Interim Results

Taverners Trust PLC 19 December 2002 THE TAVERNERS TRUST PLC UNAUDITED INTERIM RESULTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 31 OCTOBER 2002 Chairman's Statement Over the half-year ending 31st October 2002 the fully diluted net asset value of Taverners Trust changed almost exactly in line with our benchmark, the FTSE Actuaries Leisure, Entertainment and Hotels Index; however as the latter fell by 24.5% this was not a happy outcome. To a large extent our experience during this period has reflected the poor performance of the equities market as a whole as the FTSE All Share Ex Investment Company Index dropped by 22.7% during these months and the FTSE Small Cap Ex Investment Company Index, which may be a better indicator for the size of company in which Taverners typically invests, was down by 30.7% over this half-year. The period started comparatively well so that at the end of June the Trust's NAV had only fallen by 3.0% while the Benchmark had declined by 11.4%. Outperformance lasted to the end of August. I was therefore able to write to shareholders with an optimistic statement on 24th June and the Manager was able to enlarge on this on 24th July in the Annual Report and Accounts. Unfortunately on this occasion I have to report that the Trust has underperformed from around the end of September. Since we last wrote to you on 24th July the Trust's NAV has fallen by 24.0% and we have lost the outperformance built up since April 2001. Much of this underperformance has been the result of a failure to reduce sufficiently the Trust's commitment to late night operators and pub companies with town centre units. Our investments in these companies were mostly responsible for our outperformance in the earlier days of the Trust. However, this area of the licensed trade has become overcrowded as more and more units have opened in previously unlicensed premises. Competition is now intense so that a downturn in the economy or change in fashion exposes the weaker trading concepts and affects even the strongest players. Over time we have decreased our commitment to this sub-sector; for example we sold our holdings in both Yates Group and Regent Inns at much higher levels than those on which these companies shares stand at present; nor were we holders of the restaurant company Pizza Express whose share price has also fallen heavily. But it remains that 60% of the loss in Net Asset Value that has taken place since the publication of our accounts in July has come from our holdings in just four companies namely SFI Group, Luminar, Old Monk Company and Springwood all of which are involved in town centre units; half of that loss was caused by the collapse of the share price of SFI Group in which the Trust has a large holding. I feel I should comment on these four situations and on any expectations we hold for their recovery. SFI Group appears to have suffered a failure to make programmed disposals and control the cash flow impact of the roll-out of new premises, not helped by the hiatus in the early summer between one finance director leaving and another one arriving. The company was forced to acknowledge cash flow problems in a statement in September. Then at its AGM on 21st October the company made a profit warning based on an unexpected decline in trade since the end of September and said they were in breach of their banking covenants. A full financial review was announced and worse was to follow in November when this review uncovered the fact that the value of current assets was overstated and liabilities understated to the extent of £20m. The shares of SFI were suspended but the company has not been put into administration and we must hope that if enough disposals can be made to satisfy the banks' desire to reduce their exposure the company may return to the market. In past years these shares have performed well for us and in the early autumn we thought that with a well-regarded and vigorous young management in charge they could deal with the then known problems. The major night club operator Luminar reported figures for its half-year to the end of August in line with expectations but also encountered soft trading in September. Prudently they decided to reduce the speed of roll-out of new premises and instead refurbish a number of older sites thereby conserving cash. Despite better trade in October the share price reaction has been savage and we hope overdone. The company possesses a good proportion of freehold and long leasehold property, moderate gearing and reasonable fixed charge cover. We feel that the company is strong enough to handle the downturn and believe that the shares will again be attractive when the market starts to refine its blanket reaction to the sector's difficulties. Part of their problem stems from the Government's increase in the duty on premium packaged spirits on which Luminar has found it difficult to increase prices in the competitive environment. Old Monk was in retrospect too highly geared. The company had a number of high cost premises in the City of London and arguably made some ill-judged acquisitions although its Springbok themed bar formula was quite popular. Springwood is a night club company managed by one of the most experienced operators in the industry, but in retrospect it was undercapitalised. Over the last eighteen months the company has made a number of acquisitions without succeeding in issuing more equity. The last of these deals concerned a number of well-located but run-down