Final Results

For immediate release 28 April, 2004 Panther Securities PLC ('Panther') Results for the year ended 31st December 2003 CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT Introduction I am delighted to report the results for the year ended 31st December 2003. Pre-tax profits amount to £3,413,000 compared to £2,956,000 for previous year. The rental income receivable for the year rose to £9,100,000 compared with £ 8,000,000. This year the vast majority of our portfolio was independently revalued by Donaldsons. This valuation revealed an increase in value of our investment portfolio of approximately £11,400,000 so not only are our profits at near record levels but our net asset value has increased by an impressive 30% from 226.2p to 294.8p per share. The revaluation of our properties held as trading stock revealed a potential surplus of £3,180,000 which, after allowing for tax, would produce an extra net asset value of 13p per share. Stock revaluations in excess of cost are not included in the accounts. Disposals The only property disposals were 3 small freehold shops in Cheam, sold profitably, which were part of our trading stock. Acquisitions In August 2003 we acquired 32 & 32A Darley Street, Bradford. This property, located in the best part of the pedestrianised section of Bradford, cost £1.82 million and produces approximately £150,000 per annum exclusive from Specsavers, Orange Group and Game Station. Included in the property is some vacant space that could be refurbished to produce extra income and we are currently investigating this possibility. In December 2003 we acquired 29, 59 and 61 Central Avenue, West Molesey, Surrey. These three properties are mainly single storey freehold factories with a total floor space of approximately 80,000 sq ft. The properties were purchased from the administrative receiver of Arcolectric Holdings PLC for £3.6 million. The properties were simultaneously leased to Elektron PLC at £417,500 p.a. on 10 year full repairing and insuring leases. To provide Elektron PLC with additional working capital and assist with the purchase of the majority of Arcolectric's business from the receiver, Panther formed and then sold Aridmark Limited, whose sole asset was £500,000 cash in exchange for 9,090,909 shares in Elektron (equivalent to a value of 5.5p per Elektron ordinary share). This resulted in Panther holding approximately 11.9% of Elektron's enlarged capital. Elektron PLC is AIM listed and carries out a similar electrical parts manufacturing business as the former Arcolectric PLC. We are optimistic that this acquisition will produce substantial benefits for Elektron PLC which hopefully will in due course be reflected in the value of our shareholding in this company. Bid for Oakburn Properties PLC I, together with my personal pension fund, held 29.9% of an AIM listed property company called Grosvenor Land PLC. As with so many small property companies, the management enjoyed a disproportionate share of benefits from the company. Panther was in the process of purchasing these shares on favourable terms to Panther with a view to making a bid for Grosvenor. When however Grosvenor's management became aware of possible bid intentions, they issued new shares for cash and purchased a property company partly paying for the acquisition with new shares. This appeared to give the management and its associates over 42% of the voting rights making an unwelcome take-over bid virtually impossible. 29% of the Grosvenor Land shares (listed under directors' interests) were held by Oakburn Properties PLC and I became aware that not all shareholders of this company were happy. In fact, some were keen to sell. On 17th October 2003 Panther announced it would bid for Oakburn. On 23rd October Panther purchased 225,000 Oakburn shares at 576.67p per share representing 26.6% of its capital and on 29th October a further 22,124 Oakburn shares were purchased at the same price. The family directors of Oakburn outmanoeuvred us by finding a 'white knight' to partner them and outbid us. We therefore failed in our attempt to obtain control of Grosvenor Land PLC but this failure was more than compensated by the £450,000 profit (before costs) on the sale of our shares. Shareholders will be pleased to note that the successful bidder for Oakburn, Terrace Hill Group PLC, was subsequently obliged to bid for the entire share capital of Grosvenor Land PLC. Eurocity Properties PLC Our successful bid for Eurocity PLC was completed in January 2003. Having removed the majority of the group's management costs Eurocity produced a profit contribution to our Group of approximately £350,000 through rental profits alone. Panther House Redevelopment As mentioned in my interim statement we have agreed terms with two potential purchasers to sell the entire Panther House/Grays Inn Road/Churchills Pub site. Under terms agreed with both these potential purchasers we would receive an initial