Half-yearly report to 30 June 2009

ABERFORTH SMALLER COMPANIES TRUST plc HALF YEARLY REPORT For the Six Months ended 30 June 2009 Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASCoT) invests only in small UK quoted companies and is managed by Aberforth Partners LLP. The investment objective of ASCoT is to achieve a net asset value total return (with dividends reinvested) greater than on the Hoare Govett Smaller Companies Index (Excluding Investment Companies) over the long term. All data throughout this Half Yearly Report is to, or as at, 30 June 2009 as applicable, unless otherwise stated. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT For the six months to 30 June 2009, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASCoT) achieved a net asset value total return of 20.8%, which compares with a total return of 27.1% from the Hoare Govett Smaller Companies Index (Excluding Investment Companies) (HGSC (XIC)), your Company's investment benchmark. The FTSE All-Share Index, a representative of larger companies, registered a total return of 0.8%. ASCoT, therefore, underperformed its benchmark during a period when smaller companies outperformed larger companies. Your Managers' Report provides greater insight into ASCoT's performance, as well as that of small and large companies. Stock markets remained challenging during the first three months of 2009. Subsequently there has been a discernable return of investor appetite for equity risk and this has benefitted ASCoT's portfolio in absolute terms. However, the conservative positioning of the portfolio has resulted in an underperformance relative to the benchmark index. Gearing at the fund level has been helpful in partly bridging this shortfall. At 30 June 2009 gearing was 9%. Shareholders will be aware that the Company's current borrowing facility was due to expire at the end of October 2009. I am able to report that the Board has now agreed terms on a new two year committed facility of £75 million with The Royal Bank of Scotland, replacing the existing facility. As anticipated in my January report, portfolio dividend income for the six months to 30 June 2009 is 14% lower than that recognised in the corresponding period last year. The extent of the impact of the economic downturn on portfolio company dividends is proving every bit as severe as your Managers predicted. Their report expands on this topic. Nevertheless, your Board is pleased to declare a first interim dividend of 6.00 pence per share, which is the same as the corresponding payment last year. In the past, ASCoT has either held or increased its annual dividend and, during its near 20 year life, it has accumulated significant revenue reserves. At 30 June 2009, and after accounting for the first interim dividend, these amount to 31.1 pence per share. As noted in my previous report, the extent of brought forward revenue reserves gives your Board a degree of flexibility when considering future dividend levels. The first interim dividend will be paid on 21 August 2009 to Shareholders on the register at the close of business on 31 July 2009. The last date for submission of Forms of Election for those Shareholders wishing to participate in ASCoT's Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRiP) is 31 July 2009. Details of the DRiP are available from Aberforth Partners LLP on request or from their website, www.aberforth.co.uk. At the Annual General Meeting on 4 March 2009, all resolutions proposed were passed, including that which renewed the authority to buy-in up to 14.99% of ASCoT's Ordinary Shares. No shares were purchased under this authority during the six months to the end of June 2009. Your Board is pleased to announce the appointment of David Jeffcoat as a non- executive director with immediate effect. David retired as group finance director and company secretary of Ultra Electronics Holdings plc in April 2009 and brings a wealth of commercial and financial experience. I also wish to inform Shareholders that, having served on the Board for almost 15 years and as Chairman for 4 years, I shall be retiring from the Board at the Annual General Meeting in March 2010, when Professor Paul Marsh will take over the role of Chairman. While the recent rally in small company share prices is welcome, trading conditions remain challenging and if recovery is indeed underway its foundations are as yet fragile. The Board is, however, encouraged by the businesses that your Managers have selected for the portfolio. These are typically well financed and