Final Results

FIDELITY JAPANESE VALUES PLC Preliminary Announcement of Unaudited Results Chairman's Statement For the year ending 31st December 2003 The Year's Results: NAV 60.4p (+17.6p; +41.1%) The year 2003 turned out to be a much better year for your Company than any since the bursting of the technology bubble in 2000. It started pretty inauspiciously with the Japanese stock markets and indeed global markets generally being depressed by the prospect of a war, the onset of SARS and doubts about the robustness of any economic recovery in the United States of America. These concerns abated during the next nine months and markets everywhere rebounded significantly, making 2003 the first profitable year for markets in the new millennium. As a consequence of this our own net asset value rose 41.1% or 17.6p to 60.4p per share; given that our goal is capital appreciation - making money for our shareholders - this result can be considered satisfactory. The table below provides a simple attribution analysis of our performance and shows that our stock selection added just under one penny and our gearing just over four pence to the net asset value. Again, without wanting to sound in any way complacent, we regard it as satisfactory that the management of your Company added to shareholder value. Attribution Analysis for the year to 31st December 2003 Net Asset Value @ 31stDec `02 42.8p Impact of the stock market +13.8p +32.2% Impact of stock selection +0.9p +2.1% Impact of currency 0.0p 0.0% Impact of gearing +4.4p +10.3% Impact of other costs -1.5p -3.5% Net Asset Value @ 31st Dec `03 60.4p +41.1% While it is our primary objective to make money for our shareholders, it is a secondary and not unimportant objective that we do better than our competitors and also the market. Our portfolio in yen terms did do a little better than the market - it rose 34.3% while the benchmark index rose 32.2% - and we ranked second out of four in the Association of Investment Trust Companies Japanese Smaller Companies sector. In these respects too we would regard the progress of the last year as satisfactory. The Share Price and the Discount: Price: 51p (+16p; +45.7%) Discount: 15.6% (18.3% in 2002) As we have said in our annual reports during the course of the last few years, we believe there is potential for Japanese stocks and shares to perform well because of the considerable restructuring that has occurred amongst Japanese companies generally and the effect that would have on corporate profitability. Corporate profits rose by 72% in 2002 and are estimated to have risen by 19% in 2003 with 2004 growth forecast, as I write, at 11½ % - a fact that is drawing the attraction of the Japanese stock markets to the attention of investors generally. It is one of the reasons we believe that the demand for shares of investment trust companies investing in Japan has increased and caused a general narrowing of discounts in this subsector of the investment trust market. As I write this statement the discount has narrowed further since the year end and now stands at 9.6%. Board Matters: The year 2003 saw yet another enormous increase in the corporate governance requirements of boards of directors of companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. Based on reports produced by the Department of Trade and Industry in the names of Mr Higgs and Sir Robert Smith, the UK Listing Authority (part of the Financial Services Authority ('FSA')) has produced a new combined code for companies to follow. In it, it commented that the governance of investment companies had certain considerations of their own. As a consequence the Association of Investment Trust Companies has drawn up its own code for its members, one that your own Board of Directors deems to be more appropriate for the governance of your Company. We will be using it as the template for our new corporate governance procedures which will be decided upon during the course of the year. The FSA has also produced further listing requirements for all investment trust companies in reaction to the investigation to the problems of the Split Capital Investment Trust subsector. These new provisions include two which affect the composition of your Board of Directors. I am Chairman of both Fidelity Special Values and your Company, Fidelity Japanese Values. The FSA has determined that being a director of two or more investment trusts under the same management makes an individual dependent on that management house and incapable of independent behaviour. It has also ruled that the chairman of an investment trust company should be independent of management, a principal that we entirely endorse. As a consequence of this I shall be standing down as chairman and a director of your Company. I am truly sorry to do so - particularly as I believe that after a number of difficult years, the prospects look as encouraging as they have done in a long time. It is not my present intention to sell my shares after stepping down. Consequent