Results from 2nd Drill programme at Ferensola

1 August 2014 Sula Iron & Gold plc ("Sula" or the "Company") Results from 2nd Drill programme at Ferensola, Final batches 9-11 Sula Iron & Gold plc ("Sula" or the "Company"), the exploration and development company focused on iron ore in Sierra Leone, is pleased to provide an update on operations at its 100% owned Ferensola project ("the project"). The Company has now received the results from the final three batches of its direct shipping ore ("DSO") drill programme on its main Banded Iron Formation ("BIF") unit within the project. Highlights Significant results from batch nine, tenand elevensamples include: BHDD159,8m @ 60.75% Fe, 18-26m BHDD163,10m @ 57.48% Fe, 22-32m BHDD164, 16m @ 58.65% Fe, 12-28m BHDD166, 18m @ 57.26% Fe, 12-30m BHDD169, 6m @ 58.66% Fe,43-49m BHDD172, 6m @ 56.60% Fe, 6-12m BHDD172, 18m @ 55.50% Fe, 26-44m BHDD174, 26m @ 58.29% Fe, 18-44mand BHDD175, 16m @ 56.07% Fe, 14-30m All results from the oxide(DSO)targeted drilling, which commenced in early April 2014, have now been received Drilling programme targeting the depth extent of the fresh magnetite BIF has now been completed with assays expected in the coming weeks SRK Consulting (UK) have commenced work on a Mineral Resource Estimation for the Ferensola project To view a full version of the announcement, including figures and maps, please visit the Company's website at: www.sulaironandgold.com . Sula CEO Nick Warrellsaid, "These final results from the DSO drilling again support the presence of a well-defined iron oxide cap(DSO)at Ferensola. I am also pleased to report that SRK Consulting (UK) has commenced work on the DSO M ineral Resource Estimate, this is an exciting phase in your company's development and I look forward to updating you in the near future". Sula commenced a second resource drilling campaign, split into two phases, at Ferensola during 2014 after a successful reconnaissance drill programme was undertaken in May-July 2013. The results reported here are from 15 drill holes received from batches nine, ten and eleven, comprising 1,211.05m of drilling conducted between 5 June 2014 and 20 June 2014. All assay results have now been received on this drill programme targeting oxide material. The Company has focused drilling on investigating shallow, high grade iron mineralisation contained in the oxide and transitional saprolitic zones overlying the primary magnetite BIF. A summary of the mineralised intersections from batches 9, 10 and 11 are shown in Table 1. As previously announced, drilling has now been completed testing the potential depth extent of the fresh magnetite BIF interpreted below the defined oxide package with the results of those assays expected in the coming weeks. The primary magnetite BIF mineralisation continues to remain open at depth. A total of 3 drillholes were completed, totalling 1,461.8m, with the main purpose of estimating an Inferred Mineral Resource for the BIF material, when used in conjunction with the results from the 2013 drilling campaign. The Ferensola Project The Ferensola project appears to be a typical weathered BIF with an underlying fresh magnetite BIF. The project consists of elevated iron grades at surface grading down to a fresh and competent magnetite BIF. Phase 1 of the DSO drilling on the main BIF unit was undertaken on a regular grid on 400m x 50m intervals. Each hole was drilled vertically and represents the true vertical thickness of the oxide units. Phase 2 of the DSO drilling was an infill programme based on generating 200m x 50m intervals. In all phases, a total of 8,872.90m of drilling was carried out. This includes 5,423.15m of drilling targeting the oxide cap during the phase 1 and phase 2 infill drilling campaigns. Results that have been received indicate a strike extent of 2.8 km which currently remains open at either end. Results received from the 15 holes (1,211.05m) received in batches nine, ten and eleven, have been positive with multiple intercepts in excess of 55% Fe defining a potential DSO domain and additional high grade laterite and saprolitic material within the oxide zone. Results have been tabulated in Table 1 for drill holes which have intercepted the mineralised unit. Metallurgical testing has commenced on material associated with the underlying fresh magnetite-BIF to confirm that a saleable concentrate can be generated through standard magnetic separation techniques. In addition, samples have also been selected for basic metallurgical testwork from the low grade oxide zones to confirm that a saleable concentrate can be generated. SRK has selected the samples which are being analysed at SGS Minerals Services UK Limited, Truro UK. Table 1 --Mineralised Intersections* Values Drillhole Logged Material From To Sum of Average Average Average Average INTERVAL of FE of of SiO2 of P Al2O3 BHDD159 DUR 0 12 12 49.11 15.13 2.83 0.07 OX 12 64.5 52.5 31.56 13.24 31.38 0.08 Including 18 26 8 60.75 3.79 1.75 0.06 BHDD160 DUR 0 10 10 34.56 19.59 15.03 0.10 OX 10 76 66 31.83 14.57 29.21 0.09 