Half-yearly Report
Tate & Lyle PLC
TATE & LYLE PLC
STATEMENT OF HALF YEAR RESULTS
For
the six months ended 30 September 2009
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
30 September (Unaudited)
|
|
Continuing operations (£m unless stated otherwise)1
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1 823
|
|
|
|
1 698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted results2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating profit
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Adjusted profit before tax
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Adjusted diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
18.3p
|
|
|
|
19.1p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Profit for the period (on total operations)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (on total operations)
|
|
|
9.5p
|
|
|
|
14.0p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow and net debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow3
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Net debt
|
|
|
(987)
|
|
|
|
(1 128)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share
|
|
|
6.8p
|
|
|
|
6.8p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Javed Ahmed, Chief Executive, said:
“Tate & Lyle performed slightly ahead of our expectations in the first
half of the year, before the impact of exchange translation, despite
challenging conditions in a number of our markets. We are encouraged by
the good progress made in reducing net debt, reflecting our focus on
reducing costs, optimising working capital and reducing capital
expenditure.”
Financial performance
-
Net debt reduced by 20% since 31 March 2009 to £987 million (11%
before exchange translation)
-
Free cash flow3 of £258 million
-
Adjusted operating profit down 1% at £148 million (16% in constant
currency4)
-
Adjusted operating profit from core value added food ingredients5
up 10% (down 6% in constant currency)
-
Adjusted diluted earnings per share down 4% at 18.3p (14% in constant
currency)
Operating performance
-
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Americas reported higher profits from
food ingredients, outweighed by lower industrial profits, reflecting
weaker industrial starch and ethanol markets, and lower co-product
income
-
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Europe reported profits well ahead of
the prior period, aided by lower corn costs
-
The EU Sugar market remained challenging
-
Sucralose sales increased by 15% in volume and by 9% in value in
constant currency
-
Underlying costs reduced by £16 million over the comparative period
Outlook
Overall, the Group's performance, before the impact of exchange
translation, remains on track to meet our expectations for the full year.
At our Food & Industrial Ingredients businesses in the Americas and
Europe, the order patterns of our food and beverage customers appear to
have been re-established, albeit at slightly lower levels. However,
global industrial starch, US ethanol and US animal feed markets remain
under pressure. We expect continuing underlying growth in Sucralose and
improved profits from Sugars in the second half. As usual, the outcome
of the 2010 calendar year sweetener pricing rounds will influence
performance in the last quarter of the financial year.
Against this backdrop, we continue to take the actions necessary to
strengthen the Group’s balance sheet, reduce our costs and ensure that
we are well positioned as markets improve.
1 Excluding the results of International Sugar Trading and
Eastern Sugar in both periods.
2 Before exceptional costs of £55 million (2008 – £nil) and
amortisation of acquired intangible assets of £7 million (2008 – £7
million).
3 Free cash flow is operating cash flows from continuing
operations after working capital, interest, taxation and capital
expenditure.
4 Changes in constant currency are calculated by
retranslating prior period results at current period exchange rates.
5 Core value added food ingredients comprise value added
starch-based food ingredients and excludes sucralose.
Cautionary statement
This Statement of Half Year Results contains certain forward-looking
statements with respect to the financial condition, results, operations
and businesses of Tate & Lyle PLC. These statements and forecasts
involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend
upon circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of
factors that could cause actual results or developments to differ
materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements and forecasts. Nothing in this Statement of Half Year Results
should be construed as a profit forecast.
A copy of this Statement for the six months ended 30 September
2009 can be found on our website at www.tateandlyle.com.
A hard copy of this Statement is also available from The Company
Secretary, Tate & Lyle PLC, Sugar Quay, Lower Thames
Street, London EC3R 6DQ.
SPLENDA® is a trademark of McNeil Nutritionals, LLC
Webcast and conference call
A presentation of the results by Chief Executive, Javed Ahmed and Group
Finance Director, Tim Lodge will be audio webcast live at 10.00 (UKT)
today. To view and/or listen to a live audiocast of the presentation,
visit http://www.tateandlyle.com/TateAndLyle/investor_relations/results/default.htm
or http://www.thomson-webcast.net/uk/dispatching/?event_id=c796a9511c4def0352dc2b673fad69f8&portal_id=39b37fe9dc2bfc6ead9b7087924f0a2e.
Please note that remote listeners will not be able to ask questions
during the Q&A session. A webcast replay of the presentation will be
available within two hours of the end of the live broadcast for six
months, on the link above.
For those unable to view the webcast, there will also be a
teleconference facility for the presentation. Details are given below:
UK dial in number: +44 (0) 203 003 2666
US dial in number: +1 866
966 5335
US dial in number: +1 866
966 5335
7 day conference call replay:
UK replay number: +44 (0) 208 196 1998
US replay number: +1 866 583
1035US replay number: +1 866 583
1035
Replay Access code: 691691#Replay Access code: 691691#
STATEMENT OF HALF YEAR RESULTS for the six months to 30 September 2009
Results for the continuing operations are adjusted to exclude
exceptional items and amortisation of acquired intangible assets. Except
where specifically stated to the contrary, this commentary relates only
to the adjusted results for the continuing operations. A reconciliation
of statutory and adjusted information is included at Note 16.
Overview of Group financial performance
Tate & Lyle produced a performance slightly ahead of our expectations in
the first half of the 2010 financial year against the backdrop of
challenging conditions in a number of our markets. Sales increased by 7%
to £1,823 million (reduced by 5% in constant currency). Adjusted
operating profit reduced by 1% (16% in constant currency) to £148
million. Adjusted profit before tax reduced by 13% (25% in constant
currency) to £112 million, while statutory profit before tax reduced by
59% to £50 million reflecting exceptional costs of £55 million following
the decision to mothball the sucralose plant in McIntosh, Alabama.
Adjusted diluted earnings per share on continuing operations reduced by
4% (14% in constant currency) to 18.3p, while statutory diluted earnings
per share on total operations reduced by 32% to 9.5p.
We remain focused on strong cash management and, during the first half
of the year, continued to reduce costs, optimise working capital and
reduce capital expenditure across the business. As a result, free cash
flow from our continuing operations increased to £258 million from £11
million in the comparative period. Net debt reduced to £987 million from
£1,231 million at 31 March 2009. The reduction was made up of an
underlying decrease of £133 million and £111 million benefit from
exchange rate movements. The underlying decrease was underpinned by a
reduction of £146 million in working capital, which reflected
improvements achieved throughout the business as well as lower corn
inventory levels in the US which had been run down in anticipation of
deliveries from the new harvest. Capital expenditure was managed to 81%
of the six month depreciation charge. The ratio of net debt to EBITDA
was 2.4 times, comfortably inside the bank covenant maximum level of 4.0
times.
Sales volumes to food and beverage customers in both the US and Europe
were steady at levels marginally below the comparative period. EU Sugar
markets remained tough in the first half, with no improvement from the
conditions seen during the second half of the 2009 financial year.
However, following completion of the EU Sugar Regime reform process on
30 September 2009, we have seen signs of a return to equilibrium in EU
Sugar markets and expect better margins within our EU sugar business
during the second half of this financial year. We achieved 15% growth in
sucralose sales volumes, due to both underlying demand growth and to
customer restocking during the early part of the period. Sucralose sales
by value increased by 9% in constant currency. The mothballing of the
sucralose plant in McIntosh, Alabama, announced on 28 May 2009, is
proceeding ahead of schedule.
Industrial markets in both the US and Europe continued to be
challenging. With surplus capacity in US ethanol markets during much of
the first half, operating margins in ethanol were significantly below
the comparative period. Demand for industrial starches in both the US
and Europe remained depressed at levels well below the comparative
period.