substantial sum and a share of the profits on any future redevelopment. Due to the revaluation of our properties the proposed initial price is only slightly ahead of the new book value. However our profit share is speculative and not immediately quantifiable but in the event of a successful development by the purchaser, we would expect to receive extra profits some time in the future. A sale of this size may require shareholders approval in due course. Bristol Redevelopment I can only reiterate what I said in my interim statement. Whilst it appears that Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC have now obtained their required changes to implement the scheme, we have indicated to Bristol City Council that we are not prepared to proceed with the joint venture unless there is a more realistic assessment placed on the value of our interests. Our own local valuers indicate that even under compulsory purchase we would receive better terms than currently offered by Bristol Council who still insist on an excessive amount of social benefits to be paid out from the funds raised from the sale of the site. Tax & Regulations For the last four or five years I have devoted a substantial part of my statement complaining about the ever increasing tax burdens and 'red tape' regulations which continue to hamper the business environment and this year is no exception. This country's tax system penalises enterprise, initiative, hard work, success and self-sufficiency whereas laziness, dependency on the state and fecklessness are encouraged. Our Government presents much of the legislation they propose in a deceptive manner. It penalises and restricts private pensions but massively increases its own. One of the Government's first actions upon coming into power was to tax pension funds, inevitably weakening substantially those that were less well funded. It now proposes that the remaining solvent private company pension funds pay into a safety fund to protect those pensions whose funds fail in the future. It seems to me that the £5-6 billion tax taken from pension funds probably all goes to pay the Government's own bureaucrats' pensions which have cast iron guarantees. All these former state employees' pensions should have a 1% or 2% 'security' charge to provide a fund to assist those who lose out through no fault of their own and whose pension had no public guarantee. 'New Labour'! came into power in 1997 and achieved their dream, the right to spend Other Peoples Money. The property industry has been heavily targeted. Stamp Duty on larger property purchases has been raised 400% and recently Stamp Duty on new leases has been raised massively, in some cases more than 1000%. The obvious result of this is that many investors try to avoid (that's legal) this tax on investment. The Government's response to this is to introduce more red tape. On every purchase a new seven page form with 71 questions has to be completed and submitted to the Inland Revenue. The time cost for solicitors dealing with the form (up to 1 hour) is paid by the purchaser. However there has to be a bureaucrat checking that the forms are correct. He has to be paid and pensioned. This of course is paid out of our taxes creating yet more waste. Property owners have been subjected to an avalanche of new health & safety and building regulations, disability regulations etc. The cost falls upon the owners or users of property. The benefits are unquantified but probably minimal but the costs huge and probably unquantifiable. The latest daft piece of legislation is the Proceeds of Crime Act which forced many solicitors, accountants and estate agents to write to their clients informing them that if they believe that a crime had been committed they must report it to the authorities without telling the client. When you have had a longstanding relationship with a client for many years, it is an insult to be forced to treat them in this manner. What makes the situation more farcical is that what constitutes a crime doesn't just cover the house agent who buys two tons of fertiliser, a couple of barrels of diesel oil and an old white van on his business account which would seem suspicious, but it also covers a secretary using the office stamps to post her personal Christmas cards or an employee who inflates his expenses or indeed any other trivial misdemeanour that would normally go unreported. The penalty for failing to report the crime being far more severe than any possible penalty for the 'crime'. You truly have to have taken leave of your senses if you believe that this type of legislation will help to prevent the type of terrorism it is aiming to prevent. However, it will necessitate employing many thousands of bureaucrats to supervise the system. Surely we would be better protected with these extra functionaries guarding our ports of entry. I am forever amazed at the complete lack of common sense in this Government which is