Preliminary Announcement of Results

For immediate release 27 September 2010 To: City Editors Pacific Assets Trust plc Announces Interim Results for the six months to 31 July 2010 As at As at % 31 July 2010 31 January Change 2010 Share price 107.75p 104.25p +3.4 Net asset value per share 120.51p 114.28p +5.5 Discount of share price to net 10.6% 8.8% n/a asset value per share Shareholders' funds £140.8m £135.3m +4.1 Market capitalisation £125.9m £123.4m +2.0 Six months to One year to 31 July 2010 31 January 2010 Share price (total return) +4.6% +55.0% Net asset value per share (total +6.6% +56.8% return) MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan +11.1% +54.2% Index (total return) Dividends Year ended Year ended 31 January 2010 31 January 2009 Final dividend per share 1.29p 1.29p Half Year's Highs/Lows High Low Net asset value per share 133.59p 111.98p Share price 127.50p 106.00p Discount+ 2.7% 11.3% Notes + Discount high - Narrowest discount in period Discount low - Widest discount in period Source - Morningstar For and on behalf of Frostrow Capital LLP, Secretary 27 September 2010 The following are attached: * Chairman's Statement * Investment Manager's Report * Unaudited Income Statement * Unaudited Balance Sheet * Unaudited Reconciliation of Movements in Shareholders' Funds * Summarised Unaudited Statement of Cash Flows * Notes to the Interim Accounts For further information please contact: Alastair Smith/Mark Pope, Frostrow Capital LLP 020 3008 4911/4913 David Gait, First State Investment Management (UK) Limited 0131 473 2200 Chairman's Statement The past six months has been a period of transition. As discussed in my statement in the Annual Report, First State Investment Management (UK) Limited assumed responsibility for managing your Company's portfolio on 1 July. At the same time, Frostrow Capital LLP became responsible for administration and marketing. First State has lost no time in restructuring the portfolio and this process is now largely complete. A full report from your new Investment Manager is contained in this document. The Company will incur approximately £400,000 of costs in connection with the change to its investment management arrangements, representing 0.3% of the Company's net assets. Slightly more than half of these costs have been reflected in the first half of the Company's financial year and the remainder will be reflected in the second half. Based on new advice from the Company's tax advisers, the Company recently submitted a claim to the Taipei National Tax Administration in Taiwan for the recovery of tax withheld on income arising from the Company's investments in Taiwan. The claim covers the years 2005 to 2009 and, if successful, the Company expects to cover approximately £500,000 net of costs. However, as the likelihood, timing and the quantum of the recovery remain uncertain, no amount receivable has been recorded in the Company's accounts. Performance During the six month period, the Company's net asset value total return was 6.6%, compared to a total return from the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index of 11.1%. The share price total return for the period was 4.6%. During the period, the share price discount to net asset value per share widened slightly from 8.8% to 10.6% as at 31 July 2010. Share Ownership and Discount Policy As anticipated, some shareholders who held their shares through the previous Manager's savings plans have now disposed of their interest in the Company. This has enabled a number of new shareholders who share your Board's enthusiasm for the new management arrangements to join the register. On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank these new shareholders for their support whilst also thanking existing shareholders for their continuing vote of confidence in the future. The Company renewed its authority to repurchase its own shares at the Annual General Meeting in June. Through this authority it is intended to manage the discount between the Company's share price and the net asset value per share. During the past six months there was only one repurchase of 1.5 million shares on 13 July 2010 at a discount of 10.3% to the Company's ex income net asset value per share. Since the end of July there have been no further repurchases of shares as at the date of this report. Gearing The Company has a US$20 million facility which provides it with the ability to introduce gearing when it is considered appropriate to do so. This facility was not utilised during the period and up to the date of this report. Outlook With the new Investment Manager in place and the restructuring of the portfolio virtually complete, we look forward to a new and more prosperous chapter in your Company's future. Whilst there are a number of concerns about the short-term economic outlook, I am confident that patient investors in the Asian Pacific region will be well rewarded over time. David Nichol Chairman 27 September 2010 Investment Manager's Report Portfolio transition Having assumed responsibility for management of the Company's portfolio on 1 July, we spent the first part of the month transitioning the portfolio towards our own Asia Sustainability strategy. We inherited 52 companies and have retained seven. We have now purchased shares in a further 39 of our favourite companies. As such the portfolio transition is now 95% complete. By Sustainability, we are not referring to "green", "clean tech" or "ethical" investing. Rather, we are simply setting out to invest in those companies we believe are particularly well positioned to deliver long-term returns in the face of the huge development challenges Asia faces today. Land and water