BHDD161 DUR 0 10 10 49.23 12.45 4.76 0.10 OX 10 78 68 37.05 8.04 30.31 0.08 BHDD162 DUR 0 13.5 13.5 51.73 13.17 1.22 0.06 OX 13.5 61.5 48 32.15 18.32 23.21 0.08 BHDD163 DUR 0 10 10 39.30 23.78 2.16 0.06 OX 10 72 62 42.51 8.67 22.14 0.07 Including 22 32 10 57.48 4.58 4.68 0.09 BHDD164 DUR 0 10 10 40.54 18.24 11.07 0.07 OX 10 68 58 43.06 6.85 25.46 0.07 Including 12 28 16 58.65 4.85 5.22 0.08 BHDD165 DUR 0 24 24 28.08 26.41 18.04 0.08 OX 24 63.5 39.5 33.84 11.28 30.46 0.08 BHDD166 DUR 0 10 10 49.97 14.54 1.71 0.07 OX 10 68 58 44.80 8.78 18.81 0.08 Including 12 30 18 57.26 6.20 4.16 0.07 BHDD167 DUR 0 8 8 44.23 16.54 6.66 0.06 OX 8 52 44 37.24 11.95 25.16 0.09 BHDD169 DUR 3 15 12 46.04 17.94 2.73 0.07 OX 15 73 58 39.00 13.83 20.95 0.07 Including 43 49 6 58.66 4.65 4.61 0.06 BHDD170 DUR 0 16 16 35.12 22.98 11.75 0.11 OX 26 73.5 47.5 37.72 8.05 28.52 0.07 BHDD171 DUR 0.5 16 15.5 36.67 21.57 10.88 0.07 OX 32 80 48 34.19 10.05 32.14 0.09 BHDD172 DUR 0 6 6 45.07 19.12 1.74 0.06 OX 6 50 44 48.11 8.27 15.33 0.05 Including 6 12 6 56.60 8.85 2.30 0.04 And 26 44 18 55.50 2.00 14.17 0.04 BHDD174 DUR 0 12 12 47.99 15.11 5.15 0.04 OX 12 62 50 46.16 10.03 15.54 0.07 Including 18 44 26 58.29 5.69 4.11 0.06 BHDD175 DUR 0 10 10 53.33 10.04 1.13 0.07 OX 10 54 44 45.47 8.58 18.21 0.07 Including 14 30 16 56.07 7.64 3.61 0.07 *results are reported as an average for down-hole lithological intervals, high grade intervals are length weighted with a lower cut-off grade of 55% Fe and a maximum internal waste of 5m. Datum WGS84, Zone 29N, some minor errors occur due to rounding. Enquires: Sula Iron & Gold plc +44 (0) 20 7583 8304 Nick Warrell / Matt Wood www.sulaironandgold.com Cairn Financial Advisers LLP +44 (0) 20 7148 7900 James Caithie / Avi Robinson Daniel Stewart & Company Plc +44 (0) 20 7776 6550 Martin Lampshire / David Hart Yellow Jersey PR +44 (0)7768 537 739 Dominic Barretto / Kelsey Traynor Qualified Person The information in this press release that relates to the current drilling programme is based on information compiled by Mr Colin Rawbone, who is a Chartered Professional Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Rawbone is a full time employee of SRK and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Colin Rawbone has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in the press release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which this appears. In addition to the above, this press release has been compiled under the direction of Mr Howard Baker, who is a Chartered Professional Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy ("AusIMM"). Mr Baker is a full time employee of SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Baker has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in the press release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which this appears. Forward-looking Statements This announcement includes certain forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein are forward-looking statements that involve various known and unknown risks and uncertainties as well as other factors. Such forward looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations, including delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Notes: Sula Iron & Gold plc is a multi-commodity exploration company focused on West Africa. The Company's main objective is to explore and advance its Ferensola Projects, in Northern Sierra Leone, that are highly prospective for iron and gold. Sula is currently focused on delineating a maiden JORC compliant iron ore resource estimate and evaluating the gold prospectivity. The 153 sq. km licence area is contiguous to African Minerals' operational Tonkolili Iron Mine, which has a JORC compliant resource of 12.8 billion tonnes iron mineralisation. Exploration work at the project has confirmed the presence of BIF at surface, which has a known strike length of 2.8km. The BIF is proven to extend NE from the Tonkolili licence and into Sula's licence area. A 2,000m scout drilling programme conducted over a 2.2km section of BIF, confirmed the licence area's prospectivity for high grade iron mineralisation. Significant Greenstone Belt-style gold mineralisation has also been identified at various prospects within the licence area. Five target areas for hard rock gold mineralisation have been identified based on the location of historic drill intercepts, the source areas for alluvial gold deposits, and the position of major structures as defined by airborne magnetic data and drainage orientation. The information in this release that relates to Exploration Results has been reviewed by Mr Andrew Dacey, Non-Executive Technical Director of Sula Iron & Gold plc. Mr Dacey is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials Minerals and Mining, a Registered Professional Geologist with the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a Competent Person as defined in the Australasian Code for Reporting of exploration results and Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. APPENDIX A. JORC CODE, 2012 