are at historically attractive valuations, characteristics that the Board is convinced are in Shareholders' best interests over the medium to long term and that justify the tactical gearing presently employed by ASCoT. David R Shaw Chairman 22 July 2009 MANAGERS' REPORT Investment Background It's really not supposed to be like this! Entering 2009, financial markets remained extraordinarily risk averse, with credit markets still under stress and much of the developed world in recession. Nevertheless, small UK quoted companies ended June having recorded their strongest half year relative return over ASCoT's history: the HGSC (XIC) produced a total return of 27.1%, which dwarfed the FTSE All-Share's 0.8%. In an international context, the performance of UK large companies was relatively good, with most major markets down by 10- 15% in sterling terms. Alongside small companies, emerging markets were a bright spot, with Morgan Stanley's benchmark achieving a 19% capital gain in sterling terms. The rally in equity prices reflects a gradual relaxation in the extreme risk aversion that permeated financial markets in the wake of Lehman's collapse. This improvement in sentiment was in turn influenced by unprecedented monetary easing that has taken interest rates in much of the developed world to generational lows and introduced the reality of quantitative easing to economies outside Japan. The benefits of this trickled through the credit market and gradually brought corporate bond and money market spreads back from extended levels. At the same time, shareholders in highly indebted publicly quoted companies, faced with the alternative of bankruptcy, proved willing to fund equity issues. These developments allowed markets to reset their sights from an imminent descent into Depression and thus breathed life back into those companies that had been priced to fail. The first half also witnessed the return of the `decoupling trade', which is founded upon the notion that emerging economies, China in particular, can take up the strain of sustaining global demand as the US consumer succumbs to recession. This was the financial markets' last hope in the early months of 2008, when commodities were the principal beneficiaries, but was caught up in the all-consuming gloom of the second half. Its revival in 2009, manifest in the strong performance from emerging markets and the revival in commodities, reflects optimism that China's $600bn fiscal stimulus package might prove sufficient to keep its economy growing at close to the targeted 8% rate. While the risk of a return to the 1930s would appear to have receded, developments in real economies around the world have hardly made for pleasant reading. Industry has borne the brunt to date, with industrial production in the UK down by 12% year-on-year and in Japan by 31%. However, the financial markets this year have increasingly been focusing on the second derivative: the year-on-year declines two months earlier had been running at 13% in the UK and 37% in Japan. There is optimism, therefore, that, with the destocking cycle having played out, manufacturing may be through the worst. However, while these may indeed prove the `green shoots' of recovery, anecdotal evidence from companies remains mixed. Moreover, consumer spending, a crucial component of demand, is being assailed by a combination of falling house prices, rising unemployment, a resurgent oil price, and the inevitability of higher taxes to pay for the stimulus packages. With upwards pressure on savings ratios, it is tough to assess whether the declines in output have yet been sufficient to meet the adjusted levels of demand. Performance Analysis ASCoT's NAV total return over the first half was 20.8%, the third best half year result over its history. The gearing position, which built up from May last year and which proved a drag on returns in 2008, made a positive contribution. Nevertheless, ASCoT under-performed the 27.1% return of the HGSC (XIC). The following table and paragraphs explain this relative performance. Performance Attribution Analysis For the six months ended 30 June 2009 Basis Points Stock selection (750) Sector selection (118) ----- Attributable to the portfolio of investments (868) (calculated on a mid-price basis) Impact of mid-price to bid price 83 Cash/gearing 205 Management fee (net of the VAT refund) (39) Other expenses (5) ----- Total attribution based on bid-prices (624) ----- Note: 100 basis points = 1%. Total attribution is the difference between the total return of