Underlying costs reduced by £16 million in the first half compared to
the comparative period. Savings were achieved through actions taken
across the business encompassing improved energy and ingredient
efficiencies, savings within the fixed manufacturing cost base,
headcount reductions combined with a pay freeze at all levels,
optimisation within the supply chain activities of the Group and savings
in administrative costs and professional services.
Corn prices were below the level of the comparative period in both the
US and Europe. Lower corn prices in Europe benefited our Food &
Industrial Ingredients, Europe business, which delivered a strong
performance with operating profits increasing by 40% at constant
currency over the comparative period. Co-product prices in the US for
corn oil and feed, which drove strong co-product income in the
comparative period, were weak during the first half of the 2010
financial year due both to lower demand and an increased supply of the
animal feed co-product of dry mill ethanol production.
Net interest expense increased by £14 million to £36 million, after an
unfavourable currency variance of £5 million. This was due principally
to an increase of £8 million in the pensions charge, an increase
marginally above initial expectations, and an increase of £3 million
following the cessation of capitalisation of interest at Fort Dodge
while construction has been suspended. Interest cover was 5.3 times,
comfortably above the bank covenant minimum level of 2.5 times.
Following the decision to mothball our sucralose plant in McIntosh,
Alabama, as announced on 28 May 2009, we have recognised an exceptional
charge in the period of £55 million representing the anticipated cash
costs associated with this decision.
The effective tax rate on adjusted profit from continuing operations was
23.3% (30.4%). This is based on our expectations for the year to 31
March 2010 and the reduction reflects the change in the geographic mix
of profits compared to the prior year, especially lower levels of
profits in the US. The effective tax rate remains sensitive to the
geographic mix of profits.
Dividend
The Board has approved an interim dividend of 6.8p, maintained in line
with the prior year. This will be paid on 8 January 2010 to shareholders
on the register on 4 December 2009. The Company intends to offer
shareholders a scrip alternative.
Segmental analysis
In this segmental analysis, we discuss performance as reported, with
sales and profits earned in foreign currencies translated at the
relevant average exchange rates. In the commentary, we also discuss
performance in constant currency terms to assist analysis. To arrive at
a constant currency result, we have retranslated the results for the six
months to 30 September 2008 using the average exchange rates for the six
months to 30 September 2009.
Sales and operating profits by division are segmented between primary
and value added ingredients. Value added ingredients are defined as
those ingredients that utilise technology or intellectual property
enabling our customers to produce distinctive products and Tate & Lyle
to obtain a price premium and/or sustainable higher margins. There have
been no material changes in classification between segments from the
comparative period.
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Americas
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
503
|
|
189
|
|
692
|
|
|
388
|
|
164
|
|
552
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
155
|
|
92
|
|
247
|
|
|
180
|
|
79
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
281
|
|
939
|
|
|
568
|
|
243
|
|
811
|
|
Adjusted operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
48
|
|
51
|
|
99
|
|
|
48
|
|
46
|
|
94
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
2
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
13
|
|
2
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
53
|
|
94
|
|
|
61
|
|
48
|
|
109
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
9.5%
|
|
27.0%
|
|
14.3%
|
|
|
12.4%
|
|
28.0%
|
|
17.0%
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
(4.5)%
|
|
2.2%
|
|
(2.0)%
|
|
|
7.2%
|
|
2.5%
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
|
|
6.2%
|
|
18.9%
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
10.7%
|
|
19.8%
|
|
13.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Food & Industrial Ingredients, Americas, sales of £939 million were
16% higher than the comparative period (2% lower in constant currency).
Adjusted operating profit decreased by 14% to £94 million (27% in
constant currency) due to lower co-product income and lower profits from
industrial ingredients. The effect of exchange translation was to
increase operating profit by £20 million.
Co-product income was significantly below the level of the comparative
period which benefited from strong co-product prices during the
commodity price peak of summer 20081. Co-product feed prices
have been weak during the first half year due both to lower demand,
following reductions in US beef and dairy herds, and an increased supply
of the co-product of dry mill ethanol production. A large US corn crop
is forecast for 2009, and we expect corn prices to remain at levels
broadly in line with recent experience. The animal feed market in the US
is expected to remain challenging in the second half, keeping co-product
income under pressure.
1 Corn prices in the US saw an unprecedented spike in the
2008 calendar year, reaching almost US$8 per bushel in July 2008. Corn
co-product prices also peaked during the third quarter of the 2008
calendar year. However, the subsequent fall in corn and soy prices
resulted in corresponding price declines for corn gluten feed and meal,
and corn oil. Crude oil prices peaked at almost US$150 per barrel in
July 2008, but fell rapidly to below US$40 per barrel during the second
half of the 2008 calendar year.
Performance within the Food segments was sound, with operating profit in
constant currency before the impact of reduced co-product income in line
with the comparative period. Within Primary Food, volumes sold to food
and beverage customers were steady, although marginally below the
comparative period. Profits in constant currency were below the level of
the comparative period due to reduced corn oil co-product income. Our
citric acid business performed well, benefiting from strong global
demand. Operating profits from Almex, our Mexican joint venture, were
below the level of the comparative period due to lower volumes.
Shipments of High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) to Mexico from the US
increased towards the end of the period, encouraged by high Mexican
sugar prices. With improving fundamentals for HFCS exports to Mexico,
and a modest contribution margin returning to spot US ethanol markets,
US corn wet milling utilisation levels have started to recover.
Operating profits from Value Added Food ingredients increased by 11%
(reduced by 7% in constant currency). Volumes were below the level of
the comparative period although the impact was partially offset by
firmer pricing. We experienced good growth in demand for PromitorTM
Soluble Corn Fiber.
Primary Industrial ingredients recorded a loss of £7 million (£13
million profit in the comparative period) due to lower ethanol volumes
and margins, reduced profits from industrial starches, and lower income
from our animal feed co-products. Industrial starch profits were
significantly lower than the comparative period due both to lower levels
of underlying demand and to additional demand in the comparative period
following the floods in Iowa during 2008 which affected production at
competitor plants. We expect industrial starch markets to remain
difficult in the short term. Lower volumes and unit margins in ethanol
led to operating profits in the first half below the level of the
comparative period despite additional costs in the comparative period
associated with the commissioning of the Loudon capacity expansion.
As reported in our Trading Update on 25 September 2009, we are pleased
with the environmental benefits we have realised at our Loudon plant
following the installation of new technology last year. This technology
has also allowed us to obtain some benefits through process yield
improvements although below the level originally targeted. However,
changes in energy and co-product pricing over the last two years have
limited the benefits of the investment in energy cost reduction in
today’s markets, particularly since US gas prices have fallen
significantly. Using our experiences at Loudon to date, we continue to
evaluate the extent to which this technology can be used effectively
within our plant network, including at our new plant in Fort Dodge, Iowa.
Ethanol and net corn prices have produced a modest cash margin for
ethanol producers over the last few months, but forward margins remain
under pressure.
Against a backdrop of continuing uncertainty in industrial starch,
co-product feed and ethanol markets, we continue to evaluate the timing
for final completion of our Fort Dodge, Iowa plant.
Operating profits from Value Added Industrial ingredients remained flat
at £2 million (flat in constant currency). The loss from Bio-PDOTM
reduced from the comparative period as sales volumes increased, although
this impact was offset by decreased profits from industrial starches,
reflecting lower levels of demand.
Underlying cost savings totalled £8 million in the first half compared
to the comparative period. Savings were achieved through headcount
reductions, lower warehousing and distribution costs and lower
professional fees.
