Final Results

Athelney Trust PLC 11 April 2007 Embargoed 7 am April 11 2007 ATHELNEY TRUST PLC: NAV AT RECORD HIGH Athelney Trust plc, the AIM-traded investment company which invests in smaller companies and junior markets, announces its audited results for the 12 months ended 31 December 2006. Highlights: •Net Asset Value ('NAV') up 20.3 per cent at 189.7p per share (2005: 157.7p) •Revenue on a like-for-like basis rose 12.5 per cent; gross revenue up 10.8 per cent at £95,614 •Dividend income up 15 per cent •Revenue return per Ordinary Share up 22.2 per cent at 3.3p (2005: 2.7p) •Recommended annual dividend of 3.25p per share (2005: 2.5p) a 30 per cent rise Chairman, Hugo Deschampsneufs, said: '2006 was another excellent year for investors, despite all the problems and worries that many had at the start of the year. However I have worries about hedge funds, private equity and the new issue market. I believe all three should be watched extremely carefully in the coming year and beyond by investors large and small. 'I remain positive on the long-term prospects of small caps, provided one stays away from the high risk sectors. Selected small caps offer good value, rising dividends, strong balance sheets and are targets for larger competitors and financial buyers. 'However opaque prospects seem in the short-term, I am absolutely convinced that each and every investor should hold a strong portfolio of small caps for long-term growth and rising income'. -ends- For further information: Robin Boyle, Managing Director Athelney Trust plc 020 7628 7937 Paul Quade 07947 186694 CityRoad Communications 020 7248 8010 Chairman's Statement & Business Overview I have pleasure in announcing the audited results for the twelve months to 31 December 2006. The salient points are as follows: •Audited Net Asset Value ('NAV') is 189.7p per share (31 December 2005: 157.7p) a rise of 20.3 per cent. •Gross Revenue increased by 10.8 per cent to £95,614 (31 December 2005: £86,265). •On a like-for-like basis revenue increased by 12.5 per cent and dividend income rose by 15 per cent. •Revenue return per ordinary share was 3.3p, an increase of 22.2 per cent (31 December 2005: 2.7p). •Recommended dividend for the year of 3.25p per share (2005: 2.5p), a rise of 30 per cent. Review of 2006 This has been another excellent year for investors, despite all the problems and worries that many had at the start of the year. Could the world-wide bull market continue for an amazing fourth year, we all asked ourselves in January? Well, we now know that it could, thanks to no avian flu pandemic, a mild hurricane season, no successful terrorist attack on the West and no big hedge fund blow-up beyond Amaranth, which had wildly over-exposed itself to natural gas prices. There were plenty of nasty surprises, though, with Iraq and Palestine moving to the brink of civil war, the summer conflict between Israel and the Hezbollah, North Korea firing off nuclear weapons, Iran determined to acquire some of the same and Russia turning into the school-yard bully under its ex-KGB president. Despite these international factors, the price of crude oil failed to stay high: there were confident forecasts in January that it could spike at $100 a barrel (from $61) but, in the event, it hit $77 during the Lebanon conflict and dropped to just over $50 by the turn of the year. I believe that this fall in the oil price was critical to the health of world equity markets in 2006. Interest rates rose in the U.S., the U.K., Europe and Japan: as a consequence, the new housing market in America was badly hit although the impact of two rate rises here at home was less marked, nor did they seem to have much effect on inflation which finished the year at 3 per cent. Indeed, there was considerable scepticism as to whether that figure was high enough although I do not seem to remember too many people pointing out that many consumer items have fallen in price these last six years, such as used cars (an average of 3.6 per cent a year), IT equipment (20 per cent), photographic stuff (8 per cent), clothing (6 per cent), toys (5 per cent) and new cars (2 per cent). One constant and hugely positive factor last year was the tidal wave of global liquidity (the sum of corporate cash, funds available for investment by financial institutions and consumers' bank balances) which helped drive equities, bonds and gilts to ever higher levels. Investors' attitude to risk changed as well: the spread between emerging market bonds, corporate debt and U.S. Treasuries narrowed to all-time lows in December. The reason? Too many investors moving into ever-riskier areas of the market as returns in their traditional hunting grounds were squeezed. Commodities on average fell by 15 per cent in 2006 but most other things did well: China was the top-performing equity market (up by 138.4 per cent in Dollar terms), followed by Venezuela (99 per cent), Russia (70.7 per cent) and India (51.3 per cent). Turkey, on the other hand, fell by 5.6 per cent and Saudi Arabia by a striking 52.5 per cent. In the U.K., the FTSE 100 Index rose by a rather sedate 11 per cent whereas small caps., typically, were 17-18 per cent higher over the year. With an estimated $300bn in 'dry powder' (funds available for investment to you and I), private equity had a major effect on 2006 and will again this year. At its crudest, a private equity deal is no