the net asset value and the Benchmark Index (i.e. net asset value = 20.83%; Benchmark Index = 27.07%; difference is -6.24% being -624 basis points). The rally enjoyed by the HGSC (XIC) was unusual not just in terms of its strength. It was powered by two groups of stocks: the "fallen stars" and the "100% club". · The fallen stars are a collection of 40 companies that were relegated to the HGSC (XIC) on its annual rebalancing on 1 January. Among these companies are familiar names, such as GKN and Rentokil, that once sat firmly in the FTSE 100. Often with substantial debt loads and large pension deficits, their share prices suffered horribly in 2008. However, the renewed appetite for risk and the feasibility of rescue rights issues have resuscitated many of these companies. In aggregate, the fallen stars accounted for 25% of the total market capitalisation of the HGSC (XIC) at the start of the year and for 29% of the benchmark's 27.1% return over the first half. · The 100% club comprises the 55 companies in the benchmark whose share prices at least doubled over the first half. Though there is an overlap of seven, most of these companies are much smaller than the fallen stars. Their cumulative weight within the HGSC (XIC) at the start of the year was 7%. However, given their price movements, they accounted for another 33% of the benchmark's 27.1% return over the first half. ASCoT's experience of these two groups was mixed. It did well from the 100% club. Its nine holdings in this category made a significant contribution to the strong absolute gains over the period, accounting for 44% of ASCoT's return. However, exposure to the fallen stars was low: the five holdings in this group were not large weights and together contributed just 9% of ASCoT's return. Indeed, ASCoT's under-performance against the benchmark can be attributed to its low weighting in the fallen stars. There are two reasons for this under-weight position. · Reflecting the uncertain credit environment and impending recession, ASCoT's portfolio at the start of the year was still biased towards companies with strong balance sheets: just under one third of the portfolio by weight was invested in businesses with net cash. This cautious orientation was diametrically opposed to that of the fallen stars: their cumulative market capitalisation at the start of the year was £23bn, whereas their cumulative net debt was £50bn. Moreover, substantial pension deficits, which your Managers treat as debt when valuing businesses, are a feature of many fallen stars. · In ASCoT's annual report, the concept of being `paid to wait' was emphasised: reasonably high and sustainable dividend yields could provide some reward to investors for their faith in businesses during a downturn of uncertain duration. Consistent with this, ASCoT entered 2009 with an average portfolio yield of 5.3%. While six months is, in any case, too short a period for the benefits of such a strategy to play out, the stockmarket's focus was very much elsewhere: 22 of the 40 fallen stars cut their dividends over the past year, but these cutters actually out-performed the other 18 over the first half. While over this short period of six months the market has been willing to overlook dividend cuts, the underlying income experience has not been propitious. Dividends across the large company universe have been reduced by 16%. The fall across the HGSC (XIC) was 38%, almost one third of which can be attributed to the fallen stars. These declines compare unfavourably with the early 1990s recession, when the aggregate dividends of large companies were more or less unchanged, and small companies endured a drop of roughly 25%, spread over a three year period. Clearly, those companies that have been caught by both weaker trading and high gearing have little alternative but to cut their dividends. However, others have cut for no good reason. Fashion and weak advice seem to be influencing the thinking of many boards to the detriment of long term returns to shareholders. ASCoT's portfolio has not escaped unscathed but has fared relatively well: stripping out the beneficial effect of taking on gearing, income generated by the portfolio over the twelve months to the end of June fell by roughly 24% year-on-year. This was not substantially out of line with your Managers' forecasts. The portfolio's income profile remains conservative: the top ten contributors account for 31% of this year's income and an 18% weighting in non dividend payers can still be accommodated. Over its