies in recent years has seen their valuations rise to levels that, in the absence of appreciable rental growth, are considerably less appealing than previously. INVESTMENT OUTLOOK Asset prices offer the equity investor conflicting signals about the outlook for economic growth and corporate profits. The buoyancy of the corporate bond, commodity and property markets would appear to indicate good growth with some inflationary risk. On the other hand, the strength of government bonds, whose "risk free" yields are often the starting point in determining the value of other asset classes, points to a weaker and potentially deflationary outcome. In searching for a unifying theory to explain this apparent inconsistency, it is tempting to alight upon the low interest rates that have endured in the US and elsewhere for some time. While undoubtedly sustaining economic growth, these have also facilitated leveraged investment across the range of asset classes, including government bonds, the demand for which has been boosted by East Asia's central banks. For valuations across financial markets to be reliant on the perpetuation of cheap debt is troublesome. In the UK, where interest rates have been on an upward path, the potential ramifications are becoming obvious in the housing market and by extension in the consumer sector. This inevitably clouds the profit outlook for the small company universe's many consumer facing businesses, but the large company universe, with its sizeable exposure to banks, might also be affected. As ever, though, the stockmarket is performing its discounting function: many constituents of those sectors considered at risk are already trading on low valuations. 30 June 2005 30 June 2004 Characteristics AGCiT HGSC (XIC) AGCiT HGSC (XIC) Number of Companies 86 627 95 707 Weighted Average Market £343m £409m £331m £414m Capitalisation Price Earnings Ratio 14.0x 16.4x 13.1x 16.0x (Historic) Net Dividend Yield 3.1% 2.3% 3.7% 2.6% (Historic) Dividend Cover (Historic) 2.3x 2.6x 2.0x 2.4x Buoyed by takeover activity, the overall valuation of small companies remains broadly in line with that of the FTSE All-Share Index, whose PE and yield are 16.0x and 3.1% respectively. It is worth noting, though, that the HGSC (XIC) comprises a heterogeneous collection of businesses with a wide range of valuations. As the table above demonstrates, it therefore remains possible to construct a well diversified portfolio, whose average valuation would appear consistent with your Managers' value investment principles. Aberforth Partners Managers 13 July 2005 The Statement of Total Return, summary Balance Sheet and summary Cash Flow Statement are set out below: - STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN (Incorporating the Revenue Account) For the six months ended 30 June 2005 (unaudited) 6 months to 6 months to 30 June 2005 30 June 2004 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Realised gains - 5,269 5,269 - 5,745 5,745 /(losses) on sales Unrealised gains - 2,832 2,832 - 2,432 2,432 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Net Gains on - 8,101 8,101 - 8,177 8,177 investments Dividend income 1,909 515 2,424 1,862 - 1,862 Interest income 1 - 1 21 - 21 Other income - - - 9 - 9 Investment (122) (285) (407) (104) (242) (346) management fee Other expenses (94) - (94) (89) - (89 ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ------ Net return before 1,694 8,331 10,025 1,699 7,935 9,634 finance costs and taxation Interest and (339) (791)(1,130) (311) (726) (1,037) other finance costs ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Return 1,355 7,540 8,895 1,388 7,209 8,597 attributable to Shareholders Dividends and - (33) (33) (772) (33) (805) other appropriations ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1,355 7,507 8,862 616 7,176 7,792 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Returns per Share: Income Share 5.53p - 5.53p 5.67p - 5.67p Capital Share - 71.81p 71.81p - 68.66p 68.66p Dividends per - - - 3.150p - 3.150p Income Share NOTES 1. The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the period. 2. The calculations of revenue return per Income Share are based on net revenue of £1,355,000 (30 June 2004 - £1,388,000) and on 24.5 million Income Shares. The calculations of capital return per Capital Share are based on net capital gains of £7,540,000 (30 June 2004 - £7,209,000) and on 10.5 million Capital Shares. 3. The Board declared, on 13 July 2005, an interim dividend of 3.23p per Income Share (30 June 2004 - 3.15p) and the total dividend payable will be £791,000 (30 June 2004 - £772,000). The Board also declared, on 19 January 2005, a second interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 December 2004 of 5.255p per Income Share (30 June 2004 - 5.125p) and the total dividend paid amounted to £1,287,000 (30 June 2004 - £1,256,000). SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET As at 30 June 2005 (unaudited) 30 31 30 June December June 2005 2004 2004 £'000 £'000 £'000 Securities officially listed on 100,097 95,062 84,996 the London Stock Exchange ------- ------ ------ Debtors 668 258 606 Cash at bank - - - Overdraft - (1,685) (211) Other creditors (47) (1,345) (1,235) ------- ------ ------ Net current assets / 621 (2,772) (840) (liabilities) ------- ------ ------ Total assets less current 100,718 92,290 84,156 liabilities Creditors (amounts falling due (35,502) (34,235) (34,230) after more than one year) ------- ------ ------ Total assets less liabilities 65,216 58,055 49,926 ------- ------ ------ Capital and reserves: Called up share capital 350 350 350 Reserves: Capital redemption reserve 50 50 50 Special reserve 33,929 33,929 33,929 Capital reserve - realised 9,630 4,922 1,040 Capital reserve - unrealised 21,117 18,285 13,594 Interest rate swap reserve (1,734) - - Revenue reserve 1,874 519 963 ------- ------ ------ 65,216 58,055 49,926 ------- ------ ------ Net Asset Values: per Income Share 76.68p 68.48p 67.57p per Capital Share (Note 3) 442.20p 393.13p 317.81p NOTE During each period the Company had 24.5 million Income Shares and 10.5 million Capital Shares in issue. SUMMARY CASH FLOW STATEMENT For the six months ended 30 June 2005 (unaudited) 6 months to 6 months to 30 June 30 June 2005 2004 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Net cash inflow from 1,514 1,274 operating activities Returns on investments and servicing of finance Interest and other finance (1,137) (1,027) costs paid ------ ------ Net cash outflow from returns on investments and servicing of finance (1,137) (1,027) Capital expenditure and financial investment Payments to acquire (12,527) 23,051) investments Receipts from sales of 15,593 20,509 investments ------ ------ Net cash inflow/(outflow) from capital expenditure and financial investment 3,066 (2,542) Equity dividends paid (1,287) (1,256) ------ ------ Net cash inflow/(outflow) 2,156 (3,551) before financing Financing Loans (repaid)/drawn down (471) 3,339 ----- ------ Net cash (outflow)/inflow (471) 3,339 from financing ------ ------ Change in cash during the 1,685 (212) period ------ ------ NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards and the AITC's Statement of Recommended Practice "Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies". In preparing the financial statements for the current period, the same accounting policies used for the year to 31 December 2004 have been applied except that the Company has adopted FRS 25 "Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation" and FRS 26 "Financial Instruments: Measurement". 2. FRS 25 AND 26 The adoption of FRS 25 has resulted in a change in accounting for the interim dividend and the interest rate swap. Dividends payable by the Company are now recorded as a liability following a dividend declaration by the Board and therefore the interim dividend of 3.23p per share, declared on 13 July 2005, has not been recorded as a liability of the Company as at 30 June 2005. In previous financial statements, dividends declared were recognised in respect of the period to which they related. This change in accounting policy for dividends has increased Shareholders' funds by £791,350 as at 30 June 2005. FRS 25 requires derivatives to be measured at fair value and depending on the nature of the derivative, changes in fair value must be recognised either in the profit and loss account or in equity reserves. The company's interest rate swap is an effective cash flow hedge and therefore changes in its fair value are recognised in equity reserves. In previous financial statements the fair value of derivatives were not included on the Balance Sheet. The change in accounting policy for derivatives has reduced Shareholders' Funds by £1,734,000 (equivalent to 16.5p per Capital share) as at 30 June 2005. The adoption of FRS 26 has resulted in a change in the basis of valuation of investments. Under FRS 26, the Company's investments have been categorised as "financial assets at fair value through profit & loss" and therefore quoted investments are now valued at bid prices. Previously, quoted investments were valued at middle market prices. The change in accounting policy for valuations of investments has reduced Shareholders' funds by £813,000 (equivalent to 7.7p per Capital share) as at 30 June 2005. As permitted by FRS 25 and 26, comparatives have not been restated. 3. NET ASSET VALUE OF CAPITAL SHARES Net Asset Value of Capital Shares Accounting policies Accounting policies used for the year for used for the year to the six months to 31 December 2004 30 June 2005 Valuation Basis As at 30 As at 30 As at 31 June 2005 June 2005 Dec 2004 Income Shares at final entitlement of 100p 369.9p 394.2p 314.6p Income Shares at NAV of 76.68p (30 June 2005) 442.2p 466.5p - Income Shares at NAV of 68.48p (31 Dec 2004) - - 393.1p 4. In accordance with FRS 25 the Directors are of the opinion the Income and Capital Shares are in substance equity instruments of the Company. 5. The foregoing do not comprise statutory accounts (as defined in section 240(5) of the Companies Act 1985) of the Company. The statutory accounts for the period to 31 December 2003, which contained an unqualified Report of the Auditors, have been lodged with the Registrar of Companies and did not contain a statement required under section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985. The Interim Report is expected to be posted to shareholders on 18 July 2005. Members of the public may obtain copies from Aberforth Partners, 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7NS or from its website at www.aberforth.co.uk. CONTACT: David Ross Aberforth Partners 0131 220 0733 Aberforth Partners, Secretaries - 13 July 2005 ANNOUNCEMENT ENDS
UK 100

Latest directors dealings