Annual Financial Report

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc Audited Final Results for the year to 31 December 2014 The following is an extract from the Company's Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 31 December 2014. The Annual Report is expected to be posted to shareholders on 3 February 2015. Members of the public may obtain copies from Aberforth Partners LLP, 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7NS or from its website: www.aberforth.co.uk. A copy will also shortly be available for inspection at the National Storage Mechanism at: www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/NSM facility. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Net Asset Value Total Return -0.7% Numis Smaller Companies Index (Excl. Investment Companies) Total Return -1.9% Ordinary Share Price Total Return +0.1% Final Dividend increased by 5.3% to 17.00p per Ordinary Share The objective of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASCoT) is to achieve a net asset value total return (with dividends reinvested) greater than that of the Numis Smaller Companies Index (excluding Investment Companies) over the long term. ASCoT is managed by Aberforth Partners LLP. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS Review of 2014 performance In last year's report my predecessor pointed out that the strong returns of 2012 and 2013 were unlikely to be matched in 2014 and indeed the year proved tougher for small UK quoted companies when compared with the strong returns of the previous two years. The FTSE 100 Index gave a total return of +0.7% while the FTSE All-Share Index, which is heavily weighted towards large companies, delivered a return of +1.2%. By comparison, the Numis Smaller Companies Index Excluding Investment Companies (NSCI (XIC)), the Company's benchmark, produced a return of -1.9%. Over the same period, the Company's net asset value total return was -0.7% while the share price total return was +0.1%. The Managers' Report gives much greater detail to the headline numbers and expands on the influences and factors that have affected the Company's performance in 2014. Board changes In October 2014 I became Chairman of the Company replacing Professor Paul Marsh. Paul was an excellent Chairman and Director of the Company over a ten year period. We will all miss his invaluable contribution and his knowledge of the investment landscape. He did a superb job for investors in the Company and leaves with our very best wishes. I am delighted to be the Company's fourth Chairman since its formation in 1990 (even though it feels a little like being asked to follow Alex Ferguson!) and, along with my Board colleagues, look forward to working with the Managers to help extend the excellent long term record. Dividends The Company witnessed a continuation of the recent positive trends with regard to dividend experience from investee companies. In this context, the Board is pleased to propose a final dividend of 17.0p. This results in total dividends for the year of 24.75p, representing an increase of 5.3% on 2013. Based on the year end share price of 1,072p, the Company's shares deliver a historic 2.3% yield. The Board remains committed to a progressive dividend policy. The Company's revenue reserves, after adjusting for payment of the final dividend, amount to 38.6p per share (up from 36.1p as at 31 December 2013) and provide a degree of flexibility going forward. The final dividend, subject to Shareholder approval at the 2015 Annual General Meeting, will be paid on 5 March 2015 to Shareholders on the register as at the close of business on 13 February 2015. The ex dividend date is 12 February 2015. ASCoT operates a Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Details of the plan, including the Form of Election, are available from Capita Registrars. Gearing It has been the Company's policy to use gearing in a tactical manner throughout its 24 year history. As reported in the Interim Report, the previous debt facility expired in May 2014 and this was replaced with a new £125m facility from The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. The new facility is on improved terms and is due to expire on 15 June 2017. The facility provides the Managers with flexibility in accessing liquidity for investment purposes, as well as the ability to fund share buy-ins without disturbing the underlying portfolio. At the year end, gearing stood at 2.8% of Shareholders' funds. During the year, the level of gearing ranged from 0.2% to 3.6% with an average of 2.3%. Share buy-in At the Annual General Meeting in March 2014, the authority to buy in up to 14.99% of the Company's Ordinary Shares was approved. During the year, 38,000 Ordinary Shares (0.04%) were bought in at a total cost of £0.4 million. Those Shares have been cancelled rather than held in Treasury. Once again, the Board will be seeking to renew the buy-in authority at the Annual General