history, ASCoT has benefited disproportionately from M&A activity. In this, it has been helped by your Managers' preference for valuation measures based on enterprise values, which corporate acquirers tend also to use, over the simple price earnings ratio. This approach has, however, been of limited assistance so far in 2009 given the dearth of M&A transactions: only seven deals have been completed within the HGSC (XIC), compared with 42 over the course of 2008. Indeed, the stockmarket has swung decisively from de-equitisation to re- equitisation, with rights issues, notably among the fallen stars, rather than acquisitions keeping the investment bankers busy. Conclusion & Investment Outlook The first half witnessed one of the strongest ever periods of performance from small companies. ASCoT participated and secured a good absolute return, which exceeded that of large companies but lagged its benchmark. With the benefit of hindsight, the portfolio was too conservatively oriented for the risk rally. Low exposure to the fallen stars has clearly hampered relative performance so far this year. With the damage done, the question confronting your Managers is whether the fundamental developments over the quarter, including the tentative stabilisation in trading conditions and substantial equity issuance, justify the revaluations that these companies have enjoyed. On the whole the fallen stars remain plagued by the structural problems that originally deterred your Managers. Despite the rescue rights issues, these companies tend still to be highly indebted at a time of economic uncertainty. Indeed, in the case of at least one, there is speculation that another equity issue may be required. Moreover, the often substantial defined benefit pension schemes remain unaddressed. These factors may nevertheless be out-weighed by particularly low equity valuations. However, it is not clear that this is the case. The rally, the extra shares in issue and lower profits exacerbated by high gearing have combined to move the average PE of the fallen stars for the current year up to 11x and the average yield down to 2%. We believe there are more attractive values on offer within the investment universe, most relevantly within the portfolio, whose average current year PE and yield are 8.9x and 3.5%. Within this are five holdings among fallen stars, but the abundance of attractive value opportunities resides further down the scale of market capitalisation, below the fallen stars and among the `smaller small' companies. With the FTSE 250 on a historic PE of 10x and the FTSE SmallCap on 7x, the discount for size within the benchmark is at its most exaggerated in your Managers' experience. This is reflected in the portfolio's 28% over-weight position in these cheaper `smaller small' companies. A reversion of this discount to its long run average would, others things being equal, be positive for ASCoT's relative performance. Your Managers consider that this approach, rather than a belated pursuit of the fallen stars, is consistent with how the portfolio has been managed successfully over the long term. Indeed, relative performance has tended to lag in the initial phase of recovery but has improved as the initial euphoria abated, which proved the case most recently in 2003 and 2004. 30 June 2009 31 December 2008 30 June 2008 Characteristics ASCoT Benchmark ASCoT Benchmark ASCoT Benchmark Number of Companies 92 480 93 495 99 484 Weighted Average £327m £605m £259m £442m £321m £536m Market Capitalisation Price Earnings Ratio 7.0x 8.7x 6.0x 6.4x 9.2x 9.8x (Historic) Net Dividend Yield 4.3% 3.6% 5.3% 5.9% 3.7% 3.7% (Historic) Dividend Cover 3.3x 3.2x 3.1x 2.6x 2.9x 2.8x (Historic) As the table shows, the HGSC (XIC) ended June on a historic PE of 8.7x, which is up from 6.4x at the year end. At play here are both rising share prices and falling profits. This combination was a feature of the early 1990s recession, when small companies made strong absolute and relative gains from 1990 to 1993, despite profits declining in each year. The market is currently flirting with the notion that recovery is imminent. This is understandable: recovery is unarguably closer and several indicators are giving cause for some optimism. However, valuations for some of the main beneficiaries of a cyclical upturn have already reached levels that discount a relatively prompt return to peak profitability. This seems less plausible: the credit bubble was an unsustainable boost to demand and, notwithstanding government stimulus and