more than an old-fashioned asset-strip (and paying themselves a huge dividend) and gearing up the balance sheet (and paying themselves another huge dividend). The aim is to 'strip and flip' in three years by selling the husk onto gullible investors. As gearing ratios rise higher and higher, and the asking price of suitable targets increases steadily, the risks of doing this type of business are enough to make one sleep uneasily in one's bed. Hedge funds are private pools of capital that are lightly regulated, often borrow heavily to enhance returns and are sometimes paid enormous performance fees to undertake quite simple tasks, such as borrowing at very low rates of interest in Yen or Swiss Francs and lending at high rates in Australian or New Zealand Dollars for instance. Other strategies involve equities, bonds, distressed debt and so on. If 20 per cent of trading in equities on the New York Stock Exchange and 30 per cent in London is accounted for by hedge funds, as has been estimated, then I think that it is very natural to worry about this opaque area of the fund management business. Yet another area of concern is the new issue market in London. The collapse of the London-listed internet gaming shares following the Senate's effective ban on their U.S. activities came just months after the controversial flotation of Rosneft. This Russian oil giant's prospectus included a 26-page risk statement which acknowledged allegations that its assets were obtained via a 'conspiracy.' AIM, the LSE's junior market, attracted companies as far apart as Silicon Valley and China but more than a handful, in my opinion, and particularly in mining, oil and gas, looked to be poorly put together with low governance standards and speculative business plans. The continued survival of such companies should not be taken for granted. Proponents of private equity, hedge funds and new issues will no doubt think that the above comments are, to say the least, unkind. Nevertheless, I believe that all three should be watched extremely carefully in the coming year and beyond by all investors, large and small. Am I the only one to be worried about the flood of take-overs of major British companies and the lack of reciprocity when our companies want to expand overseas? I suspect that I am. As the year finished (I will use the old names to remind you just how important they are), British Oxygen Company, British Airports Authority, Associated British Ports and Pilkington Brothers have all been absorbed by overseas buyers, British Steel, Scottish Power and Gallagher were headed in the same direction and even the London Stock Exchange was under attack by American rival NASDAQ. For good or ill, take-overs were a significant factor in 2006 and are likely to be so again this year. As the market in high quality equities continued to shrink, someone invented the word 'de-equitisation' when describing the short-term beneficial effect of take-overs and cash buy-backs on the remaining stock of equities. Finally under this sub-heading, it is interesting to read that India, after years cast as China's underperforming neighbour, is now in hot pursuit. Over the past year, the Indian economy has grown by an impressive 9.2 per cent, not far behind China's 10.4 per cent. Results Gross Revenue increased 10.8 per cent compared to 2005. A breakdown of the companies paying dividends is given below: Number -------- Companies paying dividends 82 Companies sold (therefore no true comparison) 9 Companies purchased (therefore no true comparison) 17 Increased total dividend in the calendar year 44 Reduced total dividend in the calendar year 7 No change in dividend 5 Corporate Activity Six of our companies were taken over in 2006: three were reported at the half-way stage, namely PD Ports, Brandon Hire and Wyvale Garden Centres. In the second half, cash offers were accepted in respect of Richmond Foods (a 24 per cent profit on book value), MSB International (60.6 per cent) and Biotrace International (44.6 per cent). Portfolio Review A total of fifteen holdings were purchased for the first time or were existing holdings which were increased in the six months to 30 June; in the second half, the following investments were purchased: Arden Partners, Dowgate Capital, Broker Network Holdings, Johnson Service Group, Somero Enterprises, Hitachi Capital (UK), Macfarlane Group, XP Power, City of London Investment Group, Speymill Group and Tristel. Five investments were sold, all in the first half. Dividend The Board is pleased to recommend an increased annual dividend of 3.25p per ordinary share for the year ended 31 December 2006 (2005: 2.5p). This represents an increase of 30 per cent over the previous year. Subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting on 23 May 2007, the dividend will be paid on 25 May 2007 to shareholders on the register on 27 April 2007. Update The unaudited NAV at 28 February 2007 was 192.6p per share, whereas the share price stood at 190p on the same date. Further updates can be found on www.chelvertonam.com. Outlook I have already signposted my worries about hedge funds, private equity and the new issue market: other concerns include the possible trend in interest rates (particularly M. Trichet's propensity to push up rates in Euroland against all evidence of static/falling output in France, Italy and elsewhere). Mr. Greenspan, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank, has