Meeting on 27 February 2015. Scottish Independence Whilst the outcome of the referendum on Scottish Independence was that Scotland should remain within the United Kingdom, constitutional changes appear now to be a fixture on the political agenda. The Board's stance on this is unchanged: we will continue to monitor developments and be prepared to take such actions as may be appropriate and in the interest of Shareholders as a whole. Summary The Company will move past the quarter century landmark in 2015. The continuation vote held in 2014 was enthusiastically supported by the vast majority of shareholders. It is of course an election year and by the time I write to Shareholders with the Interim Report in July the Company will have experienced its sixth General Election and potentially its fifth Prime Minister. Domestic political uncertainty is at a high level and is likely to remain so at least up to and possibly beyond the date of the election. Investment trusts, with their fixed capital structures, have a long tradition of navigating both economic and political change. Regardless of the outcome of the election, the Board continues to have confidence in both the Managers and their value investing style. The Board has a clear view that this style and the exposure to smaller companies will reward investors in the long term but are very conscious that there will be possibly quite long periods when both may be out of fashion. However, it is our belief that this combination has been central to generating the excellent long term returns of the Company. Since our formation in 1990, the NSCI (XIC) has risen by +11.2% per annum in total return terms. By comparison, the Company's net asset value total return has been +14.1% per annum. Finally, the Board very much welcomes the views of Shareholders and is always available to talk to them directly. My email address is noted below. Paul Trickett Chairman 29 January 2015 paul.trickett@aberforth.co.uk MANAGERS' REPORT Introduction ASCoT's NAV total return in 2014 was -0.7%. This outcome was influenced by a weak showing from the small company asset class: the NSCI (XIC) generated a total return of -1.9%. The FTSE All-Share, which is representative of larger companies, produced a total return of 1.2%. Thus, last year brought a reversal of the pattern of very strong returns from smaller companies in recent years. Over the five years to 31 December 2014, the total return of small companies has been 104%, against 52% for large. The modest movements of UK equities in 2014 are in contrast to some remarkable gyrations in the broader financial markets. - Government bond yields, which rose sharply in 2013, headed downwards again in 2014. In the US, ten year treasury yields were 3.0% at the start of the year, experienced an extraordinary dip to 1.7% in October and stood at 2.2% at the year end. Gilts yields followed a similar path, falling from 3.0% to 1.8%. The decline was influenced by a reassessment of the outlook for economic growth, as Japan and the Eurozone in particular disappointed expectations. Also influential were the anticipation of quantitative easing in the Eurozone and more stimulus in Japan. These offset the "tapering" of the US's own quantitative easing programme. - Among equity markets, the performance of the US stockmarket, the world's largest, stood out. The S&P 500 rose by 11% and ended the year close to its all time high. Helping this performance was the relative buoyancy of the US economy. Its recovery from the global financial crisis has seen it resume its pre-eminence in the context of the global economy. However, growth in gross domestic product was not the sole determinant of equity performance. The UK market struggled, despite a better than expected outturn for economic growth, which in part reflects its significant exposure to oil companies. In contrast, Germany and Japan, whose economies have disappointed, saw their equity markets achieve positive returns in 2014. - Currency movements change the picture. The US dollar was particularly strong in 2014, rising by 13% on a trade-weighted basis. Thus, in dollar terms, the positive returns of the German and Japanese markets lapse into negative territory: for example, Germany's Dax was up by 3% in euro terms but down by 10% in dollar terms. Periods of dollar strength are frequently awkward affairs for other parts of the world economy, challenging established financial relationships and hampering global trade. - The strong dollar exerted pressure on the prices of commodities through 2014. Of these, oil stands out. Its 46% price decline over the year accelerated in the final quarter as the impact of weaker demand, the US shale boom and OPEC's reluctance to cut production were digested. The share prices of oil companies duly suffered, though other stockmarket sectors ought to be beneficiaries of lower oil prices. The aforementioned price movements are often contradictory and imply large swings