re- equitisation, the de-leveraging process will take years to play out. Accordingly, the portfolio retains its bias towards businesses that have been temporarily overlooked in the rally, typically those with strong balance sheets and good dividend yields. The potential for improved relative performance lies in the valuation advantage that the portfolio presently enjoys, in part a result of its bias to `smaller small' companies. This valuation opportunity is the primary motivation for ASCoT to retain its modestly geared position. Aberforth Partners LLP Managers 22 July 2009 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO Fifty Largest Investments as at 30 June 2009 Valuation % of No Company £'000 Total Business Activity 1 Greggs 16,730 3.4 Retailer of sandwiches, savouries and other bakery products 2 Robert Wiseman 15,089 3.0 Processing and distribution of milk Dairies 3 Domino Printing 14,384 2.9 Manufacture of industrial printing equipment Sciences 4 JD Sports Fashion 13,588 2.8 Retailer of sports and leisurewear 5 Bellway 13,553 2.7 Housebuilder 6 William Hill 12,786 2.6 Bookmaker 7 Beazley 12,535 2.5 Lloyds insurer 8 RPC Group 12,046 2.4 Manufacture of rigid plastic packaging 9 Huntsworth 11,785 2.4 International public relations 10 CSR 10,965 2.2 Fabless semiconductors Top Ten Investments 133,461 26.9 11 Evolution Group 10,840 2.2 Stockbroker and private client fund manager 12 Brown (N.) Group 10,573 2.1 Home shopping catalogue retailer 13 Phoenix IT Group 10,172 2.0 IT services 14 Spectris 9,494 1.9 Manufacture of precision instrumentation and controls 15 Dunelm Group 9,323 1.9 Homewares retailer 16 Halfords Group 9,162 1.8 Retailer of auto, leisure and cycling products 17 Hampson 8,851 1.8 Aerospace and automotive Industries 18 Collins Stewart 8,724 1.8 Stockbroker and private client fund manager 19 Headlam Group 8,608 1.7 Distributor of floorcoverings 20 Anite 8,516 1.7 Software Top Twenty Investments 227,724 45.8 21 BSS Group 8,383 1.7 Distribution of plumbing supplies & tools 22 Wilmington Group 8,219 1.6 B2B information and training 23 Holidaybreak 7,875 1.6 Holiday, travel and educational services 24 Vectura Group 7,748 1.6 Inhaled pharmaceuticals 25 Delta 7,680 1.5 Galvanising, manganese products and industrial supplies 26 Axis-Shield 7,413 1.5 in-vitro diagnostic testing 27 Keller Group 7,392 1.5 Ground and foundation engineer 28 Brewin Dolphin 7,269 1.5 Stockbroker and private client fund manager Holdings 29 Galliford Try 6,982 1.4 Housebuilding and construction services 30 Pace 6,839 1.4 Design and supply of set top boxes Top Thirty Investments 303,524 61.1 31 Intec Telecom 6,820 1.4 Software and related services Systems 32 Regus 6,807 1.4 Serviced offices 33 Microgen 6,795 1.4 Software and related services 34 Spirax-Sarco 6,555 1.3 Engineering Engineering 35 Kofax 6,529 1.3 Software and related services 36 RM 6,460 1.3 IT services for schools 37 KCOM Group 6,404 1.3 Telecommunications services 38 Henderson Group 6,352 1.3 Investment manager 39 Venture 6,121 1.2 Oil exploration and development Production 6,121 1.2 40 Ark Therapeutics 6,085 1.2 Biotechnology Group Top Forty Investments 368,452 74.2 41 Micro Focus 6,074 1.2 Software International 42 ProStrakan Group 5,917 1.2 Speciality pharmaceutical business 43 Chaucer Holdings 5,866 1.2 Lloyds insurer 44 Biocompatibles 5,665 1.1 Drug-device technology International 45 Bodycote 5,369 1.1 Industrial heat treatment 46 Castings 5,295 1.1 Engineering 47 RPS Group 5,268 1.0 Consulting 48 office2office 5,186 1.0 Distribution of office products 49 Melrose Resources 5,110 1.0 Oil exploration and development 50 Interserve 4,772 1.0 Facilities, project & equipment services Top Fifty Investments 422,974 85.1 Other Investments(42) 119,086 24.0 Total Investments 542,060 109.1 Net Liabilities (45,189) (9.1) ------- ----- Total Net Assets 496,871 100.0 INTERIM MANAGEMENT REPORT Risks and Uncertainties A review of the half year and the outlook for the Company can be found in the Chairman's Statement and the Managers' Report. The Directors have established an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the key risks faced by the Company. The Board believes that the Company has a relatively low risk profile in the context of the investment trust industry. This belief arises from the fact that the Company has a simple capital structure; invests only in small UK quoted companies; has never been exposed to derivatives and does not presently intend any such exposure; and outsources all the main operational activities to