scarcity, resource constraints, population pressure and extreme levels of poverty are just some of the challenges Asian companies are increasingly coming up against. For some, these challenges represent key risks to their business. For others, they represent opportunities to build good quality business franchises that will stand the test of time. It is the latter group in which we hope to invest. This for example, does not mean buying every solar or wind company which lists in Asia - currently we have no exposure to either sector. Our focus is on finding attractively valued companies with good quality management teams and strong franchises capable of performing in both good and bad times. Currently none of the listed wind, solar or biofuel companies in Asia meet our investment criteria. As with all First State Asian strategies, the portfolio is constructed from the bottom up, paying no regard to company, sector or country benchmark weightings. The top ten companies collectively represent over 40% of your Company's net assets and less than 4% of the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, the Company's benchmark. At first glance, it may seem a risky strategy to stray so far from the benchmark. We hold the opposite view. The object of investing should surely be to deliver attractive, long-term absolute returns, not beat any particular index. Admittedly relative performance is a key commercial reality. As the Company's new Investment Manager we believe this approach will ensure that the Company outperforms the benchmark by at least 1.75% per annum on a rolling three year period as well as ranking in the top third of its peer group on a rolling three year basis. We believe that the best way to achieve this relative outperformance is by viewing risk simply as the risk of losing money, rather than deviation from an arbitrary index. For example, six of the top ten stocks in the benchmark index presently are government-owned and controlled. We doubt that any of them are run in the long-term interests of minority shareholders. Many of them also come with significant corporate governance, environmental or social risks. In short, the risk of losing clients' money by investing in them is simply too great, regardless of their position in the benchmark index. As a result there will be times when our performance will differ considerably from the benchmark. For example, during very strong markets we would usually expect to lag the benchmark and our peers as it tends to be conceptual, lower quality, highly priced stocks that rise the fastest. On the flipside, our focus on buying attractively priced, good quality companies results in a stronger focus on capital preservation. When markets correct, we hope to fall significantly less than the benchmark. Or put another way, our strongest relative performance comes during down markets. This may sound like a strange investment proposition and our approach is certainly not suitable for short-term investors with a trading focus who are hoping to `time' Asian markets. However, for Asian investors with a longer time horizon, we believe this focus on capital preservation as well as capital growth is the best way to ensure long-term absolute returns in the asset class. Outlook We are amazed by just how little the global financial system has changed since its fall from grace in 2008. For many global banks the majority of their profits continue to come from short-term trading gains. Remuneration policies still encourage short-term risk taking with little, if any, regard for the longer-term consequences. Lending practices remain far from prudent, while debt-fuelled over-consumption remains de rigueur. All this makes us extremely cautious about the global backdrop in which many of our Asian companies operate. A second crisis in the West would hit our companies hard. Even without a second crisis, Asia is in danger of succumbing under the weight of monetary largesse currently being doled out in the West in response to the current financial situation. Asset price inflation remains a problem, particularly in China, where the property bubble has yet to be pricked despite recent Government intervention. Goods and services inflation has returned to almost every Asian country. Despite this, markets remain remarkably sanguine, for now at least. Although no company is immune from inflation, some are more vulnerable than others. We have very little direct exposure to companies which would be hurt by rising interest rates. Very few of our companies sell goods or services which are bought with credit cards for example. We do, however, own shares in a number of `utility' companies ranging from bus and subway companies in China, Hong Kong and Singapore to our favourite water company in the Philippines. In most cases, the regulatory regime in theory allows rising input prices to be passed on fairly quickly. However, in practice, if inflation does get out of control, Governments are usually quick to clamp down on such pass through mechanisms. As a result, we have reduced our exposure to these companies and continue to favour companies with at least some degree of pricing power. Meanwhile, an Asian consumer bubble is inflating in a very similar way to the Asian resources bubble of 2007. Three years ago it became very fashionable to forecast out Asian per capita demand for natural resources and commodities to infinity and beyond. Commodity prices soared on the back of simple straight line forecasts - if China reaches the US average coal consumption of two tons per person, total Chinese demand will be greater than current world production of 2.5bn tons. If the per capita grain consumption in China rises from 300kg to reach the US average of 900 kg, China will consume two thirds of all the grain currently harvested globally. Today the straight line forecasting is aimed very much at consumer companies. Most good quality consumer companies in China and India are now trading on price to earnings multiples of over thirty times. Almost every week we are invited to a new investor conference showcasing consumer companies. Asian consumer funds are now commonplace while the variety of Asian consumer ETFs available is frightening. 