in relative valuations between asset classes. Against this background, the tasks of running small UK quoted companies or of making investment decisions about those companies are inevitably complicated. The burden has been eased somewhat by the performance of the UK economy, which accounts for around half of the revenues of the small cap universe. Challenges to the domestic economy remain. Among these are several more years of austerity, wage growth that struggles to exceed the rate of inflation, and a particularly uncertain political environment. However, the recovery continued through 2014 and helped small companies generate earnings growth of around 8%. This was lower than market expectations at the start of the year, as is usually the case. It is, though, an acceptable outcome, especially when backed up by dividend growth of a similar magnitude. Investment performance ASCoT's NAV total return in 2014 was -0.7%, against the NSCI (XIC)'s total return of -1.9%. That relative performance is analysed in the table below. The following paragraphs describe the principal influences on performance in 2014. For the 12 months ended 31 December 2014 Basis points Stock selection 280 Sector selection (40) ____ Attributable to the portfolio of investments, 240 based on mid prices (after transaction costs of 29 basis points) Movement in mid to bid price spread (43) Cash/gearing 0 Purchase of Ordinary Shares 0 Management fee (76) Other expenses (6) ___ Total attribution based on bid prices 115 === Note: 100 basis points = 1%. Total Attribution is the difference between the total return of the NAV and the Benchmark Index (i.e. NAV= -0.70%; Benchmark Index = -1.85%; difference is 1.15% being 115 basis points). Sectors The portfolio's sector positions, and thus the contribution from sector selection shown in the preceding table, are usually the outcome of the Managers' bottom-up stock selections. But, in view of the recent weakness of the oil price, a general comment on the Oil & Gas sector is merited. Towards the end of 2013, exposure to the sector was increased in a meaningful way for the first time in around a decade. This was motivated by the low valuations of several small oil companies, whose share prices had fallen sharply over recent years in response to industry-wide cost pressures and deteriorating returns on marginal investment. Such were the declines that a phase of consolidation had started. The message in this consolidation was that it was becoming cheaper to own oil reserves through M&A than to produce them by drilling another hole. Indeed, the portfolio benefited from this consolidation as one of its oil holdings was acquired. However, the takeover of another oil holding towards the end of the year was thwarted by the precipitous drop in the oil price. This has provoked a reassessment of their investment plans by oil companies and has put significant pressure on share prices. The pressure was sufficient to render many mid cap oil companies eligible for inclusion in the NSCI (XIC) on its annual rebalancing. The impact of these means that the NSCI (XIC)'s weighting in Oil & Gas at 1 January 2015 was 5.8%. ASCoT's exposure was 3.7%. As they have done in other sectors over the years, the Managers will look to take advantage of an indiscriminate sell-off in share prices that becomes unfairly reflected in the valuations of small oil companies. Style & size On its 1 January 2015 rebalancing, the NSCI (XIC)'s largest constituent had a market capitalisation of £1,265m. The index thus encompasses a large portion of mid cap companies. Indeed, the overlap with the FTSE 250 represents 67% by value of the NSCI (XIC). Motivated by relative valuations, the portfolio has a relatively low exposure to this mid cap component. This positioning was unhelpful in 2014, as the returns of the FTSE 250 (+2.8%) and the FTSE SmallCap (-2.7%) suggest. Meanwhile, the Managers' value investment style, which boosted returns in 2013, played a much less significant role in 2014. Indeed, such was the narrowness of the gap between value and growth that one of the style data providers used by the Managers, London Business School, suggested that value under-performed growth, while the other, Style Research, suggested the reverse. Hindering the value style in 2014 were the relapse in bond yields and flattening of yield curves, which, all else being equal, tend to favour the prospects of growth companies. On the other hand, for a variety of company specific reasons, some growth stocks encountered trading difficulties in 2014. From lofty valuations, these often experienced substantial falls in their share prices. ASCoT benefited in a relative performance sense from not owning these companies. In certain cases, the de-rating has been such that they are starting to measure up to the Managers' value investment criteria. Dividends The dividend performance of small companies in 2014 was good. Mid to high single digit growth across the