Preliminary Interim Results

Taverners Trust PLC 22 December 2000 Announcement of Unaudited Interim Results for the six months to 31 October 2000 During the half year between 1 May and 31 October 2000 the Net Asset Value of Taverners Trust fell back by a further 7.5% to 99.4p during a period when the All Share Index advanced by 2.4%. This disappointing performance has to be viewed against the background of a decline in our benchmark Restaurant, Brewery and Pub Index over the same period of 21.6%. We wrote in the Manager's Review on 3 July that we were optimistic that the level of share prices in the Brewery sector would eventually improve because it was an area that produced profits, dividends and cash flow and we felt sure that investors would in due course return to these old-fashioned attributes. A number of depressing factors affected the sector during the half-year and we ended by saying that 'a measure of patience looks still to be in order until some of these issues are resolved and the traditional trading strengths of the sector regain favour'. The position six months on remains broadly similar except there are reasons for believing patience may soon be rewarded. First let us enumerate the problems that have beset the sector. Most obviously pubs and breweries are part of the 'old economy' at a time when some fund managers are concentrating on 'new economy' stocks. Next the period has been dominated by restructuring activity on the part of the major brewers in response to the perception that both their brewing and pub businesses have gone ex-growth. In addition the government has been imposing a large number of regulations which together with the effects of the Working Time Directive and the Minimum Wage have raised the threshold at which it is better to manage a house rather than let it to a tenant. The regionals in particular have therefore been moving significant numbers of managed houses to tenancy. This has been more difficult for the majors who hold a large number of unbranded managed houses in areas which the younger generation are forsaking for the town centre circuit. In the larger companies the walls between the tenanted and managed profit centres are so strong that they have difficulty in transferring houses between the two; indeed Bass have no option but to sell underperforming managed houses having disposed of their tenanted estate three years ago. The intended sale of the whole of the Whitbread pub estate as well as that of a substantial proportion of the Bass and Scottish & Newcastle estates has suggested to investors that pub values are likely to fall; but in fact these large parcels may even achieve lotting premia as a result of the prevailing venture capital interest in securitising pub revenues. The result of the majors' difficulties has been to create a perception that all companies running pubs are suffering from flat profitability. This is far from being the case and a number of the small companies in which your Trust is invested are making excellent progress; indeed the stance adopted by Taverners of investing in the industry's smaller companies and avoiding the nationals has been vindicated during the past six months; we simply need to wait until the rest of the market wakes up to this circumstance. The sector has also been affected by other matters. In July we expected the Review of the Beer Orders to be published in early September; in fact although the OFT delivered the Review to the DTI in July, the latter did not publish it until late November when it proved as benign as we expected. The shares of Enterprise Inns rose from low levels in November on reporting good figures but the removal of the Beer Order uncertainty will also have helped this rise. Throughout the half-year the dialogue with the government over licensing has been continuing and the immediate outlook for the pubs has not been improving. Rising crime figures have left the Home Secretary with little option but to take some sort of radical action. His response has been to cherry pick the more negative measures from the Licensing White Paper and incorporate them in an Act of Parliament foreshadowed in the recent Queen's Speech and directed against the so called 'yob' culture; at the same time the Association of Chief Police Officers have indicated their unhappiness with one of the central principles of the government's reform - namely transfer of the jurisdiction over licensing from the magistrates to the local authorities. While this action by the police has made further government review necessary, the pub trade associations who thought the transfer to the local authorities was the price they were paying for a relaxation of the regime on hours are now concerned that they may get nothing in return. Additionally, if the government do not permit the longer hours which will enable phased closing to be adopted they may not get the improvement in behaviour they seek. In September the Yates Group produced a bombshell of a profit warning that damaged the share prices of the other managed pubcos notably Wetherspoon and SFI Group which is Taverners' largest holding and accounts for 8% of our portfolio following their acquisition of Slug and Lettuce (which we also held). In fact there are strong reasons for thinking that the problems Yates is suffering are specific to that company which had failed to keep the Wine Lodge updated and had allowed service standards to slip. There are no signs that either Wetherspoon or SFI are facing