60 page consumer research reports are landing on our desks, heralding bizarre strap-lines such as "The Great Leap Forward - China, trade-up and the consumer staples opportunity" - although perhaps this is a more prescient title than we are giving the authors credit for! We are continually told just how little laundry powder, toothpaste and hair products the Asian consumer uses relative to their Western counterpart. For investors this logic is seductive. It is also dangerously misleading, for three reasons. First, in India and China, at least 700 million people still live on extremely low incomes of one or two US dollars a day. As a result, `effective demand' from Asian consumers tends to lag `potential demand' significantly. Millionaires in Shanghai do not consume 2,739 times as much toothpaste as rural farmers living on one dollar a day. Second, for many markets, supply has the potential to keep pace with demand. There is no shortage of toothpaste in the world or toothpaste-making machines. Neither is there a shortage of companies ready to sell toothpaste, particularly when returns are so high. Colgate-Palmolive India makes a return on the capital it employs in India of over 150%. Which budding entrepreneur is not going to try his hand at toothpaste in Asia with this kind of return? Market growth counts for nothing if companies cannot defend the supernormal returns many of them are currently enjoying. While Colgate may well be able to fight them off, it seems unlikely that this will be achieved without some contraction of margins and profitability. Third, there is simply not enough ecological room left globally for China or India to pursue the same consumption intensive development model followed by every `developed' country to date. This is by now a well-worn argument put forward by environmental think tanks and alternative national accounting bodies. Recently, however, we have started to hear the same argument made by mainstream policymakers in both China and India. For example, we met a Chinese government official who talked convincingly about how China will be consumption constrained and needs to pursue a strategy of "spiritual consumption" - by which he meant a shift towards spending on leisure and recreational activities rather than "stuff". With considerable reluctance we are steadily reducing our stakes in our favourite consumer companies. They are increasingly priced for perfection, and we have yet to meet the perfect company. Instead, the majority of our investment ideas continue to come from outside China and India in markets which seem to have avoided most of the hubris to date. In particular, we have increased our holdings in what we consider to be the best quality banks in Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan and Thailand. Typically these are old fashioned banks, working hard to gather deposits and doing their best to make careful prudent loans with the proceeds. They tend to trade at somewhere between one and two times their book value and are typically at attractive stages of their respective credit cycles. Loan growth is recovering and credit quality is improving. As a result, the risk/return profile seems attractive to us. Within the portfolio there are two companies whose business activities are within the Asia Pacific region but the shares of which are traded on stock markets elsewhere. This international approach to the management of a company's affairs is likely to become an increasing trend in future but does not alter the spirit of your Company's objective to invest in the Asia Pacific region. David Gait Senior Investment Manager First State Investment Management (UK) Limited 27 September 2010 Unaudited Income Statement For the six months ended 31 July 2010 Six months ended Six months ended Year ended 31 July 2010 31 July 2009 30 January 2010 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Gains on - 7,883 7,883 - 35,912 35,912 - 48,665 48,665 investments held at fair value through profit or loss (Losses)/gains - (28) (28) - - - - 39 39 on derivative arrangements Exchange - 586 586 - (238) (238) - (204) (204) differences 1,942 - 1,942 1,293 - 1,293 2,545 - 2,545 Income (186) (560) (746) (121) (363) (484) (281) (842) (1,123) Investment management fee Other expenses (720) - (720) (425) - (425) (728) - (728) Net return 1,036 7,881 8,917 747 35,311 36,058 1,536 47,658 49,194 before finance costs and taxation Interest (2) - (2) - - - - - - payable Return on 1,034 7,881 8,915 747 35,311 36,058 1,536 47,658 49,194 ordinary activities before tax Tax on (178) - (178) (219) 140 (79) (173) - (173) ordinary activities Return 856 7,881 8,737 528 35,451 35,979 1,363 47,658 49,021 attributable to equity shareholders Return per 0.72p 6.67p 7.39p 0.45p 29.95p 30.40p 1.15p 40.27p 41.42p Ordinary share (note 2) The "Total" column of this statement represents the Income Statement of the Company. The "Revenue" and "Capital" columns are supplementary to this and are prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies. All items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. The Company had no recognised gains or losses other than those declared in the Income Statement. No