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Europe
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
75
|
|
116
|
|
191
|
|
|
98
|
|
104
|
|
202
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
67
|
|
–
|
|
67
|
|
|
90
|
|
–
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
116
|
|
258
|
|
|
188
|
|
104
|
|
292
|
|
Adjusted operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
14
|
|
14
|
|
28
|
|
|
4
|
|
13
|
|
17
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
0
|
|
–
|
|
0
|
|
|
2
|
|
–
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
14
|
|
28
|
|
|
6
|
|
13
|
|
19
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
18.7%
|
|
12.1%
|
|
14.7%
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
12.5%
|
|
8.4%
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
–
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
–
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
|
9.9%
|
|
12.1%
|
|
10.9%
|
|
|
3.2%
|
|
12.5%
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Europe delivered an improved performance
in the six months over the comparative period. Sales of £258 million
were 12% lower than the comparative period (19% in constant currency).
However, adjusted operating profit increased by 47% to £28 million (40%
in constant currency) primarily due to lower net corn and energy costs
at the corn wet mills. The effect of exchange translation was to
increase profit by £1 million.
Food and beverage sales volumes were steady at levels marginally below
the comparative period. Operating profits from Primary Food ingredients
increased by £10 million to £14 million, reflecting significantly lower
net corn costs. Cereal-based sweeteners in the EU are effectively priced
against regulated sugar prices, and there is therefore a partial
mismatch with corn input pricing (which is unregulated). Total sweetener
volumes were marginally below the level of the comparative period
following the closure of the Greek plant in September 2008 although
isoglucose (HFCS) volumes in the continuing plants increased due to our
enlarged EU quotas. The isoglucose capacity expansion at our Slovakia
plant is proceeding in line with expectations. Restructuring levies
totalling £4 million were recognised in the first half compared to £6
million in the comparative period. No further cost will be incurred
going forward in respect of this levy, although this benefit is expected
to be offset by a reduction in isoglucose selling prices following the
final reduction in EU sugar reference prices with effect from 1 October
2009.
Operating profits from Primary Industrial ingredients reduced to nil
from £2 million in the comparative period. Demand for industrial
starches was significantly below the comparative period particularly
from export markets, although this impact was partially offset by
improved margins and volumes on ethanol sales at our recently expanded
Hungarian joint venture.
Operating profits from Value Added Food ingredients increased by £1
million to £14 million (flat in constant currency) due to higher unit
margins and increased volumes of modified food starches offset by
slightly lower profits from our Food Systems business. The facility
being built at our Koog, Netherlands, plant to produce polydextrose, the
value added soluble fibre, is on track for completion in the first half
of the 2010 calendar year. In our Food Systems operations, profits were
slightly lower than the comparative period due to weaker export markets.
We commissioned new blending facilities in Australia and South Africa
during the period.
Underlying cost savings of £3 million were achieved compared to the
comparative period through energy efficiency improvements, lower fixed
manufacturing costs and savings in labour and administrative costs.
The corn harvest in Europe is expected to be good and therefore we
anticipate that corn prices will remain broadly in line with current,
lower levels.
Sugars
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Products
|
|
|
372
|
|
36
|
|
408
|
|
|
352
|
|
33
|
|
385
|
|
– Molasses
|
|
|
117
|
|
–
|
|
117
|
|
|
132
|
|
–
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
36
|
|
525
|
|
|
484
|
|
33
|
|
517
|
|
Adjusted operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Products
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
1
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
3
|
|
(3)
|
|
– Molasses
|
|
|
6
|
|
–
|
|
6
|
|
|
10
|
|
–
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
3
|
|
7
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Products
|
|
|
(1.1)%
|
|
2.8%
|
|
(0.7)%
|
|
|
(1.7)%
|
|
9.1%
|
|
(0.8)%
|
|
– Molasses
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
–
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
7.6%
|
|
–
|
|
7.6%
|
|
|
|
|
0.4%
|
|
2.8%
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
0.8%
|
|
9.1%
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugars faced a challenging six months as the final stages of the EU
Sugar reform continued to disrupt sugar markets. Sales of £525 million
were 2% higher than the comparative period (3% lower in constant
currency). Adjusted operating profit decreased by 57% to £3 million (67%
in constant currency). The effect of exchange translation was to
increase profit by £2 million.
Products made a loss of £3 million, in line with the loss recognised in
the comparative period reflecting the surplus within the EU Sugar market
and a highly competitive UK retail market. The EU Sugar refining
business benefited from lower energy costs during the first half. We are
moving towards the end of the commissioning phase of our bio-mass boiler
which will reduce our exposure to volatile gas prices. Improvements in
supply chain operations resulted in cost savings of £1 million.
World raw sugar prices have recently increased significantly following
concerns over supply in both Brazil and India, and are currently at a
level close to the EU raw sugar reference price. A prolonged period of
high world sugar prices could, over time, increase the likelihood of a
deficit in EU sugar markets.
With the EU Sugar Regime reform complete from 1 October 2009, we have
seen the expected signs of a return to equilibrium in the EU sugar
market. With the majority of sugar sales for the period to 30 September
2010 now contracted with customers, we are increasingly confident of
achieving better margins within our EU Sugar business in the second half
of the financial year, following the final institutional price change on
1 October 2009.
The Molasses business achieved a good result, with operating profit of
£6 million in the period, although this was below the exceptionally
strong profits achieved in the comparative period when the sharp spike
in cereal prices during the summer of 2008 led to very high demand and
prices for molasses.
Sucralose
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
Primary
|
Value
added
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
–
|
|
101
|
|
101
|
|
|
–
|
|
78
|
|
78
|
|
Adjusted operating profit
|
|
|
–
|
|
35
|
|
35
|
|
|
–
|
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
–
|
|
34.7%
|
|
34.7%
|
|
|
–
|
|
38.5%
|
|
38.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of SPLENDA® Sucralose of £101 million were 29% ahead of
the comparative period (9% in constant currency). Adjusted operating
profit was £35 million, 17% above the comparative period (3% in constant
currency). The effect of exchange translation was to increase operating
profit by £4 million.
Sucralose sales volumes increased by 15% due to both underlying demand
growth and to customer restocking during the early part of the period.
Growth continued in Europe, Latin America and Asia. The average selling
price reduced due to volume incentive arrangements in long-term customer
contracts and a more competitive High Intensity Sweetener market.
Following the significant yield improvements achieved last year, and the
consequent decision to produce all sucralose at our fourth generation
facility in Singapore, the process of mothballing the plant in McIntosh,
Alabama is proceeding ahead of expectations, accelerating the benefit of
lower cost production. Underlying cost savings of £3 million were driven
by lower fixed manufacturing costs, as the business began to migrate to
a single production site, lower freight costs through supply chain
optimisation and savings in labour and administrative costs. Performance
also benefited from lower ingredient prices.
As previously reported, we had expected operating margins in the 2010
financial year to be somewhat lower than the underlying level achieved
in the 2009 financial year. In the event, operating margins of 34.7% in
the first half of 2010 were higher than expected, driven principally by
higher volume growth.
We continue to hold significant stocks of McIntosh production while
customers complete their qualification of products manufactured in
Singapore, and would expect to consume most of this higher cost
inventory during the second half of the 2010 financial year. We remain
on track to capture the anticipated benefits arising from the reduced
operating costs of having a single plant. Finishing and packaging
activities will continue in McIntosh until the end of the financial
year, and we continue to maintain the McIntosh plant in a state whereby
it can be restarted within a few months.
Whilst we expect our long-term customer contracts to continue to drive
volume growth, performance in the second half of the 2010 financial year
is not expected to benefit from the volume impact experienced in the
early part of the period from customers’ restocking.
Central costs
Central costs, which include head office, treasury and reinsurance
activities, reduced by £3 million to £12 million. Underlying reductions
in costs totalling £1 million were achieved. The comparative period
included costs borne by our captive reinsurance company following boiler
problems at our Decatur, Illinois facility.
