Interim Results

Jupiter European Opps. Trust PLC 29 January 2004 Jupiter European Opportunities Trust PLC Announcement of Unaudited Interim Results for the half year to 30th November 2003 CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT Your Company's net asset value per share rose by 21.6% from 83.82p to 101.94p during the six months under review. This compares with a rise of 11.7% in the FTSE World Europe ex-UK Index during the same period. Performance in the six months to 30 November 2003 was helped by the judicious use of gearing and a successful experience in the Company's trading subsidiary. So far we have not made use of the new facility available to investment companies to purchase the Company's shares in the market for treasury rather than for immediate cancellation. In the event that the Company chooses to buy shares into treasury in the future, those shares may either be reissued to investors or cancelled at a later date. Used correctly, your board believes that this facility should enhance shareholder returns. Given the eclectic nature of the Company's investment portfolio, there will be periods of underperformance against the indices, but over time we are confident that the Manager's highly selective approach to portfolio construction will serve shareholders well, as it has done hitherto. The current strength of the euro may turn out to be a powerful discipline for European company managements, forcing them to make unpalatable decisions regarding cost-cutting and thereby engendering greater efficiency and competitiveness in a world where pricing power is a rare commodity. H M Priestley Chairman 29th January 2004 MANAGER'S REVIEW Your Company has performed well during the period under review relative to its benchmark index. In part this outperformance is due to the purchase of stocks when market sentiment was absurdly pessimistic in February and March of 2003. Indeed, at that time your Company borrowed €23.7 million of bank debt to gear the return on its investment portfolio. This gearing was effective in enhancing the Company's net asset value per share, although the amount of drawn down bank debt was reduced to €7.5m by 30 November. The Company's trading subsidiary reported a profit of £760,000 for the six months under review despite a modest loss from short positions. At the time of writing there are only three small short positions in place. Despite the encouraging performance of your Company during the half year under review, the economic background in Europe remained disappointing. According to the latest OECD forecasts the eurozone grew by only 0.5% in 2003. The worst areas in Europe as a whole were Germany, France, Switzerland and the Netherlands. The better areas included Belgium, Finland, Ireland, and Sweden. There is no obvious end in sight to Europe's chronically poor economic performance. Official estimates anticipate improvement in 2004, but these are perennially optimistic. In a global context the two other major economic regions, the United States of America and Japan, enjoyed stronger growth, expanding their economies by 2.9% and 2.7% respectively. To our list of reasons for Europe's disappointing performance we can add poor corporate governance and accountability. Whilst much attention has been focussed on American corporate scandals, in relative economic terms the impact of such events in Europe has arguably been greater. Two factors are striking: the first is that such scandals tend to remain hidden for longer in Europe; the second is that political interference tends to sustain failing companies for longer. Thus, as America enjoys the upswing of rapid economic growth, Europe is still contemplating, even prolonging, the aftermath of the years of excesses. In the six months to 30 November the FTSE World Europe ex-UK index rose by 11.7% (in sterling terms) compared with 4.5% for the main American index and 26.2% for Japan. This good performance of the markets in general is due to a number of factors; the strength of the banking sector, historically low interest rates, strong economic growth in America coupled with a remarkable profits recovery, and a rise in corporate activity. The twin global concerns of a year earlier - deflation and terrorism - were largely assuaged by events. In Europe the breakdown of the Growth and Stability Pact was important. Faced with enormous structural challenges manifest in high unemployment, massive pension shortfalls, high budget deficits and low growth, the politicians have responded. In France's case the response has been to reduce the number of national holidays by one. Germany's response is more serious. Chancellor Schroder is having some success with limited reforms as set out in Agenda 2010. The flouting of the budget deficit rules by France and Germany has had a positive short term effect on the markets but leaves the challenges in Europe greater than ever. The ambition of getting the different European economies in step with one another remains distant. Within the eurozone, for instance, the inflation span of 2.7% is, in relative terms, as wide as it has been. The better performing equity markets were Germany, Holland, Norway and Sweden. The weaker markets included Italy, and France. In sector terms, the better performing included cyclicals such as automotive and industrials. The best was software as demand improved for the first time in three years. The worst sectors were those that are generally regarded as being more defensive: retail, utilities, and pharmaceuticals. The strong equity markets have been accompanied by a marked strengthening of the euro against the dollar. In the period under review the euro gained only 1.2% against sterling. From its nadir in October 2000 to 30 November 2003, it rose 46% against the dollar. This is not necessarily good news. Analysing currency moves is notoriously difficult, but this is probably a reflection of America's 'debtor' and Europe's 'creditor' status. Stock picking remains the key determinant of your