upon my departure as Chairman and Director of your Company, the Board of Directors has asked William Thomson to become Chairman of your Company. William has vast experience of Japan with his company's business having operated there for many, many years; he knows Japan very well. Furthermore, he has been a director of investment trusts for the last 30 years and is chairman of British Assets Trust. He brings knowledge and experience of both Japan and investment trusts to the leadership of the Board. I wish him well. Shareholders will note that he is standing for re-election as a director; his colleagues believe that he has a made a considerable contribution to the Company and recommend to shareholders that he be re-elected. The FSA has also ruled that there may also be only one individual employed or associated with the Manager on the board of an investment trust. We have two: Simon Fraser, Fidelity International's Chief Investment Officer and Sir John Stanley MP, who is a consultant to Fidelity. As our corporate governance statement on page 22 states, we believe that it is important 'that the manager should be party to the responsibility, authority and accountability to those investing in their management.' As a consequence we believe that it is important that Simon Fraser remains a director (his position as a director will be subject to annual re-election by shareholders from next year onwards). Unfortunately it means that Sir John Stanley will join me in stepping down as a director. Anyone who has worked with Sir John will know that he is a very conscientious director and he has a very independent nature; his conduct as a director truly reflects this and I have not come across a more independent director; rightly or wrongly however the rules require him to stand down. It is a pity because he has served shareholders well. The Board of Directors, with William Thomson and Nicholas Barber taking the lead, will be looking for and expect to appoint two new directors within the next twelve months. I will stand down as Chairman and as a Director on 31 December 2004 while Sir John Stanley will stand down on 31 March 2005. Finally Nicholas Barber is standing for re-election, his contribution to the board in his first three years as a director has been very valuable. He has brought his experience of Japan, the Far East in general and of business, to the Board's deliberations; his common sense and robust questioning have proved valuable. As with Sir John, he has an independent nature and that attribute too has been important. We, his colleagues, have no hesitation in recommending his re-election to shareholders. Gearing and Currency Hedging Gearing: In last year's Chairman's statement I articulated our gearing policy as follows. 'While the Directors maintain a long term approach to the level of gearing - in part because we have a long-term approach to investing and in part because we do not believe that short-term management of the borrowings is likely to add value to shareholders - we undertake a thorough review of the borrowings once a year at the board meeting in Tokyo - normally held in October each year. We do of course keep a permanent eye on our gearing and we also have certain trigger points established, so that if they are hit the level of borrowings is reassessed.' At the recent board meeting in Tokyo we reviewed the level of borrowings and concluded once again that they should be left at the levels they were at. We have two loans outstanding, one for Yen 1.5 billion (valued at £7.9 million at the year end); it is due for repayment in August of this year. The other loan for Yen 1.7 billion (valued at £8.8 million at the year end) is due for repayment in November of this year. As part of its gearing review process the Board will be considering the future of these two loans. Currency hedging: In the light of the weakness of the yen against sterling so far in 2004, I thought it would be worth stating the Board's policy on currency hedging. The Board takes the view that neither it nor the Manager is likely to be able to add to shareholder value through a short term currency hedging programme, particularly as the Japanese Government's policy on the management of the yen makes predicting its value so difficult. However the level of the yen/sterling exchange rate is kept under constant review; only under extreme circumstances would we be likely to depart from our policy. Annual General Meeting: 6thMay 2004 I do urge as many shareholders as possible to attend the Annual General Meeting which will be held at midday on 6th May 2004 at Fidelity's offices at 25 Cannon Street in the City of London. It is the one occasion in the year when shareholders can meet all of the directors as well as the investment manager Asako Kibe. You may have questions, comments or suggestions which we would welcome and which we feel that all shareholders should have the benefit of hearing. Following the meeting Asako Kibe will give a presentation on the