Energy
The Group’s energy cost at £100 million in the first half was 10% above
the comparative period (7% lower in constant currency). The underlying
reduction was due to lower energy prices (£2 million) and improved
efficiency (£5 million). We have in place contracts and hedges that
cover more than 80% of our estimated energy use for the current
financial year.
Exceptional items
Following our announcement on 28 May 2009 of the decision to mothball
our sucralose plant in McIntosh, Alabama, we have recognised an
exceptional charge in the six months of £55 million representing the
anticipated cash costs associated with this decision. These costs will
be paid over three years and are expected to have a three year payback
resulting from the reduced operating costs of running a single plant.
Exceptional items from discontinued operations in the comparative period
reflected the anticipated £22 million loss in relation to the disposal
of our International Sugar Trading operations.
Discontinued operations
Discontinued activities generated an adjusted operating loss of £1
million in the first half compared to a profit of £3 million in the
comparative period. The operating loss in the current period arose from
the activities of the International Sugar Trading business. Operating
profit in the comparative period comprised profits from International
Sugar Trading (£1 million) and Eastern Sugar, the beet sugar joint
venture in Eastern Europe (£2 million).
Operating cash outflows from discontinued operations totalled £39
million in the first half of the 2010 financial year. As reported in the
2009 Annual Report and Accounts, a total of £29 million outflow was
anticipated in the 2010 financial year arising from the disposal of the
International Sugar Trading business, and the majority of this has been
paid. Additionally, the significant increase in world sugar prices has
led to further cash outflows from residual margin positions during the
first half year. These positions will unwind over time.
The disposal of the minority interests related to the International
Sugar Trading business is progressing. We continue to anticipate that
the sale of these minority interests will occur in the 2010 financial
year, although the profit on disposal is now expected to be below the
£22 million exceptional loss reported in the comparative period arising
from the sale of the International Sugar Trading business, due in part
to the movement in exchange rates from the prior year.
Cash flow
Operating cash flow from continuing operations amounted to £357 million,
an increase of £207 million over the comparative period. This increase
was due principally to changes in working capital, which totalled an
inflow of £146 million in the first half, compared to an outflow of £58
million in the comparative period. Improvements in working capital were
achieved throughout the business, and reflected the actions we have
focused on to optimise working capital in all aspects of the Group’s
activities. Inventory of corn in the US at 30 September 2009 was low
because, as usual, we had run down inventories in anticipation of the
first deliveries from the 2009 corn harvest. Based on normal inventory
levels valued at current market prices, we would expect total raw
material inventories in the US and Europe to increase by around £60
million during the second half.
Capital expenditure of £46 million was below the depreciation charge for
the period of £57 million. In October, we initiated a full review of our
approach to capital investment planning and implementation with the
assistance of external experts with a view to improving the efficiency
and effectiveness of future capital expenditure.
Net debt and financing profile
Net debt at 30 September 2009 was £987 million, a decrease of £244
million since 31 March 2009. The effect of exchange translation since 31
March 2009 was to reduce net debt by £111 million.
In addition to our bonds and other debt facilities, the Group has a core
committed bank facility of US$1,000 million that matures in October 2012
of which US$775 million was undrawn at 30 September 2009. The average
maturity of gross debt is 4.5 years and the first capital market issue
to reach maturity is the US$300 million Rule 144A bond in June 2011.
Balance sheet
The Group's net assets decreased by £147 million to £866 million at 30
September 2009 from £1,013 million at 31 March 2009. Profits for the
period including minority interests of £46 million were offset by total
dividend payments of £75 million. Actuarial losses on the Group's
retirement benefits schemes were £110 million, and were driven by
reductions in discount rates which increased plan liabilities, partially
offset by increases in plan assets. After a positive impact from net
investment hedging, balance sheet translation reduced net assets by £38
million.
With a view to containing our pension costs and reducing balance sheet
volatility, we have commenced consultation with employees who are active
members of the UK Group Pension Scheme (around 400 employees,
representing just over half of our UK workforce) on the closure of that
scheme to future accrual from April 2011. The Scheme was closed to new
entrants in April 2002.
Risks and uncertainties
The principal risks and uncertainties affecting the business activities
of the Group remain those detailed on pages 28 to 30 in the Report and
Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2009, a copy of which is available
on the Company’s website at www.tateandlyle.com.
In the view of the Board, other than as referred to elsewhere in this
statement, there is no material change in these factors in respect of
the remaining six months of the year.
Outlook
Overall, the Group's performance, before the impact of exchange
translation, remains on track to meet our expectations for the full year.
At our Food & Industrial Ingredients businesses in the Americas and
Europe, the order patterns of our food and beverage customers appear to
have been re-established, albeit at slightly lower levels. However,
global industrial starch, US ethanol and US animal feed markets remain
under pressure. We look forward to continuing underlying growth in
Sucralose and to improved profits from Sugars in the second half. As
usual, the outcome of the 2010 calendar year sweetener pricing rounds
will influence performance in the last quarter of the financial year.
Against this backdrop, we continue to take the actions necessary to
strengthen the Group’s balance sheet, reduce our costs and ensure that
we are well positioned as markets improve.
|
Sir Peter Gershon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Javed Ahmed
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive
|
|
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities
The Directors confirm that this condensed set of financial statements
has been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards
34 Interim Financial Reporting as adopted by the European Union, and
that the interim management report herein includes a fair review of the
information required by the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules of
the Financial Services Authority, paragraphs DTR 4.2.7 and DTR 4.2.8,
namely:
-
an indication of important events that have occurred during the first
six months and their impact on the condensed set of consolidated
financial information;
-
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties for the
remaining six months of the financial year; and
-
material related party transactions in the first six months and any
material changes in the related party transactions described in the
last Annual Report.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the
Company’s website. UK legislation governing the preparation and
dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in
other jurisdictions.
The Directors of Tate & Lyle PLC are listed in the Tate & Lyle Annual
Report for the year ended 31 March 2009. The following changes to the
Board occurred in the period:
-
Sir Peter Gershon succeeded Sir David Lees as Chairman of the Company
on 23 July 2009. Sir David ceased to be a Director of the Company on
the same date; and
-
Javed Ahmed succeeded Iain Ferguson as Chief Executive and as a
Director of the Company on 1 October 2009. Mr Ferguson stepped down
from the Board on the same date.
For and on behalf of the Board of Directors:
|
Sir Peter Gershon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Javed Ahmed
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive
|
5 November 2009
TATE & LYLE PLC
Independent review report to Tate & Lyle PLC
Introduction
We have been engaged by the Company to review the condensed set of
financial statements in the Statement of Half Year Results for the six
months ended 30 September 2009, which comprises the consolidated income
statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the
consolidated statement of financial position, consolidated statement of
cash flows, consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity
and the related notes. We have read the other information contained in
the Statement of Half Year Results and considered whether it contains
any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the
information in the condensed set of consolidated financial statements.
Directors’ responsibilities
The Statement of Half Year Results is the responsibility of, and has
been approved by, the Directors. The Directors are responsible for
preparing the Statement of Half Year Results in accordance with the
Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial
Services Authority.
As disclosed in note 1, the annual financial statements of the Group are
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
as adopted by the European Union. The condensed set of financial
statements included in this Statement of Half Year Results has been
prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, Interim
Financial Reporting, as adopted by the European Union.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Company a conclusion on the
condensed set of consolidated financial statements in the Statement of
Half Year Results based on our review. This report, including the
conclusion, has been prepared for and only for the Company for the
purpose of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the Financial
Services Authority and for no other purpose. We do not, in producing
this report, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to
any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may
come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
Scope of review
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on
Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, ‘Review of Interim
Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity’
issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A
review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries,
primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters,
and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and consequently
does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all
significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly,
we do not express an audit opinion.