small cap universe extended to five years the run of dividend growth above its long term average. Of course, part of the reason for this record is the starting point: many small companies cut their dividends in the recession of 2009. The other important reason for the recent strong growth in dividends also has its roots in the global financial crisis. To generalise, in the years leading up to 2008, companies were able to forget about their shareholders: all the marginal financing they required came from the banks. The crisis changed this: banks came under pressure to deleverage and it was the shareholders that kept many companies solvent in 2009 with rescue rights issues. These events have reinforced the priorities of company boards, one manifestation of which is the growth in dividends. ASCoT has shared in this trend. The table below categorises the portfolio's 88 companies according to their most recent dividend action. It is pleasing to note that the largest category is represented by those that increased their dividends; among these, the median rate of increase was 9%. The `Other' category includes those companies with no meaningful comparison, i.e. IPOs in 2014 and other companies that have started paying dividends. Band Nil Down Flat Up Other No. of holdings 20 7 11 44 6 The other notable category is `Nil', which comprises those companies that have not paid a dividend over the past 12 months. These 20 companies account for 17% of the portfolio by weight: this is a high level of exposure for ASCoT to nil payers. The corollary of this exposure is average dividend cover for the 88 holdings of 3.0x, which is also towards its highest ever level. The Managers have not lost their fondness for dividends. However, in 2014 some of the most attractively valued opportunities happened to be nil yielding. Crucially, the Managers consider that many of the 20 nil yielders will be capable of (re)commencing dividend payments over the next few years. As they do so, income generated by the portfolio will be boosted, all else being equal. Strong balance sheets Managers' reports of recent years have referred to the strong balance sheets that characterise both the portfolio companies and the small company universe. This remains the case. The proportions exposed to companies with net cash on their balance sheet stood at 31% and 26% respectively at the end of the year. These proportions have been moving downwards since 2011. The Managers believe that, in reaction to the global financial crisis, balance sheets had in many cases been taken to levels that were unnecessarily strong. This conservatism was hampering growth prospects. Thus, the lower proportion now holding cash suggests that company boards have had greater confidence to invest or, in the absence of attractive investment opportunities, return cash to shareholders. Corporate activity The powerful pick-up in corporate activity through 2014 may be considered another indication of increasing corporate confidence. As described in the interim report, the first half was dominated by IPOs. The pace slackened through the second half as markets grew more nervous and as vendors became too ambitious with regard to valuations. Nevertheless, 27 IPOs eligible for inclusion in the NSCI (XIC) were completed in 2014. These had a cumulative market capitalisation of £13.4bn. Other issuance, in the form of rights issues or placings, totalled a further £4.8bn. This makes 2014 the year of highest equity issuance since 2009 when the financial crisis prompted rescue rights issues. There were four 2014 IPOs in ASCoT's portfolio at the year end. As IPO activity waned in the second half of the year, M&A activity waxed. By 31 December 2014, the takeovers of 12 NSCI (XIC) constituents had been concluded. In addition, there were incomplete bids, approaches or talks in progress for another 10. In 2013, the quietest year for small company M&A since 1955, only 5 deals were completed. The value of 2014's deals totalled £12.9bn, an impressive number, but one that is nevertheless eclipsed by the value of issuance. ASCoT's participation in the M&A upswing was considerable. Of the 22 deals noted above in the NSCI (XIC), ASCoT had holdings in 9. The takeover premiums were often large, ranging from 25% to 85%. Over the years, a meaningful boost to returns from M&A has not been unusual. Indeed, the Managers are inclined to view this as a result and validation of their value investment approach. Active share Active share is a measure of how different a portfolio is from its benchmark index. Since the publication of a research paper in 2009, it has risen in prominence as a measure of fund managers' conviction in the stocks they choose to own. In simple terms, the higher the ratio, the higher is the probability that the portfolio will perform out of line with the benchmark, for better or worse. The Managers target an active share ratio of at least 70%, though will tolerate a temporarily