legislatively incontinent and incompetent. There has been mention of possible legislation to allow listed property companies such as ours to convert to Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT's) and in particular the creation of REIT's for purely residential investment. In other countries REITS receive favourable tax treatment. However expecting any tax concessions from this Government is akin to expecting the shareholders cocktail party to be a lasting success having invited Lucretia Borgia to mix the cocktails. I believe that this Government has been bad for industry and the property industry in particular and will continue to be unreasonable. Their most recent budget even introduces a form of retrospective property tax legislation, i.e., a transaction that was legitimate when carried out, perhaps some years ago, would now carry a special penal tax liability. Any Government that brings in retrospective tax legislation is threatening the very basis of business life. I have added an extra resolution to our normal resolutions for shareholders to consider. This is that the company should donate £25,000 to the Conservative Party. As this is my personal suggestion I will not vote my controlling shareholding but would hope that not only will the main body of shareholders support the resolution but also that many other property companies will follow our lead and carry out similar moves to emphasise their distaste for the heavy-handed tax treatment and interference in their industry. Most of our shareholders are private individuals who probably own their own home and sleep content in those homes secure in the knowledge of its substantial capital appreciation over the years. However, whilst they sleep soundly they should be aware our Chancellor probably lies awake at night trying to devise ways of taxing this great tsunami of capital wealth. His problem is not how to tax, that's easy, but how to do it in such a way as to be able to disguise it under another name and justify the new imposition by saying something such as 'this charge is an environmentally sound and economically advantageous way to produce a fair and prudent allocation of national resources towards those less advantaged in our society' whereas this is a euphemism for 'rob the careful and prudent to buy votes from the foolish, the feckless and the fiddlers' as we already have sufficiently high tax rates to support the genuinely disadvantaged members of society. Finance Due to the increased value of our investment portfolio we have recently agreed to draw down the balance of our loan facility with HSBC and will thus have a total sum of £11 million cash available for further investment. Dividends On 20th June 2003 we paid a special 30th anniversary dividend of 5p per share. Additionally on 31st October 2003 we paid a 3.5p interim dividend and it is your Board's intention to recommend a final dividend of 4p per share. Outlook Most major developed countries run monumental Government budget deficits and consequently rely on borrowing untold billions of dollars, pounds, yen or euros from the private sector. This probably exacerbates currency instability and volatility. With oil and commodity prices at extreme highs, although thankfully currently cushioned by a dollar depreciation, is there not a strong possibility that some major upset will cause interest rates to rise much higher than anticipated? If this happens it will cause problems for many companies, particularly property companies who are very highly geared or indeed the many private residential owners and investors who have taken the view that residential property only ever increases in value and have geared up accordingly. Because of these concerns we have adopted a cautious approach to expansion but with our finance arrangements at fixed rates, substantial liquidity and positive cash flow from our wide mixed property portfolio spread throughout the country, we believe our company will continue to prosper. Finally I would like to thank all our staff, professional advisors and the numerous firms we deal with and of course our tenants who have helped to make this another successful year. A.S. Perloff Chairman 28 April 2004 Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31 December 2003 2003 2002 £'000 £'000 Turnover 9,791 8,240 Cost of sales (1,654) (1,389) Gross Profit 8,137 6,851 Administrative expenses (1,336) (1,194) Operating profit 6,801 5,657 Income from current asset investments 426 - (Loss)/Income from participating interests (67) 9 Profit on disposal of property - 342 Loss on disposal of investments (20) - Profit on ordinary activities before 7,140 6,008 interest Interest receivable 293 327 Interest payable (4,020) (3,379) Profit on ordinary activities before 3,413 2,956 taxation Taxation (880) (951) Profit on ordinary activities after 2,533 2,005 taxation Minority interests 9 (11) Profit attributable to members of the 2,542 1,994 parent undertaking