Conclusion
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to
believe that the condensed set of financial statements in the Statement
of Half Year Results for the six months ended 30 September 2009 is not
prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with International
Accounting Standard 34 as adopted by the European Union and the
Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom's Financial
Services Authority.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered AccountantsChartered Accountants
LondonLondon
5
November 2009
5
November 2009
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
|
|
Year to
31 March
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
|
2008
£m
|
|
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
Continuing operations
Sales
|
|
2
|
|
1 823
|
|
|
|
1 698
|
|
|
|
3 553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
2
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
Finance income
|
|
4
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
4
|
|
(47)
|
|
|
|
(40)
|
|
|
|
(78)
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
5
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
Profit for the period from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
Loss for the period from discontinued operations
|
|
8
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to the equity holders of the
Company from continuing and discontinued operations
|
|
6
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
– Basic
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
– Diluted
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to the equity holders of the
Company from continuing operations
|
|
6
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
– Basic
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
– Diluted
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share
|
|
7
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
|
Pence
|
|
|
– Proposed at the end of the period
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
– Paid in the period
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of adjusted profit before tax from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
Statutory profit before tax
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional items
|
|
3
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Adjusted profit before tax, exceptional items and amortisation of
acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
|
|
Year to
31 March
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
|
2008
£m
|
|
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (‘OCI’):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
Actuarial losses in post-employment benefit plans
|
|
|
(110)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(71)
|
|
|
Valuation (losses)/gains on available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
Net gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
(34)
|
|
|
Deferred tax relating to the above components of OCI
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the period, net of tax
|
|
|
(121)
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (expense)/income for the period
|
|
|
(75)
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
(75)
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75)
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
|
|
31 March
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
|
2008
£m
|
|
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
1 416
|
|
|
|
1 363
|
|
|
|
1 548
|
|
|
Investments in associates
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Retirement benefit surplus
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 869
|
|
|
|
1 806
|
|
|
|
2 057
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
Current tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
9
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
10
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 552
|
|
|
|
1 791
|
|
|
|
1 942
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
3 421
|
|
|
|
3 597
|
|
|
|
3 999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and reserves attributable to the equity holders of the
Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
Share premium
|
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
Capital redemption reserve
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Other reserves
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
1 002
|
|
|
|
1 013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
9
|
|
|
1 033
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
1 129
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
Retirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
Provisions for other liabilities and charges
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 484
|
|
|
|
1 294
|
|
|
|
1 554
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
Current tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
Borrowings and bank overdrafts
|
|
9
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
Provisions for other liabilities and charges
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
10
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 071
|
|
|
|
1 301
|
|
|
|
1 432
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
2 555
|
|
|
|
2 595
|
|
|
|
2 986
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
3 421
|
|
|
|
3 597
|
|
|
|
3 999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September
|
|
|
|
Year to
31 March
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
|
2008
£m
|
|
|
|
2009
£m
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Exceptional items
|
|
3
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
Amortisation of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Share-based payments charge
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Finance income
|
|
4
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
(27)
|
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
4
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
Changes in working capital
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(58)
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Cash generated from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
|
|
(44)
|
|
|
|
(45)
|
|
|
|
(86)
|
|
|
Income tax paid
|
|
|
|
|
(25)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
Cash (used in)/generated from discontinued operations
|
|
8
|
|
|
(39)
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
Net cash generated from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Purchase of available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposal of available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Disposals of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
Disposal of businesses
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
|
(112)
|
|
|
|
(224)
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets and other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(42)
|
|
|
|
(94)
|
|
|
|
(141)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Cash (outflow)/inflow from (repayment)/drawdown of borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
(191)
|
|
|
|
8787 |
|
|
|
(13)(13) |
|
|
Cash outflow from repayment of capital element of
finance leases
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Dividends paid to the Company’s equity holders
|
|
7
|
|
|
(74)
|
|
|
|
(73)
|
|
|
|
(104)
|
|
|
Dividends paid to minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/generated from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(267)
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(118)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
9
|
|
|
(60)
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
(60)
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
9
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TATE & LYLE PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
Share capital & share premium
|
|
|
|
Capital redemption reserve
|
|
|
|
Other reserves
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
Attributable
to the equity
holders of the Company
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 April 2008
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
for the period
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments charge, including tax
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares issued
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(73)
|
|
|
|
(73)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(74)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 30 September 2008
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1 002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 April 2008
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
for the year
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(40)
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments charge, including tax
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares issued
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Items transferred to income on disposal
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(104)
|
|
|
|
(104)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(105)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 31 March 2009
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1 013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1 April 2009
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1 013
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive expense
for the period
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(33)
|
|
|
|
(86)
|
|
|
|
(119)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(121)
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments charge, including tax
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(74)
|
|
|
|
(74)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(75)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 30 September 2009
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TATE & LYLE PLC
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(UNAUDITED)
For the six months to 30 September 2009
1. Presentation of half year financial information
General information
The principal activities of Tate & Lyle PLC are the development,
manufacture and marketing of food and industrial ingredients that have
been made from renewable resources. The Group operates more than 45
production facilities and in numerous partnerships and joint ventures
throughout Europe, the Americas and South East Asia. It operates through
its subsidiary companies and numerous partnerships and joint ventures.
The Company is a public limited company incorporated and domiciled in
the United Kingdom. The address of its registered office is Sugar Quay,
Lower Thames Street, London EC3R 6DQ. The Company has its primary
listing on the London Stock Exchange.
Basis of preparation
This condensed consolidated financial information for the six months
ended 30 September 2009 has been prepared on a going concern basis in
accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the Financial
Services Authority and with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as
adopted by the European Union. The condensed consolidated financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report and
Accounts 2009, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as
adopted by the European Union.
The condensed consolidated financial information is unaudited, but has
been reviewed by the external auditors. The condensed set of
consolidated financial information in the Statement of Half Year Results
does not constitute statutory accounts within the meaning of Section 434
of the Companies Act 2006. The Group’s published consolidated financial
statements for the year ended 31 March 2009 were approved by the Board
of Directors on 27 May 2009 and filed with the Registrar of Companies.
The report of the auditors on those accounts was unqualified and did not
contain an emphasis of matter paragraph or a statement under Section 237
of the Companies Act 1985. The condensed set of consolidated financial
statements for the six months ended 30 September 2009 on pages 14 to 33
was approved by the Board of Directors on 5 November 2009.
Changes in accounting policy and disclosures
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the condensed set
of consolidated financial information are consistent with those of the
Group’s Annual Report and Accounts 2009, other than the adoption, with
effect from 1 April 2009, of new or revised accounting standards, as set
out below.
IFRS 8 Operating Segments is effective for accounting periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2009 and replaces IAS 14 Segment
Reporting. IFRS 8 takes the management view to determine the
operating and reportable segments for disclosure purposes, rather than
the risks and reward model and the primary and secondary segments
currently required by IAS 14. The impact of adopting IFRS 8 is stated in
note 2.