depressed number, and consider the impact on the portfolio's active share ratio as part of the investment process. The year end portfolio's active share was 76%. This was affected by holdings in companies that, following the 1 January rebalancing, are no longer part of the NSCI (XIC). As these holdings are sold in an orderly fashion over the coming months, the active share ratio will fall to the extent that the proceeds are reinvested in new holdings that are part of the index. Turnover Over the twelve months to 31 December 2014, portfolio turnover was 36%. In two circumstances, ASCoT is effectively a forced seller of holdings. First, companies that have grown too large to remain eligible for the NSCI (XIC) are ejected on the 1 January annual rebalancing. Second, in M&A situations, it is clearly not possible to remain a holder of the target company, again necessitating sale. With the pronounced pick-up in M&A through the year, it was the second of these that was particularly influential in keeping turnover above the historic average for a second year. Adjusting for these exceptions, ASCoT's portfolio turnover was 25% in 2014, which is in line with the long term underlying average. Valuations The table below shows the historic valuation data for the portfolio and the NSCI (XIC). The 13.2x PE ratio of small companies compares with 13.8x for the FTSE All-Share, which is representative of large companies. This 4% discount is tighter than the long term average of 7%. However, at the end of 2013, small companies were on a 5% premium to large. History suggests that such a state of affairs does not persist for long. This is a reasonable explanation for the under-performance of small companies against large in 2014. A note of caution is warranted in the quirky UK stockmarket. There are four very large sectors in the FTSE 100 - Banks, Oils, Miners and Pharmaceuticals. The market capitalisation of each of these is larger than that of the entire small cap universe. This means that the merits of these four sectors should be considered before making a decision on size exposure. Characteristics 31 December 2014 31 December 2013 ASCoT NSCI(XIC) ASCoT NSCI(XIC) Number of companies 88 369 92 363 Weighted average market £614m £754m £646m £833m capitalisation Price earnings ratio 13.0x 13.2x 13.6x 16.8x (historic) Dividend yield (historic) 2.5% 2.5% 2.3% 2.2% Dividend cover 3.1x 3.0x 3.2x 2.7x Turning to the portfolio, the average PE of the 88 investee companies was 13.0x, which is 2% lower than that of the NSCI (XIC). On the basis of dividend yields, the portfolio is, unusually, not on a premium to the small cap universe. As described above, this is a function of the presently high exposure of the portfolio to nil yielding companies, which also increases the overall dividend cover. However, the portfolio is not constructed with reference to historic PE ratios. Rather the Managers' favoured valuation metric is the ratio of enterprise value to earnings before interest, tax and amortisation (EV/EBITA). Topically, given the high incidence of M&A within the portfolio in 2014, this valuation approach is aligned with how one company might assess another, since a bidding company can determine the means of funding an acquisition and often how the enlarged entity will be taxed. The table below shows the forward EV/EBITA ratio for the portfolio, the tracked universe and two subdivisions of the tracked universe: 43 growth stocks and 256 other companies. 2015 EV/EBITA ratio 43 growth companies 256 other Tracked Universe ASCoT's portfolio companies 15.6x 10.3x 11.0x 9.3x The portfolio retains a pronounced valuation advantage over the growth companies and the broader small company universe. This is consistent with the Managers' value investment discipline. It is the Managers' contention that this valuation advantage can form the basis of superior returns over the longer term. An additional reference point is the average EV/EBITA multiple of the eight portfolio companies that have received bids during the year, using the takeover price. That average is around 13x, within a range of 7x to 32x. In comparison with the portfolio's 9.3x EV/EBITA ratio, this may be interpreted as another gauge of the good value inherent in the portfolio. Outlook & conclusion From a macro economic perspective, the world's rediscovered reliance on the US economy became increasingly obvious in 2014. Japan has had to resort to another round of quantitative easing and the Eurozone continues to flirt with embracing quantitative easing for the first time. However, the US appears to have succeeded, albeit with the odd hiccup, in weaning itself off the need for incremental stimulus. The pre-eminence of the US has been reinforced by the transformation of its reliance on the rest of the world for its energy requirements: self-sufficiency, by virtue of the shale boom, appears within reach. The implications of these developments were reflected by financial