Final Results

Dinkie Heel PLC 13 June 2003 Chairman's statement (extract) Strategic review Against a sharply worsening trading climate, the company has vigorously pursued its key strategic objective for the toecap business: the orderly run-down of manufacturing in the UK, and build-up of production in Botswana. Progress in Botswana has been slower than expected, requiring both additional finance and technical support. To manage the financial impact the company has introduced a new shareholder into the Botswana company and reduced its own stake in the company to one third. Dinkie retains ownership of all the manufacturing assets. To protect customer deliveries, the final decision to close production in Bristol was made in January 2003 and production finished in April 2003. Presently the Board has decided to restrict the continuation of the toecap business in the UK to a stockholding, marketing and technical support operation based solely on supply from Botswana. The Bristol premises are for sale and suitable arrangements are being sought in the area to accommodate the much reduced operation. The Board decided to move responsibility for the Phillips Rubber business to Davies Odell in Rushden from 1 January 2003 and the move was completed efficiently during April. Prospects Toecap demand remains satisfactory but ability to satisfy that demand and return to profitability will be restricted in the short term by the production capability and cash flow requirements of Botswana. The losses in the UK toecap business have reduced sharply with the diminishing scale of the operation. Once the premises have been sold the associated fixed overheads will also cease. Phillips Rubber supplies from South Africa are now adequate and the exceptional airfreight costs associated with the initial manufacturing problems have ceased. The business, whose markets are largely in the UK, is now stable. The re-building of customer confidence will take some time. At Davies Odell the development costs of 'softer' cow mats and of Forcefield branded protective undergarments did hold back the results for 2002 but have provided a stronger base for 2003. For the division the year has begun satisfactorily, with profitability ahead of last year at the same stage. Financial results Turnover for the year was £6,909,000 (2001, £9,341,000) and the operating loss before exceptional items was £881,000 (2001, £328,000). After exceptional items of £691,000 (2001, £1,055,000) the operating loss from continuing operations was £1,572,000 (2001, £1,383,000). Interest payable was £178,000 and a research and development tax credit of £10,000 was received. The loss for the financial year totalled £1,740,000 (2001, £1,561,000). The basic loss per share was 11.78p (2001, 10.57p). Net cash outflow from operating activities was £229,000 (2001, £222,000) but was more than compensated by the sale proceeds of the Manchester premises of £674,000. Net debt was reduced by £111,000 to £2,653,000. The segmental analysis attached and my review of the year give further information about the performance of each of the company's two divisions. Review of the year Davies Odell sales were 8.2% lower at £4,317,000 (2001, £4,703,000). Matting sales were £1,322,000 (2001, £1,659,000) but would have been similar to the previous year had it not been for a change in sales procedure to a commission only basis in one important export market. Sales of body armour products were 2% lower at £921,000 and sales to the footwear trade were 1% lower at £2,074,000. The divisional operating profit reduced to £244,000 (2001, £422,000) as a result, almost equally, of reduced margin in the footwear trade and increased overheads including continuing body armour development expenditure. Dinkie-Phillips sales suffered from both the repercussions of the re-organisation and sharply increased global competition. Toecap sales volume fell 43% in the year and Phillips sales were 55% lower. The costs of airfreight of products from overseas for Phillips was £180,000 and this charge directly affected margins on sales. Overheads were considerably reduced, although insurance costs which increased by £40,000 were a notable exception, and labour costs were 26% lower. Overall the division recorded an operating loss before exceptional items of £928,000 (2001, £554,000). The company reduced its working capital requirements in the year by £792,000, this reduction being split equally between the divisions. In the Dinkie-Phillips business the reduction reflected the level of activity. In the Davies Odell business however the reduction is the result of a determined effort to reduce both debtors and stock. After restructuring costs the net cash outflow from operating activities for the year was £229,000 (2001, £222,000). Exceptional items Sale of the Manchester freehold property was completed in July 2002 realising a profit of £574,000. The strategic direction of the company requires a charge for reorganisation costs in the year of £618,000. Of this sum £136,000 relates to termination payments to employees, £178,000 is the reduction to net realisable value of toe cap stock and £148,000 represents the provision made in this year against the costs of establishing the toe cap production facility in Botswana. Costs of freighting machinery to Botswana were £62,000. Consultants' fees and other costs relating to all of these changes amounted to £94,000. The board has again considered the carrying value