IAS 1 (revised) Presentation of Financial Statements introduces
some terminology changes and changes in presentation and disclosure, in
particular, the introduction of the consolidated statement of changes in
shareholders’ equity as a primary statement. Under IAS 1 (revised), the
Group has adopted to present two statements, a Consolidated Income
Statement and a Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
The following standards are effective for the Group’s accounting period
beginning on 1 April 2009 and where relevant have been adopted in this
financial information. They have not had a material impact on the
results or financial position of the Group:
-
IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes
-
IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate
-
IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation
-
Amendment to IFRS2 Share-based Payment – Vesting conditions and
cancellations
-
Amendment to IFRS7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures –
Improving disclosures about financial instruments
-
Revised IAS23 Borrowing Costs
-
Amendment to IAS27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
– Cost of an investment in a subsidiary, jointly controlled entity or
associate
-
Amendment to IAS32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS1
Presentation of Financial Statements – Puttable financial
instruments and obligations arising on liquidation
-
IASB’s annual improvements project
1. Presentation of half year financial information (continued)
Use of adjusted measures
Tate & Lyle presents adjusted operating profit, profit before tax and
earnings per share information. These measures are used by Tate & Lyle
for internal performance analysis and incentive compensation
arrangements for employees. The terms ‘adjusted’ and ‘exceptional items’
are not defined terms under IFRS and may therefore not be comparable
with similarly titled measures reported by other companies. They are not
intended to be a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP measurements of
profit. The term ‘adjusted’ refers to the relevant measure being
reported excluding exceptional items and amortisation of intangible
assets arising on acquisition of businesses. A reconciliation to
reported information is provided in note 16.
Seasonality
The Group's principal exposure to seasonality is in relation to working
capital. The Group's inventories are subject to seasonal fluctuations
reflecting crop harvesting and purchases. Inventory levels typically
increase progressively from September to November and gradually reduce
in the first six months of the calendar year.
Going concern
Having reviewed the Group’s latest projected results, cash flows,
liquidity position and borrowing facilities, the Directors believe that
it is appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis in
preparing the condensed set of financial statements.
2. Segment information
From 1 April 2009, the Group has adopted IFRS 8 Segmental Reporting.
Under IFRS 8, there has been no change to the Group’s reportable
segments. Central costs, which include head office, treasury and
reinsurance activities, does not meet the operating segment definition
under IFRS 8 but has been disclosed as a reportable segment in the below
results to be consistent with internal management reporting.
Discontinued operations comprise International Sugar Trading and Eastern
Sugar (see note 8).
The segment results for the six months to 30 September 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food &
Industrial
Ingredients,
Americas
|
|
|
Food &
Industrial
Ingredients,
Europe
|
|
|
|
Sugars
|
|
|
|
Sucralose
|
|
|
|
Central
costs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
(note 8)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
947
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1 832
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
1 911
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
External sales
|
|
939
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1 823
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
1 902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before exceptional items and amortisation of acquired intangible
assets
|
|
94
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
Exceptional items (note 3)
|
|
–
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(55)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(55)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(55)
|
|
|
Amortisation of acquired
intangible assets
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
92
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
Net finance expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Segment information (continued)
The comparative segment results for the six months to 30 September 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food &
Industrial
Ingredients,
Americas
|
|
|
|
Food &
Industrial
Ingredients,
Europe
|
|
|
|
Sugars
|
|
|
|
Sucralose
|
|
|
|
Central
costs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
(note 8)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1 702
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
2 135
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
External sales
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1 698
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
2 122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before exceptional items and amortisation of acquired intangible
assets
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Exceptional items (note 3)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
Amortisation of acquired
intangible assets
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Net finance (expense)/income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
Profit/(loss) before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Segment information (continued)
The segment results for the year to 31 March 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food &
Industrial
Ingredients,
Americas
|
|
|
|
Food &
Industrial
Ingredients,
Europe
|
|
|
|
Sugars
|
|
|
|
Sucralose
|
|
|
|
Central
costs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
(note 8)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
1 810
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
1 053
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3 573
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
4 447
|
|
|
Inter-segment sales
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(20)
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
(42)
|
|
|
External sales
|
|
|
1 797
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
1 048
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3 553
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
4 405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before exceptional items and amortisation of
acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
Exceptional items (note 3)
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
(97)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(119)
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
(141)
|
|
|
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
Operating profit/(loss)
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(29)
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
Net finance expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(53)
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(23)
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Exceptional items
|
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure costs (a)
|
|
(55)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
Impairment charges (b)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(106)
|
|
Write-down of assets (c)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(24)
|
|
Settlement with Mexican government (d)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(55)
|
|
–
|
|
(119)
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Sugar Trading (e)
|
|
–
|
|
(22)
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
(22)
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The Group has recognised an exceptional charge in relation to the
decision to mothball the Sucralose manufacturing facilities in McIntosh,
Alabama. The charge totalled £55 million for the six months to 30
September 2009 and includes costs connected with redundancy, clean-up
activities and ongoing fixed costs. The cash outflows in the period
totalled £9 million and the remaining outflows are forecast to be spent
over three years.
(b) The decision to mothball the McIntosh plant resulted in an
impairment charge of £97 million being recognised in the year ended 31
March 2009.
In addition, following a review of its sugar refining business in
Israel, an impairment charge of £9 million relating to property, plant
and equipment was recognised in the year ended 31 March 2009. The sugar
refining business in Israel is reported in the Sugars segment.
(c) In the year ended 31 March 2009, the Group wrote off £24 million in
relation to a dispute with a supplier over the performance and
suitability of certain equipment. Of the £24 million, £6 million had
previously been reported within property, plant and equipment and £18
million within prepayments. These assets relate to operations reported
in the Food & Industrial Ingredients, Americas segment.
(d) In the year ended 31 March 2009, as a result of a settlement of a
dispute with the Mexican government over tax on soft drinks containing
HFCS, Almidones Mexicanos SA, the Group’s joint venture in Mexico,
received £22 million, of which the Group’s share is £11 million, as
compensation for lost revenue. The business is reported in the Food &
Industrial Ingredients, Americas segment.
(e) In the six months to 30 September 2008, the Group recorded a loss of
£22 million in relation to the disposal of its International Sugar
Trading business. The loss reported was net of a gain of £4 million
which arose from the disposal of an available-for-sale investment held
in connection with the business.
There was a £21 million tax credit in relation to continuing exceptional
items for the six months to 30 September 2009. There was no tax impact
in respect of the discontinued exceptional items in the period to 30
September 2008. In the year to 31 March 2009 the tax impact on
continuing net exceptional items, and on total net exceptional items,
was a £44 million credit. Tax credits on exceptional items are only
recognised to the extent that losses incurred will result in tax
recoverable in the future.
4. Finance income and finance expense
|
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Continuing
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Finance income
Interest receivable
|
|
11
|
|
18
|
|
27
|
|
Total finance income
|
|
11
|
|
18
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable on bank and other borrowings
|
|
(37)
|
|
(38)
|
|
(70)
|
|
Net finance (expense)/income arising on defined benefit retirement
schemes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– interest cost
|
|
(37)
|
|
(38)
|
|
(79)
|
|
– expected return on plan assets
|
|
28
|
|
37
|
|
76
|
|
Unwinding of discounts in provisions
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(1)
|
|
Finance lease charges
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
Fair value (loss)/gain on interest-related derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– interest rate swaps – fair value hedges
|
|
(5)
|
|
(3)
|
|
30
|
|
– derivatives not designated as hedges
|
|
–
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Fair value adjustment of borrowings attributable to interest rate
risk
|
|
5
|
|
3
|
|
(32)
|
|
Total finance expense
|
|
(47)
|
|
(40)
|
|
(78)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net finance expense
|
|
(36)
|
|
(22)
|
|
(51)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Included within the loss for the six months to 30 September 2009 in
relation to discontinued operations (note 8) is net finance expense of
£1 million (six months to 30 September 2008 – net finance income of £1
million; year ended 31 March 2009 – net finance expense of £2 million).
5. Income tax expense
|
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Continuing
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Current tax
In respect of the current period
– UK taxation
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
– Overseas taxation
|
|
12
|
|
29
|
|
70
|
|
Adjustments in respect of previous years
|
|
8
|
|
5
|
|
(14)
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
20
(18)
|
|
34
3
|
|
56
(37)
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
2
|
|
37
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Current tax
– UK taxation
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
– Overseas taxation
|
|
–
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
–
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
–
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Earnings per share
Basic
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit
attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average
number of ordinary shares in issue during the period, excluding ordinary
shares purchased by the Company and held in the employee share ownership
trust or in treasury.