past year and the prospects for the current one. The Continuation Vote: Every three years the Board of Directors puts a resolution to shareholders concerning the continuation of the Company as an investment trust, investing in the stocks and shares of smaller companies in Japan. Your board takes this recommendation most seriously and certainly has not and does not take a recommendation to continue for granted. The process of assessing the matter has involved three criteria: * Whether it is likely that the net asset value of your Company will rise in the next three years; * Whether we have the best resources to take advantage of the investment opportunities, so as to make money and to do better than our peer group and our benchmark; * Whether our shareholders want the Company to continue in business. Every year the Board of Directors conducts one of its board meetings in Tokyo. In October 2003 we met there with the special purpose of considering the prospects for the economy of Japan, for the corporate sector and its profits and finally for those of smaller companies in particular - with a view to assessing whether or not there were good prospects for a rise in the net asset value over the next three years. It has to be said that we made a similar assessment three years ago before recommending to you that the Company continue in business and that that objective was not achieved. However we came away from Tokyo believing that considerable progress has been made at the corporate level in Japan, that balance sheets are enormously improved, that there has been some consolidation of excess capacities and that there is now a more sympathetic approach by Japanese management to shareholder value. Most of all, much as we thought they would, both corporate profits and cash flows have increased materially during the last two years and look set to do so again over the next few years. In the past two years this merely resulted in lower price earnings ratios rather than higher share prices; now that price earnings ratios are really quite reasonable and much in line those of other countries, we believe that during the next few years higher profits should result in higher share prices. There is no doubt that the economy is performing much better than it has for a number of years. Not only is the robust recovery of the American economy during the last 12 months helping Japanese exporters and Japan's economy generally but there is an added dimension to the economy of the whole of the Far East area, the dynamic growth of the economy of China. Exports to China are growing rapidly and to the whole Far East area are now nearly twice as large as those to the USA. On the surface of it at least, it looks thoroughly encouraging. Looking back on the last three years, I am pleased to be able to report that our net asset value was the best performer in our peer group but on the other hand it did not outperform our benchmark. Neither we, nor indeed the rest of our peer group for that matter, were able to increase our net asset value - in large measure because the market was down over the period. This led your Board of Directors to embark upon a rigorous review of the management resources at our disposal in order to gain a better understanding as to why we had not performed better than we did and to assure ourselves that there were prospects of improvement. (we are always looking at ways of improving ourselves). We conducted a review of the whole investment process of our manager in Tokyo; your Board of Directors believes that the Manager has all the resources to do a good job and fulfil the first two criteria referred to above. Finally, the Board met with its stockbrokers to discuss shareholders' views in particular in respect to a continuation vote. We have visited one or two large shareholders and through our brokers, canvassed the opinion of a number of further shareholders. From these meetings the Board concluded that there is support for continuation and therefore general support for the Company going forward. The Board believes there is also considerable investment demand for Japan - particularly as its improved prospects are becoming more widely recognised by investors around the world. As a consequence of what I believe to be a thorough review by the Board of Directors of the prospects for Fidelity Japanese Values and of the likely demand by investors for Japanese smaller companies funds we have concluded that we should recommend to you that you vote in favour of the Company continuing business at the Annual General Meeting. If any shareholder has concerns about this matter or any other matter pertaining to the AGM, would you please contact me and I would be very happy to review them with you.. Prospects: I hope that I have already covered the prospects for Japan generally, for its stock market and for the shares of smaller companies in particular. It only suffices for me to say that we are enthusiastic about those prospects and believe that, after