markets in 2014: treasury yields, though down over the year, are higher than those of other major bond markets; US equities are at all time high levels; the dollar has strengthened considerably; and the oil price has collapsed. Understanding the ramifications of such movements is not straightforward, but it is safe to conclude that the US's leadership, while crucial to the overall health of the global economy, will not prove painless for all. Such uncertainty comes on top of sluggish economic growth from Europe and Japan, heightened tensions with Russia, and an intensification of hostilities in the Middle East. So, as usual, there is plenty for the boards of small UK quoted companies to worry about. And uncertainties also loom for the UK. These are less to do with the economy's direction in the immediate future, which, despite some disappointment with the budget deficit, still seems more akin to the US's than the Eurozone's. More significant is the perpetuation of a period of political and constitutional uncertainty, which started with 2010's coalition government, continued with the Scottish referendum and could persist until 2017 with an EU referendum. This type of risk is not one with which the boards of small UK quoted companies, or indeed their investors, have had to cope for generations. In contrast to and in spite of these top down concerns, there are signs of a general cautious optimism among smaller companies. This contention is based on the combination of three factors that have been individually addressed above: the pick-up in M&A, the willingness to utilise more fully strong balance sheets and the continuation of the impressive dividend performance of recent years. While the risk remains that this growing optimism might prove a lagging rather than a leading indicator, it is encouraging that such nascent animal spirits are in evidence. On reflection, as ASCoT enters its twenty fifth year, the present situation is not unusual. Macro economic risks of one type or another are ever-present. Generally, however, there is a disparity between top-down pessimism and optimism that individual businesses will adjust and cope. The macro economic challenges of the global financial crisis were particularly severe, but the experience of relatively nimble small companies again gives reason for hope. The Managers take additional comfort from the attractive valuations presently accorded by the stockmarket to many companies and to the portfolio in particular: these represent a discounted participation in the future wealth creation of which these businesses should be capable. This ought to translate into good returns for ASCoT's investors when averaged over several years. Aberforth Partners LLP Managers 29 January 2015 DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT Each of the Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge that: (a) the financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company; and (b) the Annual Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties it faces. A summary of these can be found below. (c) the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides information necessary for Shareholders to assess the Company's performance, business model and strategy. On behalf of the Board Paul Trickett Chairman 29 January 2015 PRINCIPAL RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT The Board carefully considers the principal risks faced by the Company and seeks to manage these risks through continual review, evaluation and taking action as necessary. Investment in small companies is generally perceived to carry more risk than investment in large companies. While this is reasonable when comparing individual companies, it is much less so when comparing the volatility of returns from diversified portfolios of small and large companies. The Company has a diversified portfolio. In addition, the Company has a simple capital structure, invests only in small UK quoted companies, and outsources all the main operational activities to recognised, well-established firms. The principal risks faced by the Company, together with the approach taken by the Board towards them, have been summarised below: (i) Investment policy/performance - the performance of the investment portfolio will typically not match the performance of the benchmark and will be influenced by market related risks including market price, interest rate and liquidity (refer to the Annual Report for further details). The Board's aim is to achieve the investment objective over the long term whilst managing risk by ensuring the investment portfolio is managed appropriately. The Board has outsourced portfolio management to experienced managers with a well defined investment process and receives regular and detailed reports on investment performance. Peer group performance is also regularly monitored by the Board. (ii) Share price discount - investment trust shares tend to trade at discounts to their