of the Dinkie-Phillips plant and machinery in the light of the performance of the division and its further restructuring and has decided to make a further impairment provision of £647,000. Dividends To achieve a successful reorganisation and return the company to healthy profit requires the conservation of cash. In these circumstances the board is unable to recommend a dividend for the year (2001, nil). Funding: the creation of Loan Notes, issue of share warrants, increase in nominal share capital and power to issue shares Throughout these developments the company has retained the support of its bankers but the bank has, in turn, required the company to look to its own resources to raise additional funds. I have explained below the various methods that the Board has used in order to finance its reorganisation needs. In December 2002 the company created 400,000 10 per cent Secured Loan Notes of £1 each repayable on 18 December 2003. It issued within the financial year 2002 Loan Notes totalling £105,000 and a further £102,500 of Loan Notes were issued in January 2003. At that time these funds, all subscribed by the directors and their immediate families, were vital in enabling the business to continue trading but it was also clear that to execute its plans the company would need further funds later in 2003. The company will seek the formal approval of shareholders for the Loan Note Instrument at the annual general meeting. The company has in June 2003 received funding from new investors in respect of Loan Notes totalling £162,500 and expects to issue the remaining £30,000 of Loan Notes to the same investors. It has also agreed a related benefit equivalent to an element of convertibility for these Loan funds. Once the arrangements are concluded warrants to subscribe for 800,000 shares on 18 December 2003 at 5p per share will be given to the investors and, subject to the passing of resolutions to be put to the annual general meeting, the company intends to issue further share warrants to the same investors for 700,000 shares also at 5p. The board has also taken advantage of the powers given to it to issue shares for cash. In June 2003 it issued 736,056 ordinary shares at 5p each, realising almost £37,000 and intends to issue a further 200,000 shares to realise a further £10,000. The board considers that these arrangements are necessary to enable the reorganisation of the company to proceed and thereby to return it to profit. These arrangements taken together require your board to seek to increase the nominal share capital of the company. The directors cannot issue new shares in the company nor can they issue them other than in strict proportion to existing holdings unless in each case the shareholders in general meeting give their permission. Your directors seek the powers to issue the whole of the un-issued share capital in the current exceptional circumstances. Other than as described above and to satisfy existing share options they have no present intention of issuing shares, but consider that such powers could be helpful and would not be excessive in view of the size of the company and the restrictive nature of taking the powers for a lesser amount. Richard Organ Chairman Dinkie Heel plc Profit and Loss Account Year ended 31 December 2002 2002 2001 £'000 £'000 Turnover from continuing operations 6,909 9,341 Cost of sales (7,024) (8,938) Gross (loss)/profit (115) 403 Net operating expenses (including exceptional items) (1,457) (1,786) Operating loss before exceptional items (881) (328) Exceptional items Profit on sale of property held for resale 574 - Restructuring costs (618) (352) Goodwill impairment provision - (403) Plant & Machinery impairment provision (647) (300) Operating loss from continuing operations (1,572) (1,383) Interest payable (178) (178) Loss on ordinary activities before taxation (1,750) (1,561) Taxation 10 - Loss for the financial year (1,740) (1,561) Dividends - - Loss for the year set against reserves (1,740) (1,561) Loss per share - basic and diluted (11.78p) (10.57p) The company has no recognised gains or losses other than the loss for the financial year as set out above Dinkie Heel plc Balance Sheet 31 December 2002 2002 2001 £'000 £'000 Net assets employed Fixed Assets Intangible assets 39 41 Tangible assets 1,427 2,310 Investment in associate - 74 1,466 2,425 Current assets: Stocks 848 1,218 Debtors 1,039 1,652 Property held for resale - 100 Cash at bank and in hand 17 17 1,904 2,987 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (2,775) (3,059) Net current liabilities (871) (72) Total assets less current liabilities 595 2,353 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year (764) (782) Provisions for liabilities and charges - - Net (liabilities)/assets (169) 1,571 Capital and reserves Called up share capital 738 738 Share premium 715 715 Revaluation reserve 513 520 Profit and loss account (2,135) (402) Total equity shareholders' funds (169) 1,571 Dinkie Heel plc Cash Flow Statement Year ended 31 December 2002 2002 2001 £'000 £'000 Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash outflow from operating activities Operating loss (1,572) (1,383) Depreciation and amortisation charges 330 418 Profit on sale of property held for resale (574) Impairment provisions 647 703 Associate, provision for costs of establishment 148 25 Decrease in stocks 370 228 Decrease in debtors 613 99 Decrease in creditors (191) (312) Net cash outflow from