operations were acquired or discontinued during the period. Unaudited Balance Sheet As at 31 July 2010 As at As at As at 31 July 2010 31 July 2009 31 January 2010 £'000 £'000 £'000 Fixedassets Investments 133,321 121,169 134,419 Current assets Debtors 1,160 1,331 236 Cash at bank and on 7,470 969 819 deposit 8,630 2,300 1,055 Creditors(amounts (1,137) (1,257) (220) falling due within one year) Net current assets 7,493 1,043 835 Net assets 140,814 122,212 135,254 Capital and reserves Share capital 14,606 14,794 14,794 Share premium account 4 4 4 Capital redemption 1,648 1,460 1,460 reserve Special reserve 14,572 16,222 16,222 Capital reserve 106,491 86,403 98,610 Revenue reserve 3,493 3,329 4,164 Equity shareholders' 140,814 122,212 135,254 funds Net asset value per 120.51p 103.26p 114.28p Ordinary share (note 3) Unaudited Reconciliation of Movements in Shareholders' Funds Six months Six months Year ended ended ended 31 January 31 July 2010 31 July 2009 2010 £'000 £'000 £'000 Opening shareholders' funds 135,254 87,760 87,760 Repurchase of own shares for (1,650) - - cancellation Return for the period 8,737 35,979 49,021 Dividend paid (1,527) (1,527) (1,527) Closing shareholders' funds 140,814 122,212 135,254 Summarised Unaudited Statement of Cash Flows For the six months ended 31July 2010 Six months Six months Year ended ended ended 31 January 31 July2010 31 July 2009 2009 £'000 £'000 £'000 Net cash inflow from operating 301 581 952 activities Servicing of finance (2) - - Financial investment Purchase of investments and (123,732) (29,136) (47,524) derivatives Sales of investments and derivatives 132,675 27,410 45,243 Net cash inflow/(outflow) from 8,943 (1,726) (2,281) financial investment Equity dividends paid (1,527) (1,527) (1,527) Net cash inflow/(outflow)before 7,715 (2,672) (2,856) financing Financing Repurchase of own shares for (1,650) - - cancellation Increase/(decrease)in cash 6,065 (2,672) (2,856) Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net funds Increase/(decrease) in cash 6,065 (2,672) (2,856) resulting from cashflows Exchange differences 586 (238) (204) Movement in net funds 6,651 (2,910) (3,060) Net funds at 1 February 819 3,879 3,879 Net funds at 31 July/31 January 7,470 969 819 Reconciliation of net return before finance costs and taxation to net cash flow from operating activities Net return before finance costs and 8,917 36,058 49,194 taxation (7,883) (35,912) (48,665) Gains on investments 28 - (39) Losses/(gains) on derivative arrangements (586) 238 204 Exchange differences (121) (89) (173) Irrecoverable withholding tax on investment income Changes in working capital and other (54) 286 431 non-cash items Net cash inflow from operating 301 581 952 activities Notes to the interim accounts 1. Basis of Preparation The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for the measurement of investments which are valued at fair value, and in accordance with applicable accounting standards, the Statement of Recommended Practice `Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts' dated January 2009 and the UK Accounting Standards Board's Statement `Half Yearly Financial Reports'. The same accounting policies that were used for the year ended 31 January 2010 have been applied in these financial statements. 2. Return per share The total return per share is based on the total return attributable to equity shareholders of £8,737,000 (six months ended 31 July 2009: return of £35,979,000; year ended 31 January 2010: return of £49,021,000) and on 118,190,927 shares (six months ended 31 July 2009: 118,348,386; year ended 31 January 2010: 118,348,386), being the weighted average number of shares in issue. The revenue return per share is calculated by dividing the net revenue return attributable to shareholders of £856,000 (six months ended 31 July 2009: return of £528,000; year ended 31 January 2010: return of £1,363,000) by the weighted average number of shares in issue as above. The capital return per share is calculated by dividing the net capital return attributable to shareholders of £7,881,000 (six months ended 31 July 2009: return of £35,451,000; year ended 31 January 2010: return of £ 47,658,000) by the weighted average number of shares in issue as above. 3. Net asset value per share The net asset value per share is based on net assets attributable to shares of £140,814,000 (31 July 2009: £122,212,000; 31 January 2010: £135,254,000) and on 116,848,386 shares in issue (31 July 2009: 118,348,386; 31 January 2010: 118,348,386). 4. Withholding tax reclaim During the period the Company submitted a claim to the Taipei National Tax Administration in Taiwan for the recovery of tax withheld on income arising from the Company's investments in Taiwan. The claim covers the years 2005 to 2009 and, if successful, the Company expects to cover approximately £ 500,000 net of costs. However, the likelihood, timing and the quantum of the recovery remain uncertain and as at 31 July 2010 no amount receivable has been recorded in the Company's accounts. 5. 2010 Accounts These are not statutory accounts in terms of Section 434 of the Companies Act 2006 and are unaudited. Statutory accounts for the year to 31 January 2010, which received an unqualified audit report, have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies. No statutory accounts in respect of any period after 31 January 2010 have been reported on by the Company's auditors or delivered to the Registrar of Companies. Earnings for the first six months should not be taken as a guide to the results for the full year. Frostrow Capital LLP Company Secretary 27 September 2010 - ENDS - Pacific Assets Trust plc
UK 100

Latest directors dealings