Preliminary Interim Results

Taverners Trust PLC 19 December 2001 THE TAVERNERS TRUST PLC Announcement of Unaudited Interim Results for the six months to 31 October 2001 In the half year ending 31 October 2001 the fully diluted net asset value of Taverners' Trust fell back by 5.8% during a period when the All Share index fell by 15.8% and our benchmark, the FTSE Actuaries Leisure Entertainment and Hotels Index, dropped by 14.4%; in fact Taverners made good progress during the early summer as was detailed in my last statement to you. When we wrote to you last on 18 July the All Share Index stood at 2610.3 and the Leisure Entertainment and Hotels Index stood at 3116.2; currently these indices stand respectively at 2484.0 and 2921.2 registering falls of 4.8% and 6.3%. Over the same period the Net Asset Value of Taverners' Trust is down by 2.4%. These declines are lower than those shown for the period up to 31 October because the market - and in particular our sector - has seen a recovery since that date. On 18 July your Manager wrote 'it would appear we are once again achieving outperformance' and I stated that 'the brewery and pub sector may be a good place to find a defensive niche'. It is obviously disappointing to record a decline in Net Asset Value but the fact remains that in comparison with the indices the Trust has outperformed. In this context it is interesting to note that over the half-year on which we are reporting six of our top ten best performing stocks and four out of the top five are regional brewers. The key to this is the turmoil that overtook the market following the tragic events in the United States on 11 September. Whilst a number of sectors have suffered in the wake of this disaster, companies in our portfolio such as Greene King and SFI have reported that they have seen no evidence of a downturn in consumer confidence. What we have seen is confirmation of the traditional resilience of the regional brewery and pub sector with its stable cash flows in difficult times and we owe the recent steady performance of our Trust to its weighting in the Regional Brewers. Another stock which has performed well during the period under review is Enterprise Inns, the tenanted pub company on which I remarked in my last statement; this company has the same attributes of strong cash flow and a predictable operating profit but is highly acquisitive and more heavily geared. It also has the enviable record of having achieved compound annual growth in adjusted earnings per share of 28% over the past five years; in June and July Enterprise made two acquisitions each of more than four hundred houses and posted a rights issue that was well received and promised further earnings enhancement. Wolverhampton & Dudley Breweries (Wolves) has also been a good performer since the company escaped the clutches of Pubmaster's 513p bid which secured acceptance from 47% of the equity. During early August it became clear that significant earnings enhancement was in prospect if management could deliver their plan to reduce the number of shares in issue, dispose of branded units and increase margins. The newsflow, which has since been confirmed, suggested that this outcome was highly possible; if on the other hand the management failed in their endeavours, another bid would seem inevitable. In the event, the share price has risen so that Wolves has been unable to implement an intended buyback at 491p and will instead provide a special dividend of 80p per share. It is noteworthy that over the half-year under reference seven out of our ten worst performing stocks were hotel or restaurant companies. All of the latter have a significant presence in Central London where business was already in decline before 11 September. We have reduced the fund's exposure to hotels. Restaurants on the other hand continue to trade well outside central London providing the average spend per head is not too high and the exposure to tourism is minimal, so we remain content with our holding in Ask Central. The regulatory front has been relatively quiet since we last wrote. The most contentious issue that has arisen has been the initiative of the police in Manchester to ask pubs on circuits to make 'voluntary' contributions towards the provision of extra police on Friday and Saturday nights; this rather questionable development appears so far to be meeting with approving noises from the government. The pub trade have protested that they are massive payers of taxes and rates and the question arises as to whether the police will neglect areas that do not co-operate. At Dover, Customs have become more vigilant over illegal imports of beer from lower duty markets across the channel. They are refusing to believe protestations that product is not for resale, are confiscating vehicles and effectively inviting owners to sue them in court, a process that some drivers who are already known to the police might find embarrassing. However in taking this action the government has aroused the ire of the European Commissioner for Internal Markets who has remonstrated publicly with the Chancellor that the heavy-handed and aggressive enforcement of what is no more than an indicative limit is illegal and that he will take the UK government to court if they will not desist. The result of the action taken by Customs has been to reduce the illegal 'white van' trade by 70-80% according to trade estimates. If as a result of action by the European Union Customs activity at Dover is reduced, there is no doubt that 'white van man' will return and pressure on the Chancellor to reduce