RE: Young & Co's Brewery

Guinness Peat Group PLC 5 July 2002 For Immediate Release 5 July 2002 GUINNESS PEAT GROUP plc LETTER TO THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUNG & CO'S BREWERY PLC Blake Nixon, UK Executive Director of Guinness Peat Group plc ('GPG') has written to Mr John Young, Chairman of Young & Co's Brewery PLC ('Young'), in support of GPG's resolutions for the forthcoming Young Annual General Meeting. GPG currently holds 23.3% of Young's 'A' ordinary share capital. The full text of the letter follows below. TEXT OF LETTER FROM BLAKE NIXON TO JOHN YOUNG, CHAIRMAN OF YOUNG & CO'S BREWERY PLC. Dear Mr Young, Shareholders are well aware that at recent years' Young & Co's Brewery ('Young') Annual General Meetings non-family shareholders have voted overwhelmingly in support of those resolutions for the regularisation of the Company's share capital proposed by Guinness Peat Group plc ('GPG'). In light of this we felt it appropriate to again this year put the proposals to shareholders, notwithstanding the Board's refusal to date to take any actions in this regard. Perhaps this inaction is unsurprising since Young's current voting structure precludes a majority of its share capital from removing directors. In summary, simplification of its share capital would allow Young to become a properly focussed and truly commercial operation and would inevitably lead to significantly improved results and share prices. Our third and fourth resolutions will enable the Company to repurchase its listed shares and thereby provide a definitive mechanism through which to promote the process of unlocking value for all shareholders. The merit of Young repurchasing its shares, which are today selling at a 35% discount to their net asset value, versus buying fully priced assets in the open market is undeniable. The detailed rationale behind these proposals has been set out in letters circulated with our resolutions in past years. We should be more than happy to provide copies of these letters to any Young shareholder and can be contacted on 020 7484 3370. This year, given the continuing concerns we have regarding the Group's operation, GPG has also proposed that I be elected a director of the Company. Our direct involvement would provide the impetus which we feel is currently lacking for meaningful action to correct Young's inadequate return on capital, and to deliver shareholder value in a timely manner. My appointment would also allow closer scrutiny of a further unsatisfactory aspect of Young's affairs, previously uncommented on, which we describe below. The principal assets of the Ram Brewery Trust ('RBT') as at 17 May 2002 were 1,858,500 'B' shares representing 14.35% of the equity share capital of the Company but, importantly, carrying at present 25.65% of the votes. The RBT has been established for many years and consists of a 'Pension Account' and a ' General Account'. Shareholders will recall that in January the Board wrote to them in connection with a change of the Company's Articles to enable the Pension Account to remedy its funding which, but for the prescribed 'grace period', was insufficient to meet the minimum requirement set out in pensions legislation. Notwithstanding the various share transfers that have since taken place, the Pension Account retains a concentration of self-investment in the Company's shares which is significantly greater than generally accepted prudent levels or indeed would be allowable under legislation were the 'B' shares listed. The General Account is stated to exist to promote the involvement of the employees of the Company in its affairs. Whilst this altruistic objective seems at first blush uncontroversial the reality is somewhat different. The Young Profit Sharing Scheme, (the principal role of the General Account) is not a normal share scheme but instead a 'Phantom' scheme: that is, for so long as the RBT exists, employees in the scheme never actually acquire ownership of the underlying shares nor the right to exercise the votes attaching to them. The same economic and legal position for their employees is generally achieved by most companies via a simple contract. The associated shares, carrying approximately 12.7% of the voting capital (allowing for the so called unallocated shares), owned by the RBT are, in fact, more in the nature of what is known in the US as Treasury Stock. Furthermore, it does not seem any coincidence that the RBT, funded by your Company, has purchased a very substantial portion of the 'B' shares sold in the past decade by members of the Young family. The key issue that arises, accentuated by the total lack of clarity as to who appoints the RBT Trustees, and the fact that two of the three are respectively the Company's Chairman and Deputy Chairman, (the other being the Chairman's brother), is the appropriateness of the RBT voting on resolutions, such as ours, that concern the long term interests of shareholders. Since we can only assume that the Board appoints the Trustees the scope for abuses is obvious. The effect is to magnify the deleterious nature of the current share structure under which the 'B' shareholders, whilst having the power to appoint the entire Board, only own 31.9% of the share capital and therefore are exposed to only 31.9% of the estimated £4m-£5m underperformance caused by the Brewery's poor economics. The combination of the RBT and the share structure makes it exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, for the independent directors to ensure they can effectively represent the public shareholders, who are forced to bear 68.1% of this shortfall. Contrary to Young's misrepresentation of my comments regarding the future of its archaic share structure, our proposals have consistently been made with only one objective in mind - lifting Young's share price to a level commensurate with the substantial underlying value of the Group. The resolutions we have proposed for this year's AGM represent a further opportunity for independent shareholders to reiterate their desire that Young adopt a structure which will secure its future. We strongly commend them to the Board and all shareholders. Yours sincerely Guinness Peat Group plc Blake A Nixon - Ends - Enquiries: Guinness Peat Group plc 020 7484 3370 Blake Nixon, UK Executive Director Weber Shandwick Square Mile 020 7950 2800 Kevin Smith / Josh Royston This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange

Companies

Coats Group (COA)
UK 100

Latest directors dealings