operating activities (229) (222) Cash Flow Statement Net cash outflow from operating activities (229) (222) Returns on investments and servicing of finance (178) (178) Taxation 10 - Capital expenditure and financial investment 582 (87) Acquisitions (74) (99) 111 (586) Financing 98 (23) Increase/(decrease) in cash 209 (609) Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt Increase/(decrease) in cash in the period 209 (609) Cash (increase)/reduction from change in debt (98) 23 Change in net debt 111 (586) Net debt at 1 January 2002 (2,764) (2,178) Net debt at 31 December 2002 (2,653) (2,764) Note 1 Basis of preparing the financial statements - going concern The company meets its long term and short term working capital requirements from a combination of bank loan and bank overdraft and working capital facilities and Loan Notes. At 31 December 2002 the company had the following borrowings: Bank overdraft and working capital facilities £1,747,000 Bank loan £818,000 Loan Notes 2003 £105,000 The terms of these borrowings are shown in the accounts. The overdraft bank borrowings are repayable on demand and the bank loan has a scheduled repayment plan. The Loan Notes are repayable on 18 December 2003. The company projections require part to be refinanced at that date and the directors believe that this will be achieved. The ability of the company to manage within its facilities is dependent on generating sufficient profits and cash flows from its future operations. The company is currently in the process of implementing a detailed restructuring program of its Bristol operations. The plan involves closure of production and sale of the premises in Bristol and continued development of outsourced toe cap production in an associated undertaking in Botswana. The directors believe that these are the steps necessary to return the company to profitability. The directors have prepared detailed profit and loss and cash flow forecasts and projections that include the planned restructuring for the period to 31 December 2004. Included in these projections are the post balance sheet events of which more information is given in the accounts. Based on these forecasts the principal lender has offered to renew and enhance the company's facilities. The facilities consist of bank overdraft and working capital facilities to a maximum of £2,325,000 and a capital holiday on the bank loan of £818,000 until October 2003. The bank overdraft facilities may be withdrawn at any time and are due for review in October 2003. The directors have accepted these facilities. The directors believe that they will be able to achieve the forecasts, operate within the new facilities and refinance the required element of the Loan Notes and therefore believe it appropriate to prepare the accounts on a going concern basis. There can be no certainty about this. The directors have reduced the carrying value of the assets of the company at 31 December 2002 by an impairment provision of £647,000. The financial statements do not include any further adjustments that might prove necessary were the forecasts not to be achieved, the support of the company's principal lender be withdrawn or the company be unable to refinance the required element of the Loan Notes. Note 2. Turnover and segmental analysis The United Kingdom is the source of turnover and operating profit and the principal location of the net assets of the company. The directors consider that the company operates in two business segments serving various markets. Turnover, loss on ordinary activities before taxation and net assets are analysed as follows: Segment of activity: Dinkie - Phillips Davies Odell Company 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Turnover 2,592 4,638 4,317 4,703 6,909 9,341 Operating (loss)/profit before exceptional items (928) (554) 244 422 (684) (132) Exceptional items (691) (1,055) - - (691) (1,055) Operating (loss)/profit before Group costs (1,619) (1,609) 244 422 (1,375) (1,187) Group costs (197) (196) Operating loss (1,572) (1,383) Interest payable (178) (178) Company loss before taxation (1,750) (1,561) Net assets 1,401 2,926 1,083 1,409 2,484 4,335 Unallocated net debt (2,653) (2,764) Total net (liabilities)/assets (169) 1,571 Geographical analysis of turnover: United Kingdom 4,534 5,571 Rest of Europe 773 889 The Americas 443 914 Australasia 46 56 Far East 800 1,180 Africa 313 731 Total turnover 6,909 9,341 Notes: 1. The Annual Report and Financial Statements will be sent to all shareholders. Further copies will be available to the public from the Company Secretary at the Company's registered office, St Ivel Way, Warmley, Bristol BS30 8TY. 2. The basic loss per share is calculated on losses of £1,740,000 (2001, £1,561,000) and on 14,770,000 (2001, 14,770,000) ordinary shares. As losses have been incurred in each year the exercise of options would not have been dilutive and accordingly basic and diluted earnings per share are the same. 3. The abridged Accounts for the year ended 31 December 2002 and 2001 do not constitute statutory accounts and are an extract from the Company's statutory accounts on which the auditors give an unqualified opinion. For further information contact: Ken Rees, Winningtons 0117 317 9477, mobile 07802 466567 Geoff Martin, Dinkie Heel 0117 961 3163 John Wakefield, Rowan Dartington 0117 933 0020 This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange

Companies

CEPS (CEPS)
UK 100

Latest directors dealings