the duty will be renewed. On the other hand, the day tripper trade has grown and students of this business believe that almost half of it is for resale. All the indications are that Calais will have an excellent Christmas although some of the offers in UK supermarkets are almost better value, albeit perhaps not as much fun as a day out across the Channel. It seems now that there will be no movement on the broader licensing front until next year's Queen's Speech. The Criminal Justice and Police Act came into effect on 1st December. So far two pubs have suffered closure as a result of its provisions but initial indications are that the Act will make little difference; certainly the police seem less than ecstatic with the new powers granted to them. Many of the rather negative proposals being discussed appear to be directed at London where the City of Westminster is trying to curtail late licenses. At the end of the day the interests of well-managed licensed premises are similar to those of the local authority. The night club operator Chorion is the company doing battle with Westminster Council but will benefit if there is a crackdown on new licenses because they are already well established in the West End. None of the above looks particularly threatening and overall the outlook for the pub and regional brewer sub-sector looks promising. The market has reacted positively to good results reported by a number of companies including Belhaven, Enterprise Inns, Greene King, Hardys & Hansons and Inventive Leisure. With Christmas Day falling on a Tuesday, the days fall well once again for the trade with New Year likely to be very beneficial providing weather conditions are reasonably benign. Trading statements issued in January will therefore in all probability be positive. If the UK economy starts to falter in the early months of 2002 Taverners' performance during the months following 11 September, and indeed the whole of the period under review, suggests that the sub-sectors in which the Trust invests have not lost their defensive quality. Lionel Ross Chairman 19 December 2001 The unaudited results were: Statement of total return (incorporating the revenue account*) Six months ended 31 October 2001 (unaudited) Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 Losses on investments - (1,160) (1,160) Income 300 - 300 Investment management fee (73) (73) (146) Other expenses (92) - (92) ________ ________ ________ Net return/(loss) before finance costs and taxation 135 (1,233) (1,098) Interest payable and similar charges (53) (50) (103) ________ ________ ________ Return/(loss) on ordinary activities before taxation 82 (1,283) (1,201) Tax on ordinary activities (1) 1 - ________ ________ ________ Transfer to/(from) reserves 81 (1,282) (1,201) ======== ======== ======== Return/(loss) per Ordinary share (pence): Basic 0.51 (8.04) (7.53) ======== ======== ======== Six months ended 31 October 2000 (unaudited) Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 Losses on investments - (1,268) (1,268) Income 310 - 310 Investment management fee (70) (70) (140) Other expenses (94) - (94) ________ ________ ________ Net return/(loss) before finance costs and taxation 146 (1,338) (1,192) Interest payable and similar charges (52) (51) (103) ________ ________ ________ Return/(loss) on ordinary activities before taxation 94 (1,389) (1,295) Tax on ordinary activities (2) 1 (1) ________ ________ ________ Transfer to/(from) reserves 92 (1,388) (1,296) ======== ======== ======== Return/(loss) per Ordinary share (pence): Basic 0.58 (8.71) (8.13) ======== ======== ======== * The revenue column of this statement is the revenue account of the Company. The Statements of Total Return presented above are in accordance with the Statement of Recommended Practice for Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies. Balance Sheet As at As at As at 31 October 31 October 31 April 2001 2000 2001 (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) £'000 £'000 £'000 Fixed assets Investments 18,685 18,785 20,603 ________ ________ ________ Current assets Debtors 40 180 44 Cash at bank 1,075 15 146 ________ ________ ________ 1,115 195 190 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (383) (144) (175) ________ ________ ________ Net current assets 732 51 15 ________ ________ ________ Total assets less current liabilities 19,417 18,836 20,618 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year Bank loan (3,000) (3,000) (3,000) ________ ________ ________ Total net assets 16,417 15,836 17,618 ======== ======== ======== Share capital and reserves Called-up share capital 3,984 3,984 3,984 Share premium account 10,536 10,536 10,536 Other reserves: Warrant reserve 981 981 981 Capital reserve - realised 1,666 1,830 2,064 Capital reserve - unrealised (1,005) (1,749) (121) Revenue reserve 255 254 174 ________ ________ ________ Total equity shareholders' funds 16,417 15,836 17,618 ======== ======== ======== Net asset value per Ordinary share (pence): Basic 103.02 99.37 110.55 ======== ======== ======== Fully-diluted 102.53 n/a 108.84 ======== ======== ======== Cash Flow Statement Six months Six months ended ended 31 October 31 October 2001 2000 (unaudited) (unaudited) £'000 £'000 Net cash inflow from operating activities 48 29 Net cash outflow from servicing of finance (103) (101) Net tax paid - (1) Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financial investment 1,014 (1,437) Equity dividends paid (72) (64) ________ ________ Net cash inflow/(outflow) before financing 887 (1,574) Net cashflow from financing - - ________ ________ Increase/(decrease) in cash 887 (1,574) ======== ======== Reconciliation of operating revenue to net cash inflow from operating activities Net revenue before interest payable and taxation 135 146 Increase in accrued income (3) (9) Decrease/(increase) in other debtors 7 (1) Decrease in other creditors (18) (36) Capitalised expenses taken to non-distributable reserves (73) (71) ________ ________ 48 29 ======== ======== Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net funds/(debt) Increase/(decrease) in cash as above 887 (1,574) Opening net debt (2,854) (1,460) ________ ________ Closing net debt (1,967) (3,034) ======== ======== Represented by: Cash at bank 1,075 15 Bank overdraft (42) (49) Debt falling due after more than one year (3,000) (3,000) ________ ________ (1,967) (3,034) ======== ======== Notes:- 1. In accordance with stated policy, no interim dividend has been declared (2000 - nil). 2. The breakdown of income for the periods to 31 October 2001 and 2000 was as follows: 31 October 31 October 2001 2000 £'000 £'000 Income from investments Franked investment income 292 299 Unfranked investment income 1 5 ______ ______ 293 304 ______ ______ Other income Deposit interest 3 6 Underwriting commission 4 - ______ ______ 7 6 ______ ______ Total income 300 310 ====== ====== 3. The basic revenue return per Ordinary share is based on net revenue on ordinary activities after taxation of £81,000 (2000 - £92,000) and on 15,936,000 (2000 - 15,936,000) Ordinary shares, being the number of Ordinary shares in issue throughout the period. The basic capital return per Ordinary share is based on net capital losses for the period of £1,282,000 (2000 - £1,388,000 loss) and on 15,936,000 (2000 - 15,936,000) Ordinary shares, being the number of Ordinary shares in issue throughout the period. The fully-diluted returns per Ordinary share have not been shown for the periods to 31 October 2001 and 2000 in accordance with FRS14 'Earnings per share' as there is no dilution in earnings resulting from Warrants in issue as the average share prices of the Warrants in the period are less than the exercise price of the Warrants. 4. The basic net asset value per Ordinary share is based on net shareholders' funds at the period end, and on 15,936,000 (31 October 2000 - 15,936,000; 30 April 2001 - 15,936,000) Ordinary shares, being the number of Ordinary shares in issue at the period end. The fully-diluted net asset values per Ordinary share as at 31 October 2001 and 30 April 2001 have been calculated by reference to the total number of Ordinary shares in issue at the period end and on the assumption that those Warrants which are not exercised at the period end, amounting to 3,081,600 Warrants as at 31 October 2001 and 30 April 2001, were fully exercised on the first day of each financial period at 100p per share, giving a total of 19,017,600 Ordinary shares. No calculation has been shown as at 31 October 2000 as the exercise price of the Warrants, being 100p, exceeded the value of the basic net asset value. 5. The financial statements for the six months ended 31 October 2001 and 31 October 2000 comprise non-statutory accounts within the meaning of Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985.The financial information for the year ended 30 April 2001 has been abridged from published accounts that have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and on which the report of the auditors was unqualified. Aberdeen Asset Management PLC Secretaries 19 December 2001 Independent Review Report by Ernst & Young LLP to The Taverners Trust PLC Introduction We have been instructed by the Company to review the financial information for the six months ended 31 October 2001 which comprises the Statement of Total Return, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statement and the related notes 1 to 5. We have read the other information contained in the Interim Report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial information. Directors' Responsibilities The Interim Report, including the financial information contained therein, is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors. The Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority require that the accounting policies and presentation applied to the interim figures should be consistent with those applied in preparing the preceding annual accounts except where they are to be changed in the next annual accounts in which case any changes, and the reasons for them, are to be disclosed. Review Work Performed We conducted our review in accordance with guidance contained in Bulletin 1999/4: 'Review of Interim financial information' issued by the Auditing Practices Board. A review consists principally of making enquiries of management and applying analytical procedures to the financial information and underlying financial data and, based thereon, assessing whether the accounting policies and presentation have been consistently applied unless otherwise disclosed. A review excludes audit procedures such as tests of controls and verification of assets, liabilities and transactions. It is substantially less in scope than an audit performed in accordance with Auditing Standards and therefore provides a lower level of assurance than an audit. Accordingly we do not express an audit opinion on the financial information. Review Conclusion On the basis of our review we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the financial information as presented for the six months ended 31 October 2001. Ernst & Young LLP London 19 December 2001
UK 100

Latest directors dealings