recognised, well established firms. As the Company's investments consist of small UK quoted companies, the principal risks facing the Company are market related and include market price, interest rate, credit and liquidity risk. Additional risks faced by the Company include investment objective, investment policy, share price discount, regulatory and operational/financial risk and gearing risk. An explanation of these risks and how they are managed can be found in the Directors' Report contained within the 2008 Annual Report. These principal risks and uncertainties have not changed from those disclosed in the 2008 Annual Report. DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT The Directors confirm that, to the best of their knowledge: (i) the condensed set of financial statements has been prepared in accordance with the Statement `Half-yearly financial reports' issued by the UK Accounting Standards Board; and (ii) the half-yearly report includes a fair review of information required by: (a) DTR 4.2.7R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being an indication of important events during the first six months of the year and their impact on the financial statements together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the year; and (b) DTR 4.2.8R of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, being disclosure of related party transactions and changes therein. On behalf of the Board David R Shaw Chairman 22 July 2009 The Income Statement, Reconciliation of Movements in Shareholders' Funds, Balance Sheet and the Cash Flow Statement are set out below:- INCOME STATEMENT (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2009 Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Realised net losses on sales - (45,943) (45,943) Movement in fair value - 123,024 123,024 --------- ---------- ---------- Net gains on investments - 77,081 77,081 Dividend income 10,750 846 11,596 Interest income 1 - 1 Other income 96 - 96 Investment management fee (619) (1,031) (1,650) (Note 2) Transaction costs - (1,068) (1,068) Other expenses (218) - (218) --------- ---------- ---------- Return on ordinary 10,010 75,828 85,838 activities before finance costs and tax Finance costs (182) (303) (485) --------- ---------- ---------- - Return on ordinary 9,828 75,525 85,353 activities before tax Tax on ordinary activities - - - --------- ---------- ---------- - Return attributable to 9,828 75,525 85,353 equity shareholders ======== ======== ======== Returns per Ordinary Share 10.14p 77.94p 88.08p (Note 4) On 22 July 2009, the Board declared a first interim dividend for the year ended 31 December 2009 of 6.00p per Ordinary Share (2008 - 6.00p)payable on 21 August 2009. INCOME STATEMENT (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2008 Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Realised net gains on sales - 2,699 2,699 Movement in fair value - (109,932) (109,932) --------- ---------- ---------- Net losses on investments - (107,233) (107,233) Dividend income 12,455 5,047 17,502 Interest income 1,144 - 1,144 Other income 44 - 44 Investment management fee (783) (1,305) (2,088) (Note 2) Transaction costs - (1,883) (1,883) Other expenses (287) - (287) --------- ---------- ---------- Return on ordinary 12,573 (105,374) (92,801) activities before finance costs and tax Finance costs (51) (86) (137) --------- ---------- ---------- Return on ordinary 12,522 (105,460) (92,938) activities before tax Tax on ordinary activities (10) - (10) --------- ---------- ---------- Return attributable to 12,512 (105,460) (92,948) equity shareholders ======== ======== ======== Returns per Ordinary Share 12.71p (107.12p) (94.41p) (Note 4) INCOME STATEMENT(unaudited) For the year ended 31 December 2008 Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Realised net losses on sales - (9,027) (9,027) Movement in fair value - (297,703) (297,703) --------- ---------- ---------- Net losses on investments - (306,730) (306,730) Dividend income 23,684 7,387 31,071 Interest income 1,152 - 1,152 Other income 54 - 54 Investment management fee (1,636) (2,727) (4,363) (Note 2) Transaction costs - (2,880) (2,880) Other expenses (489) - (489) --------- ---------- ---------- Return on ordinary 22,765 (304,950) (282,185) activities before finance costs and tax Finance costs (526) (877) (1,403) --------- ---------- ---------- Return on ordinary 22,239 (305,827) (283,588) activities before tax Tax on ordinary activities (16) - (16) --------- ---------- ---------- Return attributable to 22,223 (305,827) (283,604) equity shareholders ======== ======== ======== Returns per Ordinary Share 22.75p (313.12p) (290.37p) (Note 4) RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENTS IN SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2009 Capital Share Redemption Special Capital Revenue capital reserve reserve reserve reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2008 969 19 186,192 198,224 38,711 424,115 Return on ordinary activities after tax - - - 75,525 9,828 85,353 Equity dividends paid - - - - (12,597) (12,597) Purchase of - - - - - - Ordinary Shares ----- ------ ------- ------- ------ ------- Balance as at 969 19 186,192 273,749 35,942 496,871 30 June 2009 ===== ====== ======= ======= ====== ======= For the year ended 31 December 2008 Capital Share Redemption Special Capital Revenue capital reserve reserve reserve reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2007 988 - 197,305 504,051 32,677 735,021 Return on ordinary activities after - - - (305,827) 22,223 (283,604) taxation Equity dividends paid - - - - (16,189) (16,189) Purchase of (19) 19 (11,113) - - (11,113) Ordinary Shares ----- ------ ------- ------- ------ ------- Balance as at 969 19 186,192 198,224 38,711 424,115 31 December 2008 ===== ====== ======= ======= ====== ======= For the six months ended 30 June 2008 Capital Share Redemption Special Capital Revenue capital reserve reserve reserve reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2007 988 - 197,305 504,051 32,677 735,021 Return on ordinary activities after - - - (105,460) 12,512 (92,948) taxation Equity dividends paid - - - - (10,375) (10,375) Purchase of (19) 19 (11,113) - - (11,113) Ordinary Shares ----- ------ ------- ------- ------ ------- Balance as at 969 19 186,192 398,591 34,814 620,585 30 June 2008 ===== ====== ======= ======= ====== ======= BALANCE SHEET (unaudited) As at 30 June 2009 30 June 31 December 30 June 2009 2008 2008 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Fixed assets: Investments at fair value 542,060 464,427 657,282 through profit or loss ---------- --------- --------- Current assets Amounts due from brokers 3,745 - 380 Other debtors 3,003 2,278 3,466 ---------- --------- --------- 6,748 2,278 3,846 ---------- --------- --------- Creditors (amounts falling due within one year) Bank debt facility (50,582) (41,174) (35,885) Amounts due to brokers (1,279) (1,297) (3,812) Other creditors (76) (119) (846) ---------- --------- --------- (51,937) (42,590) (40,543) ---------- --------- --------- Net current liabilities (45,189) (40,312) (36,697) ---------- --------- --------- Total net assets 496,871 424,115 620,585 ======== ======== ======== Capital and reserves: equity interests Called up share capital 969 969 969 (Ordinary Shares) Reserves: Capital redemption 19 19 19 reserve Special reserve 186,192 186,192 186,192 Capital reserve 273,749 198,224 398,591 Revenue reserve 35,942 38,711 34,814 ---------- --------- --------- 496,871 424,115 620,585 ======== ======== ======== Net Asset Value per Share 512.77p 437.68p 640.44p Share Price 467.00p 351.25p 534.00p CASH FLOW STATEMENT (unaudited) For the six months ended 30 June 2009 Six Six months months ended ended Year ended 30 June 30 June 31 December 2009 2008 2008 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Net cash inflow from 9,076 19,187 31,520 operating activities Taxation Taxation paid - (10) (16) Returns on investments and (504) (17) (1,381) servicing of finance Capital expenditure and financial investment Payments to acquire (89,971) (166,745) (260,020) investments Receipts from sales of 84,588 114,506 198,007 investments --------- --------- ----------- Net cash outflow from capital expenditure and financial (5,383) (52,239) (62,013) investment --------- --------- ----------- 3,189 (33,079) (31,890) Equity dividends paid (12,597) (10,375) (16,189) --------- --------- ----------- (9,408) (43,454) (48,079) Financing Purchase of Ordinary Shares - (10,449) (11,113) --------- --------- ----------- Change in cash during the (9,408) (53,903) (59,192) period ======= ======= ======= Reconciliation of net return before finance costs and taxation to net cash inflow from operating activities Net return before finance 85,838 (92,801) (282,185) costs and taxation (Gains)/losses on (77,081) 107,233 306,730 investments Transaction costs 1,068 1,883 2,880 (Increase)/decrease in (725) 2,888 4,076 debtors (Decrease)/increase in (24) (16) 19 creditors -------- -------- --------- Net cash inflow from 9,076 19,187 31,520 operating activities ======= ======= ======= NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified to include the revaluation of investments and in accordance with applicable accounting standards and the AIC's Statement of Recommended Practice "Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts" issued in 2009. The total column of the Income Statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. All revenue and capital items in the Income Statement are derived from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the period. The same accounting policies used for the year ended 31 December 2008 have been applied. 2. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEE For the six months ended 30 June Revenue Capital Total 2009 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Investment management fee 619 1,031 1,650 VAT refund - - - ------ ------ ------ Total for the six months ended 619 1,031 1,650 30 June 2009 ====== ====== ====== For the six months ended 30 June Revenue Capital Total 2008 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Investment management fee 1,048 1,748 2,796 VAT refund (265) (443) (708) ------ ------ ------ Total for the six months ended 30 783 1,305 2,088 June 2008 ====== ====== ====== For the year ended 31 December Revenue Capital Total 2008 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Investment management fee 1,901 3,170 5,071 VAT refund (265) (443) (708) ------ ------ ------ Total for the year ended 1,636 2,727 4,363 31 December 2008 ====== ====== ====== The VAT refund for the six months ended 30 June 2008 and year ended 31 December 2008 above represents the repayment of VAT incurred in respect of management fees paid between 1991 and 1996. 3. DIVIDENDS Six months ended Six months ended Year ended 30 June 2009 30 June 2008 31 December 2008 £000 £000 £000 Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the period: Second interim dividend of 10.5p for the year ended 31 December 2007 - 10,375 10,375 First interim dividend of 6.0p for the year ended 31 December 2008 - - 5,814 Second interim dividend of 13.0p for the year ended 31 December 2008 12,597 - - --------- ------- -------- 12,597 10,375 16,189 ======= ======= ======= The first interim dividend of 6.0p (2008 - 6.0p) will be paid on 21 August 2009 to shareholders on the register on 31 July 2009. 4. RETURNS PER ORDINARY SHARE The returns per Ordinary Share are based on: Six months ended Six months ended Year ended 30 June 2009 30 June 2008 31 December 2008 £000 £000 £000 Returns attributable to Ordinary Shareholders 85,353 (92,948) (283,604) Weighted average number of shares in issue during the period 96,900,000 98,448,535 97,670,037 5. NET ASSET VALUES The net assets and the net asset value per share attributable to the Ordinary Shares at each period end are calculated in accordance with their entitlements in the Articles of Association and were as follows: 30 June 31 December 30 June 2009 2008 2008 £000 £000 £000 Net assets attributable 496,871 424,115 620,585 Pence Pence Pence Net asset value attributable per Ordinary Share 512.77 437.68 640.44 As at 30 June 2009, the Company had 96,900,000 Ordinary Shares in issue (31 December 2008 and 30 June 2008 - same). 6. FURTHER INFORMATION The foregoing do not constitute statutory accounts (as defined in section 434(3) of the Companies Act 2006) of the Company. The statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2008, which contained an unqualified Report of the Auditors, have been lodged with the Registrar of Companies and did not contain a statement required under section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985 (as amended). All information shown for the six months ended 30 June 2009 and 30 June 2008 is unaudited. Certain statements in this announcement are forward looking statements. By their nature, forward looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or assumptions that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements. Forward looking statements regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on forward looking statements. The Half Yearly Report is expected to be posted to shareholders during the week commencing 27 July 2009. Members of the public may obtain copies from Aberforth Partners LLP, 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7NS or from its website at www.aberforth.co.uk. CONTACT: David Ross/Alistair Whyte, Aberforth Partners LLP (0131 220 0733) Aberforth Partners LLP, Secretaries 22 July 2009 ANNOUNCEMENT ENDS
UK 100

Latest directors dealings