Edition, Table 1 (Section 1 and 2) Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling Nature and quality of sampling (eg Diamond core samples collected techniques cut channels, random chips, or by Sula staff were of half HQ specific specialised industry core, with the sample cut so standard measurement tools as to equally divide appropriate to the minerals under structures. Sample lengths investigation, such as down hole ranged from 0.5 m to 2 m. gamma sondes, or handheld XRF Sample intervals were not instruments, etc). These examples matched to geological should not be taken as limiting the boundaries. broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken Sula used a minimum sample to ensure sample representivity and size of 0.25 kg per core the appropriate calibration of any sample dispatched. They measurement tools or systems used. routinely submitted blanks, duplicate and certified reference material. Aspects of the determination of Diamond core samples were HQ mineralisation that are Material to diameter, and were cut in half the Public Report. using a core saw, dividing geological structures equally where possible. Some samples demonstrated a significant variance when compared to duplicate samples, but this affect was observed to be minor, with most samples showing good repeatability. Sample preparation techniques were deemed to be of international best practice. In cases where 'industry standard' All sampling preparation has work has been done this would be been undertaken by an relatively simple (eg 'reverse accredited laboratory; circulation drilling was used to preparation of samples has obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg been undertaken through ALS was pulverised to produce a 30 g Monrovia and XRF analysis has charge for fire assay'). In other been undertaken by ALS based cases more explanation may be in Ireland. required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drilling Drill type (eg core, reverse Drill method was diamond techniques circulation, open-hole hammer, drilling of dominantly HQ core rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, during the drill programmes sonic, etc) and details (eg core undertaken, using standard diameter, triple or standard tube, tubes. A CS1000 man portable depth of diamond tails, drill rig operated by a face-sampling bit or other type, reputable company acting under whether core is oriented and if so, industry best practices. by what method, etc). Core on vertical holes targeting oxide material has not been orientated. Drill sample Method of recording and assessing Drill core recovery was recovery core and chip sample recoveries and recorded for every hole results assessed. through routine monitoring of drill rod depth and recovered core. Recoveries for each hole were graphically plotted and show total recovery better than 85%. Where recovery has been recorded these intervals are identified and flagged for re-drilling as required. Measures taken to maximise sample Supervision of the diamond recovery and ensure representative drilling by Sula geologists nature of the samples. ensured sample recovery was good, and that samples were representative without contamination issues. Where poor recovery has been encountered contractual agreements with the drill company incur penalties and re-drill policies. Whether a relationship exists No studies are known to have between sample recovery and grade been completed on sample bias. and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/ gain of fine/coarse material. Logging Whether core and chip samples have Geological logging for diamond been geologically and geotechnically core includes a descriptive logged to a level of detail to log with some quantitative support appropriate Mineral Resource logging of mineralogy and estimation, mining studies and alteration, in addition to metallurgical studies. plotting of assays and the geology as a graphic log. No geotechnical logging has been undertaken on oxide material due to core fragmentation and lack of orientation. Whether logging is qualitative or Logging is qualitative, with quantitative in nature. Core (or the exception of some costean, channel, etc) photography. quantitative logging of mineralogical and alteration content. Core photography is undertaken for both half and whole core on a box by box basis. The total length and percentage of 100% of diamond core samples the relevant intersections logged. can be correlated to graphic logs of the diamond drill hole. Sub-sampling If core, whether cut or sawn and Drill core samples were half techniques whether quarter, half or all core HQ core, where the core was and sample taken. cut to equally divide preparation significant structures in the rock. Half core is dispatched for analytical process's If non-core, whether riffled, tube All sampling relates to drill sampled, rotary split, etc and core whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, Diamond core samples have been quality and appropriateness of the analysed by XRF for a full sample