these problems and SFI's prospects are for 30% earnings growth in each of the next two years. We have described above some of the influences which have led to the rather dismal progress of the pub sector over the past half-year. We believe however that underlying trade is good and that investors who have endured misfortunes with technology stocks may once again be watching the sector closely as a number of companies such as Belhaven, Burtonwood and the restaurant group Ask Central continue to produce good results. Because of the poor sentiment towards the sector, some of the reasons for which have been outlined above, it is unlikely that the market will re-rate it until some really good news is available. It is possible that this will come with seasonal trading statements in January as the festive days fall favourably this year and comparisons should benefit from last year's flat Millennium New Year trading. We therefore hope our investors' patience will soon be rewarded. Sadly we have to report the death of one of our Directors, Neil Scourse, who was not only a person of great charm but an expert deriving his knowledge from his years as a senior analyst of the brewery industry, first at Fielding Newson Smith and latterly at BZW. We are fortunate indeed that Dr Martin Hawkins has accepted our invitation to join the Board. Martin has recently retired from the post of drinks industry analyst at stockbroker Greig Middleton and we are delighted to have been able once again to attract as a non executive director someone with a deep knowledge and wide experience of our sector. Lionel Ross Chairman 22 December 2000 The unaudited results were: Statement of total return (incorporating the revenue account*) For the six months to 31 October 2000 Six months ended 31 October 2000 (unaudited) Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 Losses on investments - (1,268) (1,268) Income 310 - 310 Investment management fee (70) (70) (140) Other expenses (94) - (94) ______ ______ ______ Net return before finance costs and taxation 146 (1,338) (1,192) Interest payable and similar charges (52) (51) (103) ______ ______ ______ Return/(loss) on ordinary activities before tax 94 (1,389) (1,295) Tax on ordinary activities (2) 1 (1) ______ ______ ______ Transfer to/(from) reserves 92 (1,388) (1,296) ====== ====== ====== Return per Ordinary share (pence): - Basic 0.58 (8.71) (8.13) ====== ====== ====== Six months ended 31 October 1999 (unaudited) (restated) Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 Gains on investments - 2,390 2,390 Income 285 - 285 Investment management fee (82) (82) (164) Other expenses (90) - (90) ______ ______ ______ Net return before finance costs and taxation 113 2,308 2,421 Interest payable and similar charges (52) (52) (104) ______ ______ ______ Return on ordinary activities before tax 61 2,256 2,317 Tax on ordinary activities (6) 3 (3) ______ ______ ______ Return attributable to Ordinary shareholders transferred to reserves 55 2,259 2,314 ====== ====== ====== Return per Ordinary share (pence): - Basic 0.35 14.23 14.58 ====== ====== ====== * The Statements of Total Return presented above are in accordance with the Statement of Recommended Practice for Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies. The revenue column of this statement represents the profit and loss account of the Company. Balance Sheet of the Company as at 31 October 2000 31 October 31 October 30 April 2000 1999 2000 (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) £'000 £'000 £'000 Fixed assets Investments 18,785 23,593 19,308 Current assets Debtors 180 167 56 Cash at bank and in hand 15 249 1,540 ______ ______ ______ 195 416 1,596 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (144) (328) (772) ______ ______ ______ Net current assets 51 88 824 ______ ______ ______ Total assets less current liabilities 18,836 23,681 20,132 Creditors: Amounts falling due after one year (3,000) (3,000) (3,000) ______ ______ ______ Total net assets 15,836 20,681 17,132 ====== ====== ====== Capital and reserves Called-up share capital 3,984 3,984 3,984 Share premium account 10,536 10,536 10,536 Other reserves Warrant reserve 981 981 981 Capital reserve - realised 1,830 1,856 2,064 Capital reserve - unrealised (1,749) 3,161 (595) Revenue reserve 254 163 162 ______ ______ ______ Total shareholders' funds 15,836 20,681 17,132 ====== ====== ====== Net asset value per Ordinary share (pence): Basic 99.37 129.78 107.51 ====== ====== ====== Diluted N/A 124.95 106.29 ====== ====== ====== Cash Flow Statement For the six months to 31 October 2000 Six months ended Six months ended 31 October 31 October 2000 1999 (unaudited) (unaudited) £'000 £'000 Net cash inflow from operating activities 29 32 Net cash outflow from servicing of finance (101) (115) Net tax (paid)/recovered (1) 5 Net cash outflow from financial investment (1,437) (363) Equity dividends paid (64) (48) ______ ______ Net cash outflow before financing (1,574) (489) Net cash inflow from financing - 88 ______ ______ Decrease in cash 1,574) (401) Reconciliation of operating revenue to net cash inflow from operating activities Net revenue before finance costs and taxation 146 113 Increase in accrued income (9) (14) Increase in other debtors (1) (4) (Decrease)/increase in other creditors (35) 19 Capitalised expenses taken to non distributable reserves (72) (82) ______ ______ Net cash inflow from operating activities 29 32 ====== ====== Reconciliation of net cash inflow to movements in net debt Decrease in cash as above (1,574) (401) Net debt at 1 May (1,460) (2,350) ______ ______ Net debt at 31 October (3,034) (2,751) ====== ====== Represented by: Cash at bank 15 249 Bank overdraft (49) - Debt falling due after more than one year (3,000) (3,000) ______ ______ (3,034) (2,751) ====== ====== Notes: 1 The interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards and under the historic cost convention as modified to include the revaluation of fixed asset investments. 