nearly 15 years of bear markets in Japan, things do look a lot better. Given the low margins and low return on capital that Japanese companies generally have, the prospects for continued profit growth and thence higher share prices, are encouraging. It is just possible that they may well be better than those of many other markets. If so, it could be Japan's turn again - at last! Alex Hammond-Chambers Chairman 11 March 2004 Enquiries: Barbara Powley, Fidelity Investments International - 01737 836 883 Alex Hammond-Chambers - 0131 222 9430 FIDELITY JAPANESE VALUES PLC Statement of Total Return (incorporating the revenue account1) - unaudited For the year ended 31 December 2003 2003 2002 revenue capital total revenue capital total £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Gains/(losses) on investments - 17,973 17,973 - (9,805) (9,805) Dividend income 648 - 648 677 - 677 Interest income 9 - 9 6 - 6 Investment management fee (673) - (673) (657) - (657) Other expenses (266) - (266) (204) - (204) Exchange losses - (14) (14) - (61) (61) Net (loss)/return before (282) 17,959 17,677 (178) (9,866) (10,044) finance costs and taxation Interest payable (286) - (286) (384) - (384) Exchange (losses) gains on - (40) (40) - 150 150 loans (Loss)/return on ordinary (568) 17,919 17,351 (562) (9,716) (10,278) activities before tax Tax on ordinary activities (66) - (66) (119) - (119) (Loss)/return on ordinary (634) 17,919 17,285 (681) (9,716) (10,397) activities after tax for the period attributable to equity shareholders (Loss)/return per ordinary share Basic (note 2) (0.65p) 18.25p 17.60p (0.69p) (9.83p) (10.52p) 1. The revenue column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. 2. Returns per ordinary share are based on the net revenue loss on ordinary activities after taxation of £634,000 (2002: loss £681,000) and the capital appreciation in the year of £17,919,000 (2002: depreciation £9,716,000) and on 98,206,253 ordinary shares (2002: 98,825,157) being the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year. As the basic and fully-diluted returns, calculated according to the provisions of FRS 14, are identical, the fully-diluted return has not been disclosed. Since the effect of the warrants outstanding on the first day of the accounting period is not dilutive, they have not been included in the calculation of the fully-diluted return. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the year. FIDELITY JAPANESE VALUES PLC Balance Sheet - unaudited as at 31 December 2003 2003 2002 £'000 £'000 Fixed assets Investments 72,616 55,492 Current assets Debtors - amounts falling due within one year 865 548 Cash at bank 3,248 2921 4,113 3,469 Creditors - amounts falling due within one year Fixed rate unsecured loans (16,660) - Other creditors (731) (288) (17,391) (288) Net current (liabilities)/assets (13,278) 3,181 Total assets less current liabilities 59,338 58,673 Creditors - amounts falling due after more than one year Fixed rate unsecured loans - (16,620) Total net assets 59,338 42,053 Capital and reserves Called up share capital 24,551 24,551 Share premium account 40 40 Capital redemption reserve 1,780 1,780 Other reserves Other reserve 60,369 60,369 Warrant exercise reserve 2 2 Warrant reserve 10,198 10,198 Capital reserve - realised (30,687) (7,193) Capital reserve - unrealised 2,410 (39,003) Revenue reserve (9,325) (8,691) Total equity shareholders' funds 59,338 42,053 Net asset value per ordinary share: Basic 60.42p 42.82p FIDELITY JAPANESE VALUES PLC Cash Flow Statement - unaudited For the year ended 31 December 2003 2003 2002 £'000 £'000 Operating activities Investment income received 570 557 Interest received 9 6 Investment management fee paid (631) (712) Directors' fees paid (32) (54) Other cash payments (179) (237) Net cash outflow from operating activities (263) (440) Returns on investments and servicing of finance Interest paid (286) (389) Net cash outflow from returns on investments and (286) (389) servicing of finance Financial investment Purchases of investments (42,489) (16,682) Exchange gains/(losses) 16 (377) Disposals of investments 43,379 20,409 Net cash inflow from financial investment 906 3,350 Net cash inflow before financing 357 2,251 Financing Repurchase of ordinary shares - (1,470) 1.05% fixed rate unsecured loan drawn down - 8,300 2.16% fixed rate unsecured loan repaid - (8,226) Net cash outflow from financing - (1,396) Increase in cash 357 1,125 The above statements have been prepared on the basis of the accounting policies as set out in the recently published set of annual financial statements. The figures for the year to 31 December 2002 have been extracted from the accounts for the year ended 31 December 2002 which have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and on which the Auditors gave an unqualified report. The annual report and accounts will be posted to shareholders as soon as is practicable and in any event no later than 2 April 2004.
UK 100

Latest directors dealings