preparation technique. suite of analytes including but not limited to Fe_%, Al2O3_%, SiO2_% and P_%. In addition to this analysis the LOI was also recorded. Quality control procedures adopted For diamond drill core for all sub-sampling stages to sampling, standards, maximise representivity of samples. duplicates and blanks were interleaved randomly with the routine samples, every 20th sample; targeting a frequency of 5% Measures taken to ensure that the Field duplicates are submitted sampling is representative of the in as 1 in 20 insertion rate, situ material collected, including where duplicates are selected for instance results for field the remaining half core is duplicate/second-half sampling. split to produce a field based quarter core sample for comparative studies. Whether sample sizes are appropriate Diamond core samples were half to the grain size of the material HQ core, which is a large being sampled. diameter core for exploration drilling. Quality of The nature, quality and SRK deem the accredited assay data appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory and the requested and laboratory procedures used and analysis to be suitable and laboratory whether the technique is considered sufficient for this type and tests partial or total. style of mineralisation deposit For geophysical tools, No geophysical tools or other spectrometers, handheld XRF unusual analysis methods were instruments, etc, the parameters employed. used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures For diamond drill core adopted (eg standards, blanks, sampling, standards, duplicates, external laboratory duplicates and blanks were checks) and whether acceptable interleaved randomly with the levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) routine samples, every 20th and precision have been established. sample; targeting a frequency of 5%. Samples are reviewed on a batch by batch basis to identify any bias with in the analytical process. Verification The verification of significant Mr Colin Rawbone of SRK has of sampling intersections by either independent independently verified the and assaying or alternative company personnel. intersections derived from lithological and grade logging. The use of twinned holes. No twinned holes have been used to verify sampling and assaying. Documentation of primary data, data Data has been compiled from entry procedures, data verification, good quality paper plans and data storage (physical and digitally compiled at a later electronic) protocols. date. The data has been assimilated into the Company's Microsoft Excel database, after compilation and validation in Mapinfo Software. Discuss any adjustment to assay No adjustment to assay data data. has been undertaken Location of Accuracy and quality of surveys used All drill collars are data points to locate drill holes (collar and positioned with handheld GPS down-hole surveys), trenches, mine to an accuracy of within 5m. workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Down hole surveys are not utilised on shallow vertical drill holes but where required has been undertaken using the REFLEX tools Specification of the grid system WGS 84 UTM Zone 29 North used. Quality and adequacy of topographic Current topographic surveys control. has been limited to SRTM data. An aerial survey to meter scale accuracy has recently been undertaken - results pending Data spacing Data spacing for reporting of Diamond drill core samples are and Exploration Results. collected over contiguous distribution intervals of alteration as per logging. There are lengths of diamond core not sampled. Some sampled intervals were re– sampled as composites, or as single duplicate samples. Drilling has taken place on 400m spaced drill fences at 50m intervals Whether the data spacing and No Mineral Resource or Ore distribution is sufficient to Reserve calculations have been establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for reported on the deposit at the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve this stage. estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been Sample compositing was applied. performed for reporting of diamond drill core results, based on a weighted average as a function of sample length versus grade. Orientation Whether the orientation of sampling Drilling has been best of data in achieves unbiased sampling of orientated to allow a relation to possible structures and the extent perpendicular intercept of the geological to which this is known, considering surface oxide zone to be structure the deposit type. achieved. If the relationship between the Based on current information drilling orientation and the no bias has been introduced orientation of key mineralised based on the orientation of structures is considered to have drilling and relationship with introduced a sampling bias, this key structures. should be assessed and reported if material. Sample The measures taken to ensure sample Sula geologists maintain a security security. full chain of custody of samples