First Leisure clubs; the company nevertheless failed in its intention to run these recent acquisitions at breakeven until they could be refurbished. This weakened cash flow at a time when trading in some of its other units came under pressure. Springwood's core Zanzibar and Cobana units continue to trade well. The profit warning at the start of November alluded to the fact that the company was close to breaching its banking covenants and the shares fell by more than 50%. The company is well backed by freehold estate and we are hopeful for its survival and eventual recovery. The woes of the sector became more general at the end of November as a result of a profit warning from JD Wetherspoon which revealed that the autumn promotion had not achieved the expected increase in drink volumes. The company said that if similar trends persisted, the profits to the end of July would be 10% lower than expectations. The shares fell by 27% on the announcement. The Trust had fortunately lightened its holding prior to this event. The impact was felt across the whole of the sub-sector, and the Net Asset Value of the Trust fell by 3.7% just on that day. A number of major stocks that form part of the benchmark index, which includes hotels, gaming and other leisure interests, were not affected by the Wetherspoon statement and thus created further comparative underperformance for your Trust. Following results in line with expectations delivered by Greene King and Wolverhampton and Dudley together with reassuring trading statements the shares of these companies have recovered albeit not to the level prior to the Wetherspoon statement. As a result of our underperformance a number of adjustments have been made to the portfolio. We have reduced our commitment to AIM stocks which pay little in the way of dividends and have increased our holdings of main market stocks where the share price is underpinned to some degree by a reasonable dividend. Over half of the portfolio is now invested in regional brewers and we have a large investment in Enterprise Inns where we believe the share price is also soundly based. We think that the worst of the carnage meted our to share prices of companies concentrating on the High Street circuits should now be over and we believe that the steps we have taken to reposition the portfolio should mean that the period of underperformance has come to an end. There is no reason why regional brewers and tenancies should not turn out as defensive in this economic downturn as they have proved on previous occasions and it is interesting to note that among out best performers during the period since 24th July have been Burtonwood Brewery, Belhaven Group and Hardys and Hansons, all of which have increased in value. During recent days the Trust's Net Asset Value has slowly started to recover ground against the benchmark. Lionel Ross Chairman 19 December 2002 Statement of Total Return (unaudited) Six months ended Six months ended 31 October 2002 31 October 2001 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Losses on investments - (5,064) (5,064) - (1,160) (1,160) Income 273 - 273 300 - 300 Investment management fee (70) (70) (140) (73) (73) (146) Other expenses (109) - (109) (92) - (92) Net return before finance costs and taxation 94 (5,134) (5,040) 135 (1,233) (1,098) Interest payable and similar charges (52) (51) (103) (53) (50) (103) Return on ordinary activities before taxation 42 (5,185) (5,143) 82 (1,283) (1,201) Tax on ordinary activities (2) 1 (1) (1) 1 - Transfer to/(from) reserves 40 (5,184) (5,144) 81 (1,282) (1,201) Return per Ordinary share (pence): Basic 0.25 (32.53) (32.28) 0.51 (8.04) (7.53) The revenue column of this statement represents the profit and loss account of the Company. The Statement of Total Return is presented in accordance with the Statement of Recommended Practice for 'Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies'. All revenue and capital items are derived from continuing operations. Balance Sheet At At At 31 October 2002 31 October 2001 30 April 2002 (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) £'000 £'000 £'000 Fixed assets Investments 16,542 18,685 22,438 Current assets Debtors 96 40 215 Cash at bank 729 1,075 - 825 1,115 215 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (100) (383) (242) Net current assets/(liabilities) 725 732 (27) Total assets less current liabilities 17,267 19,417 22,411 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year (3,000) (3,000) (3,000) Total net assets 14,267 16,417 19,411 Share capital and reserves Called-up share capital 3,984 3,984 3,984 Share premium account 10,536 10,536 10,536 Other reserves: Warrant reserve 981 981 981 Capital reserve - realised 1,518 1,666 1,922 Capital reserve - unrealised (2,948) (1,005) 1,832 Revenue reserve 196 255 156 Total equity shareholders' funds 14,267 16,417 19,411 Net asset value per Ordinary share (pence): Basic 89.53 103.02 121.81 Fully-diluted n/a 102.53 118.27 Cash Flow Statement (unaudtied) Six months ended Six months ended 31 October 2002 31 October 2001 £'000 £'000 Net cash (outflow) / inflow from operating activities (39) 48 Net cash outflow from servicing of finance (103) (103) Net cash inflow from financial investment 974 1,014 Equity dividends paid (80) (72) Increase in cash 752 887 Reconciliation of operating revenue to net cash inflow from operating activities Net revenue before interest payable and taxation 94 135 Increase in accrued income (1) (3) Decrease in other debtors 4 7 Decrease in other creditors (65) (18) Capitalised expenses taken to non-distributable reserves (70) (73) Overseas withholding tax suffered (1) - (39) 48 Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net funds/(debt) Increase in cash as above 752 887 Net debt at 1 May (3,023) (2,854) Net debt at 31 October (2,271) (1,967) Represented by: Cash at bank 729 1,075 Bank overdraft - (42) Debt falling due after more than one year (3,000) (3,000) (2,271) (1,967) Notes: 1. The interim accounts have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards under the historical cost convention modified to include the revaluation of fixed asset investments. 