Interim Results

Aberforth Smaller Companies Tst PLC 18 July 2000 ABERFORTH SMALLER COMPANIES TRUST plc INTERIM RESULTS For the Six Months to 30 June 2000 FEATURES Fully Diluted Net Asset Value Total Return +2.8% Benchmark Index Total Return -0.7% Interim Dividend Increase +5.3% Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc ('ASCoT') invests only in small UK quoted companies and is managed by Aberforth Partners. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS 'RESULTS REVIEW For the six months to 30 June 2000, ASCoT achieved a total return of plus 2.8% which compares favourably with a total return of minus 0.7% from the Hoare Govett Smaller Companies Index (excluding investment trusts). The comparative performance of large companies, represented by the FTSE All- Share Index, was a total return of minus 5.5% over the same period. Your Board is pleased to announce an increase in this year's interim dividend to 3.00p per Ordinary Share, up from 2.85p last year, representing an increase of 5.3%. This interim dividend will be paid on 1 September 2000 to holders of Ordinary Shares on the register on 4 August 2000. During the six month period, your Company has bought-in 50,000 Warrants for cancellation at a price which enhanced ASCoT's fully diluted asset value only marginally due to the small number of Warrants bought-in. There remain 2.9 million Warrants outstanding and your Company is prepared to buy these in at attractive prices. In addition, at the Annual General Meeting held in February, Shareholders passed resolutions renewing ASCoT's authority to buy-in up to 14.99% of its Ordinary Shares and to change the Articles of Association so that ASCoT will not have to relinquish its status as an investment company should it do so. To date, no Ordinary Shares have been bought-in, however your Board will not hesitate to do so should we believe it to be in Shareholders' best interests. At 31 December 1999, ASCoT's gearing ratio was 4.9% which reflected a gradual reduction from its peak in July 1999 of 21.0%. As I noted in my Statement in January of this year, this reduction in gearing reflected your Managers' cautious view of prospective absolute returns at that time. ASCoT's gearing was subsequently eliminated during February and a net cash position of 6.2% has now been accumulated reflecting your Managers' continued caution. However, it is not intended to take this cash position further as it is ASCoT's policy to operate close to a fully invested position and to employ gearing on a tactical basis. INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE The six month period includes within it two very different stockmarket environments. In the first ten weeks of the calendar year financial markets globally behaved as they had in the second half of 1999 with incredible enthusiasm for the New Economy benefiting the Technology, Media, and Telecommunications sectors leading to the now universally recognised acronym of TMT. Over that period stockmarket interest became increasingly speculative as ever more esoteric methods of company valuation appeared and investment companies targeting Internet start-ups sold on multiples of their asset value ascribing skills to their managers akin to those of financial alchemists. In March 2000 investor sentiment finally shifted and share prices declined sharply around the globe with tightening monetary policy in the USA playing a significant part. Since early March 2000, interest in the TMT sectors has waned and share prices have declined sharply. Despite this fact they remain the sectors of the stockmarket with the highest absolute returns over the twelve months to June 2000. At the same time interest has returned to areas of the stockmarket which had been at best ignored or at worst used as a source of cash in the period from the end of August 1999 to the middle of March 2000 allowing the Old Economy to retrace some, but certainly not all, of the ground lost since the middle of last year. Your Managers are value investors seeking shares in companies where the financial characteristics are expected to improve or are already attractive but remain unrecognised by the stockmarket. In the environment of the early part of the year this discipline struggled as the majority of companies were shunned regardless of their valuation and, for the remaining minority, investor optimism had ensured that long term potential was more than fully recognised in prevailing share prices. Indeed, towards the end of this period even some investment managers with a growth discipline found the environment increasingly difficult as the shares of companies where high rates of future growth were anticipated had been driven to valuations inconsistent with their likely achievements. Hence, towards the latter end of this period of stockmarket euphoria, it was the so-called momentum investor who was the major beneficiary. As one would anticipate, ASCoT underperformed its benchmark in the early part of the year by a wide margin. This is clearly illustrated in the table below which highlights the difference between ASCoT's total return and that of the investment benchmark for the first two and the last four months of the period to end June. ASCoT HGSC Under/ Total Returns NAV (ex ITs) Out-Performance 1 January - 29 February 2000 -5.2% +3.5% -8.7% pts 1 March - 30 June 2000 +8.4% -4.0% +12.4% pts However, as is equally apparent, ASCoT recovered ground as quickly as it was lost and, as stated previously, outperformed the benchmark over the six month period as a whole. This sharp improvement in relative performance reflects the following factors. First, ASCoT, although exposed to the TMT sectors where your Managers believed that value existed, was