Company's performance and our approach to stock selection is unchanged. We seek to buy companies with a good record, a proven product and business model, combined with evidence of entrepreneurial endeavour and the prospects of above average growth opportunities. Given the consistency of the investment approach turnover in the portfolio is relatively low. The biggest sale was that of Matalan, where the competition is intensifying. Other sales were of ebookers and Soitec, the performance of the latter having disappointed. We reduced our holdings in Coloplast, UFF, Euler, Stedim and Dassault Systemes, mainly on valuation grounds. Purchases were made of shares in SES Global, the world's leading satellite company. A new holding was taken in Clarins, the French skincare company. The holding in Imerys, a French company which is one of the world's leading industrial minerals companies, was increased. Further purchases of Depfa bank, the European sovereign debt bank, and Essilor, the world's leading ophthalmic company, were made. We also added to our existing positions in Novozymes and Novo-Nordisk. Geographic weightings play little part in the investment strategy. Investments are made in companies in greater Europe outside the index zone when there is a compelling case. The UK weighting has fallen to 13.2% and a small holding has been taken in a Polish (NASDAQ listed) company. East European holdings are likely to remain small as few companies in that area fulfil our investment criteria, whilst many do in Western Europe. The impact of such factors as the developing economies like China and the accession of the Central and Eastern European countries to the EU will accelerate the polarisation of winning and losing companies in Europe. Ten countries are due to join the EU in May 2004, although the full impact will be staggered over a number of years. The success of your Company depends, as always, on your manager's ability to identify the winning business models. Undoubtedly excellent investment opportunities will continue to exist in Europe. Alex Darwall Manager Jupiter Asset Management Limited 29th January 2004 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN (Incorporating the Revenue Account) for the six months to 30th November 2003 (unaudited) 2003 2002 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Realised losses on investments - (1,775) (1,775) - (2,101) (2,101) Increase/(decrease) in unrealised appreciation - 15,328 15,328 - (10,310) (10,310) of fixed asset investments _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Total capital gains/(losses) on investments - 13,553 13,553 - (12,411) (12,411) Foreign exchange gains/(losses) on loan - 540 540 - (178) (178) Other exchange losses - (1) (1) - (11) (11) Income 706 - 706 372 - 372 Gain on dealings by subsidiary 714 - 714 513 - 513 Investment management fee (359) - (359) (309) - (309) Other expenses (236) - (236) (210) - (210) _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Net return/(loss) before finance costs and 825 14,092 14,917 366 (12,600) (12,234) taxation Interest payable (210) - (210) (198) - (198) _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Return/(loss) on ordinary activities before tax 615 14,092 14,707 168 (12,600) (12,432) Tax on ordinary activities (91) - (91) (22) - (22) _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Return/(loss) on ordinary activities after tax 524 14,092 14,616 146 (12,600) (12,454) _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Transfer to reserves 524 14,092 14,616 146 (12,600) (12,454) _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Return/(loss) per Ordinary share 0.65p 17.47p 18.12p 0.18p (15.25)p (15.07)p The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Group. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. The financial information does not constitute 'accounts' as defined in section 240 of the Companies Act 1985. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET as at 30th November 2003 30thNovember 31st May 2003 2003 (Unaudited) (Audited) £'000 £'000 Fixed assets Investments 88,516 80,578 Current assets Investments 1,279 4,145 Debtors 1,001 1,689 Cash at bank 123 130 2,403 5,964 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (3,461) (1,950) Net current (liabilities) / assets (1,058) 4,014 Total assets less current liabilities 87,458 84,592 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year (5,227) (16,977) Net Assets 82,231 67,615 Capital and reserves Called up share capital 807 807 Share premium 38,843 38,843 Special reserve 37,597 37,597 Redemption reserve 22 22 Capital reserve - realised (9,317) (7,541) Capital reserve - unrealised 13,887 (1,981) Revenue reserve 392 (132) Total equity shareholders' funds 82,231 67,615 Net asset value per Ordinary share 101.94p 83.82p CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT for the six months to 30th November 2003 (unaudited) 30th November 2003 30th November 2002 £'000 £'000 Operating activities Net cash inflow from operating activities 4,071 1,877 Servicing of finance Interest paid (247) (238) Net cash outflow from servicing of finance (247) (238) Taxation Net tax (paid) / received (56) 98 Capital expenditure and financial investment Purchase of fixed asset investments (15,262) (37,735) Sale of fixed asset investments 23,213 39,426 Net cash inflow from capital expenditure and financial investment 7,951 1,691 Net cash inflow before financing 11,719 3,428 Financing Long term loan received - 4,985 Long term loan repaid (11,210) (10,292) Shares repurchased and cancelled - (540) Net cash outflow from financing (11,210) (5,847) Increase/(decrease) in cash 509 (2,419) The interim report will be sent to all shareholders and copies may be obtained from the registered office of the Company at 1 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7JJ. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED SECRETARIES This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
UK 100

Latest directors dealings