underlying net asset values. The Board and the Managers monitor the discount on a daily basis. The Board intends to continue to use the share buy in facility to seek to sustain as low a discount as seems possible. (iii) Gearing risk - in rising markets, the effect of borrowings would be beneficial but in falling markets the gearing effect would adversely affect returns to Shareholders. The Board and the Managers consider the gearing strategy and associated risk on a regular basis. (iv) Reputational risk - the Board and the Managers monitor external factors affecting the reputation of the Company and/or the key service providers and take action if appropriate. (v) Risk appetite - the effect of inappropriate risk appetite or failure to establish an appropriate framework to manage the Company to a desired risk level. The Managers have a clearly defined investment philosophy and they manage a diversified portfolio. The Board continually monitors the Company's performance against the benchmark, and regularly receives a detailed portfolio attribution analysis, including risk measures. (vi) Regulatory risk - failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements could lead to suspension of the Company's share price listing, financial penalties or a qualified audit report. A breach of Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 could lead to the Company being subject to capital gains tax. The Board receives quarterly compliance reports from the Secretaries to monitor compliance with rules and regulations, together with information on future developments. The Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Reconciliation of Movements in Shareholders' Funds and summary Cash Flow Statement are set out below:- INCOME STATEMENT For the year ended 31 December 2014 (audited) For the year ended For the year ended 31 December 2014 31 December 2013 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Gains on investments - (24,628) (24,628) - 377,222 377,222 Investment income 30,166 291 30,457 29,741 - 29,741 Other income 1 - 1 - - - Investment management fee (3,240) (5,399) (8,639) (2,614) (4,357) (6,971) Other expenses (661) (3,346) (4,007) (496) (3,892) (4,388) ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- ------- Return on ordinary activities 26,266 (33,082) (6,816) 26,631 368,973 395,604 before finance costs and tax Finance costs (289) (482) (771) (485) (808) (1,293) ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- ------- Return on ordinary activities 25,977 (33,564) (7,587) 26,146 368,165 394,311 before tax Tax on ordinary activities - - - - - - ------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- Return attributable to equity shareholders 25,977 (33,564) (7,587) 26,146 368,165 394,311 ====== ======= ======= ====== ======= ======= Returns per Ordinary Share 27.24p (35.19)p (7.95)p 27.37p 385.35p 412.72p The Board declared on 29 January 2015 a final dividend of 17.00p per Ordinary Share (2013 - 16.15p). The Board also declared on 25 July 2014 an interim dividend of 7.75p per Ordinary Share (2013 - 7.35p). The total column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the period. A Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses is not required as all gains and losses of the Company have been reflected in the above statement. RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENTS IN SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS For the year ended 31 December 2014 (audited) Capital Share redemption Special Capital Revenue Capital reserve reserve reserve reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2013 954 34 176,703 910,616 49,818 1,138,125 Return on ordinary activities after taxation - - - (33,564) 25,977 (7,587) Equity dividends paid - - - - (22,795) (22,795) Purchase of Ordinary Shares (1) 1 (403) - - (403) ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- -------- Balance as at 31 December 2014 953 35 176,300 877,052 53,000 1,107,340 ====== ====== ======= ======= ====== ======== For the year ended 31 December 2013 (audited) Capital Share redemption Special Capital Revenue Capital reserve reserve reserve reserve Total £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Balance as at 31 December 2012 957 31 179,461 542,451 45,279 768,179 Return on ordinary activities after taxation - - - 368,165 26,146 394,311 Equity dividends paid - - - - (21,607) (21,607) Purchase of Ordinary Shares (3) 3 (2,758) - - (2,758) ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- -------- Balance as at 31 December 2013 954 34 176,703 910,616 49,818 1,138,125 ====== ====== ======= ======= ====== ======== BALANCE SHEET As at 31 December 2014 (audited) 31 December 31 December 2014 2013 £ 000 £ 000 Fixed assets: Investments at fair value through profit or loss 1,138,793 1,167,630 ---------- ---------- Current assets Debtors 2,670 2,120 Cash at bank 238 536 ---------- ---------- 2,908 2,656 Creditors (amounts falling due within