underexposed relative to the benchmark index and benefited from that position as share prices declined. Secondly, the other facet of being underexposed to the TMT sectors was a greater exposure to segments of the stockmarket previously ignored during the period of New Economy euphoria. The level of apathy prevailing earlier in the year created an environment where businesses with strong market positions, good returns on assets and potential for unit growth, were available at historically very attractive valuations. Recently, these fundamentally attractive features have received greater attention from investors with better share price performances being the result. Further impetus to this return to more fundamental values came from an increase in the level of corporate activity with offers being made for companies at significant premia to prevailing share prices with cash often being the form of consideration. ASCoT benefited directly from a number of transactions and indirectly as investors have sought out the next target in areas of the stockmarket where corporate activity has been high. Accordingly, the factors which were assistive to performance in the closing months of the first half of 2000 were the opposite of those which prevailed earlier in the year and at the end of 1999. Over the last year technology exposure has been the key driver to relative returns and the underweighting in these areas reflects the fact that in the view of your Managers, valuations have been excessive in relation to the likely level of future profits. Major technological advances are likely but they will not always be correlated with making money from the shares of companies exposed to those changes. However, Shareholders, who are quite correctly encouraged by technological change and its longer term implications for productivity, should take comfort from two factors. First, the principal barrier to greater exposure by ASCoT to the TMT sectors is one of price. The combination of more equity supply and companies failing to meet somewhat heady expectations should lead to future opportunities to gain exposure at valuations where money can be made for Shareholders. Secondly, your Managers see the distinction between the Old and the New Economy becoming increasingly irrelevant. The key driver for any business is the ability to use new technology to attract new customers or deal with existing customers at a lower cost. In this regard many companies currently perceived as belonging to the dark ages are well positioned with products, services and customers combined with the necessary level of existing profits and cash flow to fund any change in their business models. Companies of this type are well represented in ASCoT's portfolio and are available at modest valuations with a good chance of exploiting technological change. They may prove to be more remunerative investments than recently formed highly valued businesses dependent on external funding and therefore the whim of the financial markets. INVESTMENT OUTLOOK The last few months have seen an improvement in the stockmarket environment for the value style practised by your Managers. However, this change has been modest in the context of the relative performance trends of the last twelve months and your Managers are optimistic regarding future relative performance for the following reasons. The popular stockmarket areas of the last twelve months remain expensive in an historic context and are vulnerable to both profit disappointments and additional supply of shares. Further, the areas of the US stockmarket which set the valuation benchmark for the technology sectors remain vulnerable to further monetary tightening as the Federal Reserve attempts to slow the US economy to more sustainable levels. The derating of significant elements of the UK stockmarket outwith the popular areas described has created many opportunities for your Managers to select higher quality businesses with good potential for profits expansion at historically attractive valuations. The table below details some of the salient characteristics of the portfolio. Portfolio Characteristics as at 30 June 2000 1999 Number of Companies in the Portfolio 95 109 Weighted Average Market Capitalisation £289.7m £262.7m Capitalisation Price Earnings Ratio (Historic) 12.2x 13.2x Net Dividend Yield (Historic) 3.5% 3.2% Dividend Cover (Historic) 2.4x 2.4x Against a background of secular low inflation the necessity for industries to consolidate compounded by the desire for greater portfolio focus from investment institutions will continue to drive corporate activity to the benefit of ASCoT. In my Statement in January of this year, I sought to assure Shareholders that, when the stockmarket environment changed from the obsession at that time with 'growth' companies to one more favourable to your Managers' investment style, ASCoT's relative performance would benefit. It is very reassuring to note this has proved to be the case recently. Provided the stockmarket continues its return to an environment whereby companies' valuations are capable of rational explanation, your Board believes ASCoT's future relative performance should be good. William Y Hughes Chairman 18 July 2000 The Statement of Total Return, Summary Balance Sheet and Summary Cash Flow Statement are set out below:- STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN (Incorporating the Revenue Account*) For the Six Months ended 30 June 2000 (unaudited) 6 months to 6 months to 30 June 2000 30 June 1999 (restated) Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Realised - 18,423 18,423 - 4,406 4,406 gains/(losses) on sales Unrealised - (14,946) (14,946) - 69,723 69,723 gains/(losses) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Gains/(losses) on - 3,477 3,477 - 74,129 74,129 investments Deemed cost of Warrants purchased for cancellation - (41) (41) - (793) (793) Dividend income 4,980 - 4,980 5,195 - 5,195 Interest income 234 - 234 55 - 55 Other income 4 - 4 1 - 1 Investment (462) (771) (1,233) (362) (601) (963) management fee Other expenses (98) - (98) (129) - (129) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Net return before finance costs and taxation 4,658 2,665 7,323 4,760 72,735 77,495 Interest payable and similar charges (41) (69) (110) (421) (703) (1,124) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Return on ordinary activities before tax 4,617 2,596 7,213 4,339 72,032 76,371 Tax on ordinary - - - - - - activities ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Return attributable to equity shareholders 4,617 2,596 7,213 4,339 72,032 76,371 Dividends in respect of equity shares (2,498) - (2,498) (2,359) - (2,359) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Transfer to reserves 2,119 2,596 4,715 1,980 72,032 74,012 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Returns per Ordinary Share - Basic 5.56p 3.13p 8.69p 5.24p 87.04p 92.28p Returns per Ordinary Share - Diluted 5.44p 3.06p 8.50p 5.08p 84.38p 89.46p Dividends per Ordinary Share 3.00p - 3.00p 2.85p - 2.85p NOTES The calculations of revenue return per Ordinary Share are based on net revenue of £4,617,000 (30 June 1999 - £4,339,000) and on Ordinary Shares of 83,008,843 (30 June 1999 - 82,755,687) in the case of basic returns and 84,920,175 (30 June 1999 - 85,369,020) in the case of diluted returns. The calculations of capital return per Ordinary Share are based on net capital gains of £2,596,000 (30 June 1999 - £72,032,000) and on Ordinary Shares of 83,008,843 (30 June 1999 - 82,755,687) in the case of basic returns and 84,920,175 (30 June 1999 - 85,369,020) in the case of diluted returns. * The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the period. SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET As at 30 June 2000 (unaudited) 30 June 30 June 31 December 2000 1999 1999 £'000 £'000 £'000 Securities listed on the London 254,809 304,336 279,325 Stock Exchange Cash at bank 14,725 - - Debtors 6,214 6,784 5,278 Bank overdrafts - (46,911) (14,205) Other creditors (4,195) (7,907) (4,028) ------- ------- ------- Net current assets/(liabilities) 16,744 (48,034) (12,955) ------- ------- ------- Total assets less current 271,553 256,302 266,370 liabilities ------- ------- ------- Capital and reserves: equity interests Called up share capital (Ordinary 833 828 828 Shares) Reserves: Share premium account 500 2 2 Special reserve 133,525 133,525 133,525 Capital reserve - realised 118,665 78,980 101,158 Capital reserve - unrealised 9,012 35,843 23,958 Revenue reserve 9,018 7,124 6,899 ------- ------- ------- 271,553 256,302 266,370 ------- ------- ------- Net Asset Values: Ordinary Share (basic) 326.1p 309.7p 321.9p Ordinary Share (fully diluted) 318.6p 300.4p 313.0p Ordinary Share (diluted - FRS 14) 319.3p 301.1p 313.5p NOTES As at 30 June 2000, the Company had 83,260,325 Ordinary Shares (30 June 1999 and 31 December 1999 - 82,757,359) and 2,878,897 Warrants (30 June 1999 - 3,821,863 and 31 December 1999 - 3,431,863) in issue. On 31 March 2000, as a result of certain holders exercising the subscription rights of their Warrants, 502,966 Ordinary Shares of 1p were issued at 100p per share. Also, during the six months to 30 June 2000, the Company bought in 50,000 Warrants for cancellation at a total cost of £76,000. SUMMARY CASH FLOW STATEMENT For the Six Months ended 30 June 2000 (unaudited) 6 months to 6 months to 30 June 2000 30 June 1999 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Net cash inflow from operating activities 3,286 3,083 Returns on investment and servicing of finance Interest paid (182) (1,018) ------ ------ Net cash outflow from returns on investment and servicing of finance (182) (1,018) Taxation UK taxation 23 15 recovered ------ ------ Net cash inflow from 23 15 taxation Capital expenditure and financial investment Payments to acquire investments (51,947) (93,492) Receipts from sales of investments 81,254 72,059 ------ ------ Net cash inflow/(outflow) from capital expenditure and financial 29,307 (21,433) investment ------ ------ 32,434 (19,353) Equity dividends (3,931) (3,765) paid ------ ------ 28,503 (23,118) Financing Issue of Ordinary 503 3 Shares Warrants purchased for cancellation (76) (1,545) ------ ------ Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing 427 (1,542) ------ ------ Increase/(decrease) 28,930 (24,660) in cash ------ ------ NOTES In accordance with FRS 16, dividend income is now shown excluding any related tax credit with a consequential reduction in the amount of the tax charge to £NIL. This change in policy does not affect the return attributable to equity shareholders for either of the six month periods to 30 June 1999 and 2000. The 1999 figures in the Statement of Total Return have been restated to reflect this change in policy. The foregoing do not comprise statutory accounts (as defined in section 240(5) of the Companies Act 1985) of the Company. The statutory accounts for the year to 31 December 1999, which contained an unqualified Report of the Auditors, have been lodged with the Registrar of Companies and did not contain a statement required under section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985. The Interim Report is expected to be posted to shareholders on 21 July 2000. Members of the public may obtain copies from Aberforth Partners, 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7NS. CONTACT: John Evans Aberforth Partners 0131 220 0733
UK 100

Latest directors dealings