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company (£m)
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (millions)
|
|
457.2
|
|
|
|
457.2
|
|
|
|
457.2
|
|
|
|
456.2
|
|
|
|
456.2
|
|
|
|
456.2
|
|
|
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
|
|
10.0p
|
|
|
|
(0.5)p
|
|
|
|
9.5p
|
|
|
|
18.1p
|
|
|
|
(4.0)p
|
|
|
|
14.1p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to 31 March 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company (£m)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (millions)
|
|
|
456.5
|
|
|
|
456.5
|
|
|
|
456.5
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
19.5p
|
|
|
|
(5.3)p
|
|
|
|
14.2p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted
average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of
all potential dilutive ordinary shares. Potential dilutive ordinary
shares arise from share option and award plans. For these, a calculation
is performed to determine the number of shares that could have been
acquired at fair value (determined as the average market share price of
the Company’s shares during the period) based on the monetary value of
the subscription rights attached to outstanding share options.
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company (£m)
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted shares in issue (millions)
|
|
458.3
|
|
|
|
458.3
|
|
|
|
458.3
|
|
|
|
459.4
|
|
|
|
459.4
|
|
|
|
459.4
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share
|
|
10.0p
|
|
|
|
(0.5)p
|
|
|
|
9.5p
|
|
|
|
18.0p
|
|
|
|
(4.0)p
|
|
|
|
14.0p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to 31 March 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company (£m)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted shares in issue (millions)
|
|
|
459.8
|
|
|
|
459.8
|
|
|
|
459.8
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
19.4p
|
|
|
|
(5.3)p
|
|
|
|
14.1p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustment for the dilutive effect of share options at 30 September
2009 was 1.1 million (30 September 2008 – 3.2 million; 31 March 2009 –
3.3 million).
6. Earnings per share (continued)
Adjusted earnings per share
Adjusted earnings per share is stated excluding exceptional items and
amortisation of acquired intangible assets, as follows:
|
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
Year to
31 March
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company (£m)
|
|
46
|
|
83
|
|
89
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– exceptional items (note 3)
|
|
55
|
|
–
|
|
119
|
|
– amortisation of acquired intangible assets
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
15
|
|
– tax effect on the above adjustments
|
|
(24)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(49)
|
|
Adjusted profit (£m)
|
|
84
|
|
88
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted basic earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
18.4p
|
|
19.2p
|
|
38.2p
|
|
Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
18.3p
|
|
19.1p
|
|
38.0p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Dividends
The Directors have declared an interim dividend of £31 million out of
the profit for the six months to 30 September 2009 (30 September 2008 –
£31 million), representing 6.8p per share (30 September 2008 – 6.8p),
payable on 8 January 2010. The final dividend for the year to 31 March
2009 of £74 million, representing 16.1p per share, was paid during the
six months to 30 September 2009.
8. Discontinued operations
As previously reported, during the year ended 31 March 2009, the Group
reached an agreement for the sale of its International Sugar Trading
operations to Bunge Limited. Accordingly, the results of the
International Sugar Trading operations are presented as discontinued
operations for the periods ended 30 September 2009 and 30 September 2008
and for the year ended 31 March 2009. Under the terms of the sale
agreement, the Group managed the working capital of the business until
31 March 2009, when the balances were assumed by Bunge. Accordingly, the
related assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale at 30
September 2008 (note 10).
In addition, as a result of the EU Sugar Regime, the Group’s Eastern
Sugar joint venture ceased processing beets by March 2007 and renounced
its sugar quotas in Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia in return for
Restructuring Aid. Accordingly, the results of Eastern Sugar are
presented as discontinued operations for the periods ended 30 September
2009, 30 September 2008 and the year ended 31 March 2009.
The results of International Sugar Trading and Eastern Sugar were both
previously reported in the Sugars segment.
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Eastern
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
79
|
|
–
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
(1)
|
|
–
|
|
(1)
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
(1)
|
|
–
|
|
(1)
|
|
Loss before tax
|
|
(2)
|
|
–
|
|
(2)
|
|
Income tax expense (note 5)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
(2)
|
|
–
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Eastern
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
424
|
|
–
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before exceptional items
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
Exceptional items (note 3)
|
|
(22)
|
|
–
|
|
(22)
|
|
Operating (loss)/profit
|
|
(21)
|
|
2
|
|
(19)
|
|
Finance income
|
|
–
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
(Loss)/profit before tax
|
|
(21)
|
|
3
|
|
(18)
|
|
Income tax expense (note 5)
|
|
–
|
|
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
|
Loss for the period
|
|
(21)
|
|
2
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to 31 March 2009
|
|
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Eastern
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Sales
|
|
852
|
|
–
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss)/profit before exceptional items
|
|
(1)
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
Exceptional items (note 3)
|
|
(22)
|
|
–
|
|
(22)
|
|
Operating (loss)/profit
|
|
(23)
|
|
2
|
|
(21)
|
|
Finance income
|
|
4
|
|
2
|
|
6
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
(8)
|
|
–
|
|
(8)
|
|
(Loss)/profit before tax
|
|
(27)
|
|
4
|
|
(23)
|
|
Income tax expense (note 5)
|
|
–
|
|
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
|
(Loss)/profit for the year
|
|
(27)
|
|
3
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Discontinued operations (continued)
Net cash flows from discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Eastern
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
(35)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(39)
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(9)
|
|
–
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Eastern
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Net cash generated from operating activities
|
|
46
|
|
20
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to 31 March 2009
|
|
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Eastern
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
Sugar
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Net cash generated from operating activities
|
|
87
|
|
53
|
|
140
|
|
Net cash generated from investing activities
|
|
62
|
|
4
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no cash flows used in or generated from financing activities
in relation to discontinued operations in the periods ended 30 September
2009, 30 September 2008 and the year ended 31 March 2009.
9. Net debt
The components of the Group’s net debt profile are as follows:
|
|
|
30 September
2009
|
|
30 September
2008
|
|
31 March
2009
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Non-current borrowings
|
|
(1 033)
|
|
(926)
|
|
(1 129)
|
|
Current borrowings and overdrafts (a)
|
|
(297)
|
|
(459)
|
|
(523)
|
|
Debt-related derivative instruments (b)
|
|
(14)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(13)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
357
|
|
259
|
|
434
|
|
Net debt
|
|
(987)
|
|
(1 128)
|
|
(1 231)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Current borrowings and overdrafts at 30 September 2009 include £58
million (30 September 2008 – £70 million, 31 March 2009 – £98 million)
in respect of securitised receivables.
(b) Derivative financial instruments presented within assets and
liabilities in the statement of financial position of £37 million net
liability (30 September 2008 – £22 million net liability; 31 March 2009
– £93 million net liability) comprise net debt-related instruments of
£14 million liability (30 September 2008 – £2 million liability; 31
March 2009 – £13 million liability) and non debt-related instruments of
£23 million liability (30 September 2008 – £20 million liability; 31
March 2009 – £80 million liability).
