RM PLC
31 October 2003
31st October 2003
RM welcomes European Commission Decision on BBC Digital Curriculum scheme
RM plc, the leading supplier of information and communications technology (ICT)
and educational services to the UK education market, today welcomed the Decision
of the European Commission (Commission) on the BBC Digital Curriculum scheme
(the Decision).
As expected the Commission's Decision gave the BBC the go ahead. However the
Commission has taken into account the concerns of the educational software
industry, and, as a result, has introduced a number of significant
clarifications, which RM supports:
• The Decision states (i) that the Digital Curriculum constitutes state
aid that should have been notified to the Commission for approval before taking
effect and (ii) that this state aid is new aid because 'the Digital Curriculum
is a digression from the various markets within which the BBC is active'(1).
• The Commission requires that any funding of the Digital Curriculum in
excess of £150m or any funding beyond 5 years must be the subject of a new state
aid notification by the UK authorities.
• The Decision states that the distortion of competition caused by the
Digital Curriculum in England is only mitigated by the existence of eLCs(2) at
their current level, underlining the need for eLCs to continue for the entire
duration of the Digitial Curriculum. This gives greater visibility on funding.
The Decision also clarifies that eLCs are to be used exclusively on genuine
educational software.
• The Commission will require the BBC to publish a fixed 5 year
commissioning plan for the Digital Curriculum, 15 months in advance of the
launch of the Digital Curriculum, which will indicate areas where the BBC is
excluded from producing - the plan must have 'explicit criteria for the
exclusion providing clarity for users and commercial providers of the subjects
and learning outcomes that will not be provided by the BBC.' This will give
greater certainty on opportunities for RM and other alternative suppliers within
the UK educational software market. The Commission states that this
commissioning plan must provide the parameters within which the BBC will be
allowed to operate and that any divergence from the scope of the plan will be a
breach of the DCMS approval given in January 2003(3).
• The Commission states that the BBC must not use the publicly funded
Digital Curriculum to cross subsidise its commercial operations in any way and
that the BBC must comply with the Transparency Directive.
RM believes that this decision brings the matter to a close, and RM looks
forward to working constructively with the BBC and others within this framework
for the benefit of UK education.
The full Decision will be available in the next few days and can be found by
clicking on the following link:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/oj/index.html
- Ends -
For further information, please contact:
Tim Pearson/Mike Greig RM plc 08709 200200
Andrew Fenwick/Fiona Laffan, Brunswick 020 7404 5959
Notes to Editors:
1. In the Judicial review brought by a group of commercial providers in
2002, one of the main grounds for the action was that the funding of the Digital
Curriculum constituted state aid.
2. eLCs are Electronic Learning Credits - funds distributed by the DfES to
schools. According to the Commission, eLCs are to be used exclusively on proper
educational software, 'strictly for material which is certified as eligible for
the Curriculum Online programme; the programme comprises of products that have
been designed and produced to deliver the Curriculum as taught in England.'
3. On 9th January 2003, the DCMS gave approval to the BBC Digital
Curriculum subject to 18 conditions.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
*A Private Investor is a recipient of the information who meets all of the conditions set out below, the recipient:
Obtains access to the information in a personal capacity;
Is not required to be regulated or supervised by a body concerned with the regulation or supervision of investment or financial services;
Is not currently registered or qualified as a professional securities trader or investment adviser with any national or state exchange, regulatory authority, professional association or recognised professional body;
Does not currently act in any capacity as an investment adviser, whether or not they have at some time been qualified to do so;
Uses the information solely in relation to the management of their personal funds and not as a trader to the public or for the investment of corporate funds;
Does not distribute, republish or otherwise provide any information or derived works to any third party in any manner or use or process information or derived works for any commercial purposes.
Please note, this site uses cookies. Some of the cookies are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but if you do, parts of the site may not work. To find out more about the cookies used on Investegate and how you can manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy
To continue using Investegate, please confirm that you are a private investor as well as agreeing to our Privacy and Cookie Policy & Terms.