2 The breakdown of income for the periods to 31 October 2000 and 31 October 1999 was as follows: 31 October 2000 31 October 1999 (restated) £'000 £'000 Income from investments Franked investment income (net) 299 252 Unfranked investment income (gross) 5 23 ______ ______ 304 275 ______ ______ Other income Deposit income 6 10 ______ ______ Total income 310 285 ====== ====== With effect from 1 May 2000 franked investment income is presented excluding attributable tax credits. Previously, franked investment income was presented including attributable tax credits, which were then also included within the charge for taxation. The change, which has no effect on the net income after taxation for the period, has been made to comply with FRS 16 'Current Tax'; comparative figures have been restated. The effect of this change in presentation is to decrease franked investment income and the tax charge in 2000 by equal amounts of £33,000 (1999 - £29,000) resulting in no net change in the net income after taxation for the period for either 2000 or 1999. 3 The interim financial statements for the period ended 31 October 2000 are unaudited and do not constitute statutory accounts. The financial information for the year ended 30 April 2000 has been abridged from published accounts that have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and on which the report of the auditors was unqualified. 4 In accordance with stated policy, no interim dividend has been declared (1999 - nil). 5 The basic revenue return per Ordinary share is based on net revenue on ordinary activities after taxation of £92,000 (1999 - £55,000) and on 15,936,000 Ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue for the period (1999 - 15,877,174). 6 The basic capital return per share is based on net capital losses of £1,388,000 (1999 - gains of £2,259,000 loss) and on 15,936,000 Ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue for the period (1999 - 15,877,174). 7 The fully-diluted returns per Ordinary share have not been shown for the periods to 31 October 2000 and 1999 in accordance with FRS14 'Earnings per Share' as there is no dilution in earnings resulting from the Warrants in issue as the average share prices for the periods are less than the exercise price of the Warrants. 8 The fully-diluted net asset values per Ordinary share have been calculated by reference to the total number of shares in issue at the period end and on the assumption that those Warrants which are not exercised at the period end, amounting to 3,081,600 Warrants (31 October 1999 and 30 April 2000 - 3,081,600), were fully exercised on the first day of the financial period at 100p per share, giving a total of 19,017,600 Ordinary shares. No calculation has been shown as at 31 October 2000 as the exercise price of the Warrants, being 100p, exceeded the value of the basic net asset value. 9 Copies of the Interim Report will be posted to all shareholders and warrant holders in due course. Copies may be obtained from One Bow Churchyard, Cheapside, London EC4M 9HH. Aberdeen Asset Management PLC - Secretaries 22 December 2000 Review report by Ernst & Young to The Taverners Trust PLC Introduction We have been instructed by the Company to review the financial information set out above and we have read the other information contained in the Interim Report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial information. Directors 'responsibilities The Interim Report, including the financial information contained therein, is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors. The Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority require that the accounting policies and presentation applied to the interim figures should be consistent with those applied in preparing the preceding annual accounts except where they are to be changed in the next annual accounts in which case any changes, and the reasons for them, are to be disclosed. Review work performed We conducted our review in accordance with guidance contained in Bulletin 1999/4: 'Review of Interim financial information' issued by the Auditing Practices Board. A review consists principally of making enquiries of management and applying analytical procedures to the financial information and underlying financial data and, based thereon, assessing whether the accounting policies and presentation have been consistently applied unless otherwise disclosed. A review excludes audit procedures such as tests of controls and verification of assets, liabilities and transactions. It is substantially less in scope than an audit performed in accordance with Auditing Standards and therefore provides a lower level of assurance than an audit. Accordingly we do not express an audit opinion on the financial information. Review conclusion On the basis of our review we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the financial information as presented for the six months ended 31 October 2000. Ernst & Young London 22 December 2000
UK 100

Latest directors dealings