taken to musing in public about the likelihood (one chance in three, he believes) of America sliding into recession - certainly, the housing market looks to be in a dreadful mess in some states. Not just that, but so-called trailer-park lending is now throwing up huge bad debts. Having said all that, I remain positive on the long-term prospects of small caps. provided one stays away from the high risk sectors. Selected small caps. offer good value, rising dividends, strong balance sheets and are targets for larger competitors and financial buyers. Donald Rumsfeld, the then U.S. Defense Secretary said, 'I would not say that the future is necessarily less predictable than the past. I think that the past was not predictable when it started.' However opaque prospects seem in the short-term, I am absolutely convinced that each and every investor should hold a strong portfolio of small caps. for long-term growth and a rising income. Hugo Deschampsneufs Chairman 2 April 2007 ATHELNEY TRUST PLC STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN (incorporating the revenue account) FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2006 Audited Results to 31 December 2006 Audited Results to 31 December 2005 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £ £ £ £ £ £ Profits on investments - 708,480 708,480 - 460,306 460,306 Income 95,615 - 95,615 86,265 - 86,265 Investment management expenses (8,216) (24,164) (32,380) (7,266) (21,362) (28,628) Other expenses (35,355) - (35,355) (37,753) - (37,753) ________ _________ _________ ________ _________ _________ Return on ordinary activities before taxation 52,044 684,316 736,360 41,246 438,944 480,190 Taxation 8,278 (122,442) (114,164) 7,579 (77,234) (69,655) ________ ________ _________ ________ ________ _________ Return on ordinary activities after taxation 60,322 561,874 622,196 48,825 361,710 410,535 ________ ________ _________ ________ ________ _________ Return per ordinary share 3.3p 31.2p 34.5p 2.7p 20.1p 22.8p Dividend paid per ordinary share - Final dividend 2.5p 2p The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account for the Company. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued during the above financial years. There have been no recognised gains or losses, other than the results for the financial years shown above. ATHELNEY TRUST PLC BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2006 2006 2005 (audited) (audited) £ £ Fixed assets Investments 3,706,392 2,985,922 _________ _________ Current assets Debtors 105,603 145,109 Cash at bank and in hand 32,486 40,048 _________ _________ 138,089 185,157 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (50,797) (33,769) _________ _________ Net current assets 87,292 151,388 _________ _________ Total assets less current liabilities 3,793,684 3,137,310 Provisions for liabilities and charges (374,390) (295,142) _________ _________ Net assets 3,419,294 2,842,168 _________ _________ Capital and reserves Called up share capital 450,700 450,700 Share premium account 405,605 405,605 Other reserves - non distributable Capital reserve - realised 719,086 520,007 Capital reserve - unrealised 1,723,399 1,360,604 Revenue reserve 120,504 105,252 _________ _________ Shareholders' funds - all equity 3,419,294 2,842,168 _________ _________ Net Asset Value per share 189.7p 157.7p ATHELNEY TRUST PLC CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2006 2006 2005 (audited) (audited) £ £ £ £ Net cash inflow from operating activities 68,111 3,487 Servicing of finance Dividends paid (45,070) (36,056) ________ ________ Net cash (outflow) from servicing of finance (45,070) (36,056) Taxation Corporation tax paid (18,613) (2,017) Investing activities Purchases of investments (1,103,978) (529,075) Sales of investments 1,091,988 542,398 ________ ________ Net cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities (11,990) 13,323 ________ ________ Decrease increase in cash in the year (7,562) (21,263) ________ ________ Notes: 1. The figures included in the above statement are an abridged version of Athelney's audited results for the year ended 31 December 2006 and do not constitute statutory accounts within the meaning of Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985, as amended. The figures for the year ended 31 December 2005 are extracted from the statutory accounts filed with the Registrar of Companies and which contained an unqualified audit report. 2. The calculation for the return per ordinary share is based on the return on ordinary activities after taxation shown below and on the average weighted number of shares in issue during the period of 1,802,802 (2005: 1,802,802 ). 2006 2005 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £ £ £ £ £ £ 60,322 561,874 622,196 48,825 361,710 410,535 3. Dividend information: Ex dividend date 25 April 2007 Dividend payable to shareholders registered on 27 April 2007 Dividend payable on 25 May 2007 4. Copies of this announcement are available, free of charge, for a period of one month from Athelney's Nominated Advisor: Noble & Company Limited, 76 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 3BU Copies of the full financial statements will be posted to shareholders on 11 April 2007. 11 April 2007 END This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange ABRBRRSAAR
UK 100

Latest directors dealings