Movements in the Group’s net debt profile are as follows:
|
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
Six months to
30 September
|
|
Year to
31 March
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
(1 231)
|
|
(1 041)
|
|
(1 041)
|
|
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents in the period
|
|
(60)
|
|
89
|
|
229
|
|
Repayments of/(proceeds from) borrowings
|
|
192
|
|
(86)
|
|
16
|
|
Debt transferred on disposal of subsidiaries
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
8
|
|
Inception of finance leases
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(1)
|
|
Trade finance recognised as debt
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(55)
|
|
Fair value and other movements
|
|
1
|
|
–
|
|
(9)
|
|
Exchange differences
|
|
111
|
|
(90)
|
|
(378)
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in net debt in the period
|
|
244
|
|
(87)
|
|
(190)
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
(987)
|
|
(1 128)
|
|
(1 231)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale
On 31 March 2009 the Group completed the disposal of its International
Sugar Trading operations to Bunge Limited. The assets and liabilities
relating to this business were classified as held for sale at 30
September 2008.
A small number of minority interests related to the International Sugar
Trading business were not included in the sale and are being addressed
separately in accordance with the related shareholders’ agreements. The
sale of these minority interests are expected to occur in the second
half of the year and have been classified as held for sale at 30
September 2009, 30 September 2008 and 31 March 2009.
Assets and liabilities as at 30 September 2009 are shown as held for
sale as follows:
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
–
|
|
39
|
|
–
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
–
|
|
88
|
|
–
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
–
|
|
50
|
|
–
|
|
Available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
17
|
|
28
|
|
28
|
|
Total assets held for sale
|
|
17
|
|
205
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
–
|
|
87
|
|
–
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
–
|
|
99
|
|
–
|
|
Total liabilities held for sale
|
|
–
|
|
186
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Capital expenditure
In the six months to 30 September 2009, there were additions to
intangible assets of £2 million (30 September 2008 – £3 million) and
additions to property, plant and equipment of £46 million (30 September
2008 – £112 million). There were no material disposals of property,
plant and equipment during the period (2008 – £nil million).
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
£m
|
|
Commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment
|
|
22
|
|
44
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Contingent liabilities
There have been no material changes to the Group’s contingent
liabilities since 31 March 2009.
13. Related party disclosures
The Group’s significant related parties are its associates and joint
ventures as disclosed in the Tate & Lyle Annual Report for the year
ended 31 March 2009. There were no material differences in related
parties or related party transactions in the period or prior period.
14. Post balance sheet events
There are no post balance sheet events requiring disclosure.
15. Foreign exchange rates
The following exchange rates have been applied in the translation of the
financial statements of the Group’s principal overseas operations:
|
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Six months to
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
Average exchange rates
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
US Dollar £1 = $
|
|
1.60
|
|
1.93
|
|
1.80
|
|
Euro £1 = €
|
|
1.14
|
|
1.26
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 September
|
|
30 September
|
|
31 March
|
|
Period end exchange rates
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
US Dollar £1 = $
|
|
1.60
|
|
1.78
|
|
1.43
|
|
Euro £1 = €
|
|
1.09
|
|
1.26
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Reconciliation of adjusted financial information
Adjusted information is presented as it provides both management and
investors with valuable additional information on the performance of the
business. The following items are excluded from adjusted information:
-
discontinued operations;
-
exceptional items including profits/losses on disposal of businesses
and impairments; and
-
amortisation of acquired intangibles.
The following table shows the reconciliation of the statutory
information presented in the income statement to the adjusted
information:
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
£m
|
|
|
|
Exceptional/
amortisation
£m
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
£m
|
|
|
|
Reported£m
|
|
|
|
Exceptional/
amortisation
£m
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
£m
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
1 823
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1 823
|
|
|
|
1 698
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1 698
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
Net finance expense
|
|
(36)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(36)
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
|
(26)
|
|
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(39)
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share (pence)
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (pence)
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
5.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3%
|
|
|
|
30.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
Operating (loss)/profit
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Net finance (expense)/income
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit before tax
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit attributable to equity holders of the Company
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss)/earnings per share (pence)
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
|
(4.0)
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share (pence)
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
|
(4.0)
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
(2.3)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3)%
|
|
|
|
(2.8)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
1 902
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1 902
|
|
|
|
2 122
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2 122
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
Net finance expense
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
|
(26)
|
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(40)
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Profit attributable to equity holders of the Company
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share (pence)
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (pence)
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
5.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.8%
|
|
|
|
36.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
For the six months to 30 September 2009
Additional Information
(i) Adjusted operating profit margin analysis
(ii) Ratio analysis
(i) Adjusted operating profit margin analysis
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2009
|
|
|
|
Six months to 30 September 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
£m
|
|
|
|
Value added
£m
|
|
|
|
Total
£m
|
|
|
|
Primary
£m
|
|
|
|
Value added
£m
|
|
|
|
Total
£m
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
Sugars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Products
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
– Molasses
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
Sucralose
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 289
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
1 823
|
|
|
|
1 240
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
1 698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Sugars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Products
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
– Molasses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Sucralose
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
Central costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
Adjusted operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
9.5%
|
|
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
|
14.3%
|
|
|
|
12.4%
|
|
|
|
28.0%
|
|
|
|
17.0%
|
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
(4.5)%
|
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
(2.0)%
|
|
|
|
7.2%
|
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2%
|
|
|
|
18.9%
|
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
|
10.7%
|
|
|
|
19.8%
|
|
|
|
13.4%
|
|
|
Food & Industrial Ingredients, Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Food
|
|
|
18.7%
|
|
|
|
12.1%
|
|
|
|
14.7%
|
|
|
|
4.1%
|
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
|
|
8.4%
|
|
|
– Industrial
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9%
|
|
|
|
12.1%
|
|
|
|
10.9%
|
|
|
|
3.2%
|
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
Sugars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– Products
|
|
|
(1.1)%
|
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
(0.7)%
|
|
|
|
(1.7)%
|
|
|
|
9.1%
|
|
|
|
(0.8)%
|
|
|
– Molasses
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5.1%
|
|
|
|
7.6%
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
7.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4%
|
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
|
|
0.8%
|
|
|
|
9.1%
|
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
Sucralose
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
34.7%
|
|
|
|
34.7%
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
38.5%
|
|
|
|
38.5%
|
|
|
Margin before central costs
|
|
|
4.4%
|
|
|
|
19.3%
|
|
|
|
8.8%
|
|
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|
|
20.5%
|
|
|
|
9.7%
|
|
|
Margin after central costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Ratio analysis
|
|
|
As at
30 September
2009
|
|
As at
30 September
2008
|
|
Year to
31 March
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt to EBITDA (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Net debt
|
|
1 012
|
|
1 031
|
|
1 013
|
|
Annualised pre-exceptional EBITDA
|
|
421
|
|
414
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
= 2.4 times
|
|
= 2.5 times
|
|
= 2.4 times
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gearing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Net debt
|
|
987
|
|
1 128
|
|
1 231
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
866
|
|
1 002
|
|
1 013
|
|
|
|
= 114%
|
|
= 113%
|
|
= 122%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cover (a)
= Operating profit before amortisation of acquired
intangibles and exceptional items
Net interest and finance expense
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
305
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
43
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
= 5.3 times
|
|
= 7.1 times
|
|
= 6.1 times
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Net Operating Assets (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Annualised profit before interest, tax and exceptional items
|
|
|
|
|
Average net operating assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 x 140)
|
|
(2 x 146)
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
2 142
|
|
2 204
|
|
2 239
|
|
|
|
= 13.1%
|
|
= 13.2%
|
|
= 12.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating assets are calculated as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
866
|
|
1 002
|
|
1 013
|
|
Add back net debt (see note 9)
|
|
987
|
|
1 128
|
|
1 231
|
|
Add back net tax liabilities
|
|
67
|
|
164
|
|
119
|
|
Net operating assets
|
|
1 920
|
|
2 294
|
|
2 363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average net operating assets
|
|
2 142
|
|
2 204
|
|
2 239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) These ratios have been calculated under the Group’s bank covenant
definitions.
(b) This ratio has been based on financial information
from total operations.
(b) This ratio has been based on financial information
from total operations.