Dividends (2,125) (1,183) Retained profit for the year 417 811 Transferred from revaluation reserve - 151 Purchase of own shares - (67) Transfer from negative goodwill reserve - 911 Retained profit brought forward 12,297 10,491 Retained profit carried forward 12,714 12,297 Earnings per share 15.0p 11.8p Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 31 December 2003 2003 2002 £'000 £'000 Fixed assets Tangible assets 93,996 79,769 Intangible asset - negative goodwill (793) (893) Investments 223 290 93,426 79,166 Current assets Stock 8,790 7,147 Current asset investments 1,297 1,015 Debtors: due within one year 5,580 1,999 Cash at bank and in hand 2,444 9,690 18,111 19,851 Creditors: amounts falling due within one (5,767) (7,258) year Net current assets 12,344 12,593 Total assets less current liabilities 105,770 91,759 Creditors: amounts falling due after more (55,576) (53,253) than one year Minority interests (90) (266) Net assets 50,104 38,240 Capital and reserves Called up share capital 4,250 4,226 Share premium account 2,886 2,862 Revaluation reserve 29,471 18,072 Capital redemption reserve 571 571 Negative goodwill reserve 212 212 Profit and loss account 12,714 12,297 Equity shareholders' funds 50,104 38,240 Net assets per share 294.8p 226.2p Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31st December 2003 2003 2002 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Cash flow from operating activities 2,242 3,651 Returns on investments and servicing of (3,727) (3,052) finance Taxation (1,097) (864) Investing activities (3,388) (7,464) Acquisitions and disposals - (507) Equity dividends paid (2,036) (1,524) Cash outflow before financing (8,006) (9,760) Financing Net proceeds of share issue 48 - Increase in debt 750 10,289 Purchase of own shares - (67) 798 10,222 (Reduction)/Increase in cash in the (7,208) 462 period Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt (Reduction)/Increase in cash in the (7,208) 462 period Cash inflow from increase in debt (750) (10,289) Loans acquired on acquisition - (8,094) Change in net debt resulting from cash (7,958) (17,921) flows Movement in net debt in the period (7,958) (17,921) Net debt at 1st January 2003 (46,019) (28,098) Net debt at 31st December 2003 (53,977) (46,019) At 1st Cash At 31st January Cash December 2003 Flow 2003 £'000 2002 £'000 £'000 Analysis of net debt Cash at bank 9,690 (7,246) 2,444 Overdrafts (39) 39 - 9,651 (7,207) 2,444 Net debt due after 1 year (53,252) (2,325) (55,577) Net debt due within 1 year (2,418) 1,574 (844) (55,670) (751) (56,421) Total (46,019) (7,958) (53,977) Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses For the year ended 31st December 2003 2003 2002 £'000 £'000 Profit for the financial year after 2,533 2,005 taxation Unrealised surplus on revaluation of 11,399 310 properties and investments Total gains and losses relating to the 13,932 2,315 year Note of consolidated historical cost profits and losses For the year ended 31st December 2003 2003 2002 £'000 £'000 Reported profit on ordinary activities 3,413 2,956 before taxation Realisation of property revaluation gains - 151 Historical cost profit before taxation 3,413 3,107 Historical cost retained profit 417 1,806 Notes to the Results Notes 1. Dividends The Company has already paid a special dividend of 5p (2002: nil) and interim dividend of 3.5p per share (net) (2002: 3.5p (net)) and the Directors now recommend payment of a final dividend of 4p per share (net) (2002: 3.5p (net)). The final dividend will be payable on 25th June 2004 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 28th May 2004. 2. Earnings per ordinary share The calculation of earnings per ordinary share is based on earnings, after minority interests, of £2,542,000 (2002 - £1,994,000) and on 16,992,408 ordinary shares being the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year (2002 - 16,926,761). 3. Report and Accounts The financial information for the year ended 31st December 2002 is extracted from the group's financial statements to that date which received an unqualified auditor's report and have been filed with the Registrar of Companies. The financial information presented does not constitute statutory accounts as defined in Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985. The results for the year ended 31st December 2003 have been extracted from the group's financial statements to that date which received an unqualified auditor's report and will be filed with the Registrar of Companies in due course. 4. Annual General Meeting The Annual General Meeting will be held on 16th June 2004. 5. Copies of the Report and Accounts will be posted to shareholders shortly and will be available from the Company's registered office at Panther House, 38 Mount Pleasant, London WC1X 0AP. Further Enquiries: Panther Securities P.L.C Peter Rowson 020 7278 8011 John East & Partners David Worlidge 020 7628 2200
UK 100

Latest directors dealings