one year) (209) (32,161) ---------- ---------- Net current (liabilities)/assets 2,699 (29,505) ---------- ---------- Total Assets less Current Liabilities 1,141,492 1,138,125 Creditors (amounts falling due after more than one year) (34,152) - ---------- ---------- Total Net Assets 1,107,340 1,138,125 ========= ========= Capital and reserves: equity interests Called up share capital (Ordinary Shares) 953 954 Reserves: Capital redemption reserve 35 34 Special reserve 176,300 176,703 Capital reserve 877,052 910,616 Revenue reserve 53,000 49,818 ---------- ---------- Total Shareholders' Funds 1,107,340 1,138,125 ======== ========= Net Asset Value per Ordinary Share 1,161.41p 1,193.22p SUMMARY CASH FLOW STATEMENT For the year ended 31 December 2014 (audited) For the year ended For the year ended 31 December 2014 31 December 2013 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 £ 000 Net cash inflow from operating activities 21,065 21,827 Returns on investments and servicing of finance (863) (1,225) Taxation 15 (15) Capital expenditure and financial investment Payments to acquire investments (419,879) (398,414) Receipts from sales of investments 420,312 417,219 -------- -------- Net cash inflow from capital expenditure and financial investment 433 18,805 -------- -------- 20,650 39,392 Equity dividends paid (22,795) (21,607) -------- -------- (2,145) 17,785 Financing Purchase of Ordinary Shares (403) (2,758) Net drawdown/(repayment) of bank debt facilities (before costs) 2,250 (14,750) ------- ------- (Decrease)/increase in cash (298) 277 ====== ====== Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt (Decrease)/increase in cash in the year (298) 277 Net (drawdown)/ repayment of bank debt facilities (2,250) 14,750 Increase/ (decrease) in amortised costs in respect of the bank debt facility 85 (51) -------- -------- Change in net debt (2,463) 14,976 Opening net debt (31,451) (46,427) -------- -------- Closing net debt (33,914) (31,451) ======= ======= NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and in accordance with applicable accounting standards and the AIC's Statement of Recommended Practice "Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts" issued in 2009. The same accounting policies used for the year ended 31 December 2013 have been applied. 2. DIVIDENDS Year to Year to 31 December 2014 31 December 2013 £000 £000 Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the period: Final dividend of 16.15p for the year ended 15,404 14,584 31 December 2013 (2012: 15.25p) Interim dividend of 7.75p for the year 7,391 7,023 ended 31 December 2014 (2013: 7.35p) ------ ------ 22,795 21,607 ====== ====== The final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2014 of 17.00p will be paid, subject to shareholder approval, on 5 March 2015. This dividend has not been included as a liability in these financial statements. 3. RETURNS PER ORDINARY SHARE The returns per Ordinary Share are based on: Year to Year to 31 December 2014 31 December 2013 Returns attributable to Ordinary Shareholders £ (7,587,000) £ 394,311,000 Weighted average number of shares in issue during the period 95,367,970 95,541,545 Return per Ordinary Share (7.95)p 412.72p 4. NET ASSET VALUES The net assets and the net asset value per share attributable to the Ordinary Shares at each period end are calculated in accordance with their entitlements in the Articles of Association and were as follows: 31 December 31 December 2014 2013 Net assets attributable £1,107,340,000 £1,138,125,000 Ordinary Shares in issue at the end of the year 95,344,792 95,382,792 Net asset value attributable per Ordinary Share 1,161.41p 1,193.22p No shares have been bought back for cancellation between 31 December 2014 and 29 January 2015. 5. FURTHER INFORMATION The foregoing do not constitute statutory accounts (as defined in section 434(3) of the Companies Act 2006) of the Company. The statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2013, which contained an unqualified Report of the Auditors, have been lodged with the Registrar of Companies and did not contain a statement required under section 498(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 2006. Certain statements in this announcement are forward looking statements. By their nature, forward looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or assumptions that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements. Forward looking statements regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on forward looking statements. The Annual Report is expected to be posted to shareholders on 3 February 2015. Members of the public may obtain copies from Aberforth Partners LLP, 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7NS or from its website at www.aberforth.co.uk. CONTACT: Alistair Whyte/Euan Macdonald, Aberforth Partners LLP, 0131 220 0733 Aberforth Partners LLP, Secretaries - 29 January 2015 ANNOUNCEMENT ENDS
UK 100

Latest directors dealings