as they leave site and are transported to the process laboratory. Upon sample return sufficient checks and balances are undertaken to ensure samples have not been tampered with. Audits or The results of any audits or reviews All logging and sampling reviews of sampling techniques and data. techniques have been audited during an independent site visit undertaken by Mr Colin Rawbone of SRK Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral Type, reference name/number, EL54/2011 issued by the Government tenement and location and ownership of Sierra Leone 23rd August 2011 land tenure including agreements or to Blue Horizon (SL Ltd). Blue status material issues with third Horizon (SL Ltd) is a 100% owned parties such as joint subsidiary of Sula Iron & Gold ventures, partnerships, Plc. Full due diligence on the overriding royalties, native license was carried out by Sula's title interests, historical SL lawyers and UK lawyers prior to sites, wilderness or national IPO in October 2012. There are no park and environmental joint ventures in place save an settings. MOU with the Town Chief and his Elders of Dalakuru Town regarding the buildings in Dalakuru base camp. There are no historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings within our demarcated license area. The security of the tenure As above held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Exploration Acknowledgment and appraisal Exploration carried out by Mano done by other of exploration by other River during the 1990s. Almost parties parties. impossible to appraise the exploration as little or no records of the exploration were submitted to the Ministry of Mineral Resources. Geology Deposit type, geological The Ferensola project appears to setting and style of be a typical weathered BIF with an mineralisation. underlying fresh magnetite BIF. Drill hole A summary of all information All tabulated exploration collars Information material to the understanding are included in the release in of the exploration results appendix B. including a tabulation of the following information for all Table depicts all intercepts where Material drill holes: drill holes have intercepted mineralisation. Intercept lengths easting and northing of the from diamond drilling are drill hole collar presented as down hole lengths, not true lengths, and this is elevation or RL (Reduced Level stated in the release. - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar dip and azimuth of the hole down hole length and interception depth holelength. If the exclusion of this Intercepts have been omitted from information is justified on this report where drill holes have the basis that the information not intercepted the interpreted is not Material and this mineralisation. Drill collars for exclusion does not detract each of these holes however have from the understanding of the been recorded in Appendix B report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data In reporting Exploration Weighting is calculated as a aggregation Results, weighting averaging function of each sample length methods techniques, maximum and/or multiplied by each grade, with the minimum grade truncations (eg summed product divided by the cutting of high grades) and total sample length, to present cut-off grades are usually composited intervals. A high grade Material and should be stated. portion of these intercepts has been highlighted using a 55% Fe Cut-off grade where intervals were greater than 5m. Where aggregate intercepts Where intercepts are reported as incorporate short lengths of longer lengths of lower grade, it high grade results and longer is clearly stated that the higher lengths of low grade results, incepts within are part of the the procedure used for such lower grade intercept, not in aggregation should be stated addition to the low grade and some typical examples of intercept. such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any No metal equivalents are used for reporting of metal equivalent the exploration results at values should be clearly Ferensola Prospect. stated. Relationship These relationships are Diamond drill sample intercepts between particularly important in the are reported as down hole widths. mineralisation reporting of Exploration widths and Results. intercept lengths If the geometry of the Mineralisation is considered to be mineralisation with respect to steeply dipping (approx. 70° NW) the drill hole angle is known, with a dominant strike NE-SW. its nature should be reported. However oxidation of this material is deemed to have affected a horizon of material concordant with topography. Therefore the vertical holes currently drilled in targeting this material are deemed suitable to intercept the primary target as close to 90° as possible. If it is not known and only This is clearly stated in the the down hole lengths are release. reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known'). Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections Diagrams are provided that show (with scales) and tabulations all surface samples and the of intercepts should be diamond drill hole traces in plan included for any significant view, plus a cross section is discovery being reported These provided with the intercept should include, but not be locations and known geology. limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Balanced Where comprehensive reporting Exploration results are presented reporting of all Exploration Results is in the Table 1, regardless of not practicable, grade where mineralised material representative reporting of has been intercepted. Grade has both low and high grades and/ been split by lithology based on or widths should be practiced logging undertaken by the Sula to avoid misleading reporting geologists. of Exploration Results. Other Other exploration data, if Discussion of the Ferensola substantive meaningful and material, Prospect geology is included in exploration should be reported including the release. data (but not limited to): geological observations; In situ density measurements are geophysical survey results; carried out using Archimedean geochemical survey results; principles for consolidated fresh bulk samples - size and method core and are undertaken on a of treatment; metallurgical lithological basis. test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and To date no economic or extractive rock characteristics; measures such as bulk samples, potential deleterious or metallurgical testing, bulk contaminating substances. density, groundwater, geotechnical or rock samples have been undertaken. Further work The nature and scale of Drill testing is identified as planned further work (eg tests future planned work. At present for lateral extensions or the infill drilling to a 200m x depth extensions or 50m spacing has been commenced to large-scale step-out increase confidence in the initial drilling). interpretations of geometry and grade distribution. In addition 1,500m of deep drilling has been planned to develop the fresh magnetite BIF interpreted below the primary oxide material. Diagrams clearly highlighting Possible extensions are indicated the areas of possible on the plan and cross section extensions, including the main provided in the release. geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. APPENDIX B. - Ferensola Completed Drill Collars XCOLLAR YCOLLAR ZCOLLAR BHID DH 216834 1013727 795 BHDD001 187.5 216768 1013806 797 BHDD002 302.2 216546 1013462 763 BHDD003 240.25 216478 1013533 776 BHDD004 269.65 216010 1012883 750 BHDD005 157.4 215946 1012957 765 BHDD006 245 215681 1012631 768 BHDD007 131.7 215589 1012757 808 BHDD008 293.15 216997 1013856 803 BHDD009 161.1 215928 1012978 758 BHDD101 72 215962 1012938 763 BHDD102 70.5 215598 1012733 799 BHDD103 64.5 215994 1012895 722 BHDD104 66.5 215633 1012688 769 BHDD105 67 216028 1012860 733 BHDD106 62.5 215669 1012654 782 BHDD107 63 216057 1012821 723 BHDD108 66 215696 1012626 732 BHDD109 65.5 216088 1012782 675 BHDD110 67.5 215727 1012579 737 BHDD111 61.5 215348 1012322 670 BHDD112 49.5 216210 1013192 703 BHDD113 46 215379 1012289 695 BHDD114 43.5 216501 1013515 776 BHDD115 66 216537 1013479 765 BHDD116 81 215429 1012257 683 BHDD117 48 215283 1012401 744 BHDD118 54.5 216258 1013173 683 BHDD119 56 216563 1013442 755 BHDD120 77 215306 1012369 733 BHDD121 69.2 216599 1013399 729 BHDD122 70 216291 1013148 705 BHDD123 72.5 216814 1013759 794 BHDD124 75 216622 1013373 717 BHDD125 63 216317 1013109 710 BHDD126 64.5 216846 1013725 788 BHDD127 69 217119 1013970 788 BHDD128 100 216876 1013685 770 BHDD129 70.5 217427 1014213 663 BHDD130 78 217091 1014007 781 BHDD131 129 216909 1013648 751 BHDD132 56.5 217399 1014248 654 BHDD133 63 217788 1014753 594 BHDD134 25.5 217065 1014043 772 BHDD135 127.5 217347 1014270 656 BHDD136 58.5 218089 1014591 634 BHDD137 79.5 217143 1013952 783 BHDD138 100.5 215838 1012832 779 BHDD139 71.5 218080 1014633 633 BHDD140 84 215881 1012798 769 BHDD141 73.5 217031 1014085 754 BHDD142 131 218080 1014633 633 BHDD143 67.5 218104 1014586 635 BHDD144 69 215902 1012757 732 BHDD145 60.5 217176 1014230 711 BHDD146 100.5 216109 1013104 709 BHDD147 54 215926 1012729 739 BHDD148 86.8 216648 1013922 736 BHDD149 500.3 217208 1014192 716 BHDD150 114.6 216133 1013067 729 BHDD151 70.5 216178 1013048 702 BHDD152 72 215492 1012518 732 BHDD153 76.5 216963 1013895 797 BHDD154 106.5 216186 1013005 650 BHDD155 91.5 215477 1012547 757 BHDD156 72 216929 1013926 788 BHDD157 123 216354 1013350 741 BHDD158 67.5 215537 1012468 692 BHDD159 64.5 216676 1013612 783 BHDD160 76.6 216378 1013323 732 BHDD161 78 215564 1012435 715 BHDD162 98.8 216697 1013583 774 BHDD163 72 216409 1013293 719 BHDD164 75 215971 1012923 721 BHDD165 63.5 216725 1013556 760 BHDD166 75 216427 1013241 704 BHDD167 108 216137 1013324 732 BHDD168 437.5 216745 1013531 746 BHDD169 80.15 215853 1012822 777 BHDD170 73.5 216525 1013497 772 BHDD171 80 215707 1012606 759 BHDD172 73.5 217312 1014110 700 BHDD173 50 216583 1013425 745 BHDD174 73.5 217278 1014153 700 BHDD175 69 215497 1012855 781 BHDD176 524
UK 100

Latest directors dealings