Interim Results

Jupiter European Opps. Trust PLC 31 January 2002 Jupiter European Opportunities Trust PLC Stock Exchange Announcement Preliminary announcement of unaudited results for the half year to 30th November 2001. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT Markets continued to slide during the six months to 30th November 2001 and Europe suffered more than most. The FTSE World Europe ex-UK index declined by 11.9 per cent, a greater fall than those suffered by the markets of North America even though the tragic events of 11th September actually took place in the USA. Against this background it is pleasing to report that net asset value per share fell by only 6.9 per cent from 89.29p to 83.10p and that the Company's share price stayed close to asset value - indeed from time to time a premium has been seen. The Manager's Review on page 4 to 5 highlights the principal portfolio changes. Although overall the list has not changed substantially , value has been added by reducing holdings when prices have gone up strongly and by buying on setbacks, notably in the second half of September, when share prices were particularly depressed. Borrowing facilities have been drawn down as required, but gearing has at all times remained within the limits set by your Board. Net loss on revenue before interest and tax amounted to £867,000 in the half year. In accordance with the prospectus, no dividend is recommended. World markets have fallen for two successive calendar years and the general expectation is for some recovery in 2002. However, valuations are higher than at a similar stage in previous market cycles, so the upside may be limited for the majority of stocks. In such conditions, a carefully chosen list of investments together with a disciplined investment process can prove the worth of an active approach to portfolio management. H M Priestley Chairman 31st January 2002 MANAGER'S REVIEW The economic background continued to deteriorate during the six months under review. Whereas, at the start of the year, the German government had forecast growth of 3 per cent in 2001, by the end of the period this estimate had been revised downward to 0.7 per cent. Politicians and forecasters have been quick to cite the impact of US events as the primary cause of this slowdown, but this is misleading as the German economy was slowing markedly already. The slowdown in Germany was the most obvious example within 'Euroland', but similar conditions pertained elsewhere in Europe. The main exception to this was Ireland where growth has remained impressive. Overall expectations are for 1.5 per cent growth in 'Euroland' in 2001 to be followed by 1.2 per cent in 2002. The European Central Bank (ECB) has been criticised for being slow to cut interest rates thus dampening economic recovery. Such criticism, however, is inappropriate as the ECB's sole task is to control inflation. Europe's central problem remains supply side rigidities and the poor productivity record that goes with it. The euro has firmed in the period under review up by 5.9 per cent against the US dollar and by 5 per cent against sterling. These currency moves had relatively little impact on economic developments or on the way in which your manager has invested. Corporate sector profitability in Europe wilted in 2001 under a combination of slowing GDP growth, an adverse shift in pricing power brought about by greater transparency, which was itself the result of technology changes, and continuing wage inflation across much of Europe. Market estimates are that earnings fell by 13.9 per cent in Europe in 2001. The fall in technology, media and telecommunications (TMT) earnings was the most marked, whereas oil earnings were much better. The problem of overcapacity is concentrated largely in the TMT sectors. By contrast more traditional sectors have not suffered from over-investment. In fact, in some ways corporate Europe has proved itself more robust than in previous recessions. Hotels, banks and car manufacturers, traditionally amongst the sectors most impacted by slowdowns, can claim to have been more resilient this time. All these are better capitalised than before. There are other reasons to be optimistic for the corporate sector. Although the erosion of corporate pricing power is harmful in the near term, in the longer run this should be good for growth generally. Furthermore, it is quite possible that the corporate sector will start to enjoy the full benefits of the IT revolution at the same time that expenditure on IT equipment is falling. Perversely, the loss of confidence in the TMT sectors has relieved pressure on the established companies as new entrants have found funding to be increasingly difficult to obtain. Finally, the capital gains tax reforms in Germany are good news. Europe performed badly, down by 11.9 per cent over the six month period compared with falls of 11.5 per cent for the FTSE World Index, 9.8 per cent for the FTSE World United Kingdom and 9.3 per cent for the S&P 500 Composite. In the equity markets the TMT sectors continued to perform poorly, but worse were the leisure, airline and aerospace sectors. These, along with the insurance sector, suffered most from the events