2. In accordance with stated policy, no interim dividend has been declared (2001 - nil). 3. The breakdown of income for the periods to 31 October 2002 and 31 October 2001 was as follows: 31-Oct 31-Oct 2002 2001 £'000 £'000 Income from investments Franked investment income 262 292 Unfranked investment income 8 1 270 293 Other income Deposit interest 2 3 Underwriting commission 1 4 3 7 Total income 273 300 4. The basic revenue return per Ordinary share is based on net revenue on ordinary activities after taxation of £40,000 (2001 - £81,000) and on 15,936,000 (2001 - 15,936,000) Ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue for the period. The basic capital return per Ordinary share is based on net capital losses for the period of £5,184,000 (2001 - losses of £1,282,000) and on 15,936,000 (2001 - 15,936,000) Ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue for the period. The fully-diluted returns per Ordinary share have not been shown for the periods to 31 October 2002 and 2001 in accordance with FRS14 'Earnings per share' as there is no dilution in earnings resulting from Warrants in issue as the average share prices of the Warrants for the period are less than the exercise price of the Warrants. 5. The basic net asset value per Ordinary share is based on net shareholders' funds at the period end, and on 15,936,000 (31 October 2001 - 15,936,000; 30 April 2002 - 15,936,000) Ordinary shares, being the number of Ordinary shares in issue at the period end. The fully-diluted net asset values per Ordinary share as at 31 October 2001 and 30 April 2002 have been calculated by reference to the total number of Ordinary shares in issue at the period end and on the assumption that those Warrants which are not exercised at the period end, amounting to 3,081,600 Warrants as at 31 October 2001 and 30 April 2002, were fully exercised on the first day of each financial period at 100p per share, giving a total of 19,017,600 Ordinary shares. No calculation has been shown as at 31 October 2002 as the exercise price of the Warrants, being 100p, exceeded the value of the basic net asset value. 6. The financial information for the six months ended 31 October 2002 and 31 October 2001 comprises non-statutory accounts within the meaning of section 240 of the Companies Act 1985. The financial information for the year ended 30 April 2002 has been abridged from published accounts that have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and on which the report of the auditors was unqualified. The interim accounts have been prepared on the same basis as the annual accounts. Aberdeen Asset Management PLC Secretaries 19 December 2002 INDEPENDENT REVIEW REPORT BY ERNST & YOUNG LLP TO THE TAVERNERS TRUST PLC Introduction We have been instructed by the Company to review the financial information for the six months ended 31 October 2002 which comprises the Statement of Total Return, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statement and the related notes 1 to 6. We have read the other information contained in the Interim Report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial information. Directors' responsibilities The Interim Report, including the financial information contained therein, is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the Directors. The Directors are responsible for preparing the Interim Report in accordance with the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority which require that the accounting policies and presentation applied to the interim figures should be consistent with those applied in preparing the preceding annual accounts except where any changes, and the reasons for them, are disclosed. Review work performed We conducted our review in accordance with guidance contained in Bulletin 1999/4 'Review of interim financial information' issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review consists principally of making enquiries of management and applying analytical procedures to the financial information and underlying financial data, and based thereon, assessing whether the accounting policies and presentation have been consistently applied, unless otherwise disclosed. A review excludes audit procedures such as tests of controls and verification of assets, liabilities and transactions. It is substantially less in scope than an audit performed in accordance with United Kingdom Auditing Standards and therefore provides a lower level of assurance than an audit. Accordingly we do not express an audit opinion on the financial information. Review conclusion On the basis of our review we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the financial information as presented for the six months ended 31 October 2002. Ernst & Young LLP London 19 December 2002 This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
UK 100

Latest directors dealings