of 11th September. Swissair was a notable corporate failure. The best performing sectors included property, drinks and other defensives. The advent of the single currency and the increasing internationalisation of business within Europe mean that geographic performance is becoming less and less important. Finland's poor performance is almost wholly explained by its dependence on Nokia. Italy's equally poor performance is mainly due to the underperformance of the banks. Spain and Sweden were amongst the best performing markets, largely for stock specific reasons. Against a backdrop of volatile markets, your Company has pursued a consistent approach to investment. The fund remains concentrated in mid cap companies where we can identify the combination of good long term records and entrepreneurial flair. Accordingly, despite the volatile markets, there have been relatively few changes to the portfolio. We sold our holdings of FMC and Numico. Both these companies released poor results, reflecting problems which appeared to be more fundamental rather than transient. We also sold a number of holdings in smaller companies where developments were disappointing. These included Roesch, Riber, Tomra and Class Editori. New positions included Deutsche Post, the German postal company, Mediaset, the dominant Italian TV group, and Hartwall, the Finnish brewer, which has a leading position in the Russian beer market. The weakness in markets in late September allowed us to increase positions in a number of stocks notably Novozymes, the Danish enzymes company, and Techem, the German utility support company. The largest position continues to be Neopost, the French mail room systems company. Our UK weighting was approximately 10 per cent at the period end. This comprises AB Ports and Matalan, both of which have distinctive qualities which cannot be replicated on the Continent. Challenges remain in Europe. The greatest is the reluctance of the political establishment to tackle the problem of rigid labour markets. Productivity improvements lag behind those of North America, and the gap appears to have widened in recent years. Fiscal problems and unfunded pension liabilities will become increasingly acute. Those who hope that the advent of the euro in January 2002 will be a panacea for Europe's ills will be disappointed. On the contrary, it may itself preclude the resolution of the key problems. Nevertheless, there will always be great investment opportunities in Europe and this, rather than any general view of markets, underscores our enthusiasm. Your manager's ability to uncover these opportunities is the principal determinant of the level of gearing and of geographical weightings. A F C Darwall Jupiter Asset Management Limited CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN (incorporating the revenue account) for the six months to 30th November 2001 (Unaudited) Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 Realised losses on investments - (5,600) (5,600) Decrease in unrealised depreciation of fixed - 2,163 2,163 asset investments _______ ________ _______ Total capital losses on investments - (3,437) (3,437) Foreign exchange losses - (529) (529) Income 369 - 369 Loss on dealings by subsidiary (638) - (638) Investment management fee (352) - (352) Other expenses (246) - (246) ________ _______ _______ NET LOSS BEFORE FINANCE (867) (3,966) (4,833) COSTS AND TAXATION Interest payable (269) - (269) __________ _______ _______ LOSS ON ORDINARY ACTIVITIES (1,136) (3,966) (5,102) BEFORE TAX Tax on ordinary activities (26) - (26) ________ _______ ______ LOSS ON ORDINARY ACTIVITIES (1,162) (3,966) (5,128) AFTER TAX FOR THE FINANCIAL ====== ====== ====== PERIOD _______ _______ _______ TRANSFER FROM RESERVES (1,162) (3,966) (5,128) ====== ====== ====== LOSS PER ORDINARY (1.40)p (4.78)p (6.18)p SHARE (pence) ====== ====== ====== The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Group. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. Jupiter European Opportunities Trust PLC was launched on 20th November 2000 and therefore there is no comparative period on which to report. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET as at 30th November 2001 30th November 31st May 2001 2001 (Unaudited) (Audited) £'000 £'000 FIXED ASSETS Investments 76,519 84,329 ______ ______ CURRENT ASSETS Investments 3,667 1,476 Debtors 131 191 Cash at bank 881 181 _______ _______ 4,679 1,848 CREDITORS: amounts falling due within one year (2,227) (2,577) _______ ______ NET CURRENT ASSETS / 2,452 (729) (LIABILITIES) _______ _______ TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT 78,971 83,600 LIABILITIES CREDITORS: amounts falling due after more than one year (10,046) (9,547) _______ ______ NET ASSETS 68,925 74,053 ====== ===== CAPITAL AND RESERVES Called up share capital 829 829 Share premium 77,686 77,686 Capital reserve-realised (6,812) (1,290) Capital reserve - unrealised (1,351) (2,907) Revenue reserve (1,427) (265) ______ ______ TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS 68,925 74,053 ===== ===== NET ASSET VALUE PER ORDINARY 83.10p 89.29p SHARE (pence) ===== ===== This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
UK 100

Latest directors dealings